Given the following rates, calculate the price of a 4-year 12% bond whose coupon is paid annually and par value is $1,000.
One-year spot rate is 5.5%
One-year forward rate one year from now is 6%
One-year forward rate two years from now is 10%
One-year forward rate three years from now is 15%

The supply chain for Aus ManTec's mechanical ventilator includes the following organizations and supplies:

1. Aus ManTec Pty Ltd (Townsville, Queensland, Australia) - Designs and develops the mechanical ventilator, manages the supply chain, and coordinates production.

2. Taj Manufacturing Company (Manufacturing Hub North Main Road, Koregaon Park, Pune, Maharashtra 414001, India) - Contracted manufacturer responsible for producing the mechanical ventilator in India.

3. Component Suppliers - Various suppliers located globally provide the necessary components for the ventilator, including electronics, motors, sensors, valves, and other mechanical parts.

4. Raw Material Suppliers - These suppliers provide the raw materials required for manufacturing the ventilator, such as metals, plastics, circuit boards, and cables.

5. Logistics and Transportation Companies - Facilitate the movement of components, raw materials, and finished ventilators between different stages of the supply chain, including international shipping.

6. Distribution Channels - Distributors or wholesalers who handle the distribution of the ventilators to hospitals, healthcare facilities, and retailers.

Overall, the supply chain involves Aus ManTec's design and coordination efforts, Taj Manufacturing Company as the contracted manufacturer, various suppliers for components and raw materials, logistics and transportation companies for movement, and distribution channels for reaching the end customers.

To know more about supply chain, visit:- brainly.com/question/28165491

#SPJ11

a. The forward price-sales multiple is a valuation ratio that measures the relationship between a company's market capitalization (price) and its projected sales for a future period.

It is calculated by dividing the market capitalization by the projected sales. Forward Price-Sales Multiple = Market Capitalization / Projected Sales.

b. The trailing price-sales multiple, on the other hand, is a valuation ratio that measures the relationship between a company's market capitalization (price) and its past sales over a specific period.

It is calculated by dividing the market capitalization by the trailing twelve months (TTM) sales. Trailing Price-Sales Multiple = Market Capitalization / TTM Sales

Both the forward and trailing price-sales multiples are used by investors and analysts to assess a company's valuation relative to its sales. The forward multiple provides insight into future expectations, while the trailing multiple reflects historical performance.

Know more about trailing twelve months here

https://brainly.com/question/33427619#

#SPJ11

Annual deposit should be approximately $4,210.53 in order to accumulate $10,000 at the end of 12 years with the given interest rates and reinvestment.

To accumulate $10,000 at the end of 12 years with equal deposits on the first day of each year,

you can use the formula for the future value of an ordinary annuity:

FV = P * [(1 + r/n)^(n*t) - 1] / (r/n)

Where:
FV is the future value of the annuity ($10,000),
P is the annual deposit (the amount you want to find),
r is the interest rate (3% effective),
n is the number of compounding periods per year (1 for yearly deposits),
and t is the number of years (12).

Substituting  in the values:

$10,000 = P * [(1 + 0.03/1)^(1*12) - 1] / (0.03/1)

Simplifying the equation:

$10,000 = P * (1.03^12 - 1) / 0.03

$10,000 = P * (1.425) / 0.03

To isolate P, we divide both sides of the equation by (1.425/0.03):

$10,000 / (1.425/0.03) = P

P ≈ $4,210.53

Therefore, your annual deposit should be approximately $4,210.53 in order to accumulate $10,000 at the end of 12 years with the given interest rates and reinvestment.

Learn more about annual deposit:

https://brainly.com/question/14831031

#SPJ11

T

As of the first quarter of 2009, the largest net lender to the economy was U.S. Households. This may include details about the first quarter of 2009, which was a tough time for the US economy, with the housing bubble bursting and causing a ripple effect across several industries.

The economy was also experiencing a recession, which was the most severe since the Great Depression. During this time, various lenders and organizations were involved in lending to the economy, with US households coming out on top as the largest net lender. This is because during this period, many households decided to reduce their spending to build up savings and weather the economic storm. They were also repaying their debts, leading to an increase in household savings.

This resulted in a surplus, which helped them become the largest net lender to the economy.The other options in the question, such as the U.S. government, The World Bank, U.S. Investment Banks, and The Federal Reserve, were not the largest net lender during this period. The U.S. government was involved in different stimulus packages to help boost the economy and stabilize the markets. The Federal Reserve implemented several policies to help combat the recession and stabilize the economy.

To know more about the economy, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29892424

#SPJ11

Having more information is a key tenet of the decision theory, which emphasizes the importance of gathering and considering relevant information to make informed decisions.

The decision theory holds that making optimal decisions requires gathering as much relevant information as possible. By obtaining more information, decision-makers can enhance their understanding of the problem at hand, assess the potential outcomes and associated probabilities, and make informed choices.

This principle recognizes that having access to a greater amount of information increases the likelihood of making accurate predictions, evaluating risks, and selecting the most favorable course of action. It aligns with the idea that decisions should be based on sound reasoning, analysis, and the best available evidence. Thus, the tenet of having more information is central to the decision theory and its objective of making rational and optimal decisions.

learn more about information click here;

brainly.com/question/33427978

#SPJ11

South Korea's GDP per capita grew at an average annual rate of 6.41% from 1960 to 2000, which means it took approximately 10.92 years for South Korea to double its GDP per capita.

a. To calculate the average annual growth rate of GDP per capita, we can use the formula:

Average annual growth rate = [tex](Ending value / Beginning value)^{(1 / Number of years)} - 1.[/tex]

Using the given data:

Beginning value (Yo) = $944.

Ending value (Yt) = $15,105.

Number of years (T) = 2000 - 1960 = 40.

Average annual growth rate =[tex]($15,105 / $944)^{(1 / 40)} - 1.[/tex]

Calculating this value yields an average annual growth rate of approximately 6.41%.

b. To determine the number of years it took South Korea to double its GDP per capita, we can use the rule of 70, which states that the doubling time (in years) is approximately 70 divided by the growth rate.

Doubling time = 70 / Average annual growth rate.

Doubling time = 70 / 6.41% ≈ 10.92 years.

Therefore, it took South Korea approximately 10.92 years to double its GDP per capita.

c. The alternative method mentioned, taking the percentage change divided by the number of years, would yield a different result. In this case, the calculation would be:

Percentage change = (Ending value - Beginning value) / Beginning value.

Percentage change = ($15,105 - $944) / $944.

This percentage change would be substantially different from the calculated average annual growth rate.

The reason for the difference is that the alternative method does not account for the compounding effect of growth over multiple years.

The average annual growth rate formula takes into consideration the cumulative growth over the entire period, providing a more accurate representation of the overall growth rate.

Dividing the percentage change by the number of years assumes a linear growth pattern, which does not capture the compounding nature of growth.

Learn more about GDP here:

brainly.com/question/31197617

#SPJ4

The manufacturer would be indifferent between manufacturers' representatives and an internal sales force at a sales volume of approximately $29,285,714.29. The savings achieved by switching to an internal sales force at double the breakeven volume can be calculated using the provided cost estimates.

To determine the sales volume at which the manufacturer would be indifferent between manufacturers' representatives and an internal sales force, we need to equate the costs of both options.

For the manufacturers' representatives:

Total cost = Commission + Fixed costs

Total cost = 7.9% of sales + $645,000

For the internal sales force:

Total cost = Commission + Fixed costs

Total cost = 3.0% of sales + $2,080,000

To find the sales volume, we set the total costs of both options equal to each other:

7.9% of sales + $645,000 = 3.0% of sales + $2,080,000

Subtracting 3.0% of sales from both sides gives:

4.9% of sales + $645,000 = $2,080,000

Subtracting $645,000 from both sides gives:

4.9% of sales = $2,080,000 - $645,000

4.9% of sales = $1,435,000

Dividing both sides by 4.9% gives:

sales = $1,435,000 / 4.9%

sales ≈ $29,285,714.29

Therefore, the manufacturer would be indifferent between manufacturers' representatives and an internal sales force at a sales volume of approximately $29,285,714.29.

For the second question, we need to find the savings achieved by switching to an internal sales force at double the breakeven volume.

Assuming the breakeven volume is the sales volume at which the manufacturer would be indifferent, which is $29,285,714.29, we can calculate the savings.

Savings = Total cost with manufacturers' reps - Total cost with internal sales force

Savings = (8.8% of sales + $600,000) - (3.3% of sales + $1,750,000)

At the breakeven volume, the sales would be $29,285,714.29:

Savings = (8.8% of $29,285,714.29 + $600,000) - (3.3% of $29,285,714.29 + $1,750,000)

Calculating this equation will give the amount saved by switching to an internal sales force.

To know more about   sales volume

https://brainly.com/question/29732841

#SPJ11

The maximum amount the SNB could lend, given an $8000 deposit and a 12% reserve requirement ratio, is $7040.

To calculate the maximum amount the SNB (Simple National Bank) could lend with a 12% reserve requirement ratio, we need to determine the amount of reserves that the bank is required to hold and then calculate the maximum lending amount based on the remaining funds.

1. Required Reserves = Deposit * Reserve Requirement Ratio

  Required Reserves = $8000 * 0.12

  Required Reserves = $960

2. Maximum Lending Amount = Deposit - Required Reserves

  Maximum Lending Amount = $8000 - $960

  Maximum Lending Amount = $7040

Considering an $8000 deposit and a reserve requirement ratio of 12%, the maximum lending capacity of the SNB amounts to $7040.

Learn more about reserve requirement ratio here:

https://brainly.com/question/30076175

#SPJ11

Offering virtual assistant services to small business owners and solopreneurs is a lucrative opportunity to provide assistance remotely, manage tasks like appointments and customer queries, and earn a median salary of $37,018 per year.

With the increasing demand for remote support, providing virtual assistant services can be a profitable venture. Global marketplaces and BPOs like 1840 & Company can help connect you with potential clients, while crowdsourcing platforms such as Upwork, Remote.co, and Indeed can expand your client base. As a virtual assistant, you can offer various services like managing appointments, email correspondence, client calls, and more. The required training and qualifications may vary depending on the specific assistance you offer, but certifications in your industry and an associate's or bachelor's degree can enhance your credibility. By capitalizing on the growing trend of outsourcing administrative tasks, you can build a successful career as a virtual assistant while providing valuable support to busy entrepreneurs and business owners.

To know more about marketplaces visit-

https://brainly.com/question/32631900

#SPJ11

A case law that represents foreseeability principle using IRAC method.

Title: Smith v. Johnson

I. Introduction

In the case of Smith v. Johnson, the central issue at hand is whether the defendant, Mr. Johnson, can be held liable for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, Mr. Smith, under the principle of foreseeability. Foreseeability is a key component of tort law, which establishes that a defendant can be held responsible for harm caused to another person if the harm was reasonably foreseeable as a result of the defendant's actions.

II. Rule                                                                                                                      Under the foreseeability principle, a defendant may be held liable for the consequences of his actions if a reasonable person could have anticipated that those actions would result in harm to another person. In order to establish foreseeability, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant could have reasonably foreseen the risk of harm arising from his conduct.

III. Application                                                                                                                                    In the present case, Mr. Smith was injured when he slipped and fell on a wet floor at Mr. Johnson's grocery store. Mr. Smith alleges that the wet floor was a result of the store's negligence in failing to promptly clean up a spill. To establish foreseeability, Mr. Smith must show that it was reasonably foreseeable for Mr. Johnson that failing to address the spill promptly could lead to someone slipping and getting injured.

Mr. Smith presents evidence that the spill had been present for a significant amount of time before his accident, indicating that Mr. Johnson or his employees had sufficient notice of the dangerous condition. Additionally, Mr. Smith calls witnesses who testify that the area around the spill was frequently traversed by customers, suggesting that the risk of someone slipping was reasonably foreseeable.

Furthermore, Mr. Smith presents expert testimony from a safety consultant who explains that it is a common practice in the grocery industry to promptly clean up spills to prevent accidents. The expert further opines that failing to address a spill in a timely manner increases the risk of slips and falls, thereby establishing the foreseeability of harm.

IV. Conclusion                                                                                          Based on the presented evidence and expert testimony, it can be concluded that the harm suffered by Mr. Smith was reasonably foreseeable to Mr. Johnson. The existence of the spill for a significant period, the frequented nature of the area, and the expert opinion all support the notion that a reasonable person in Mr. Johnson's position should have foreseen the risk of someone slipping and getting injured.

Therefore, under the principle of foreseeability, Mr. Johnson can be held liable for the injuries sustained by Mr. Smith as a result of the slip and fall incident.

To know more about IRAC method visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27726671

#SPJ11

The amount of money in the savings account will be $810.57 when her son was 6 years and 6 months old.

The given problem can be solved using the formula of Future Value of Annuity. The formula is given as:

FV of Annuity = PMT [(1 + i)^n - 1] / i

Where,PMT = Payment made in regular intervals,

n = Number of regular intervals,

i = Rate of interest per regular interval

FV of Annuity = $200 [(1 + 0.035/2)^(12/6) - 1] / (0.035/2)

FV of Annuity = $200 [1.035^2 - 1] / 0.0175

FV of Annuity = $200 [0.071225] / 0.0175

FV of Annuity = $810.57

Therefore, the amount of money in the savings account when her son was 6 years and 6 months old was $810.57.

Know more about the savings account

https://brainly.com/question/30101466

#SPJ11

Dominant and Nash Equilibrium strategy: Both firms stay out of the market to avoid negative profits in a natural monopoly.

In the given game setup, there are two firms (Firm 1 and Firm 2) considering entering the market. The strategy set for each firm is the choice of output, which can be either "Enter" (E) or "Stay out" (S).

To determine if there are any dominated or dominant strategies, we need to analyze the payoff matrix. The given information states that if both firms are in the market, each firm's profit is represented as ∏i = -L. If a single firm is in the market, its profit is Πi, and if a firm stays out of the market, its profit is Πi = 0.

To identify dominated strategies, we compare the payoffs for each firm based on their choices. If there exists a strategy for a firm that guarantees a higher payoff regardless of the other firm's choice, that strategy is considered dominant.

In this case, if Firm 2 chooses to enter the market (E), Firm 1's dominant strategy would be to stay out (S) since Π1 = 0 > -L. Similarly, if Firm 2 chooses to stay out (S), Firm 1's dominant strategy would still be to stay out (S) since Π1 = 0 > Π1 = -L.

The Nash Equilibrium strategy (or strategies) is the set of choices where no player has an incentive to unilaterally deviate from their chosen strategy given the other player's choice. In other words, it is the outcome where each player's strategy is the best response to the other player's strategy.

In this game, the Nash Equilibrium strategy is for both firms to choose the dominant strategy of staying out of the market (S). If both firms stay out, neither firm can earn any profit (Π1 = Π2 = 0), but entering the market would result in negative profits (-L). Therefore, both firms have no incentive to deviate from staying out, leading to a Nash Equilibrium.

To summarize, in this game, the dominant strategy for both firms is to stay out of the market, and the Nash Equilibrium strategy is for both firms to stay out.

learn more about Natural Monopoly.

brainly.com/question/1450566

#SPJ11

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is a federal agency established by the US government to ensure the safety of the country's infrastructure and citizens. DHS is responsible for securing the borders, preventing terrorism, and managing disasters that may occur within the United States.

Does the DHS accomplish what the law says it should?DHS is responsible for protecting the US against terrorist attacks and has been successful in preventing several attacks. DHS has also been involved in identifying and capturing criminal and illegal activities along the border. They have been able to reduce illegal immigration to a great extent. Therefore, it can be concluded that DHS does accomplish what the law says it should.Is it too big.The DHS is one of the largest federal agencies in the US government, consisting of numerous departments, including FEMA, ICE, TSA, and others.

It has a budget of over $40 billion, and its operations are spread throughout the country. Therefore, many believe that DHS is too big and bureaucratic.Should DHS be changed or abolished,It's a matter of debate whether DHS should be changed or abolished. Some believe that the department should be abolished as it is too big, bureaucratic, and expensive.

To know more about abolished visit:

brainly.com/question/19955080

#SPJ11

A Treasury bill rate is the rate of return that an investor receives on U.S. Treasury bills. The United States government issues Treasury bills to raise funds to finance its operations.

These securities are low-risk, high-liquidity assets that are also used as a benchmark to price other types of debt instruments.

Suppose the real rate is 2.5% and the inflation rate is 4.1%. The Fisher effect formula is Nominal rate = Real rate + Expected inflationNominal rate = 2.5% + 4.1%Nominal rate = 6.6%Therefore, the expected rate that you would expect to see on a Treasury bill is 6.6%.Answer: 6.6%.

To know more about  Treasury bill  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15234748

#SPJ11

The primary aims of an investment recovery program are to maximize the economic return on investments, reduce waste, and ensure that all materials are disposed of in an environmentally responsible manner. It is a systematic approach to identifying and recovering excess, obsolete, or surplus assets from the organization's operations.

The program is designed to optimize the utilization of company resources and maximize their value over time.Investment recovery programs are used to support an organization's strategic objectives by reducing costs and freeing up capital for other business priorities. By recovering as much value as possible from surplus materials, the organization can offset expenses and increase profits.  The team is responsible for identifying and assessing the disposition options for excess assets.

This process involves analyzing the condition of the materials, identifying potential users or buyers, and determining the most appropriate disposition method, such as resale, donation, or recycling.In conclusion, investment recovery programs are an essential part of any organization's asset management strategy. They help to optimize the utilization of company resources, reduce waste, and ensure environmental responsibility while maximizing the economic return on investments.

To know more about primary visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29704537

#SPJ11

The proportion of ABC (wABC) in the global minimum variance portfolio is approximately 63.12%. So correct option is B

To calculate the proportion, wABC, in the global minimum variance portfolio, we need to use the concept of portfolio optimization. The global minimum variance portfolio is the portfolio with the lowest possible volatility or standard deviation.

The formula to calculate the weight of a security in a portfolio is given by:

wABC = (σXYZ² - ρ * σABC * σXYZ) / (σABC² + σXYZ² - 2 * ρ * σABC * σXYZ)

Where:

wABC = Proportion of ABC in the portfolio

σABC = Standard deviation of ABC

σXYZ = Standard deviation of XYZ

ρ = Correlation coefficient between ABC and XYZ

Given the following data:

ABC: Expected return = 17.64%, Standard deviation = 24.03%

XYZ: Expected return = 33.0%, Standard deviation = 60.54%

Correlation coefficient (ρ) = -0.3

Let's calculate wABC:

wABC = (60.54² - (-0.3) * 24.03 * 60.54) / (24.03² + 60.54² - 2 * (-0.3) * 24.03 * 60.54)

wABC = (3667.4918 + 437.5732) / (578.2809 + 7329.0516 - 364.15236)

wABC = 4105.065 / 6743.18014

wABC ≈ 0.6312

Therefore, 63.12% is the proportion of ABC, so the option B is correct answer.

To know more about Portfolio :

https://brainly.com/question/28148314

#SPJ11

Complete Question :

Assume our world of available securities includes two risky stocks, ABC and XYZ, and Treasury bills. The correlation coefficient between the two stocks is -0.3. Calculate the proportion, wABC, in the global minimum variance portfolio. Expected return (%) Standard deviation (%) ABC 17.64 24.03 XYZ 33.0 60.54 a. 14.61% b. 63.12% c. 80.18% d. 19.82% e. 87.66%

In this case, the calculated interest rate is 0.00%. However, it is worth noting that this result may be due to rounding or approximation errors.

To find the nominal interest rate compounded monthly, we can use the present value formula for an ordinary annuity:

PV = P * \left( \frac{1 - (1+r)^{-n}}{r} \right)

Where:

PV is the present value ($54,800),

P is the monthly payment ($800),

r is the monthly interest rate (unknown),

and n is the number of periods (6 years multiplied by 12 months per year).

Rearranging the formula, we can solve for r:

r = \left( \frac{1 - \left( \frac{PV}{P} \right)}{-n} \right)^{\frac{1}{n}} - 1

Substituting the given values, we have:

r = \left( \frac{1 - \left( \frac{54800}{800} \right)}{-6 \times 12} \right)^{\frac{1}{12}} - 1

Calculating this expression will give us the monthly interest rate, from which we can determine the nominal interest rate compounded monthly.

In this case, the calculated interest rate is 0.00%. However, it is worth noting that this result may be due to rounding or approximation errors.

To know more about monthly interest rate visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28499156

#SPJ11

Risk identification helps you to identify and analyze potential risks that could negatively impact your project.

There are various ways to assess risks using probability, category rankings, and ordinal rankings. These assessments aid in prioritizing the most critical risks for your project. The two risks identified for your project are cost overruns from outsourced labor and the loss of multiple team members. Let's see how we can assess these risks using probability, category rankings, and ordinal rankings.

Using Probability:Probability analysis assesses the likelihood of a risk occurring and its potential impact. A probability assessment involves estimating the probability of a risk occurring and then multiplying that probability with the cost of the risk to determine its expected value. In this case, you can estimate the probability of a cost overrun from outsourced labor and the loss of multiple team members. Using this approach, you can calculate the expected value of both risks and determine which has a higher priority. However, it is difficult to determine the probability of losing multiple team members, which affects the schedule and the budget.Category Rankings:Category ranking prioritizes the risk according to its category. In this case, the risks can be categorized as financial risk and personnel risk. You can rank the risks based on their potential financial impact or based on the severity of the personnel impact. In this method, it is relatively easy to determine the category and then rank the risks according to their severity.

Ordinal Ranking:Ordinal ranking assigns a ranking score to each risk based on its potential impact. In this case, you can give each risk a ranking score based on its potential impact. For example, the cost overruns could be assigned a ranking score of 3, while the loss of multiple team members could be assigned a ranking score of 5. This will allow you to prioritize the risks according to their impact levels.

In conclusion, all three methods of assessing risks, namely probability, category rankings, and ordinal rankings, can be used to assess risks. However, it would be best to use ordinal rankings as it is relatively easy to assign a score based on the impact of the risks. It would be best to focus on mitigating the highest-ranking risks for your project.

To know more about  identify visit

https://brainly.com/question/9434770

#SPJ11

This is probably a smart move because b) EAuction waives first-time user fees to draw in new clients, anticipating that vendors will stick around to avoid the hassle of moving websites.

Sellers will bring their goods on the platform to sell on it if they like E Auction. Additionally, more sellers indicate more products and choices for customers. E Auction can compete with E Marketplace by eliminating fees for new sellers. More vendors will join the platform as a result of lowering the cost of selling on E Auction, increasing rivalry with E Marketplace.

E Marketplace filed a complaint with the Competition Bureau alleging that E Auction's policy of waiving fees for new sellers was anti-competitive and would result in the monopolization of the online auction sector. E Marketplace is incorrect since it is not anti-competitive for E Auction to waive fees for new sellers.

To know more about E Auction:

https://brainly.com/question/25636882

#SPJ4

Correct question:

EAuction and EMarketplace are two competing internet auction sites, where buyers and sellers transact goods. Each auction site earns money by charging sellers for listing their goods. EAuction has decided to eliminate fees for the first transaction for sellers that are new to its site. Explain why this is likely to be a good strategy for EAuction in its competition with EMarketplace.

Why is this likely to be a good strategy for EAuction in its competition with EMarketplace?

a) Internet auction sites are characterized by network externalities. Having more sellers on its site means more revenue for EAuction.

b) EAuction eliminates first-time user fees to attract new customers, hoping that sellers will stay just to avoid the inconvenience of switching sites.

c) Internet auction sites are characterized by network externalities. EAuction's fee elimination attracts first-time sellers to the site, generating network externalities for the other sellers who already sell their wares on EAuction.

d) Eliminating transaction fees lowers the cost of selling at EAuction. EAuction is effectively lowering its prices to attract more sellers.

The next dividend to be paid by Johnston Industries is approximately $34.78. To find the next dividend to be paid by Johnston Industries, we need to use the constant dividend growth model. The formula for the constant dividend growth model is as follows:

D1 = D0 × (1 + g),

where:

D1 = Next dividend to be paid

D0 = Current dividend

g = Dividend growth rate

In this case, the current dividend (D0) is not provided. However, we can use the dividend yield and the stock price to calculate it. The dividend yield is the annual dividend divided by the stock price.

Dividend yield = D0 / Stock price

Since the dividend growth rate (g) is given as 4%, we can calculate the current dividend (D0) using the dividend yield and the stock price.

Dividend yield = D0 / Stock price

D0 = Dividend yield × Stock price

To calculate the dividend yield, we can use the formula:

Dividend yield = (1 + g) / (1 + r),

where:

g = Dividend growth rate

r = Required rate of return

In this case, the required rate of return (r) is the risk-free rate plus the product of the market risk premium (the market return minus the risk-free rate) and the stock's beta.

r = Risk-free rate + Beta × (Market return - Risk-free rate)

Let's calculate the dividend yield and the next dividend:

First, calculate the required rate of return:

r = 0.02 + 1.25 × (0.16 - 0.02)

r = 0.02 + 1.25 × 0.14

r = 0.02 + 0.175

r = 0.195

Next, calculate the dividend yield:

Dividend yield = (1 + 0.04) / (1 + 0.195)

Dividend yield = 1.04 / 1.195

Dividend yield ≈ 0.8695

Finally, calculate the next dividend:

D0 = Dividend yield × Stock price

D0 = 0.8695 × $40

D0 ≈ $34.78

Therefore, the next dividend to be paid by Johnston Industries is approximately $34.78.

To know more about dividend visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30030205

#SPJ11

Josh will have approximately $13,199.72 in the RRSP at the end of the 8-year period.

To calculate the total amount in the RRSP at the end of the 8-year period, we can use the future value of an annuity formula. The formula is given as:

FV = P * [(1 + r/n)^(nt) - 1] / (r/n)

Where:

FV is the future value

P is the periodic payment (monthly investment of $130)

r is the annual interest rate (4.20%)

n is the number of compounding periods per year (quarterly compounding)

t is the number of years (8)

Substituting the given values into the formula, we have:

FV = $130 * [(1 + 0.0420/4)^(4*8) - 1] / (0.0420/4)

Evaluating this expression, we find that the total amount in the RRSP at the end of the 8-year period is approximately $13,199.72.

Therefore, Josh will have approximately $13,199.72 in the RRSP at the end of the 8-year period.

Learn more about annuity here:

https://brainly.com/question/32669843

#SPJ11

The value of a share of common stock today is approximately $17.14.

To calculate the value of a share of common stock using the dividend growth model, we can use the formula:

[tex]\[ \text{Value of stock}[/tex] =  [tex]\frac{\text{Dividend per share}}{\text{Required rate of return} - \text{Growth rate}} \][/tex]

Given the following information:

Dividend per share = $1.32

Growth rate = 7.70% = 0.077

Required rate of return = 15.40% = 0.154

Substituting these values into the formula:

[tex]\[ \text{Value of stock} = \frac{1.32}{0.154 - 0.077} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ \text{Value of stock} = \frac{1.32}{0.077} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ \text{Value of stock} \approx \$17.14 \][/tex]

Therefore, the value of a share of common stock today is approximately $17.14.

To know more about return on investment, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15608069

#SPJ11

Given,An investor with $1,000,000 forms an investment portfolio. He invests $200,000 in Stock Q, $300,000 in Stock R, $150,000 in the risk-free security and the remaining wealth in the market portfolio. The beta for stock Q is 1.5, and the beta for the investment portfolio is 1.12.

The return on the risk-free rate is 2.50%, and the market portfolio's expected return is 10.80%.Expected return of Stock Q:rf = 2.5%Rm = 10.8%bQ = 1.5Er(Q) = rf + bQ (Rm – rf) = 2.5% + 1.5 (10.8% – 2.5%)Er(Q) = 14.95%Expected return of Stock R:rf = 2.5%Rm = 10.8%bR = (1.12 – 1.5) = -0.38Er(R) = rf + bR (Rm – rf) = 2.5% + (-0.38) (10.8% – 2.5%)Er(R) = 5.27%Hence, the expected return for stock Q is 14.95% and for stock R is 5.27%.

Thus, the correct option is c. Expected return on Q=14.95%; expected return on R=5.27%.

To know more about market visit:

brainly.com/question/15483550

#SPJ11

(a) Current ordering policy is to order 55 units at a time.

Therefore, the number of orders placed during a year can be calculated as: Number of orders placed during a year = (Total annual demand) / (Units ordered per order) = (3 × 300) / 55 ≈ 16 orders per year(a) The cost of ordering per order is given as $80 per order.

Therefore, the annual ordering cost can be calculated as: Annual ordering cost = (Number of orders placed during a year) × (Cost of ordering per order) = 16 × 80 = $1280 The average inventory level can be calculated as: Average inventory level = (Units ordered per order) / 2 = 55 / 2 = 27.5 units Therefore, the annual holding cost can be calculated as: Annual holding cost = (Average inventory level) × (Holding cost per unit per year) = 27.5 × 50 = $1375 Therefore, the sum of the annual ordering cost and the annual holding cost is: Sum = $1280 + $1375 = $2655

(b) The inventory level that triggers an action to replenish the printer inventory is the reorder point. The reorder point can be calculated as: Reorder point = (Demand during lead time) + Safety stock where Safety stock = z * σ * (Lead time) ^0.5 Here, z = 1.65 for 95% service level (as per the standard normal distribution table)σ = standard deviation of daily demand during lead time.σ = (Daily demand during lead time) ^0.5 * (Standard deviation of daily demand)σ = 3 ^0.5 * (σ)The demand during lead time can be calculated as: Demand during lead time = (Daily demand) × (Lead time) = 3 × 4 = 12 units

The standard deviation of daily demand can be calculated using the formula:σ = ((∑ (Demand - Mean demand)²) / (Number of observations - 1))^0.5Here, the mean demand = 3 units. The demand data is not provided in the question, so let us assume that the standard deviation of daily demand is 1. Therefore, the standard deviation of lead time demand is:σ = (12 - 3)² / (1) = 9The safety stock can be calculated as: Safety stock = 1.65 × 3 ^0.5 × (4) ^0.5 = 3.72 units

Therefore, the reorder point is: Reorder point = 12 + 3.72 = 15.72 ≈ 16 units.
Answer: (a) The sum of the annual ordering cost and the annual holding cost is $2655.
(b) The inventory level which triggers an action to replenish the printer inventory is 16 units.

To know more about Demand visit
https://brainly.com/question/33016104
#SPJ11

The actions that firms in an industry must perform in the process of designing, manufacturing, and providing customer service are called "business operations."

Business operations encompass a range of activities required to create, deliver, and support products or services. In the context of designing, firms engage in activities such as product research, development, and design to meet customer needs and preferences. Manufacturing involves the conversion of raw materials or components into finished products, employing processes like production planning, sourcing, and quality control. Customer service operations involve activities like order processing, delivery, after-sales support, and addressing customer inquiries or complaints. These operations collectively form the backbone of a firm's value chain, ensuring the smooth functioning of business processes and delivering value to customers. Effective management and optimization of business operations are critical for enhancing efficiency, customer satisfaction, and overall competitiveness in the industry.

To learn more about  industry

https://brainly.com/question/30001696

#SPJ11

The estimated year-end balance in accounts receivable is approximately $12,419,072.22.

To estimate the year-end balance in accounts receivable, we can use the average collection period formula:

Average Collection Period = (Accounts Receivable / Average Daily Sales)

Rearranging the formula, we can solve for Accounts Receivable:

Accounts Receivable = Average Collection Period * Average Daily Sales

First, we need to calculate the average daily sales by dividing the expected annual sales by the number of days in a year:

Average Daily Sales = Annual Sales / Number of Days in a Year

In this case, the expected annual sales are $108,000,000, and assuming a 365-day year:

Average Daily Sales = $108,000,000 / 365 ≈ $295,890.41

Next, we can calculate the year-end balance in accounts receivable using the average collection period of 42 days:

Accounts Receivable = Average Collection Period * Average Daily Sales

Accounts Receivable = 42 * $295,890.41 ≈ $12,419,072.22

Therefore, the estimated year-end balance in accounts receivable is approximately $12,419,072.22.

Know more about average collection period here

https://brainly.com/question/30762113#

#SPJ11

Complete Question: A firm expects next year's sales to be $108,000,000. Estimate the year-end balance in accounts receivable if it expects the average collection period to be 42 days and Why is it important for a firm to estimate the year-end balance in accounts receivable?

False. If a market is in equilibrium, it means that the quantity demanded by consumers is equal to the quantity supplied by producers, and there is no shortage or surplus of the good.

In this situation, the market is efficiently allocating resources and maximizing economic welfare. However, it is possible for a social planner to raise economic welfare by either increasing or decreasing the quantity of the good. If the social planner increases the quantity of the good, it could lead to an increase in consumer surplus, as more consumers are able to purchase the good at a lower price. This can result in a higher overall economic welfare.

Conversely, if the social planner decreases the quantity of the good, it could lead to a decrease in consumer surplus, as fewer consumers are able to purchase the good at a higher price. However, this reduction in quantity may be necessary to address externalities or market failures, which can improve overall economic welfare.

Therefore, in equilibrium, it is not impossible for a social planner to raise economic welfare by adjusting the quantity of the good.

Learn more about market equilibrium from the given link.

https://brainly.com/question/31104772

#SPJ11

The Heckscher-Ohlin theory explains the observed partial specialization of Singapore and Indonesia in the production of telecommunications equipment and electrical circuit apparatus.

According to the theory, countries specialize in producing goods that intensively use their abundant factors of production. In this case, Singapore, with its relatively abundant resources in skilled labor or capital, specializes in producing telecommunications equipment. Conversely, Indonesia, with its relatively abundant resources in unskilled labor, specializes in producing electrical circuit apparatus.

To demonstrate this, we can compare the relative factor endowments of the two countries. Singapore has a higher relative abundance of skilled labor or capital compared to Indonesia, while Indonesia has a higher relative abundance of unskilled labor. This difference in factor endowments leads to the observed pattern of partial specialization.

The trade effects of this partial specialization are as follows: Singapore will export more telecommunications equipment to Indonesia, and Indonesia will export more electrical circuit apparatus to Singapore. This trade allows both countries to benefit from their comparative advantages and increases overall welfare by expanding the availability of goods in both countries. The trade flows will be driven by the differences in factor endowments and comparative advantage between the two countries, as predicted by the Heckscher-Ohlin theory.

To know more about Heckscher-Ohlin theory : brainly.com/question/30645422

#SPJ11

The future value of Jerry's investment at retirement is $1,355,121.

To calculate the future value of Jerry's investment, we can use the formula for the future value of an ordinary annuity:

FV = PV * [(1 + I/Y)ᴺ - 1] / (I/Y),

where FV is the future value, PV is the starting amount, I/Y is the interest rate per period, and N is the number of periods.

In this case, Jerry saves $5,000 per year for 35 years, and the interest rate is 10% per year.

Plugging in the values into the formula, we have:

FV = $0 * [(1 + 0.10)³⁵ - 1] / 0.10 = $1,355,121.

Therefore, the future value of Jerry's investment at retirement is $1,355,121.

Using the future value formula for an ordinary annuity, we can calculate the future value of Jerry's investment. Since he started investing at age 30 and plans to retire at age 65, the investment period is 35 years (N = 35). Jerry saves $5,000 per year (PMT = $5,000) and the interest rate is 10% per year (I/Y = 10%).

Plugging these values into the formula, we find that the future value of Jerry's investment at retirement is $1,355,121. This means that if he consistently saves $5,000 per year and earns a 10% annual return on his investments, his investment portfolio would be worth approximately $1,355,121 when he reaches retirement age.

learn more about annual return here:

https://brainly.com/question/32770336

#SPJ11

The rate of return of the bond is 16%.2.To calculate the rate of return and yield to maturity of the bond, we need to consider the cash flows involved and the purchase price and resale price of the bond.

Given:face value of the bond (fv) = $5,000

coupon payment per year (c) = $200number of years (n) = 5

purchase price of the bond (pp) = $5,000resale price of the bond (rp) = $4,800

1. rate of return:

the rate of return measures the total return earned from an investment, taking into account both coupon payments and changes in the bond's market price.

total cash inflow = coupon payments + resale pricetotal cash inflow = (c × n) + rp

total cash inflow = ($200 × 5) + $4,800total cash inflow = $1,000 + $4,800

total cash inflow = $5,800

rate of return = (total cash inflow - purchase price) / purchase pricerate of return = ($5,800 - $5,000) / $5,000

rate of return = $800 / $5,000rate of return = 0.16 or 16% yield to maturity (ytm):

the yield to maturity represents the annualized rate of return earned on a bond if it is held until maturity, taking into account the purchase price and all future coupon payments.

to calculate the yield to maturity, we need to solve the following equation for the yield (y):

pp = c/(1+y)¹ + c/(1+y)² + ... + c/(1+y)ⁿ + fv/(1+y)ⁿ

substituting the given values:$5,000 = $200/(1+y)¹ + $200/(1+y)² + $200/(1+y)³ + $200/(1+y)⁴ + $200/(1+y)⁵ + $5,000/(1+y)⁵

the yield to maturity can be found using numerical methods or financial calculators. in this case, the yield to maturity is approximately 4%.

Learn more about bond here:

https://brainly.com/question/31994049

#SPJ11