The executive branch of the UN plays a critical role in ensuring the effective functioning of the organization and advancing its mission of promoting peace, security, and human rights around the world.
The executive branch of the United Nations (UN) is responsible for implementing the decisions made by the UN's legislative and deliberative bodies. The head of the executive branch is the Secretary-General, who is elected by the General Assembly for a five-year term.
The Secretary-General is supported by a team of officials who oversee various areas of UN operations. This team includes the Deputy Secretary-General, who assists the Secretary-General in carrying out his or her duties, as well as Under-Secretaries-General and Assistant Secretaries-General who lead specific departments and offices within the UN.
The departments and offices overseen by the Secretary-General's team include political affairs, peacekeeping operations, humanitarian affairs, management, economic and social affairs, and legal affairs. Each of these departments is responsible for a different aspect of UN operations, from promoting international cooperation to providing aid to those in need.
To learn more about the executive branch
https://brainly.com/question/17816479
#SPJ4
What was the Doctrine of Nullification similar to?
The Doctrine of Nullification was similar to the concept of state sovereignty, where states believed they had the right to nullify federal laws they deemed unconstitutional.
This idea was based on the belief that the states were independent entities that formed a union and had delegated limited powers to the federal government.
The Doctrine of Nullification was most prominently seen in the lead up to the Civil War, where Southern states attempted to nullify federal laws related to slavery.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled that nullification was unconstitutional and the Civil War was fought over the issue of state sovereignty and the power of the federal government.
To know more about federal laws click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/28498485#
#SPJ11
Is America about to have a 2nd Civil War?
Yes, no, why?
Are we sectionalised?
Polarized?
How/Why/About what?
Can we agree politically? In person?
Violence?
Pass laws to help all? or few?
No, America is not about to have a 2nd Civil War. Human is Polarizing.
Divide is to polarize. When something is polarized, it is divided into two sides that are so dissimilar from one another that it appears they are from opposite poles of the earth, the North Pole and the South Pole. Political parties have historically been divided by opposing ideologies and methods of governance.
To divide into two opposing groupings those who have opposing views: The business community is divided over the issue of interest rates.
Thus, No, America is not about to have a 2nd Civil War.
For more information about Polarizing, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30002497
#SPJ1
1. Please summarize Dr. West's argument.
2. Please explain why Dr. West opens the op-ed with a reference to Frederick Douglas.
3. Please describe the purpose of Dr Wests op-ed.
4. Please explain Howard Universities motive behind the restructuring of the Classics
department.
5. What does Dr. West mean by "The Western canon is, more than anything, a conversation
among great thinkers"
In his op-ed, Dr. Cornel West argues that the decision by Howard University to eliminate its Classics department is a mistake. He believes that the Classics are an essential part of a well-rounded education and that they can help students develop critical thinking skills, deepen their understanding of Western civilization, and connect with other cultures.
Dr. West opens the op-ed with a reference to Frederick Douglass to highlight the importance of studying the Classics. Douglass was a former slave who became a prominent abolitionist and intellectual. He studied the Classics and believed that they were essential to his education and development as a thinker.
The purpose of Dr. West's op-ed is to argue against the decision by Howard University to eliminate its Classics department. He believes that this decision will be detrimental to the education of Howard students and to the study of the Classics more broadly.
Howard University's motive behind the restructuring of the Classics department is to focus on more "practical" majors that will better prepare students for the job market. The university argues that the elimination of the Classics department is part of a larger restructuring effort aimed at addressing budgetary and enrollment challenges.
When Dr. West says that "The Western canon is, more than anything, a conversation among great thinkers," he is emphasizing the idea that the Classics are not a fixed set of texts but rather an ongoing dialogue among thinkers across time and space. He believes that this conversation is essential to understanding Western civilization and that it can help us grapple with contemporary issues.
Learn more about budgetary here:
https://brainly.com/question/29798607
#SPJ4
Where was bolivia's former capital? santiago sucre almondine trafficante
The former capital of Bolivia is Sucre.
Sucre was the original capital of Bolivia before the government and administrative functions were moved to La Paz. Established in the 16th century, Sucre is a historic city with rich cultural heritage.
Although La Paz is now the administrative capital, Sucre remains the constitutional capital and an important cultural and educational center.
The terms Santiago, almondine, and trafficante are not directly related to the topic of Bolivia's former capital. Sucre is known for its well-preserved colonial architecture and was declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1991, making it a popular tourist destination.
To know more about cultural heritage click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/28665802#
#SPJ11
Who was the Prince what Appointed Haydn as composer and leader of the royal family’s personal orchestra
Count Morzin was soon forced to close his musical business due to financial setbacks, but Haydn was promptly offered a comparable position (1761) by Prince Paul Anton, the leader of the obscenely wealthy Esterházy family.
A well-equipped orchestra would frequently perform in Prince Pál Antal's palace in Eisenstadt, a tiny village around 48 kilometers (30 miles) from Vienna. In 1761, the prince assigned the almost unheard-of Haydn to the position of assistant conductor due to the sick condition of his ailing music director.
Beethoven's performance sufficiently pleased Haydn that he offered to take him under his wing as a student provided he could make travel arrangements to Vienna. Soon after his arrival in Vienna in November 1792, Beethoven started taking lessons from Haydn, but he soon grew unsatisfied.
To learn more about Haydn, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28603330
#SPJ4
Why did Britain want to colonise the Caribbean?
Determine which phrases relate to the kingdoms of Mall, Songhai, or both
founded by
Muhammad
Askia
conquered by
Moroccans
founded by
the leader
Sundiata
took advantage
of the gold-salt
trade
rose to power
after the decline
of Ghana
Mali
Songhai
Mali - founded by Sundiata, took advantage of gold-salt trade, rose to power after decline of Ghana. Songhai - founded by Muhammad, ruled by Askia, conquered by Moroccans.
"Mali" connects with the realm of Mali, while "Songhai" connects with the realm of Songhai.
"Established by Muhammad" connects with the realm of Songhai, as Muhammad Ture, otherwise called Askia the Incomparable, established the Songhai Domain in 1493 subsequent to ousting the past ruler.
"Askia" connects with the realm of Songhai, as Askia the Incomparable was an exceptionally compelling leader of the Songhai Domain who extended its region and concentrated its administration.
"Vanquished by Moroccans" connects with the realm of Songhai, as the Songhai Domain was vanquished by Moroccan powers in 1591, prompting the downfall of the domain.
"Established by the pioneer Sundiata" connects with the realm of Mali, as Sundiata Keita is credited with establishing the Mali Domain in the thirteenth hundred years.
"Exploited the gold-salt exchange" connects with both the realms of Mali and Songhai, as the two realms were arranged in the locale of West Africa where the gold-salt exchange was a significant financial movement.
"Rose to control after the downfall of Ghana" connects with the realm of Mali, as the Mali Domain arose as a predominant power in West Africa after the decay of the Ghana Realm.
To learn more about Songhai Empire, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/11344890
#SPJ4
Why did anti-abolitionists attack Elijah Lovejoy?
Answer:
Elijah Lovejoy was a journalist and Presbyterian minister who was an outspoken abolitionist in the United States in the 19th century. His newspaper, the Alton Observer, was devoted to promoting the cause of abolition and advocating for the immediate emancipation of slaves.
Anti-abolitionists, who were opposed to the abolitionist movement and the idea of emancipating slaves, attacked Elijah Lovejoy because they saw him as a threat to their interests and way of life. They believed that the abolitionist movement was a direct threat to the institution of slavery, which they saw as essential to the Southern economy.
In addition to his work as a journalist and minister, Lovejoy was also involved in the Underground Railroad, a network of people who helped slaves escape to freedom in the North. This further angered anti-abolitionists, who saw him as a dangerous agitator and a threat to the social order.
Lovejoy was attacked multiple times by anti-abolitionists, and his printing press was destroyed three times. He was eventually killed by a pro-slavery mob in 1837 while defending his press. His death became a rallying cry for the abolitionist movement, and his legacy helped to galvanize support for the cause of emancipation.
Explanation:
Question 8 of 15
How are Mexico and the United States similar nations?
Check all that apply.
A. They both share identical cultures on the interior of each country.
B. They both have similar military might and culture.
C. They both share cultures, especially along the border.
D. They both work together as economic partners.
SUBMIT
Answer:
its D and C
Explanation:
hope this helps!
Why would the white people who burned Greenwood down not want the event in textbooks?
Answer: The Greenwood massacre, also known as the Tulsa race massacre, was a violent and tragic event that occurred in 1921 in Greenwood, a prosperous African American community in Tulsa, Oklahoma. During the massacre, a white mob destroyed the entire community, burning down homes, businesses, and churches and killing an estimated 300 Black people.
There could be several reasons why some white people who were responsible for the massacre or who may have supported it would not want the event to be included in textbooks:
Guilt or shame: Some individuals may not want the event to be included in textbooks because they feel ashamed or guilty about what happened. They may not want to be associated with such a horrific event, or they may fear backlash or criticism from others.
Desire to maintain power and control: Some individuals or groups may not want the event to be included in textbooks because it could challenge their power and control over the narrative of history. Acknowledging the massacre would mean recognizing the atrocities committed against the Black community and would challenge the dominant narrative that portrays white people as the heroes of American history.
Efforts to minimize or deny the event: Some individuals or groups may want to minimize or deny the event altogether because it does not align with their worldview or political agenda. They may believe that acknowledging the event would undermine their beliefs or political positions, or they may simply not believe that the event occurred or was as severe as reported.
Overall, the reasons why some white people who burned Greenwood down would not want the event to be included in textbooks are likely complex and multifaceted, involving personal, cultural, and political factors.
Explanation:
Answer:
they wanted to cover up their atrocities, escape justice, and preserve their racial and economic privilege.
Explanation:
the Tulsa race massacre was a two-day-long massacre that took place between May 31 and June 1, 1921, when mobs of white residents, some of whom had been appointed as deputies and armed by city government officials, attacked Black residents and destroyed homes and businesses of the Greenwood District in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The event remains one of the worst incidents of racial violence in U.S. history, and, for a period, remained one of the least-known: News reports were largely squelched, despite the fact that hundreds of people were killed and thousands left homeless.
One possible reason why the white people who burned Greenwood down would not want the event in textbooks is that they wanted to erase the evidence of their crimes and avoid accountability for their actions. For decades, there was no public recognition or official investigation of the massacre. The local newspapers that had covered the story were removed from archives or destroyed. The survivors and their descendants were silenced by fear, intimidation, and legal threats. The state and city governments did not acknowledge or compensate the victims for their losses. The history of Greenwood and its prosperous Black community was largely forgotten or distorted.Another possible reason why the white people who burned Greenwood down would not want the event in textbooks is that they wanted to maintain their racial supremacy and economic dominance over the Black population. One factor that drove the violence was resentment toward the Black prosperity found in block after block of Greenwood, which was home to what was known as America’s Black Wall Street. The white mob looted and burned down hundreds of businesses, including grocery stores, hotels, nightclubs, theaters, doctor’s offices, and churches. They also killed hundreds of residents and drove thousands out of their homes. By destroying Greenwood, they eliminated a source of competition and inspiration for Black people across the nation. They also prevented the accumulation and transmission of generational wealth that could have shaped and secured the fortunes of Black children and grandchildren.
Therefore, some possible reasons why the white people who burned Greenwood down would not want the event in textbooks are that they wanted to cover up their atrocities, escape justice, and preserve their racial and economic privilege.
How did the shogun control japanese society during the 12th century?
they studied christian teachings.
they used military power to enforce laws.
they farmed crops for the emperors.
they traded with european monarchs.
During the 12th century, the shogun in Japan controlled society primarily through the use of military power to enforce laws. They relied on samurai warriors to maintain order and suppress any uprisings. Additionally, the shogun implemented a feudal system that ensured loyalty and obedience from local lords and their vassals. The shogun did not study Christian teachings, farm crops for the emperors, or trade with European monarchs, as these were not significant factors in their control of Japanese society at that time.
Explanation:
The emperor really appointed the shoguns, who were hereditary military leaders. Despite working closely with other social classes in Japanese society, the shoguns themselves held true power. Shoguns worked with government employees who oversaw things like trade and taxation.
What do you mean by using military force to uphold the law?
Instances of martial law, which temporarily replaces civilian authority with military authority, are frequently brought about by conflict, uprisings, or natural disasters. When martial law is in effect, the military ruler of a territory or country has full authority to enact and enforce laws.
to know more about military power to enforce laws.
https://brainly.com/question/29454141
#SPJ11
From the article "Time Travel Is A Fun Science Fiction Story But Could It Be Real?",
Albert Einstein's Theory of Relativity is described as what?
The pulling force of gravity causes space to curve and causes time to slow down.
Everything is relative to where you are on only Earth.
Space and time are different things
Einstein never thought of the Theory of Relativity
Actually, the statement that "Einstein never thought of the Theory of Relativity" is incorrect. In fact, Einstein is the one who proposed the theory of relativity. The article "Time Travel Is A Fun Science Fiction Story But Could It Be Real?" discusses the concept of time travel and explores the possibility of it being real based on the principles of relativity.
The theory of relativity is a fundamental concept in physics that explains how time and space are relative to each other and how they are affected by gravity. It has been proven through numerous experiments and observations, and is considered one of the most important scientific breakthroughs in history.
To know more about theory of relativity, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/31293268#
#SPJ11
Arrange the following 9 (nine) events in chronological order: 1. caesar invades italy by crossing the rubicon river 2. caesar requests an extension of his 2nd command in gaul 3. caesar's first term as consul 4. crassus defeated and killed in parthia 5. death of caesar's daughter and pompey's wife julia 6. invasion of britain by caesar 7. renewal of caesar's 1st command in gaul 8. seige of alesia, surrender of vercingetorix 9. senate orders caesar to surrender his command of gaul early brainly
In chronological order, the events are as follows: Caesar's first term as consul, Caesar requests an extension of his 2nd command in Gaul, Renewal of Caesar's 1st command in Gaul, Death of Caesar's daughter and Pompey's wife Julia, Siege of Alesia, surrender of Vercingetorix,
Crassus was defeated and killed in Parthia, Senate orders Caesar to surrender his command of Gaul early, Caesar invades Italy by crossing the Rubicon River, and finally, he Invasion of Britain by Caesar. These events were important in shaping the political and military landscape of ancient Rome and Caesar's rise to power as a military leader and politician.
Learn more about Caesar
https://brainly.com/question/1324420
#SPJ4
What statement best explains why most of the greatest artistic undertakings of the Byzantine Empire were religious in nature? The Byzantine Empire was originally part of the Roman Empire The Byzantine Empire combined the Christian church and state. The Byzantine Empire moved its capital from Rome. The Byzantine Empire was ruled by Constantinel.
The statement that best explains why most of the greatest artistic undertakings of the Byzantine Empire are b. The Byzantine Empire combined the Christian church and state.
The Byzantine Empire was established after Roman Emperor Constantine was able to take control of the Eastern region of Rome after it had been taken from him by his brother-in-law. The Byzantine Empire was renowned for its strong relationship between the Church and the State, where the emperor served as both head of the Church and political leader.
It merged the Christian church and state. As a result, many of greatest artistic endeavors of this magnificent Empire were centred on religious subjects. Religious art was considered as a method to portray the splendour of the empire and the authority of the Church.
Read more about Byzantine Empire on:
https://brainly.com/question/28037691
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
What statement best explains why most of the greatest artistic undertakings of the Byzantine Empire were religious in nature?
a. The Byzantine Empire was originally part of the Roman Empire
b. The Byzantine Empire combined the Christian church and state.
c. The Byzantine Empire moved its capital from Rome.
d. The Byzantine Empire was ruled by Constantine.
How did slavery change over time in Britain and the United States?
Answer:
Explanation:
Hundreds of thousands of Africans, both free and enslaved, aided the establishment and survival of colonies in the Americas and the New World.
According to the Brown vs.
BOE ruling, the doctrine of
"separate but equal" is which of
the following?
A. Constitutional
B. Up to the states
C. Unconstitutional
According to the Brown vs. BOE ruling, the doctrine of "separate but equal" is unconstitutional. Therefore Option D is correct
The perfect court docket, in a unanimous decision, declared that separate educational centers for Black and white college students were inherently unequal and violated the equal safety clause of the 14th modification to the U.S. constitution.
The ruling invalidated the felony precedent set by means of the Plessy vs. Ferguson case of 1896, which had upheld the constitutionality of segregation beneath the "separate but equal" doctrine.
The Brown vs. BOE decision marked a good sized turning point within the Civil Rights movement and paved the way for similarly legal challenges to segregation and discrimination.
Learn more about Brown vs. BOE ruling:-
https://brainly.com/question/30489023
#SPJ4
Complete Question:-
According to the Brown vs BOE ruling, the doctrine of "separate but equal" is which of the following?
A. Constitutional
B. Up to the states
C .Up to the Country
D. Unconstitutional
Where did German communists take their orders from?
Answer:
German communists took their orders from the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU). The CPSU was the ruling party of the Soviet Union and it had a great deal of influence over communist parties around the world. The CPSU provided financial and logistical support to communist parties in other countries, and it also issued directives on how they should operate. German communists were expected to follow the CPSU's lead, and they were often punished if they did not.
The CPSU's influence over German communists was particularly strong during the Cold War. The Soviet Union was seen as the leader of the communist world, and German communists were expected to toe the party line. The CPSU's influence began to decline after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, and it has been virtually nonexistent since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
examples of civil cases from a lower court
Answer:
Explanation:
Examples of civil cases from a lower court could include:
Small Claims Court: Cases involving disputes over small amounts of money or property, typically up to a certain monetary limit set by law. Examples may include disputes over unpaid debts, damage to property, or breaches of contract.
Family Court: Cases involving family law matters such as divorce, child custody and visitation, child and spousal support, domestic violence, and adoption.
Traffic Court: Cases involving traffic violations such as speeding, reckless driving, parking violations, and other infractions related to motor vehicles.
Landlord-Tenant Court: Cases involving disputes between landlords and tenants, such as eviction proceedings, rent disputes, and claims related to property maintenance or repairs.
Probate Court: Cases involving the administration of estates, including wills, trusts, and probate of assets after a person's death.
Small Claims Court: Cases involving disputes over small amounts of money or property, typically up to a certain monetary limit set by law. Examples may include disputes over unpaid debts, damage to property, or breaches of contract.
Contract Disputes: Cases involving disputes over contracts, including breach of contract, enforcement of contract terms, and disputes related to performance, payment, or interpretation of contracts.
Tort Cases: Cases involving civil wrongs or injuries caused by one party to another, such as personal injury cases, property damage, defamation, and negligence claims.
Consumer Protection Cases: Cases involving disputes between consumers and businesses, such as product liability, unfair business practices, and consumer fraud.
Employment Disputes: Cases involving disputes between employers and employees, such as wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, wage and hour disputes, and workplace safety issues.
Why did militarism erode diplomacy
Answer:
The military establishments became increasingly influential, particularly in Germany and Austria under the influence of Bulow and Conrad. Diplomats could not match either the tactical or strategic arguments of the generals, nor their rationalizations for mobilizations and counter mobilizations.
What were some of the restrictions that hitler placed on german jews?.
Adolf Hitler's regime placed a wide range of restrictions on German Jews, including legal, social, economic, and political measures that aimed to isolate and discriminate against the Jewish population.
Adolf Hitler's regime in Germany implemented a variety of legal, social, economic, and political restrictions on Jews in the years leading up to World War II. These measures were part of a broader plan to isolate and discriminate against Jewish people in German society, and eventually to commit genocide against them.
One of the key laws that Hitler passed was the Nuremberg Laws, which defined Jews as a separate race and stripped them of their citizenship, civil rights, and property. These laws prohibited Jews from marrying non-Jews and from having sexual relations with Germans. They also made it easier for the Nazi government to identify and isolate Jews for persecution. In addition to the Nuremberg Laws, the Nazi regime implemented a series of restrictions on Jewish employment and education. Jews were banned from working in most professions, including civil service, journalism, teaching, and law.
To know more about Adolf Hitler, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/3905550
#SPJ4
Why was the oral tradition important in Africa?
Answer:
Explanation:The oral tradition was important in the region because it preserved knowledge, passed on cultural values, and transmitted memories from one generation to the next.
9. What does it mean to live in a global marketplace?
A. We are able to shop in places designed to attract people from all over the world.
B. Nobody is able to impose any restrictions on what we are able to buy and sell.
C. Many of the things we wear, use, or eat ever day come from other countries.
D. We are only able to buy things from one country.
Living in a global marketplace means that we have access to goods and services from all over the world, which increases availability and competition. Thus option C is correct.
Living in a global marketplace means that our world is economically interconnected and interdependent. It implies that products, services, and ideas may freely flow across borders, allowing individuals and corporations to conduct global trade. This has boosted the availability of items from throughout the world, as well as competitiveness, creativity, and cultural interaction.
It also means that firms and consumers have access to a larger market and a wider choice of products, but it also brings with it new issues in terms of legislation, labour practises, and environmental effects. Finally, living in a global marketplace necessitates navigating the complexity of a globally interconnected world while weighing the advantages and disadvantages of globalisation.
Learn more about the marketplace:
https://brainly.com/question/31686926
#SPJ4
Which claim about the constitution best reflects the point of view that marshall expresses his bicentennial speech? help please! i keep getting these 2 questions wrong.
In his bicentennial speech, Marshall emphasized the importance of the Constitution as a document that established the framework for a strong federal government. He argued that the Constitution was not only a legal document but also a moral one and that it was essential to uphold the principles it embodied to maintain a just and free society.
The claim that best reflects Marshall's point of view in his bicentennial speech is that the Constitution is a vital and enduring document that serves as the foundation for American democracy and should be upheld and respected. Marshall's speech also emphasized the need for the judiciary to interpret the Constitution in a way that upheld its principles and protected individual rights. He argued that the Supreme Court had a crucial role in ensuring that the government remained within the limits set by the Constitution and that it was essential to maintain the balance of power between the different branches of government.
Know more about the bicentennial speech:
https://brainly.com/question/17919459
#SPJ11
How can a speech or public statement resonate differently with various audiences, depending upon their point of view?
A speech or public statement can resonate differently with various audiences depending on their point of view due to factors like cultural background, personal beliefs, and emotional connection.
The speaker's message may be interpreted differently based on the audience's prior experiences and knowledge. Additionally, the use of language, tone, and rhetoric can impact how well the message is received. Some individuals might feel inspired, while others may feel indifferent or even offended by the same speech.
To effectively communicate with diverse audiences, it's essential for the speaker to consider these factors and adapt their message accordingly, aiming for inclusivity and empathy to maximize resonance with different listeners.
To know more about cultural background visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11079603
#SPJ11
Choose the word or phrase that best completes each sentence about the origins of the Bill of Rights.
The ? idea that government should protect human rights influenced the US Bill of Rights.
The ? was the first document to limit a king’s power and give people a say in government.
The Bill of Rights comprise the first ? amendments to the US Constitution.
The United States Constitution ratified the Bill of Rights in 1791, a compilation of amendments intended to limit the government’s authority and ensure fundamental personal freedoms for all Americans.
As early as the notion of natural rights, it was assumed that protection of human liberties such as free speech, religion, and legal procedure were imperative federal obligations.
Read more on Bill of rights here:https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ1
Answer:
Enlightenment, Magna Carta, and 10.
Explanation:
3.2.6 Quiz: The Rise and Fall of Rome
Which of these statements best compares the Roman Republic with ancient
Greece's direct democracy?
OA. The Roman concept of appointing a dictator to rule during times
of crisis came directly from Greek direct democracy. So the
Roman Republic had no voters.
OB. In both forms of government, voters elected representatives.
Those representatives were the only people who could vote on
specific laws.
OC. Voters elected representatives in the Roman Republic. In the
Greek direct democracy, voters themselves enacted laws and
policies.
D. Greek direct democracy was a form of monarchy, so there were no
voters In the Roman Republic voters elected representatives who
Enacted law and policies
A(n) ______ responsibility originated in natural law before any government existed
A natural responsibility is one that originates in natural law before any government existed.
This type of responsibility is based on the belief that individuals have certain inherent rights and obligations that are independent of the laws and regulations of any particular society.
The idea of natural responsibility can be traced back to the ancient Greeks, particularly to the philosopher Aristotle, who argued that humans have a natural inclination to seek the good and to live a virtuous life.
The concept of natural responsibility has been embraced by many political philosophers, including John Locke and Thomas Jefferson, who argued that all people have the right to life, liberty, and property.
These rights are not granted by any government but are inherent in human nature. According to this view, government exists to protect these natural rights and to promote the well-being of its citizens.
Overall, the concept of natural responsibility emphasizes the importance of individual rights and obligations, regardless of the laws and regulations of any particular society or government. It serves as a reminder that humans have certain inherent responsibilities and that governments exist to protect these responsibilities, rather than to create them.
To know more about natural law refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/21628970
#SPJ11
Please help hurry I’ll mark brainly
Write a letter to president Truman advising him of the consequences a decision to use nuclear warfare will have on the world choose weather to advise him to drop the bomb or not drop the bomb but u must include the topics in the picture below
Answer:
Hello, Mr. President Truman I'm writing to you today to offer you some advice on the choice to wage nuclear war on Japan. As a concerned citizen, I strongly advise you to consider the long-term effects of using nuclear warfare. The use of such weapons will not only cause immediate destruction but also have devastating consequences for the environment and future generations.
The United States was poised to win the Pacific Theater of World War II as of July 1945. The Allied Powers, which included New Zealand, Australia, and Great Britain, supported the nation. With its military force reduced and its economy in ruins, Japan was in a weak position. The military and industrial capabilities of Japan had already suffered significant harm from the United States.
There were a lot of people living in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which had respective populations of about 255,000 and 195,000. These cities were well-known for their historical and industrial significance, and they were home to numerous significant structures and factories. Nagasaki was a significant port city, while Hiroshima was a significant military hub.
The use of nuclear weapons by the United States could have serious political consequences. Some people think the choice was made for racial reasons, while others think it was made for political reasons to send a message to the Soviet Union. This might trigger a new Cold War arms race and raise tensions between the US and other nations. Nuclear war would have terrible consequences on both the physical world and humans.
Finally, I implore you to think carefully about each of these aspects before deciding whether to use nuclear weapons. This is not a choice to be made lightly because it will have a significant impact on the entire world. I'm hoping you'll consider my suggestions as you make this challenging choice.
Sincerely,
heyyyyy2746
Explanation:
write 5-7 sentences minimum as to why this source supports the new deal.
The New Deal was a series of programs and policies implemented by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1930s to address the economic challenges of the Great Depression.
What was Great Depression?The Great Depression was a severe global economic downturn that lasted from 1929 to 1939. It originated in the United States with the stock market crash of October 1929 and quickly spread to other countries. The depression was characterized by a massive decline in output, severe unemployment, bank failures, and widespread poverty. Governments struggled to respond effectively, and many policies worsened the situation. The depression ultimately ended with the onset of World War II, which created massive government spending, increased employment, and stimulated economic growth. The Great Depression had a profound impact on the world, leading to fundamental changes in economic theory, government policies, and the structure of the global economy.
To learn more about Great Depression, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31256235
#SPJ1
In the ancient Roman Republic, two officials called “consuls” made up the executive branch of government. Each consul had power to reject an action of the other consul. Consuls served one-year terms.
This information explains how Romans
Responses
created laws.
created laws.
elected officials.
elected officials.
limited the power of leaders.
limited the power of leaders.
established rules for campaigns.