Explain how different themes of Greek Mythology are evident in Greek literature/drama like the Iliad and Odyssey.

If I had been a member of the British House of Commons in 1938, I would have voted against the Munich Agreement.

The Munich Agreement was a document signed between Germany, France, Italy, and Britain in 1938. It provided for the cession of the Sudetenland, a part of Czechoslovakia, to Germany in exchange for Germany's assurance not to seek any further territory in Europe. Although the agreement was seen as a way of avoiding war, it did not work as expected.

I would have voted against the Munich Agreement because I would have believed that it was a bad deal for Czechoslovakia, which was not even consulted about the agreement. Czechoslovakia was given up as if it was just a piece of property, without any regard for its people, and this would not have sat well with me.

Moreover, I would have felt that appeasement would not have worked with Germany, which was hell-bent on expanding its territory.

It was not long after the Munich Agreement was signed that Hitler broke his promise not to seek further territorial gains, and invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia. This demonstrated that the Munich Agreement had failed, and that Germany was not to be trusted.

The lesson that history teaches us is that appeasement does not work with bullies, and it only serves to embolden them.

Therefore, I would have voted against the Munich Agreement because it was a bad deal for Czechoslovakia, and because it was an ineffective way of dealing with Hitler's expansionist policies.

By taking a stand against Germany, the British government would have sent a clear message that it would not stand for aggression and territorial expansion, and this would have been more effective in preventing the outbreak of war.

To know more about Munich Agreement, click on the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/29770761#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Your answer would be : William Lloyd Garrison

Explanation:

A man of moral authority, Douglass developed into a charismatic public speaker. Prominent abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison recognized his oratory skill and hired him as a speaker for the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society.

Source From : www.nps.gov!

I have also done this quiz and found that it was correct! Wishing you the best of luck!

Answer:

a long-term effect is losing a lot of the population there because of all the diseases going around

Explanation:

During the Civil War, Nashville had a population of approximately 16,000 to 18,000 white citizens and approximately 4,000 to 5,000 black citizens.

During the Civil War, Nashville, Tennessee played a significant role as a strategic city in the Western Theater. Initially occupied by Union forces in February 1862, the city became a vital supply and transportation hub for the Union army.

The city also served as a major center for recruiting and training African American soldiers, who would go on to play a crucial role in the war. In December 1864, the Confederate Army attempted to retake Nashville, but were defeated in the Battle of Nashville. After the war, Nashville became a symbol of Reconstruction in the South, as the city experienced significant growth and economic development.

Read more about Nashville

brainly.com/question/29411067

#SPJ1

The Philippines has asserted its maritime rights over the West Philippine Sea based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and has recently filed several diplomatic protests against Chinese activities in the area.

The Philippines has a valid legal claim to the maritime areas within its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and to certain maritime entitlements beyond that, such as a continental shelf. The Philippines has also taken a number of initiatives to defend its sovereign rights, including filing a case against China in the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and conducting military exercises and drills in the area.

For such more question on United Nations:

https://brainly.com/question/909525

#SPJ11

The photograph (Source 4) depicts a family of four tending to a "victory garden".

The family is posed in a very traditional way, with the mother and father in the center, a daughter on the left, and a son on the right. This suggests that the victory garden program was seen as a family activity, with all members of the family taking part in the effort.

This implies that the victory garden program was seen as a communal activity, where all members of society worked together to contribute to the war effort. It also suggests that the war efforts on the homefront were seen as a communal responsibility, where all members of society had a role to play.

She is posed with her hands on her hips, wearing a hat and apron, and smiling confidently. Her pose suggests that she is proud of the garden that she has planted and is confident in the success of the Victory Garden program.

The Victory Garden program was a response to food shortages during World War II and allowed citizens to grow their own fruits and vegetables in their backyards. This photo suggests the success of the program and the effort that citizens put into supporting the war effort on the home front. It also serves as a reminder of the commitment and patriotism of the citizens of the United States during the war effort.

To know more about World War II, click here;

https://brainly.com/question/1449762

#SPJ4

In my opinion it is fair that every state gets two senate seats because the system of providing every state with two Senate seats was established as part of the United States Constitution so that smaller states have an equal say in government.

The idea behind it was to ensure that smaller states have an equal say in the legislative process, rather than being dominated by larger, more populous states.

This system is often debated and criticized by some who argue that it can result in disproportionate representation, with some smaller states having more influence than their population would suggest. On the other hand, others believe that it's important to protect the interests of less populated states and to maintain the federalist structure of the US government.

Learn more about senate at:

https://brainly.com/question/747425

#SPJ1

During World War II, George Marshall oversaw the Army of the United States as its chief of staff. His wartime experiences impacted creation of the Marshall Plan, which utilised American resources to rebuild Europe and foster stability and economic progress.

On September 1, 1939, the day that Germany invaded Poland to start World War II, Marshall took the oath of office as chief of staff of the United States Army.

For his work on the Marshall Plan and other contributions to world peace and understanding, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in December 1953. On October 16, 1959, General Marshall passed away at Reed Army Hospital in Washington.

To know more about World War II visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/7745710

#SPJ9

Nationalism, imperialism, economic rivalry, ideological disagreements, and geopolitical power struggles are some of the major elements that have contributed to global conflict from 1900 to the present.

Yet, the roots of this conflict are complicated and multidimensional. With the rise and fall of empires, the consequences of major economic crises, and the diffusion of novel ideas and technology, the relative importance of these factors has changed over time.

Recent decades have also seen the emergence of new potential drivers of conflict, including terrorism, environmental deterioration, and resource shortages.

Understanding these dynamics is crucial for creating a more peaceful and just world since, in the end, many different social, political, and economic forces interact and have an impact on the causes of international conflict.

Learn more about global conflict at

https://brainly.com/question/27867966

#SPJ4

The Treaty of Versailles led to World War 2 because the Germans and the allies felt that the Germans had been unfairly treated by the treaty due to the punishments and all they lost to the treaty

The Treaty of Versailles, signed on June 28, 1919, officially marked the end of World War I. The treaty imposed heavy reparations on Germany, stripped it of its territories, and forced it to accept the sole responsibility for the war.

The treaty left Germany in a state of economic and political instability, which ultimately led to the rise of Adolf Hitler and the outbreak of World War II. In this essay, we will examine how the Treaty of Versailles contributed to the outbreak of World War II.

Body paragraph:

The Treaty of Versailles imposed harsh reparations on Germany, which included the payment of billions of dollars in damages to the Allied powers. The economic burden of these reparations, coupled with the loss of territories and resources, left Germany in a state of economic distress. Inflation soared, unemployment rates skyrocketed, and poverty became widespread. The German people felt humiliated and bitter about the terms of the treaty, and their resentment fueled the rise of extremist political parties, such as the Nazi Party, led by Adolf Hitler.

Hitler promised to restore Germany's glory and reclaim its lost territories, and his rhetoric appealed to many Germans who were eager to regain their national pride. As Hitler rose to power, he began to violate the terms of the Treaty of Versailles by rearming Germany and annexing neighboring countries, which eventually led to the outbreak of World War II.

In conclusion, the Treaty of Versailles played a significant role in the outbreak of World War II. Its harsh terms left Germany in a state of economic and political instability, which ultimately paved the way for the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party.

Hitler's aggressive policies violated the terms of the treaty, leading to the eventual invasion of neighboring countries and the outbreak of war. The Treaty of Versailles serves as a reminder of the importance of finding a fair and equitable resolution to conflicts to prevent the rise of extremist ideologies and the outbreak of war.

Read more on treaty of Versailles here:https://brainly.com/question/3604628

#SPJ1

Answer: true, buddha and greek philosophical schools attributed the human problem to ignorance.

Explanation: Yes, that is correct. The Buddha taught that ignorance or "avidya" is one of the root causes of suffering and human problem.

Similarly, many Greek philosophical schools, such as the Socratic, Platonic, and Aristotelian traditions, also believed that ignorance or "agnoia" was a primary cause of human problems. They believed that by gaining knowledge and wisdom, humans could overcome their ignorance and achieve a better understanding of themselves and the world around them.

Both the Buddha and the Greek philosophical schools recognized the importance of knowledge and understanding in addressing the fundamental human problems of suffering and ignorance.

https://brainly.com/question/11471661

The trans-Saharan trade increased dramatically in the first centuries CE due to the introduction of the camel as a reliable mode of transportation. Before this, goods were transported through caravans on foot, which was extremely slow and tedious.

The introduction of the camel, which was capable of carrying heavier loads in a shorter time, allowed goods to be transported more efficiently and over longer distances.

1. Prior to the introduction of the camel, goods were transported through caravans on foot, making travel slow and tedious.

2. The introduction of the camel as a reliable mode of transportation allowed goods to be transported more efficiently and over longer distances.

3. As a result, the trans-Saharan trade increased dramatically in the first centuries CE.

To know more about trans-Saharan refer to-

brainly.com/question/28904415#
#SPJ11

The main reason that the Texas Constitution of 1876 would have pleased many former Confederates is that it reduced the power of the state government and limited the rights of African Americans.

It provided few restrictions on corporations and limited government interference in the economy. It also extended voting rights to all men, regardless of race or previous status as a Confederate soldier.

The Texas Constitution of 1876 removed the Reconstruction-era requirements that the state's governor and lieutenant governor be of different political parties.

This meant that former Confederates, who largely held a single political affiliation, were more likely to be represented in government.

Furthermore, African Americans had few rights and few options for legal recourse against oppression. The limited government interference in the economy was also attractive to former Confederates, as it allowed them to remain economically successful and autonomous.

Finally, the extension of voting rights to all men, regardless of race or previous Confederate status, was a major draw for former Confederates.

To know more about Confederates click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/11649223#

#SPJ11

Answer:  No.

Explanation:

Hope It Helps

The wisdom of US involvement in Vietnam is a complex issue with arguments on both sides.

what does Hawks argue and what was the war?

Hawks argued that the US needed to contain the spread of communism and protect its allies in Southeast Asia. They believed that the US had a moral obligation to defend democracy and human rights against the threat of communism.

Doves, on the other hand, argued that the war was a costly and unnecessary intervention in a civil conflict that the US had no business in. They believed that the war was causing unnecessary death and suffering, and that the US should focus on domestic issues instead.

The war between the US and Vietnam, commonly known as the Vietnam War, was a conflict that took place from 1955 to 1975. The war began as a result of the US's involvement in the Cold War and its policy of containing the spread of communism. The US provided military and economic support to the South Vietnamese government, which was fighting against communist forces in the North led by the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army.

The war was marked by intense fighting, including guerilla warfare, bombing campaigns, and ground operations.

To know more about Vietnam War visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4292602

#SPJ1

Although it was incredibly difficult to survive the Rwandan genocide, some victims were able to flee or hide from the assailants.

Many moderate Hutus and Tutsis fled to refugee camps in nearby nations including Burundi, Tanzania, and Uganda. Others sought safety from the violence in temples, mosques, or educational institutions. Some were protected by strangers, acquaintances, or family members who put their own lives in danger to keep them hidden. Individuals who managed to survive the genocide frequently struggled to rebuild their lives after the bloodshed stopped due to the unfavorable living circumstances in refugee camps. Many survivors are still dealing with the effects of the genocide's trauma today.

Learn more about Rwandan genocide here:

brainly.com/question/20996958

#SPJ9

The Great Compromise between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists resolved the issue of representation in Congress, specifically how the number of representatives each state would receive in both legislative houses.

The compromise created a bicameral Congress, with the House of Representatives based on proportional representation based on population, and the Senate with each state receiving two representatives regardless of population.

This compromise allowed states with small populations to be represented equally in Congress, while still allowing states with larger populations to have more representation.

To know more about Federalists click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/28563784#

#SPJ11

By the time of the 1828 presidential election, a new political system had begun to emerge out of the divisions within the Republican Party is Multi-party system, the correct option is (a).

The election saw the emergence of two major political parties: the Democratic Party, which supported Andrew Jackson, and the National Republican Party, which backed John Quincy Adams. This was a significant departure from the previous political landscape, which had been dominated by a single political party, the Democratic-Republican Party.

The emergence of multiple political parties marked the beginning of a multi-party system in the United States, which has since become a defining feature of American politics. The two-party system that emerged in 1828 has persisted to this day, with the Democratic Party and the Republican Party dominating American politics, the correct option is (a).

To learn more about Republican Party follow the link:

brainly.com/question/1204107

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

By the time of the 1828 presidential election, a new had begun to emerge out of the divisions within the republican party. Multiple choice questions.

a. Multi-party system

b. System of regional alliances

c. Variable-party system

All of the actions of British caused many colonists to desire independence even more than they had before.

Colonist refers to a person who has migrated to and settled in a new area with the intention of establishing a permanent residence. Colonists can be individuals, families, or groups of people who leave their homeland to seek new opportunities or escape persecution, poverty, or other unfavorable conditions. Colonization has been a common practice throughout history, with various motivations ranging from religious or political persecution to economic gain. Colonists often face numerous challenges in adapting to their new environment, including language barriers, cultural differences, and unfamiliar terrain. They must also contend with the native inhabitants of the area they are settling, which can lead to conflicts and tensions. The legacy of colonization continues to have profound impacts on societies around the world.

To learn more about colonist, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19584698

#SPJ1

Some historians may feel that the Civil Rights Movement ended in the late 1960s because of several reasons. For example, one of the reasons could be that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 had been passed, and these laws were crucial in ending legal segregation and ensuring voting rights for African Americans.

Some historians may feel that the Civil Rights Movement ended in the late 1960s because of several reasons. For example, one of the reasons could be that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 had been passed, and these laws were crucial in ending legal segregation and ensuring voting rights for African Americans.

Another reason could be that the movement had achieved its major goals, such as desegregation and voting rights, and the focus shifted to other issues such as poverty and war. On the other hand, some historians may argue that the Civil Rights Movement did not end in the late 1960s for various reasons.

One reason could be that even though legal segregation had ended, segregation in other forms such as housing and education still existed, and these issues required continued activism. Additionally, while African Americans had gained voting rights, voter suppression still occurred, and this issue needed further attention. Another reason could be that the movement had a lasting impact on American society, and the struggle for civil rights continued in various forms after the 1960s.
Some historians may feel that the Civil Rights Movement ended in the late 1960s due to the following reasons:
1. Major legislation: The passage of key civil rights legislation, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968, addressed many of the movement's primary goals related to ending racial segregation and discrimination.
2. Assassination of key leaders: The assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968 and Malcolm X in 1965 removed influential voices from the movement, potentially weakening its momentum.
3. Shift in focus: The 1960s saw a shift in focus towards other social issues such as the anti-Vietnam War movement, the feminist movement, and the environmental movement, which may have diverted attention away from civil rights issues.

On the other hand, other historians may feel that the Civil Rights Movement did not end in the late 1960s due to the following reasons:

1. Continued struggles for equality: Racial disparities in areas such as education, income, and criminal justice persisted beyond the 1960s, indicating that the fight for civil rights was not yet over.
2. Ongoing activism: Civil rights activism continued after the 1960s with organizations such as the Black Panthers, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the NAACP continuing their work towards racial equality.
3. Modern-day civil rights movements: Contemporary movements, such as Black Lives Matter, suggest that the struggle for civil rights is still ongoing and has evolved to address current challenges faced by marginalized communities.
In conclusion, some historians might argue that the Civil Rights Movement ended in the late 1960s due to major legislative achievements and the loss of key leaders, while others might contend that it did not end because of ongoing activism and the persistence of racial disparities.

To know more about Civil Rights Movement.

visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10557348

#SPJ11

Answer:

electoral college

Based on this picture, one interpretation of politics in the 1830s is that Andrew Jackson behaved more like a king than a president.

Jackson disliked national banks, so he withdrew all the money from it and transferred it to private institutions in the United States.

Jackson signed the specie circular, which required people to pay in gold in order to purchase public property. Despite the fact that the bank ran out of money and fell into a depression that sparked the Panic of 1837, the high demand for property was to blame.

Jackson believed that the Bank of the United States was an institution that was appointed, according to his interpretation of government authority as stated in his letter to Congress. As a result, people would not hold it accountable. According to Webster's definition of government, Jackson was criticizing a government agency.

To know more about Andrew Jackson, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27920494

#SPJ1

The Reformation movement in the sixteenth century led to the establishment of Protestantism.

The Reformation was a movement in the 16th century that saw the emergence of Protestantism. This movement was triggered by Martin Luther's 95 Theses, which were a series of criticisms of the Catholic Church.

The Reformation was characterized by the development of new denominations, which emphasized the importance of the Bible in the life of the believer. The Reformation Movement in the sixteenth century led to the establishment of Protestantism.

Protestantism is a form of Christianity that emphasizes the importance of salvation by faith alone, the authority of the Bible, and the priesthood of all believers. Protestantism is a term used to refer to a diverse range of churches that emerged after the Reformation, including Lutheran, Anglican, Presbyterian, and Baptist.

To know more about Protestantism, click on the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/11855941#

#SPJ11

Observe how inflation is a factor would be the next step for the Federal Reserve Bank.

GDP is typically used to assess changes in output. Since the amount of finished goods and services affects real GDP, a decrease in real GDP will result from a decrease in output. Thus, the price level must have decreased during the year when the nominal GDP is lower than the real GDP.

Real GDP will decline together with price level. Thus, real GDP will decline, ceteris paribus, if interest rates rise.

To know more about Reserve Bank visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/4076601

#SPJ1

Throughout the early years of World War Two, the United States stayed out of the combat thanks to its isolationist policy. Britain and France complied with Germany's demand for the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia due to the appeasement strategy.

Isolationism was a foreign policy that sought to stay out of international disputes and instead concentrated on home problems. This approach might be seen in the US's decision to stay out of the war in the early going, even though European countries were being attacked by the Nazis. A foreign policy known as appeasement sought to prevent conflict by caving in to the demands of an aggressor. In this instance, Britain and France believed that by caving in to Germany's demands, they could stop the war from spreading. Unfortunately, this strategy ultimately failed since it just gave Hitler more confidence to press his case, which ultimately sparked the start of World War Two.

To know more about World War  click here:

brainly.com/question/11823247

#SPJ4

Answer:

Article Summary:

According to an article published by Reuters in December 2021, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that executing prisoners with severe dementia or mental illness is unconstitutional. The article presents evidence showing that the court's decision is based on the idea that executing individuals with severe dementia or mental illness violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The article also highlights how some U.S. states, including Texas and Alabama, continue to execute prisoners with severe mental illnesses. This article is significant in that it highlights the ongoing debate surrounding capital punishment and the ethical implications of executing individuals with mental illnesses.

Link to the article: https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/us-supreme-court-bars-executions-prisoners-severe-dementia-2021-12-06/

Compare/Contrast:

The information presented in the article aligns with the Ethics textbook chapter's argument that capital punishment is ethically problematic due to the possibility of executing innocent people, racial and economic bias, and mental health issues. The Ethics textbook chapter further argues that the death penalty is often a form of institutionalized violence that targets marginalized communities. The article highlights how the Supreme Court's decision to prohibit the execution of individuals with severe mental illnesses is a step towards reducing the ethical concerns surrounding the death penalty. However, the article also shows how some U.S. states continue to execute prisoners with mental illnesses, indicating that much work still needs to be done to address the ethical issues surrounding capital punishment.

Reaction:

The article is both surprising and encouraging. It is encouraging to see that the Supreme Court recognizes the ethical implications of executing individuals with severe mental illnesses and that they have taken a step towards prohibiting such executions. However, it is concerning to see that some U.S. states continue to execute prisoners with mental illnesses, despite the ethical implications. This article highlights the need for continued debate and activism surrounding the death penalty, particularly in relation to the ethical concerns it raises. It is vital that we continue to work towards a more just and equitable criminal justice system that ensures that all individuals are treated with dignity and respect.

Answer:

Is this a question?

Explanation:

The publication of the Pentagon Papers had a significant impact on the United States' involvement in the Vietnam War and on public trust in the government.

The Pentagon Papers were a classified government report on the history of US involvement in the Vietnam War, revealing previously unknown details about the government's decision-making process and the true nature of the war. In 1971, The New York Times published a series of articles based on the Pentagon Papers, and subsequent legal battles led to the papers' full publication.

The release of the Pentagon Papers had several effects. First, it confirmed suspicions that the government had been misleading the public about the war and the prospects for victory. Second, it damaged public trust in the government and increased skepticism of official statements. Third, it fueled opposition to the war and increased pressure on the Nixon administration to withdraw US troops from Vietnam.

Overall, the publication of the Pentagon Papers contributed to a growing disillusionment with the government and its handling of the war, and it played a significant role in shaping public opinion and policy decisions related to the conflict.

To know  more about  pentagon papers here

https://brainly.com/question/28108792

#SPJ4