I believe the answer is court-packing plan
if an expert system recognizes a new pattern, it can set up a rule based on it.
T/F
The statement: if an expert system recognizes a new pattern, it can set up a rule based on it is TRUE.
An expert system is a type of artificial intelligence that uses a knowledge base and a set of rules to make decisions and provide advice in a specific domain.
These systems can learn from new information or data, and if they recognize a new pattern, they can set up a new rule based on it. Expert systems are designed to mimic the decision-making ability of a human expert in a particular field, and they can be used in a variety of applications, including medicine, engineering, finance, and more.
As the system becomes more experienced, it can refine its rules and decision-making abilities to become even more accurate and effective.
To know more about artificial intelligence, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/22678576#
#SPJ11
Write about the five principles of contract administration and indicate which components you feel can result in the biggest problems with subcontractors if not done well.
Answer:
Explanation:
Contract administration is the process of managing and monitoring contracts after they have been awarded to ensure that the parties involved fulfill their obligations. It is a critical aspect of project management and involves ensuring that the contractor performs the work in accordance with the contract's terms and conditions. The following are the five principles of contract administration:
Communication: Effective communication is essential for successful contract administration. It involves regular and open communication between the parties involved to clarify expectations, exchange information, and resolve issues as they arise.
Documentation: Proper documentation is critical to ensure that the parties involved fulfill their obligations. This includes keeping accurate records of all communications, changes, and payments made throughout the project.
Compliance: Compliance with the contract's terms and conditions is vital to ensure that the project meets its objectives. It is necessary to ensure that all parties adhere to the terms of the contract, including quality standards, timelines, and budget.
Risk Management: Contract administration involves identifying and managing risks associated with the project. This includes identifying potential risks, assessing their likelihood and impact, and developing strategies to mitigate them.
Performance Evaluation: Performance evaluation involves monitoring the contractor's performance to ensure that they deliver on the project's objectives. This includes assessing the quality of work, meeting timelines, and managing costs.
Of these principles, communication and compliance are crucial components that can result in significant problems with subcontractors if not done well. Failure to communicate effectively can lead to misunderstandings and misinterpretations of the contract's terms and conditions, resulting in delays, disputes, and additional costs. Compliance is also essential to ensure that subcontractors adhere to the project's requirements and quality standards, and any deviations can have significant consequences for the project's success.
In summary, effective contract administration is essential for ensuring successful project outcomes. It requires adherence to the five principles of communication, documentation, compliance, risk management, and performance evaluation, with particular attention to effective communication and compliance to avoid problems with subcontractors.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
The five principles of contract administration include clarity and completeness, communication, documentation, compliance, and risk management. Each of these principles is critical to ensuring that a contract is executed effectively and efficiently.
The component that can result in the biggest problems with subcontractors if not done well is communication. Effective communication is key to ensuring that both parties understand their obligations and responsibilities under the contract. Miscommunication can lead to misunderstandings, delays, and even litigation.
For example, if the subcontractor is unclear about the scope of work or the timeline for completion, they may miss deadlines or deliver subpar work, resulting in additional costs and delays. Similarly, if the contractor fails to communicate changes to the contract or other important information, the subcontractor may not be able to perform as required, leading to further complications.
To avoid these issues, it is important to establish clear lines of communication from the outset, including regular meetings and progress updates, as well as a system for addressing issues or concerns as they arise. Both parties should also be clear on their respective roles and responsibilities, including any reporting requirements or deadlines.
Overall, effective contract administration requires attention to all five principles, but clear communication is the linchpin that holds them all together. By prioritizing communication and ensuring that both parties are on the same page, contractors can avoid many of the common pitfalls that can arise when working with subcontractors.
To learn more about contract administration refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31200613
#SPJ11
The prosecutor and the individuals who signed the petition were challenging that Mizanskey had NOT fulfilled which of the following functions of the court?
Clemency
Crime control
Rehabilitation
The prosecutor and the individuals who signed the petition were challenging that Mizanskey had not fulfilled are Rehabilitation. Therefore the correct option is option C.
The prosecutor and the others who signed the petition did not make clear which duty Mizanskey had to perform for the court, based on the few information offered.
Clemency: The authority of a government official, such as a governor or president, to commute or commute a criminal's sentence. Controlling crime: The job of the court is to uphold the law and punish those who break it. Rehabilitation: The process of assisting a convicted criminal in altering their behaviour and turning into a law-abiding citizen is known as rehabilitation.For such more question on Rehabilitation:
https://brainly.com/question/13032255
#SPJ11
The governor's powers and duties include all of the following EXCEPT a. signing bills passed by the legislature. b. nullifying unconstitutional laws.
The governor is an executive leader who holds significant powers and duties within the state government.
One of the primary responsibilities of the governor is to sign bills passed by the legislature, thereby giving them the force of law. This is a critical function of the governor and one that is essential for the effective operation of the state government.
Another power of the governor is to nullify unconstitutional laws. The governor has the authority to veto bills passed by the legislature that violate the state or federal constitution. This is an important check on the power of the legislature and helps to ensure that laws are in compliance with constitutional principles.
However, the governor's powers and duties do not include nullifying constitutional laws. Instead, the governor is responsible for upholding and enforcing the state's constitution and ensuring that all laws are in compliance with it. This is a critical duty of the governor and one that helps to maintain the integrity of the state's legal system.
Overall, the governor's powers and duties are vast and encompass a wide range of responsibilities. While the governor does not have the power to nullify constitutional laws, he or she plays a crucial role in ensuring that the state government operates effectively and in accordance with constitutional principles.
Learn more about government :
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ11
Should judges only consider the law in making decisions, or should they consider other factors, as well?
Judges should consider the law in making decisions but to achieve a much fair decision they should consider other factors as well.
When making decisions, judges are typically expected to interpret and apply the law fairly and impartially. The law may occasionally be ambiguous or open to interpretation, and judges may need to take other factors into account in order to make a just and equitable decision.
Judges may be required to take into account a wide range of factors, including the best interests of the child, the financial needs of the parties involved, in addition to the pertinent legal principles, in cases involving issues like child custody, spousal support, or property division in divorce.
Similar to this, when deciding on an appropriate sentence in criminal cases, judges may need to take into account elements like the defendant's background, mental health and other mitigating circumstances.
Learn more about Judges at:
brainly.com/question/16726610
#SPJ1
what makes probation different from policing is that it is not always a(n) _________ function.
Answer:
executive
Explanation:
Probation and policing are both important components of the criminal justice system. While both of these functions involve the supervision of individuals who have been involved in criminal activities,
They differ in their purpose and approach. Probation is a process by which a convicted criminal is released back into the community under the supervision of a probation officer. The goal of probation is to help the individual reintegrate back into society and avoid further criminal behavior.
The probation officer is responsible for monitoring the individual's progress, providing guidance, and making sure that the individual complies with the conditions of their probation. On the other hand, policing is a function of law enforcement that involves the prevention, detection, and investigation of criminal activities.
Police officers are responsible for maintaining public order, protecting the public, and enforcing the law. Policing involves the use of force and can often involve the arrest and detention of individuals who have been involved in criminal activities.
The main difference between probation and policing is that probation is not always a law enforcement function. While probation officers do have some law enforcement powers, their primary function is to provide support and guidance to individuals who are trying to reintegrate into society. In contrast, policing is primarily a law enforcement function that involves the use of force to maintain public order and enforce the law.
In conclusion, probation and policing are both important functions of the criminal justice system, but they differ in their purpose and approach. While probation is focused on helping employees reintegrate into society and avoid further criminal behavior, policing is focused on maintaining public order and enforcing the law. The main difference between the two is that probation is not always a law enforcement function, whereas policing is primarily a law enforcement function.
To know more employees click here
brainly.com/question/31166948
#SPJ11
Why is important to be physically fit as a law enforcement officer ? Provide at least 4 reasons
Answer:are better able to respond when called to do so. can perform more work with less effort. are less likely to suffer injury during physically demanding activities. experience faster recovery following physical exertion.
Explanation:
during arrest and before questioning, defendants are usually advised of their ________.
During arrest and before questioning, defendants are usually advised of their Miranda rights. These rights include the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and the warning that anything they say can be used against them in court.
This advice is required by law to ensure that defendants are aware of their rights and to protect their constitutional rights against self-incrimination. Failure to advise a defendant of their Miranda rights can result in the exclusion of any statements made by the defendant during questioning. It is important for defendants to understand their rights and to exercise them, with the guidance of an experienced attorney, to ensure a fair trial and protect their interests.
These rights inform defendants of their legal rights to remain silent, to consult with an attorney, to have an attorney provided if they cannot afford one, and to be aware that anything they say can be used against them in court. This ensures that defendants are aware of their protections under the law while being arrested and questioned by authorities.
Learn more about defendants here : brainly.com/question/30736002
#SPJ11
using the _____ approach is the most accurate method to determine life insurance needs.
Using the Needs Analysis approach is the most accurate method to determine life insurance needs. This approach involves calculating the total amount of financial support that would be required by the family in the event of the insured's death.
Factors such as outstanding debts, future expenses, and income replacement are taken into consideration when determining the amount of life insurance coverage needed.
This approach ensures that the amount of coverage purchased is sufficient to cover all financial obligations and provide for the family's future financial needs. It also helps to avoid purchasing unnecessary coverage and wasting money on premiums.
Overall, the Needs Analysis approach provides a thorough and accurate assessment of life insurance needs, giving peace of mind to both the insured and their loved ones.
To know more about Needs Analysis visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31789126
#SPJ11
in the case of furlong v. alpha chi omega sorority, the issue of the case is:
In the case of Furlong v. Alpha Chi Omega sorority, the issue at hand was whether the sorority had discriminated against a member based on her disability.
The plaintiff, Furlong, had been diagnosed with anxiety and depression and had requested accommodations from the sorority in order to participate in events and meetings.
However, she alleged that the sorority failed to provide reasonable accommodations and ultimately forced her to withdraw from the organization.
The main issue, in this case, was whether the sorority had violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by failing to provide Furlong with reasonable accommodations.
The ADA prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities and requires employers and organizations to provide reasonable accommodations that enable individuals with disabilities to participate in the same opportunities as those without disabilities.
In this case, Furlong argued that the sorority had not provided her with reasonable accommodations and had therefore discriminated against her on the basis of her disability.
Know more about discrimination here:
https://brainly.com/question/1084594
#SPJ11
examples of __________ crowds include sit-ins, marches, boycotts, blockades, and strikes.
Answer:
protesting
Explanation:
Those are all examples of protests.
The statement is completed as: ''Examples of protest crowds include sit-ins, marches, boycotts, blockades, and strikes.'' These crowds are organized and mobilized to express discontent or grievances.
Protest crowds are typically organized by social or political movements, interest groups, or individuals who seek to bring attention to a particular issue or demand social or political change. They can be either peaceful or violent, depending on the nature of the protest and the response of law enforcement or other authorities.
Protest crowds often utilize tactics such as civil disobedience, nonviolent resistance, or disruptive actions to draw attention to their cause and to pressure those in power to address their concerns. They can have a significant impact on public opinion and policy, and can sometimes lead to major social or political changes.
Overall, protest crowds are an important aspect of democratic societies, as they provide a means for citizens to voice their concerns and advocate for change. While they can sometimes be controversial or disruptive, they are an essential component of political and social activism.
See more about strikes (protest) at https://brainly.com/question/26933190.
#SPJ11
in their oversight role with regard to the bureaucracy, the courts tend to support ______.
In their oversight role with regard to the bureaucracy, the courts tend to support individual rights.
This is because the courts are responsible for interpreting the Constitution and ensuring that the government acts in accordance with its provisions. When citizens believe that their rights have been violated by bureaucratic actions, they can bring their case to court.
If the court finds that the bureaucracy has overstepped its bounds and violated the individual's rights, it can order the bureaucracy to cease its actions or take corrective action. This helps to ensure that the bureaucracy operates within the bounds of the law and respects the rights of citizens.
The courts play an important role in upholding the principles of democracy by holding the bureaucracy accountable for its actions and protecting individual rights.
To know more about individual rights, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14316517#
#SPJ11
in a suit against myron, neva obtains damages. in the u.s. legal system, this remedy at law is
In a suit against Myron, Neva obtains damages. in the U.S. legal system, this remedy at law is monetary award.
When a party is successful in a civil lawsuit for damages, the court may order the defendant to pay a specific amount of money to the plaintiff as compensation for their losses or injuries. This remedy at law is known as a "monetary award" or "damages." The amount of damages awarded may vary depending on the circumstances of the case and the type of damages sought by the plaintiff, such as compensatory, punitive, or nominal damages. The purpose of a monetary award is to provide a tangible remedy for the harm suffered by the plaintiff, and to deter similar conduct in the future by the defendant.
To know more about monetary award
brainly.com/question/30500535
#SPJ11
The complete question is:
Fill in the blank,
In a suit against Myron, Neva obtains damages. in the U.S. legal system, this remedy at law is _____________.
he law of piercing the corporate veil has been developed through __________ law in order to provide protection to the creditors of corporations.
The law of piercing the corporate veil has been developed through common law in order to provide protection to the creditors of corporations.
The corporate veil refers to the legal separation between the corporation and its shareholders. This separation limits the liability of the shareholders to the amount of their investment in the corporation, which provides an incentive for investors to put money into businesses without fear of being held personally responsible for the corporation's debts or liabilities.
However, in some cases, shareholders may abuse this separation by using the corporation as a shield for fraudulent or illegal activities or to avoid paying debts. When this happens, the corporate veil may be pierced, and the shareholders may be held personally liable for the corporation's actions.
Piercing the corporate veil is a complex legal concept that requires meeting certain legal criteria, such as showing that the corporation was undercapitalized, that the shareholders disregarded corporate formalities, or that the corporation was used to perpetrate a fraud. Courts will carefully analyze the facts of each case to determine whether the shareholders should be held personally liable.
Overall, the law of piercing the corporate veil serves as an important protection for creditors, as it helps ensure that they can recover debts owed to them by corporations even when shareholders attempt to use the corporate form as a shield.
Learn more about Courts :
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ11
whether a person is single, married, or divorced is part of his or her _____ identity.
Answer: whether a person is single, married, or divorced is part of his or her relationship_____ identity.
Explanation:
The statement is completed as: ''Whether a person is single, married, or divorced is part of his or her relationship identity.'' Relationship identity refers to the sense of self that is tied to one's personal and social relationships.
For many people, romantic relationships, including marriage, can be a significant aspect of their relationship identity. Being in a relationship may be associated with feelings of love, companionship, and fulfillment, while being single or divorced may be seen as a source of independence or loneliness.
However, it is important to note that relationship identity is just one aspect of a person's overall identity, which may also be influenced by other factors such as work, hobbies, spirituality, and personal interests. Additionally, individuals have the right to define their own sense of identity and should not be defined solely by their relationship status or any other single factor.
Ultimately, having a strong relationship identity can contribute to a sense of belonging and connectedness with others, but it is important to maintain a healthy balance between one's personal and social relationships and other aspects of life.
See more about relationships at https://brainly.com/question/30550242.
#SPJ11
women commit about _____ of murders, but make up only _____ of death row inmates.
Women commit about 10% of murders, but make up only 1% of death row inmates.
While men commit the majority of homicides, it is important to note that women are also capable of committing violent crimes. However, the number of women who receive the death penalty is disproportionately low compared to men.
Some experts argue that this is due to the fact that the criminal justice system is biased against women and that juries and judges may be more likely to give women the benefit of the doubt.
Additionally, women who are sentenced to death often have different experiences and backgrounds than male death row inmates. For example, many women on death row have suffered from abuse or trauma, and some have been coerced into committing crimes by male partners. These factors may influence how their cases are viewed and how they are sentenced.
To know more about death row inmates, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29871341#
#SPJ11
european media policies echo ____________________ stances.
European media policies often echo democratic stances. These policies aim to promote freedom of speech, diversity, and plurality in the media landscape. The focus is on ensuring that citizens have access to accurate information and a wide range of opinions to make informed decisions, fostering an open and democratic society.
European media policies echo the stances of the European Union (EU) on various issues.
The EU's policies on media are designed to promote freedom of expression, ensure pluralism, and protect media diversity. The European Union has implemented policies that regulate the media market, promote public service media, and protect the independence and safety of journalists. In addition, the EU has a strong stance on protecting data privacy and fighting against disinformation and fake news. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is one of the most comprehensive data protection regulations in the world, which provides EU citizens with more control over their personal data. The EU has also established the European Digital Media Observatory (EDMO) to monitor and counter disinformation campaigns.Moreover, the EU has been actively involved in promoting media literacy and providing funding to support the development of quality journalism. The Media Literacy for All initiative aims to equip citizens with the skills to navigate the digital world critically. Therefore, European media policies align with the EU's values and stances on issues such as freedom of expression, data privacy, and media literacy. These policies reflect the EU's commitment to upholding democratic values and ensuring a diverse and independent media landscape.Know more about the European union
https://brainly.com/question/30021063
#SPJ11
a _____ is the least intrusive type of seizure of a person under the fourth amendment.
A brief seizure is the least intrusive type of seizure of a person under the fourth amendment.
This type of seizure occurs when a law enforcement officer briefly stops an individual for questioning or to obtain identification. This type of seizure does not involve physical restraint or removal of the person from the scene. In fact, the individual is free to leave after the questioning is complete or identification has been obtained.
The Supreme Court has held that brief seizures are permissible under the fourth amendment as long as they are based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. This means that the officer must have specific and articulable facts that lead them to believe the individual is involved in criminal activity. If the officer lacks reasonable suspicion, the brief seizure may be deemed unconstitutional and any evidence obtained as a result may be suppressed.
Overall, a brief seizure is a less invasive means of investigating criminal activity while still protecting an individual's constitutional rights under the fourth amendment.
Learn more about Supreme Court here: https://brainly.com/question/29304855
#SPJ11
rights established under deeds, wills, and contracts in one state must be honored by other states. T/F?
True, rights established under deeds, wills, and contracts in one state must be honored by other states.
This principle is supported by the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution (Article IV, Section 1), which requires each state to respect and enforce the judicial proceedings, public records, and legislative acts of other states.
This clause ensures that legal agreements, such as deeds, wills, and contracts, made in one state are recognized and upheld in other states.
It promotes consistency and fairness across state lines, allowing individuals and businesses to conduct transactions and plan for the future with confidence in the enforceability of their rights and obligations, regardless of their location.
To know more about legal agreements visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4702081
#SPJ11
the highest fine an individual can receive upon criminal sentencing is ________.
The highest fine an individual can receive upon criminal sentencing varies depending on the jurisdiction and the severity of the offense committed.
In the United States federal system, fines can range from thousands to millions of dollars for certain crimes, such as securities fraud or environmental violations. However, there are also maximum statutory fines set by law for certain offenses, such as a $250,000 fine for an individual convicted of violating federal firearms laws.
In some states, the maximum fines can also vary depending on the type of offense, ranging from a few hundred dollars to thousands of dollars. Ultimately, the amount of the fine is determined by the judge based on the specific circumstances of the case, including the severity of the offense, the defendant's criminal history, and the ability to pay.
To know more about federal system visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31610448
#SPJ11
which of the following was not part of the ""good government"" movement of the progressive era?
The establishment of the Federal Reserve System was not part of the "good government" movement of the progressive era.
The "good government" movement of the progressive era focused on political reforms aimed at reducing corruption, increasing efficiency, and promoting democracy.
This included initiatives such as civil service reform, direct primaries, and initiatives and referendums. The Federal Reserve System, on the other hand, was established in 1913 as a response to financial panics and aimed to stabilize the economy through central banking.
While the progressive era did see increased regulation of business and industry, the establishment of the Federal Reserve System was not primarily driven by the goals of the "good government" movement.
For more questions like Economy click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/2421251
#SPJ11
the affect of the new law is minimal compared to the effort that went into getting it passed.T/F
True, The statement suggests that although there was a significant amount of effort put into getting the new law passed, the impact it has is not substantial.
This could mean that the law is not comprehensive enough or that its effects are too minor to have a significant impact. It is possible that the law was passed as a symbolic gesture rather than as a practical solution to a problem.
Alternatively, it could be that the law was designed to have a slow and steady impact that may not be immediately noticeable. However, without more information on the specific law and its intended purpose, it is difficult to determine the precise reason why the impact is minimal.
Nonetheless, the statement suggests that the effort put into passing the law was not commensurate with the benefits it provides.
To know more about law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28121935
#SPJ11
The president's expressed powers include all of the following categories EXCEPT ______. a. military b. partisan c. judicial d. diplomatic e. executive.
The president's expressed powers include all of the following categories EXCEPT "b. partisan."
Expressed powers are specifically granted to the president by the Constitution.
These powers cover a wide range of categories, including military (a), judicial (c), diplomatic (d), and executive (e) powers.
However, partisan powers, which involve political party-related activities and decisions, are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution as a category of expressed powers for the president. Thus, the correct answer is b. partisan.
To know more about president's expressed powers refer here: https://brainly.com/question/14720932#
#SPJ11
the term ________ refers to the legal, tangible evidence of ownership of goods.
The statement is completed as: ''The term title refers to the legal, tangible evidence of ownership of goods.'' It is an important concept in the world of business and commerce.
Title can take many forms, depending on the type of goods and the jurisdiction in which they are located. For example, title to real property (land and buildings) may be established through a deed or other legal document, while title to a vehicle may be established through a certificate of title or other government-issued document.
In general, title provides proof of ownership, which can be important in a variety of contexts. For example, if a business purchases goods from a supplier, it will want to obtain clear title to those goods in order to avoid any disputes over ownership or liability.
Overall, the concept of title is essential to the functioning of modern commerce, as it provides a clear legal framework for establishing ownership rights and resolving disputes over the ownership of goods and products.
See more about title at https://brainly.com/question/30713990.
#SPJ11
when someone steals and uses your debit or credit card info, that's called ______________.
When someone steals and uses your debit or credit card information without your authorization, that's called credit card fraud.
Credit card fraud can happen when someone steals your physical card or when someone obtains your card information through other means, such as through a data breach or phishing scam.
Once the thief has access to your card information, they can use it to make purchases or withdraw cash from your account.
To protect yourself from credit card fraud, it's important to monitor your account activity regularly and report any unauthorized charges to your card issuer as soon as possible. Some card issuers also offer fraud protection services that can alert you to suspicious activity on your account.
To know more about phishing scam, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/2880574#
#SPJ11
A. In your opinion, did the justice and correctional system fail Paula Cooper (this should include from the time she was a child until her adulthood)? If yes, detail what should have been done to maybe have a different outcome in Miss Cooper's life. If no, (you do not think the systems failed her) detail what both systems did for Miss Cooper as she moved through them (child to adult). This should be a minimum of 10 sentences to get full credit.
B. What did you think about this case?
A. The justice and correctional system failed Paula Cooper in many ways. Paula Cooper had a difficult childhood, and she was already a victim of neglect and abuse before committing a heinous crime at the age of 15. She was sentenced to death, which was later commuted to 60 years in prison.
However, she should have received help and support to address the underlying causes of her behavior, such as mental health issues and childhood trauma. Instead, she was put in an adult prison where she faced violence, abuse, and poor living conditions.
The correctional system did not provide her with the necessary rehabilitation, education, and therapy to prepare her for re-entry into society. If the justice and correctional system had treated Paula Cooper's underlying issues instead of punishing her, there could have been a different outcome in her life. She could have had the chance to lead a productive life and avoid the mistakes of her past.
B. This case is a tragic example of how the justice system can fail individuals, particularly those who have experienced childhood trauma and mental health issues. It highlights the need for a more holistic approach to the criminal justice system, one that emphasizes rehabilitation and support instead of punishment.
It is important to recognize the root causes of criminal behavior and address them rather than simply punishing the offender. The case also underscores the racial and economic disparities that exist within the criminal justice system, where individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds are more likely to be incarcerated and receive harsher sentences. Overall, this case should serve as a reminder of the flaws in the justice system and the need for reform.
To know more about heinous crime here:
https://brainly.com/question/2455972
#SPJ1
a key principle in the dred scott case was that slaves could not sue because _____.
A key principle in the Dred Scott case was that slaves could not sue because they were not considered citizens under the U.S. Constitution.
Dred Scott was a slave who sued for his freedom in a landmark Supreme Court case in 1857. The Supreme Court's decision in the case was based on several principles, including the idea that slaves and their descendants were not considered citizens under the U.S. Constitution and therefore could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that the Missouri Compromise, which had banned slavery in certain territories, was unconstitutional. The decision in the Dred Scott case was highly controversial and contributed to the growing tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery. The case is now widely regarded as a major injustice and a dark moment in American history.
To know more about Dred Scott case
brainly.com/question/14394331
#SPJ11
. fail, because the wind that directed the cigarette onto vanessa's balcony causing the fire originated in nature. b. fail, because vanessa knew about earl's habit of tossing his cigarettes onto her balcony and should have known better than to have kept trash on her balcony. c. succeed, because earl's violation of the statute regulating cigarette disposal constituted negligence per se. d. succeed, under res ipsa loquitur
Option C would be the most applicable answer in this scenario. Vanessa could argue that Earl's violation of the statute regulating cigarette disposal was negligence per se, which means that his behavior was inherently negligent according to the law.
Therefore, if Vanessa could prove that Earl violated the statute and that his behavior caused the fire, she would have a strong case for a successful lawsuit. Option A is not relevant because the source of the wind does not absolve Earl of negligence. Option B may hold some weight, but Vanessa may still argue that Earl's actions were the primary cause of the fire. Option D is not applicable because res ipsa loquitur applies when an accident occurs that would not typically happen in the absence of negligence, and the cause of the accident is unknown.
To know more about Negligence refer :
brainly.com/question/20373662
#SPJ11
________ states prohibit prison inmates who are serving a felony sentence from voting.
Answer:
Sixteen
Explanation:
Forty-eight states prohibit prison inmates who are serving a felony sentence from voting.
A felon is a person who has been found guilty of committing a crime. Other words that can be used to refer to a felon include criminal, crook, malefactor, or outlaw. Felony disenfranchisement laws are state-level policies that restrict the voting rights of individuals who have been convicted of a felony crime. The only two states that allow persons in prison to vote are Maine and Vermont.
In the US around 4.6 million Americans are barred from voting due to a felony conviction. Approximately 8 percent of the US population are convicted felons. Once you have fulfilled the terms of your parole and probation, your voting rights will be reinstated in Kentucky, provided that your felony was not violent.
To learn more about Felony disenfranchisement laws:
https://brainly.com/question/30901729
#SPJ4
Gyekye draws similarities between communitarianism and African socialism which several African leaders adopted in the early days of political independence. Whose conception of African socialism does Gyekye subscribe to? a. None of the options are correct. b. Mogobe Ramose, Thabo Mbeki, and Robert Mugabe. c. Kwame Nkrumah, Leopold Senghor, and Julius Nyerere. O d. Nelson Mandela, Leopold Senghor, and Cedric Robinson.