Answer:
lol
Explanation:
don't worry be happy now.
Answer:
thanks
Explanation:
dont worry be happy by bobby McFerrin
One objection to slavery that stemmed from the Second Great Awakening was that slavery
brought too many people to the United States.
would bring about a mixing of the races.
denied the humanity of enslaved people.
took jobs away from immigrant workers.
Answer:
b, would bring about a mixing of the races.
Explanation:
I just did this on edge2020
Would bring down about a mixing of the races is One objection to slavery that stemmed from the Second Great Awakening was that slavery. Between 1795 and 1835, there was a Protestant religious resurgence in the United States.
What is the Second Great Awakening ?The second great awakening movement is the Protestant religious, during the late seventeen. It is the movement when the spread of religion through emotional speeches and opposition.
This is to attract the hundreds of people so that they can convert their religion and makethem new Protestant denominations.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more information about second great awakening movement, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1100097
#SPJ5
What is the exact OPPOSITE of bimetallism?
Answer: nonstandard,ubnormal
Explanation:
What compromises over slavery did Congress make to settle the Missouri crisis?
Answer:
The compromises the congress did to settle the Missouri crisis were the exclusion of slavery from most of the Louisiana Purchase and in return, Missouri becomes a slave state.
Explanation:
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 which was majorly composed by Henry Clay was popular for admitting Missouri into the Union as a slave state.
However, the compromises over slavery that Congress make to settle the Missouri crisis was the "exclusion of slavery from most of the Louisiana Purchase and in return, Missouri becomes a slave state."
Also, this made the state of Maine to enter the union as a free state.
It was also known to level the proportion in the senate between north and south.
Similarly, it set the standards for subsequent admission of states into the United States.
Economically, by the time of Justinian, the Byzantine Empire
was still struggling to keep up with the trade of Western Europe
was far wealthier than the small states of the former Roman Empire in the West
was still held back by the lack of a port to the sea
had developed and abandoned a feudal society
By the time of Justinian, the Byzantine Empire's economy was far wealthier than the small states of the former Roman Empire in the West.
What was the economy like under Justinian?When Justinian became emperor of the Byzantine empire, the empire's economy was quite prosperous.
This meant that they were far more wealthy than the small states that had come out of the Roman Empire in the West after that empire had fallen to different tribes.
Find out more on the Byzantine Empire at https://brainly.com/question/1446842
#SPJ1
Answer: was still struggling to keep up with the trade of Western Europe
Explanation:
What part of the government makes new laws?
A. He carries out laws all by himself.
B. He decides if laws are broken.
C. He works to create new laws.
D. He does not have to follow the laws.
Answer: I believe the answer is c.
Explanation:
definition of history
History is the science that studies the past.
Imma help y'all out if u download taco ball and sign in go to my rewards and u will get 2 free meals thank me later
Answer:
What's taco ball?
Explanation:
Hi how are ya.
Answer:
Thanks but does this still work?
Explanation:
Its been long since this question was up sooo
What did the Great Awakening reveal?
nothing, really..
....
Answer:
altered the religious climate in the american colonies
Explanation:
Great Awakening affected the beginning of the Revolutionary War due to empowering individuals with nationalistic ideologies and individualism
Who oversaw the Jamestown settlement, the King, or
the Virginia Company?
Answer: King James I granted the Virginia Company a royal charter for the colonial pursuit in 1606. The Company had the power to appoint a Council of leaders in the colony, a Governor, and other officials. It also took the responsibility to continually provide settlers, supplies, and ships for the venture.
Explanation:
The stance toward foreign policy that suggests that the United States should "go it alone," pursuing its national interests without seeking the cooperation of other nations or multilateral institutions is known as: Nativism. unilateralism. isolationism. multilateralism.
Answer:
unilateralism
Explanation:
Unilateralism mode of government is a style of government that favors taking a decision or policy concerning its foreign affairs alone without consulting other foreign nations or allies.
In other words, it involves a situation in which a country doesn't involve an International institution in its foreign activities or affairs. It is the opposite of Multilateralism.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is UNILATERALISM.
Why were the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation considered weaknesses?
Answer:
They had no real power or authority to enforce their laws, taxes, and/or polices.
Explanation:
Which was NOT an improvement in transportation during the 1820's?
Steamboats
Railroad
Paved Roads
Canals
Which reason supports the thesis that people throughout the United States wanted George Washington to be the first president?
He was well educated and represented Virginia.
He wanted to retire to his home and live a quiet life.
He worked tirelessly as a young man to help his family.
He was a popular leader during the Constitutional Convention.
Answer:
He was well educated and represented Virginia
Know what conservative response to the Great Depression was
Answer:
The Conservative Response: Let the Economy Stabilize
Explanation:
How did humans adapt to the conditions of the last Ice Age? Select the three correct answers.
A.
They built permanent dwellings from wood and stone.
B.
They crossed newly exposed land bridges to warmer regions.
C.
They followed migrating animal herds to ensure their food supply.
D.
They used fire, portable huts, and animal furs to stay warm.
E.
They settled in caves and waited for warmer temperatures to return.
Answer:
B,c D?
Explanation:
Answer:
B, C, D
Explanation:
who won King Phillip's
Answer:
New England's English settlers
Explanation:
Answer:
Metacom, also known as Pometacom, Metacomet, and by his adopted English name King Philip, was sachem to the Wampanoag people and the second son of the Sachem Massasolt. Metacom became Sachem In 1662 when his brother Wamsutta died shortly after the death of their father.
PLEASE ANSWER ALL OF THESE FOR ME AND I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST, FIVE STARS, A THANKS YOU, AND A SHOUT OUT
4.he contributed as a lawyer, politician, and a principal author of the Texas Declaration of Independence.
5.David G. Burnet
6.Porfirio Díaz
7.Miguel Francisco Barragán Andrade
8.General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna
What was a consequence of rising fears of communism and socialism after World War I?
A)
President Wilson invited Soviet leaders to visit the United States.
B)
Americans decided to provide economic aid to Germany and Hungary.
Congress passed laws restricting immigration from Europe.
D)
Most Americans preferred to listen to jazz rather than to music from
Europe.
Answer:
They restricted immigration.
Explanation:
The consequence of rising fears after World War I revolved around the American labor movement, anarchist movement, and the implementation of the immigration act of 1924.
The correct answer is:
Option C. Congress passed laws restricting immigration from Europe.
Communism is defined as the principle of different political organizations based on directed communities, whereas, socialism is the political theory of social organization, in which different communities work as a whole.
After World War I, the Immigration Act of 1924 was passed. The law restricted immigration from Europe due to rising fears of communism and socialism.
The law was passed to preserve the ideal U.S. homogeneity.
Therefore, the correct option is that Congress passed laws to restrict immigration.
To know more about communism and socialism, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/9973830
People protest outside a state prison on the day a prisoner is to be executed. To which principles does this connect?
Answer: popular sovereignty
Explanation:
Speakeasies and bootleggers were a product of:
A. segregation
B. debt.
C. Prohibition
D. unemployment.
Answer:
C. Prohibition
Explanation:
how were the colonies before the seven years war
Answer:
Prior to the Seven Years War, the Colonists in Maryland Were Faithful
Subjects of the King and Lived Under the Protection of the British Military
Explanation:
In 1754, Maryland was a colony of Great Britain. People living in Maryland were
considered to be English citizens and they were governed by British laws. The colony
was ruled by a Royal Governor that reported directly to the King. The colonists
depended upon British merchants to supply them with many important items in their
daily lives including tools, clothing, furniture and weapons.
These goods were sailed across the Atlantic Ocean in large
ships and delivered to ports such as Annapolis, Baltimore,
Oxford, Cambridge and Chester (now Chestertown). In
return, colonial merchants sailed raw materials such as corn,
grain, tobacco and lumber to England. Daily life in
Maryland in 1754 often centered around activities that took
place on the water. Since nearly all trade goods traveled by
boat, most of Maryland’s homes were located within easy
walking distance of a major river. Rivers also provided the
colonists with an important source of food. In the spring,
striped bass, shad and herring were netted by the thousands
as the fish made their annual migrations up the Bay’s rivers
and streams. The Bay’s abundant oyster bars also added a
valuable source of protein to the colonists’ diets.
One of the greatest benefits to being an English
colony was receiving protection from the British military.
This was critical because the colonists had no established
military of their own. As a result, they lived under the
constant threat of invasion by the French and the Spanish,
who were struggling with England for control of North America. Without British
protection, either one of these world powers could have easily overtaken the colonists
and their lands.
In 1755, tensions between England and France led to the beginning of a conflict
known as the Seven Years War. From 1755 to 1762, English and French forces battled
each other throughout the Ohio Valley and Canada for control over the eastern half of
North America. Eventually, the French were driven from their lands and forced to
abandon their North American empire. When the war ended in 1763 with a convincing
English victory, it also left the country with a very large debt. As a result, King George
III decided to raise money by taxing the thirteen colonies. Disagreements over how
these taxes were created and enforced would soon change the relationship between
England and its thirteen colonies forever.
According to Martin Luther, the only authority for Christian living is the Bible. true or false
The map shows physical features in and around the Arabian Peninsula.
Which letter on the map identifies the Caspian Sea?
A.
b.
c.
d.
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
who had the write to claim Texas?the Mexicans or the Texans? and why
I just need an 4 paragraph essay
Answer: The people who had the right to claim Texas is the mexicans. The reason for this is the Mexican were the first ones to INVITE the settlers to Texas in the first place.
Millions struggled and some even lost their jobs. Mexicans wanted to give americans part of their land, multiple times they tried making it apart of Mexico. People were paid to bring settlers to their land.
For instance, Empersarios were the ones used to bring settlers to Mexico. And Stephen F Austin had became the one to form a colony and call it, "Old Three Hundred." The effect that was given made a big impact for Mexico.
Mexicans had been the ones that won the Independence of Spain in 1821. Therefore, Mexicans were the ones that had the right to claim Texas.
Hope this helped.
The doctrine that the God knows from the beginning of time who will be saved
Answer: Predestination
Explanation: This Christian doctrine speaks that, although it is true that God knows everything that is going to happen, he lets it happen since there is something that human beings have and that is free will. God, if he wants, can destroy the world since he knows when the end of things will be, but he lets things happen as faith in humanity that they can change.
The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police
Answer:
may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio and Horton v. California ruled that the police, in certain cases, can search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
Terry v. Ohio was the case, of which the Supreme Court gave verdict on June 10, 1968, in which the Supreme Court ruled that police can search individuals or seize property without a warrant. In Terry v. Ohio, the case was when a local plice officer suspected Terry and his two accomplice were upto something, possibly robbing of a store, searched them and found them armed with pistols.
And, in Horton v. California case, Seargent LaRault got warrant to search on the property of Horton, who was suspected of robbery, and found criminal weapons used at the time of robbery. Because the warrant only permitted of searching and not seizure of property, the Supreme Court gave verdict that in such cases, police can seize the property without warrant.
So, the correct answer is that the Supreme Court gave verdict that police in some cases can have warrantless individual search and seizure of property.
Answer:
may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio and Horton v. California ruled that the police, in certain cases, can search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
Terry v. Ohio was the case, of which the Supreme Court gave verdict on June 10, 1968, in which the Supreme Court ruled that police can search individuals or seize property without a warrant. In Terry v. Ohio, the case was when a local plice officer suspected Terry and his two accomplice were upto something, possibly robbing of a store, searched them and found them armed with pistols.
And, in Horton v. California case, Seargent LaRault got warrant to search on the property of Horton, who was suspected of robbery, and found criminal weapons used at the time of robbery. Because the warrant only permitted of searching and not seizure of property, the Supreme Court gave verdict that in such cases, police can seize the property without warrant.
So, the correct answer is that the Supreme Court gave verdict that police in some cases can have warrantless individual search and seizure of property.
How was the Northwest Territory intially governed under the Northwest Ordinance of 1787?
O The British government ruled the territory.
O The French government ruled the territory.
O A single government ruled the entire territory.
O Various state governments ruled different parts of the territory.
Why can’t the end of the Roman Empire be explained by a single cause?
Answer:
All most nothing can be explained with one cause, the fall of the Roman Empire was due to many factors.
Explanation:
1: The Bill of Rights was added by the first _____
A: Congress
B: Governor
C: States
D: Senate
E: House of Representatives
2: and was later ratified by the ______.
A: Congress
B: Governor
C: States
D: Senate
E: House of Representatives
Answer:
The Bill of Rights was added by the first
Congress
and was later ratified by the
States
Explanation:
After many months, some states were still holding out. The ratification of the Constitution by several states had not yet been accomplished. The holdout states agreed that they would ratify the Constitution if the Congress would agree to add a bill of rights. The Constitution was ratified in its adopted form, with the understanding that a bill of rights would be added by the Congress. The first Congress, meeting in 1789–1790, took up the task of adding a bill of rights. A committee proposed twelve amendments which were taken from various other constitutions. Ten of these amendments were adopted and later ratified by the states.
PS. You can remove that other guys answer
Brainliest Please?
What is your definiton of freedom?
Answer: Freedom, generally, is having the ability to act or change without constraint.
Explanation: A person has the freedom to do things that will not, in theory, or in practice, be prevented by other forces.
Hope this helps!! Brainlist Plz?!