Answer:
Model Parliament, parliament called by King Edward I of England in 1295 that is widely regarded as the first representative parliament. It included not only archbishops and bishops but also archdeacons and one proctor for each cathedral and two for each diocese, marking the first time the lower orders of clergy were represented.
Explanation:
Explanation:
Model Parliament, parliament called by King Edward I of England in 1295 that is widely regarded as the first representative parliament. It included not only archbishops and bishops but also archdeacons and one proctor for each cathedral and two for each diocese, marking the first time the lower orders of clergy were represented. In addition, there were two knights from each shire, two citizens from each city, and two burgesses from each borough. Seven earls and 42 barons were also summoned.
The parliament was called, as was standard practice, because the king sought financial support for the wars that he was prosecuting in Scotland and in France. In summoning the parliament, Edward wrote,
Inasmuch as a most righteous law of the emperors ordains that what touches all should be approved by all, so it evidently appears that common dangers should be met by remedies agreed upon in common.
Each of the estates—clergy, nobles, and commons—met separately to consider the request. The clergy agreed to contribute a tenth of their income, and the barons and knights offered an eleventh of theirs, while the boroughs were willing to donate a seventh.
For the next several years, the pattern of those summoned for parliaments varied from assembly to assembly, depending on Edward’s decision, but eventually all parliaments came to be composed of the three estates, those from the commons being chosen by election. Although some earlier parliaments had similar compositions and subsequent parliaments did not all follow the precedent of the Model Parliament, historians regard that assembly as a turning point in the development of the English system of government.
What member of the Feudal system was most impacted by the Magna Carta AND what impacts does it have on Feudalism?
Answer:
King John
Explanation:
John angered his own nobles with oppressive taxes and other abuses of power. In 1215, a group of rebellious barons cornered John and forced him to sign the Magna Carta, or great charter. In this document, the king affirmed a long list of feudal rights. Besides protecting their own privileges, the barons included a few clauses recognizing the rights of townspeople and the Church.
Among other clauses in the Magna Carta that would have lasting impact were those that protected freemen from arbitrary arrest, imprisonment, and other legal actions, except “by legal judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.”
Which actions by the US government is protected by the fifth amendment
Answer:
the right to a grand jury, forbids “double jeopardy
What is a personal staff member with office management duties
Answer:
administrative assistant.
Explanation:
Office Manager Job Description: Top Duties and Qualifications
An Office Manager,or Business Manager,is responsible for overseeing the daily operations of an office and its various departments. Their duties include communicating with department heads, relaying important information or policy changes from upper management and implementing incentives to enhance employee productivity.
Office Manager duties and responsibilities
Office Managers may be the first point of contact for internal and external parties for your office, which may impact some customer service and communication elements of their job duties. Duties and responsibilities will vary depending on an organization’s size, but might include:
Overseeing the work of all office employees to ensure they work productively and meet deadlines and company standards Counseling any employees struggling in their roles Answering telephone calls and emails from customers and clients and directing them to relevant staff Creating an office budget and ensuring all employees follow it Monitoring office supplies and ordering new stationery, furniture, appliances and electronics as required Interviewing and training new office employees and organizing their employment paperwork Organizing maintenance companies to keep the office clean and safe and ensure its appliances are in good working order Reporting office progress to senior management and working with them to improve office operations and proceduresExplain the benefits and costs of a free trade agreement
Answer:
Benefits:
- Increases access to higher-quality and lower priced goods
- Higher growth rate
- Improves efficiency and innovation
- Drives competitiveness
- Promotes fairness
Cons:
- increasing job outsourcing
- poor working conditions
- degradation of natural resources
Explanation:
Helpppppp !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer: To stop Senate corruption, progressives wanted the direct election of senators by all state voters. In 1912 Congress passed the direct-election amendment. In 1913 it was ratified, becoming the Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution.
Explanation:
During the early years of World War I, which of the following did the Germans use to great advantage?
the field telephone
the machine gun
the submarine
the tank
The Germans made excellent use of the submarine in the early stages of World War I. Thus, the third option is correct.
During World War I, the Germans employed their submarines, known as U-boats, against Allied ships most successfully.
Observing this, the Allies started updating their submarines.The developments were essential to the success of the nation's maritime power by the time the United States entered World War II."Submarines (in World War II) now displayed greater speed, more effective weaponry, sophisticated detection technology, great versatility, and could pursue their victims rather than just lying in wait," wrote historian Gary E. Weir in a U.S. Naval Historical Center publication titled "Silent Victory 1940–1945."Therefore, The Germans made excellent use of the submarine in the early stages of World War I. Thus, the third option is correct.
Learn more about World War I here,
https://brainly.com/question/3411906
#SPJ5
which war is consider to be a turning point in history of India?
Answer:
The Battle of Plassey (1757) was a defining moment in Indian history. The Battle of Plassey was fought between the British East India Company and the Nawab of Bengal and his close supporters, most of whom were French forces.
Answer:
The Battle of Plassey was a major turning point in the history of India.
I need this three pleas help
Answer:
Yes, I believe it should, and here’s why. When somebody takes, they could say anything, in any language, in any tone of voice. This can offend someone greatly, cheer them , up, or not effect them at all. There have been endless amount of times when it has offended someone, so dearly that they might have done something to severely harm other people, property, or really anything. This should be taken into account during prosecution, because this can also be included as a threat. Now, there are certain limitations as to what can be considered a threat in the USA, but there are loopholes. Things you can say that will be considered NOT a threat, and overlooked, though still causing someone to do something horrendous. That communication should be used to defend someone, even if it isn’t the worst thing in the world, that person wouldn’t have done anything if that hadn’t been said, whatever that may be. You could make a law, or reinforce the current one about threats, to prevent anything like this happening, or stopping it happening further.
Hope This Helped!
15 PTS How did the United States entry into World War I change the culture and international political policies of the country?
Answer:
World War I was the "war to end all wars." It had major consequences on Americans both at home and abroad.
Explanation:
what is the nationalism
Based on this map, why were Spain and Portugal initially more successful at Atlantic exploration than many other European states?
1. They dominated Mediterranean trade routes and wanted to extend this power into the Atlantic.
2.They were two of the westernmost European states, both located very close to Africa.
3.They were both Catholic kingdoms funded by the pope.
Answer:
I think 1
Explanation:
Im not 100% sure thought
1. Explain why the North was in a better position to feed their troops even though
the South's major industry was agriculture.
08.02 lesson summary and assessment
World history
Answer:
Where is the question???????
How does Anne feel when she thinks of her friend Lies?
A hope
B hatred
C guilt
Describe how the sankin-kotai system affected the Daimyo.
Answer:
The costs of the sankin kotai was the financial drain it placed on the daimyo, an economic and political cost of keeping the daimyo weak in relation to the shogun. ... Yet this cost allowed the Tokugawa to maintain its hegemony over Japan until 1862.
Which statement is true about Spain?
A. More schools exist in Spain than any other nation in
Western Europe.
B. Spain is the most densely populated country in Europe.
C. There are more doctors per person than anywhere else
in the world.
Answer:
Its AAExplanationAAAAExplanationAA
Explanation:
Which statements about how Federalists and Anti-Federalists felt about the Constitution are true?
Choose all answers that are correct.
A.The Anti-Federalists demanded that the Constitution include a bill of rights to guarantee personal freedoms.
B.The Federalists at first argued that a bill of rights was not needed in the Constitution.
C.The Anti-Federalists created a second draft of the Constitution, this time adding a bill of rights, and ratified their version.
D.The Federalists finally relented and promised to add a bill of rights to the Constitution, which cleared the way for its ratification.
Answer:
The Federalists finally relented and promised to add a bill of rights to the Constitution, which cleared the way for its ratification.
The Anti-Federalists demanded that the Constitution include a bill of rights to guarantee personal freedoms.
Which statement was true of both Spanish and Anglo settlements in Texas?
A.
Both were found along the Gulf Coast near Matagorda Bay.
B.
Both built towns on the banks of the Brazos River in East Texas.
C.
Both centered on East Texas although their methods of settlement were different.
D.
Both concentrated most of their efforts around present-day San Antonio.
Answer:
your mom
Explanation:
your mom is big
Hello guys!
Who is the first president of Sua?
Hello!
The first president of USA (United States of America) is George WashingtonAnswer:
I think you meant to say "U.S.A"
Explanation:
The correct answer would be George Washington. He was elected and took his oath on April 30, 1789 in the current state of New York.
Note - Please be sure your question is typed correctly, or else it can't be answer properly, and we don't know what you are talking about.
Thank you! :)
Which statement about the Amazon rain forest is false?
0 It is considerably smaller today than it was a century ago because of cutting and burning.
O It is considerably larger today than it was a century ago because of self-reseeding.
O More that 500 species of trees grow in a single two-and-a-half-acre plot.
O Scientists believe species there could hold the key to medical breakthroughs.
Answer: It is considerably larger today than it was a century ago because of self-reseeding.
Explanation: I hope this helps :) You've got this!
Answer:
O It is considerably larger today than it was a century ago because of self-reseeding.
Explanation:
this is correct
What do you know already about the United States Constitution?
Answer:
The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America. This founding document, originally comprising seven articles, delineates the national frame of government.Explanation:
HELP ME OUT PLEASE!!
Why did the framers feel it was necessary at times to amend the Constitution?
A) amending the Constitution can reflect changing times, beliefs, and social conditions.
B) amending the Constitution would allow for tyranny.
C) amending the Constitution shows other countries how strong the U.S. government is.
D) amending the Constitution allows for a smooth transition of power between political parties.
Answer:
C would be your answer
Explanation:
the men who wrote the Constitution, wanted the amendment process to be difficult. They believed that a long and complicated amendment process would help create stability in the United States. Because it is so difficult to amend the Constitution, amendments are usually permanent.
CAN SOMEONE WHO IS REALLY GOOD AT HISTORY HELP ME PLEASE
Answer:
Patriarchy.
Explanation: Remember, the men took the brunt of the war, and women stayed behind. It's going to be patriarchy because they're currently following tradition.
Date :
:
1
Who was George Washington?
Answer:
George Washington (1732-99) was commander in chief of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War (1775-83) and served two terms as the first U.S. president, from 1789 to 1797. The son of a prosperous planter, Washington was raised in colonial Virginia. As a young man, he worked as a surveyor then fought in the French and Indian War (1754-63). During the American Revolution, he led the colonial forces to victory over the British and became a national hero. In 1787, he was elected president of the convention that wrote the U.S. Constitution. Two years later, Washington became America’s first president. Realizing that the way he handled the job would impact how future presidents approached the position, he handed down a legacy of strength, integrity and national purpose. Less than three years after leaving office, he died at his Virginia plantation, Mount Vernon, at age 67.
Explanation:
1) What was the Yazoo Land Act?
2) Why did the Act become a Scandal?
3) Why were the legislators in the picture burning the law after it had already been repealed?
4) What did that message send to the public?
Answer:
You know sometimes reading the lesson really helps you progress in school and makes it alot easier on you so you dont have to be here
Explanation:
The US government encourage American industry in the late
nineteenth century by creating protective tariffs."
True or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Culture affects the way people conduct which of the following activities?
i. Practicing important traditions.
ii. Creating political organizations.
iii Meeting basic needs for survival.
A. i. only
B. i. and ii.
C. i. and iii.
D i., il., and iii.
What was the reasoning of the United States government for placing thousands of Japanese Americans into internment camps?
A.
Japanese Americans were quarantined to prevent a small pox outbreak.
B.
The U.S government wanted to train Japanese Americans to fight in the war.
C.
The U.S. government wanted to offer protection to Japanese Americans.
D.
Many Americans were concerned about the loyalty of Japanese Americans.
Answer:
D. Many Americanas were concerned about the loyalty of Japanese Americans
Explanation:
so this was during WWII where we were fighting Japan. so the government decided to enact racist policy putting them into camps.
How was Mexico's struggle for independence similar to and different from the founding of the United States?
Answer:
Mexico was first populated more than 13000 years ago before the Spanish conquered and colonized the country in the 16th century.
What are the challenges we face today to uphold the rule of law? What about in the future?
Answer:
Anyone who holds that what matters most in politics is having the right people in power and not how power should be constrained will be unconvinced of the value of the rule of law. Neither will anyone who believes that institutions of public power are merely instruments of the ruling class that need to be dismantled rather than merely constrained. For the majority of modern democratic societies, however, the rule of law’s requirement that both rulers and the ruled be accountable to the law is of unquestionable value. To be sure, in the modern world, it is the liberal tradition that values the rule of law most highly. Liberals who are concerned with ways of protecting (and realizing) liberty in some form and averting threats to it view the rule of law as an overarching source of security. Nonetheless, there is substantial disagreement even among liberals over what exactly counts as a faithful application of the term and, even when that is pinned down, how it is to be accomplished.
In itself, the notion of the rule of law is not a faithful description of any state of affairs but a complex ideal that is even more complex to realize. Thus, there is reason to be skeptical about whether societies necessarily benefit from all that might be invoked under the term. The independence of the judiciary, for instance, is clearly a problem if the independence is misused to foster the sectoral privileges of judicial personnel or to allow unchallenged interpretations of the law. Heavy emphasis on the formal aspects of the rule of law—for example, on procedural justice—may distract from the content and consequences of those laws. Critics of a strictly formal conception of the rule of law argue that too much attention to legal process generates significant vices of its own in the form of exaggerated legalism and neglect of the political or real-world dimensions of legal conflicts. Excessive veneration of the law and legal procedures may be too costly if it inhibits independent social assessments of the merits of a given policy proposal or if the official mandate of “blindness” gives legitimacy to actions performed “according to the law” even when most people would oppose such acts. Some writers have charged, moreover, that the increasing domain of judges and lawyers—indeed, their encroachment into areas previously left to politicians and the electorate—entails the loss of much that is politically and democratically valuable.
In short, too much emphasis on procedures for preventing arbitrariness can lead to subverting the doing of justice according to what might otherwise find support in the rule of law, and the legal strictures then become themselves a form of arbitrariness that is no more legitimate. On the other hand, those who defend the negative value of the rule of law object to more substantive understandings of the ideal on the grounds that morally ambitious aspirations about the rule of law threaten to purge the concept of its specificity and usefulness. They argue that to open the concept to a whole host of extralegal considerations about substantive justice and wider societal goals is to conflate ideas about “the rule of law” with notions about “the rule of good law,” such that any distinction between the two is reduced to nothing. As a consequence, no discussion of the rule of law can be complete without some philosophical reflection on law, including on its purpose and meaning.