which of the following is true for normal distributions? group of answer choices kurtosis is always less than 1 the range of the random variable is bounded the mean, mode, and median are all equal skewness is always greater than 1
The following statement is true for normal distributions: the mean, mode, and median are all equal.
A normal distribution is a continuous probability distribution that is symmetric around its mean value, forming a bell-shaped curve. The mean, mode, and median of a normal distribution are all equal. The range of the random variable for a normal distribution is unbounded, meaning that it can take on any real value. Kurtosis, which is a measure of the "peakedness" of the distribution, can take on values less than, equal to, or greater than 1 depending on the shape of the distribution. Finally, the skewness of a normal distribution is always 0, meaning that the distribution is perfectly symmetric. Therefore, out of the options given, the statement "the mean, mode, and median are all equal" is true for normal distributions.
To know more about normal distribution,
https://brainly.com/question/31197941
#SPJ11
I need help showing work for this
check it now my dear brother
Scientists are measuring the thickness of ice on a large lake. When they first measure the ice, it is 3. 1 inches thick. Three weeks later the ice was measured to be 5. 5 inches thick. At what rate is the thickness of the ice growing in inches per week?
For measuring the thickness of ice on a large lake, the rate of the thickness of the ice growing in inches per week is equals to the 0.8 per week.
Growth rate is calculated by dividing the difference between the ending and intital values to the time period for analyzed. A scientists who are measuring thickness of ice on a large lake. In first measure, the intial thickness of ice = 3.1 inches
After three weeks that is 21 days, the thickness of ice= 5.5 inches
Number of weeks = 3
We have to determine the rate of thickness of the ice growing in inches per week. Using rate of thickness formula, the rate of thickness of the ice growing in inches per week = ratio of difference in thickness of ice to the number of weeks
The difference in thickness of ice = 5.5 inches - 3.1 inches = 2.4 inches
So, rate = [tex]\frac{2.4}{3} [/tex]
= 0.8 inches per week
Hence, required value is 0.8 inches per week.
For more information about growth rate, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/12081555
#SPJ4
ree-ring dating from archaeological excavation sites is used in conjunction with other chronologic evidence to estimate occupation dates of prehistoric Indian ruins in the southwestern United States. Suppose it is thought that a certain pueblo was occupied around 1292 A.D. (based on evidence from potsherds and stone tools). The following data give tree-ring dates (A.D.) from adjacent archaeological sites:1189 1267 1268 1275 1275 1271 1272 1316 1317 1230(ii) Assuming the tree-ring dates in this excavation area follow a distribution that is approximately normal, does this information indicate that the population mean of tree-ring dates in the area is different from (either higher or lower than) 1292 A.D.? Use a 1% level of significance.
The P-value is greater than the level of significance of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is: not enough evidence to suggest that the population mean of tree-ring dates is different from 1284 A.D. at the 5% level of significance.
(a) The sample mean is x = 1271.8 A.D. and the sample standard deviation is s = 35.8 yr.
(b) To test whether the population mean of tree-ring dates is different from 1284 A.D., we can use a one-sample t-test with the null hypothesis H0: μ = 1284 and the alternative hypothesis Ha: μ ≠ 1284, where μ is the population mean of tree-ring dates. Using a calculator or a t-table, the sample test statistic is calculated as:
t = (x - μ) / (s / √n) = (1271.8 - 1284) / (35.8 / √10) = -1.263
(c) The P-value for this test is the probability of obtaining a sample mean as extreme or more extreme than 1271.8 if the null hypothesis is true. Since this is a two-tailed test and the calculated t-value is negative, we need to find the area in the left tail and right tail of the t-distribution with 9 degrees of freedom.
From a t-table or using a calculator, we find the area in the left tail to be 0.1295 and the area in the right tail to be 0.1295. Therefore, the P-value is the sum of the two tail probabilities, which is P = 2 × 0.1295 = 0.259.
Since the P-value is greater than the level of significance of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the population mean of tree-ring dates is different from 1284 A.D. at the 5% level of significance.
To know more about hypothesis, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30751004#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
Tree-ring dating from archaeological excavation sites is used in conjunction with other chronologic evidence to estimate occupation dates of prehistoric Indian ruins in the southwestern United States. Suppose it is thought that a certain pueblo was occupied around 1284 A.D. (based on evidence from potsherds and stone tools). The following data give tree-ring dates (A.D.) from adjacent archaeological sites:
1189 1267 1268 1275 1275 1271 1272 1316 1317 1230
(i) Use a calculator with sample mean and standard deviation keys to find x and s. (Round your answers to one decimal place.)
x = A.D.
s = yr
(ii) Assuming the tree-ring dates in this excavation area follow a distribution that is approximately normal, does this information indicate that the population mean of tree-ring dates in the area is different from (either higher or lower than) 1284 A.D.? Use a 5% level of significance.
(a) What is the level of significance?
(b) What is the value of the sample test statistic? (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
(c) Find the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
Find the extremum of f(x,y) subject to the given constraint, and state whether it is a maximum or a minimum. f(x,y) = x^2 + y^2 – xy ; x + y = 6
The extremum of f(x,y) subject to the constraint x + y = 6 is a minimum at the point (2,4).
To find the extremum, we can use the method of Lagrange multipliers. Let g(x,y) = x + y - 6 be the constraint function. Then, the system of equations to solve is: ∇f(x,y) = λ∇g(x,y) g(x,y) = 0
Taking partial derivatives, we have: ∂f/∂x = 2x - y
∂f/∂y = 2y - x
∂g/∂x = 1
∂g/∂y = 1
Setting the equations equal to each other and solving for x and y, we get: 2x - y = λ
2y - x = λ
x + y = 6
Solving for λ, we get λ = 2. Substituting into the first two equations, we get:
2x - y = 2
2y - x = 2
Solving this system of equations, we get x = 2 and y = 4.
To know more about equations, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29174899#
#SPJ11
Find f. f'(t) = 2 cos(t) + sec^2(t), -1/2
The function f(t) is equal to the antiderivative of f'(t) = 2 cos(t) + sec²(t), -1/2.
To find the antiderivative, we need to integrate 2 cos(t) + sec²(t) with respect to t. Using the trigonometric identity, sec²(t) = 1/cos²(t), we can rewrite the integral as: ∫[2cos(t) + sec²(t)]dt = ∫[2cos(t) + 1/cos²(t)]dt
Now, using the power rule of integration, we can integrate each term separately:
∫2cos(t) dt = 2sin(t) + C1
∫1/cos²(t) dt = ∫sec²(t) dt = tan(t) + C2
where C1 and C2 are constants of integration.
Therefore, the antiderivative of f'(t) is given by:
f(t) = 2sin(t) + tan(t) - 1/2
Note that the constant of integration is represented by -1/2 instead of C, since the original problem specifies the initial condition f'(t) = 2 cos(t) + sec²(t), -1/2.
To know more about variable , refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/2466865#
#SPJ11
Find the area of the region inside the inner loop of the limaçon r=3−6cosθ.The area of the region is? (Use pi as needed)
Answer: Therefore, the area of the region inside the inner loop of the limaçon r = 3 - 6 cosθ is approximately 14.14 square units.
Step-by-step explanation: The limaçon is given by the equation r = 3 - 6 cosθ.
The inner loop of the limaçon occurs when 0 ≤ θ ≤ π, where r = 3 - 6 cosθ is positive.
To find the area of the region inside the inner loop, we need to integrate the expression for the area inside a polar curve, which is given by the formula A = 1/2 ∫[a,b] r^2(θ) dθ.
For the inner loop of the limaçon, we have a = 0, b = π, and r = 3 - 6 cosθ. Therefore, the area of the region inside the inner loop is:
A = 1/2 ∫[0,π] (3 - 6 cosθ)^2 dθ
= 1/2 ∫[0,π] (9 - 36 cosθ + 36 cos^2θ) dθ
= 1/2 [9θ - 36 sinθ + 12 sin(2θ)]|[0,π]
= 1/2 [9π]
= 4.5π
Hope this Helps :D
xfind the centroid (\bar x,\bar y) of the region bounded by: y = 2 x^2 9 x, \ \ \ y = 0 , \ \ \ x = 0, \ \ \ \mbox{and} \ \ \ x = 7
The centroid of the region bounded by y=2x^2-9x, y=0, x=0 and x=7 is (3.5, -11.375/14).
To find the centroid, we need to calculate the area of the region and the x and y coordinates of the centroid.
First, we find the intersection points of the parabola y=2x^2-9x with the x-axis, which are x=0 and x=4.5.
The area of the region is then given by the definite integral of the parabola between x=0 and x=4.5:
A = ∫0^4.5 (2x^2-9x) dx = [2/3 x^3 - 9/2 x^2]0^4.5 = 81/4
Next, we use the formulas for the x and y coordinates of the centroid:
x = (1/A) ∫yxdA, y = (1/2A) ∫y^2dA
where yx and y^2 are the distances from the centroid to the x-axis and y-axis, respectively.
For the x coordinate, we have:
x = (1/A) ∫yxdA = (1/A) ∫0^4.5 x(2x^2-9x) dx = 9/8
For the y coordinate, we have:
y = (1/2A) ∫y^2dA = (1/2A) ∫0^4.5 (2x^2-9x)^2 dx = -11.375/14
Therefore, the centroid of the region is (3.5, -11.375/14).
For more questions like Integral click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/22008756
#SPJ11
Which measure should Raul use to learn how far apart the upper and the lower quartile of the distances he hit the ball are?
Take the Average of the distances the ball travelled each hit.
The average of the distances the ball travelled after each strike should be used by Raul.
To do this, multiply the total number of times he hit the ball by the sum of the total distances it travelled on each bounce, which comes to 10.
The interquartile range should be used. He hits the ball at a distance that falls between the Upper Quartile and the Lower Quartile.
He ought to take the average of the ball's infield distances.
The majority of the nine bounces that stayed infield occurred at this distance. It is unreasonable to apply any other centre metric, assuming the mean, given the outfielder.
Learn more about IQR here:
https://brainly.com/question/31207390
#SPJ1
Answer:
Raul should use the interquartile range to find how far apart the upper and lower quartiles of the distances he hit the ball are.
suppose that f(x) and g(x) are convex functions defined on a convex set c in rn and that h(x) = max
Suppose that f(x) and g(x) are convex functions defined on a convex set C in R^n and that h(x) = max{f(x), g(x)} for all x in C. Then, h(x) is also a convex function on C.
To see why this is the case, consider the definition of convexity: a function f(x) is convex on C if for any two points x1 and x2 in C and any λ between 0 and 1, the following inequality holds:
f(λx1 + (1-λ)x2) ≤ λf(x1) + (1-λ)f(x2)
Now, suppose we have two points x1 and x2 in C and let λ be a number between 0 and 1. We want to show that h(λx1 + (1-λ)x2) ≤ λh(x1) + (1-λ)h(x2).
We can write h(x) as max{f(x), g(x)}. Then, we have:
h(λx1 + (1-λ)x2) = max{f(λx1 + (1-λ)x2), g(λx1 + (1-λ)x2)}
By the definition of convexity of f(x) and g(x), we know that:
f(λx1 + (1-λ)x2) ≤ λf(x1) + (1-λ)f(x2)
g(λx1 + (1-λ)x2) ≤ λg(x1) + (1-λ)g(x2)
Therefore, we have:
h(λx1 + (1-λ)x2) ≤ max{λf(x1) + (1-λ)f(x2), λg(x1) + (1-λ)g(x2)}
Now, because f(x) and g(x) are both convex functions, we know that λf(x1) + (1-λ)f(x2) and λg(x1) + (1-λ)g(x2) are both in C. Thus, we can take the maximum of these two values, which gives us:
h(λx1 + (1-λ)x2) ≤ λmax{f(x1), g(x1)} + (1-λ)max{f(x2), g(x2)}
But by definition, we have h(x1) = max{f(x1), g(x1)} and h(x2) = max{f(x2), g(x2)}. So we can simplify this inequality to:
h(λx1 + (1-λ)x2) ≤ λh(x1) + (1-λ)h(x2)
Therefore, h(x) is a convex function on C.
To learn more about function visit;
brainly.com/question/12431044
#SPJ11
Triangle HIJ, with vertices H(-9,-7), I(-3,-8), and J(-6,-3), is drawn inside a rectangle, as shown below.
The Area of Triangle HIJ is 11 square unit.
We have,
H(-9,-7), I(-3,-8), and J(-6,-3)
So, the Area of Triangle HIJ
= (6×4) - ½(6×1 + 4×3 + 2×4)
= 24 - ½(6+12+8)
= 24 - ½(26)
= 24-13
= 11 sq units
Thus, the area of triangle is 11 sq. unit.
Learn more about Area here:
https://brainly.com/question/27683633
#SPJ1
pls help i need thisss asapp
Answer: 6.0
Step-by-step explanation:
tan 37 = x/8
x=8tan37
What is the sum of −2^3+x-3 and x^3-3x-4?
(a) Show your work.
(b) Is the sum of −2^3+x-3 and x^3-3x-4 equal to the sum of x^3-3x-4 and -2x^3+x-3? explain.
The requreid sum of the given expression is x³ - 2x - 15.
(a)
To find the sum of −2^3+x-3 and x^3-3x-4, we can simply add the two expressions:
=(-2³ + x - 3) + (x³- 3x - 4)
= (-8 + x - 3) + (x³ - 3x - 4) [since -2^3 = -8]
= (x - 11) + (x³ - 3x - 4)
= x³ - 2x - 15
Therefore, the sum of −2³+x-3 and x³-3x-4 is x³ - 2x - 15.
(b)
No, the sum of −2³+x-3 and x³-3x-4 is not equal to the sum of x³-3x-4 and -2x^³+x-3.
We can see this by simplifying the second expression:
=x³-3x-4 + (-2x³+x-3)
= -x³ - 2x - 7
Learn more about the sum of algebraic expressions here:
https://brainly.com/question/15284271
#SPJ1
Write the definite integral for the summation: lim n rightarrow infinity sigma^n_k = 1 (4 + 3k/n)^2 (3/n). integral^4_1 x^2 dx integral^7_3 (x + 4)^2 dx integral^7_1 x^2 dx integral^7_4 x^2 dx
The definite integral for the given summation is: ∫(from 4 to 7) (x + 4)^2 dx
The definite integral for the given summation is:
integral^1_0 (4 + 3x)^2 dx + integral^2_1 (4 + 3x/n)^2 dx + ... + integral^n_1 (4 + 3k/n)^2 (3/n) dx
Taking the limit as n approaches infinity and using the definition of a Riemann sum, we can rewrite this as:
integral^1_0 (4 + 3x)^2 dx = lim n rightarrow infinity sigma^n_k = 1 (4 + 3k/n)^2 (3/n)
Therefore, the definite integral for the given summation is:
integral^1_0 (4 + 3x)^2 dx.
To write the definite integral for the given summation, we first need to analyze the summation expression and understand how it corresponds to a Riemann sum. The given summation is:
lim n → ∞ Σ (4 + 3k/n)² (3/n) from k=1 to n
This summation can be recognized as a Riemann sum for a definite integral with the following structure:
Δx * f(x_k), where Δx = (b - a)/n and x_k = a + kΔx
In this case, Δx = 3/n, and the function f(x) can be determined from the term inside the sum, which is (4 + 3k/n)².
We can rewrite x_k in terms of x by using the given expression:
x_k = 4 + 3k/n => x = 4 + 3Δx
Now we need to find the limits of integration (a and b). Since x_k is a sum, we should be able to find the limits by examining the minimum and maximum values of x:
- When k = 1 (minimum), x = 4 + 3(1)/n -> x = 4 + 3/n
- When k = n (maximum), x = 4 + 3(n)/n -> x = 4 + 3
The limits of integration are a = 4 + 3/n and b = 7. As n approaches infinity, the lower limit a will approach 4. Therefore, the definite integral for the given summation is:
∫(from 4 to 7) (x + 4)^2 dx
Learn more about :
Riemann sum : brainly.com/question/30241844
#SPJ11
a researcher has collected the following sample data. 5 12 6 8 5 6 7 5 12 4 the 75th percentile is a. 7.
b. 7.5.
c. 8.
d. 9.
The 75th percentile of the given data set is 9. The correct option is d.
To find the 75th percentile, we need to first order the data from smallest to largest:
4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7, 8, 12, 12
Next, we can use the formula P = (n+1) * (k/100), where P is the percentile we want to find, n is the total number of data points, and k is the percentage we're interested in.
For the 75th percentile, k = 75. So, P = (10+1) * (75/100) = 8.25.
Since 8.25 is not a whole number, we need to interpolate between the 8th and 9th values in the ordered data set:
8th value = 8
9th value = 12
The difference between these values is 12 - 8 = 4. To find the exact value at the 75th percentile, we need to add 0.25 of this difference to the 8th value:
8 + 0.25 * 4 = 9
Therefore, the 75th percentile of the given data set is 9. Answer (d) 9 is the correct option.
To know more about data set, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/30647245#
#SPJ11
x^2-36 ------- (x-6)(x+6)
9x^2-1 --------(3x-1)(3x+1)
4x^2-16 --------4(x+2)(x-2)
part C. what's the product of each expression using properties of complex numbers?
part B. Describe any patterns or trends you noticed when finding the products in part C.
part E. Generalize the patterns you noticed in part D to create a rule or identity to describe those patterns. For example, if you notice that every time you multiply a negative number by another negative number the result is positive, we can generalize this by saying (-a)(-b) = c, where a, b, and c are all positive real numbers.
part F. Use the rule or identity you created in part E to find the factors for the expressions in the table below.
PLS helpp
When exploring elements in part C employing properties of complex numbers, an obvious pattern emerges that the final product of each expression is a real number compounded by a fixed coefficient.
This exact factor perpetually stands as equal to the amount of complex conjugate root sets existing in the primary formula.
How to explain the expressionFor illustration, in the initial equation x^2 - 36, there are two sets of complementary conjugate roots (6i and -6i) thus making this precise constant be 3. Resultingly, the total output of the equation turns out to be (x - 6)(x + 6) multiplied by 3.
Likewise with the succeeding expression 9x^2 - 1, presenting one intricate set of conjoined conjugate roots (1/3i and -1/3i), suggesting that this similar coefficient exactly equals 3. Ultimately, producing the entire outcome of the equation to be (3x - 1)(3x + 1) then multiplied by 3.
Learn more about expressions on
https://brainly.com/question/1859113
#SPJ1
Find the missing side length.
Assume that all intersecting sides meet at right angles.
Be sure to include the correct unit in your answer.
The length of the missing side is 8 centimeters.
How to find the missing side length?Notice that all the angles are of 90°.
From that, we can conclude that the total length in the left side is the same as the one in the right side, then we can write the equation:
13cm = 5cm + ?
Solving that equation we can find the length of the missing isde:
13cm - 5cm = ?
8cm = ?
That is the lenght.
Learn more about length at:
https://brainly.com/question/24487155
#SPJ1
Consider = f(x,y) – 12x2 – 3y2 + Axy This has a stationary point at (0,0) (you do not need to check this). The type of stationary point changes at a specific positive value of A. For positive values of A < the stationary point is a Above that threshold it is a
For positive values of A below this threshold, the stationary point is a saddle point. For positive values of A above this threshold, the stationary point becomes a definite maximum or minimum.
Consider the function f(x,y) – 12x2 – 3y2 + Axy, which has a stationary point at (0,0). To determine the type of stationary point, we need to examine the second-order partial derivatives of the function.
Specifically, we need to evaluate the Hessian matrix at the stationary point.
The Hessian matrix of f(x,y) is:
| -24A 2A |
| 2A -6 |
Evaluating the Hessian at (0,0) yields:
| 0 0 |
| 0 -6 |
The determinant of this matrix is 0 x -6 - 0 x 0 = 0, which means that the Hessian is indefinite. This tells us that the stationary point is a saddle point.
However, we are also told that the type of stationary point changes at a specific positive value of A. To determine this threshold value, we need to consider the discriminant of the Hessian matrix, which is:
D = (-24A)(-6) - (2A)2 = 144A2 - 4A2 = 140A2
For the Hessian to change from indefinite (saddle point) to definite (either a maximum or a minimum), we need the discriminant to be positive. This occurs when:
140A2 > 0
A > 0
Therefore, for positive values of A below this threshold, the stationary point is a saddle point. For positive values of A above this threshold, the stationary point becomes a definite maximum or minimum.
To learn more about partial derivatives click here
brainly.com/question/31397807
#SPJ11
Can someone please help me ASAP? It’s due tomorrow!! I will give brainliest if it’s all correct
i hope this helps you and am sorry in advance of this is not right.
You are going to spend no more than 5. 5 hours hiking. During the 5. 5 hours, you will take a 30 minute lunch break. You can hike at a rate of 3 miles per hour. What is the greatest number of miles that you can hike?
The greatest number of miles you can hike is 13.5 miles.
If you are going to spend no more than 5.5 hours hiking and take a 30-minute lunch break, then you will have 5 hours for hiking.
In 5 hours, you can cover a distance of:
distance = rate x time
where the rate is your speed and time is the amount of time available for hiking.
distance = 3 miles/hour x 5 hours
distance = 15 miles
However, you will be taking a 30-minute lunch break, so you need to subtract that time from the total time available for hiking:
time available for hiking = 5 hours - 0.5 hours
time available for hiking = 4.5 hours
Now you can calculate the maximum distance you can hike in 4.5 hours:
distance = rate x time
distance = 3 miles/hour x 4.5 hours
distance = 13.5 miles
Therefore, the greatest number of miles you can hike is 13.5.
Learn more about distance:
brainly.com/question/26711747
#SPJ4
pca and topic modeling a. both can operate on the term-document frequency matrix b. have the ability to extract latent dimensions from data c. help the data scientist explore and understand the data d. none of these are correct e. all of these are correct
The correct answer is e) all of these are correct. Both PCA (principal component analysis) and topic modeling operate on the term-document frequency matrix and are able to extract latent dimensions from the data.
They both aid the data scientist in exploring and understanding the data, as they can help to identify patterns and underlying themes in the data. PCA is a linear dimensionality reduction technique that can be used to identify the most important variables in a dataset, while topic modeling is a probabilistic approach to uncovering latent topics within a corpus of text. Both methods have been widely used in natural language processing and machine learning applications, and can be powerful tools for gaining insights into large, complex datasets.
PCA (Principal Component Analysis) and topic modeling are techniques that can both operate on the term-document frequency matrix, extract latent dimensions from data, and help data scientists explore and understand the data.
Therefore, the correct answer is e. all of these are correct. PCA is a dimensionality reduction technique that identifies the principal components in the data, while topic modeling is a text mining approach that uncovers hidden topics in a collection of documents. Both methods facilitate data analysis and interpretation by reducing complexity and revealing underlying patterns.
Visit here to learn more about variables : https://brainly.com/question/29583350
#SPJ11
Find,in its simplest form, the equation of the line
(a) through (2,3) with gradient 1
(b) through (-1,-1) with gradient 3/4
(c) through (1,0) and (-2,3)
(d) through (0,1) and (-1,3)
(e) through (1,2) and parallel to the line with gradient 2
The equation of the line are :
(a) y = x + 1, (b) 4y = 3x - 1, (c) y = -x + 1, (d) y = -2x + 1 and (e) y = 2x.
Slope intercept form of the line is y = mx + c, where m is the gradient and c is the y intercept.
Point slope of the line is (y - y') = m (x - x'), where m is the gradient and (x', y') is a point.
(a) Equation of the line through (2, 3) and gradient 1.
Substituting in point slope form,
y - 3 = 1 (x - 2)
y - 3 = x - 2
y = x + 1
(b) Equation of the line through (-1, -1) and gradient 3/4.
y - -1 = 3/4 (x - -1)
y + 1 = 3/4 x + 3/4
y = 3/4 x - 1/4
4y = 3x - 1
(c) Equation of the line through (1, 0) and (-2, 3).
Slope, m = (3 - 0) / (-2 - 1) = -1
y intercept = 1
y = -x + 1
(d) Equation of the line through (0, 1) and (-1, 3).
Slope, m = (3 - 1) / (-1 - 0) = -2
y - 1 = -2 (x - 0)
y = -2x + 1
(e) Equation of the line through (1, 2) and parallel to the line with gradient 2.
Two parallel lines have the same slope.
y - 2 = 2 (x - 1)
y = 2x
Learn more about Equation of Lines here :
https://brainly.com/question/21511618
#SPJ1
find the equation of the line passing through the points of (-6, 15) and (4, 5)
[tex](\stackrel{x_1}{-6}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{15})\qquad (\stackrel{x_2}{4}~,~\stackrel{y_2}{5}) \\\\\\ \stackrel{slope}{m}\implies \cfrac{\stackrel{\textit{\large rise}} {\stackrel{y_2}{5}-\stackrel{y1}{15}}}{\underset{\textit{\large run}} {\underset{x_2}{4}-\underset{x_1}{(-6)}}} \implies \cfrac{-10}{4 +6} \implies \cfrac{ -10 }{ 10 } \implies - 1[/tex]
[tex]\begin{array}{|c|ll} \cline{1-1} \textit{point-slope form}\\ \cline{1-1} \\ y-y_1=m(x-x_1) \\\\ \cline{1-1} \end{array}\implies y-\stackrel{y_1}{15}=\stackrel{m}{- 1}(x-\stackrel{x_1}{(-6)}) \implies y -15 = - 1 ( x +6) \\\\\\ y-15=-x-6\implies {\Large \begin{array}{llll} y=-x+9 \end{array}}[/tex]
To find the equation of the line passing through two points, you can use the point-slope form of a line. The slope of the line is given by the formula m = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1), where (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are the coordinates of the two points. In this case, the slope is m = (5 - 15) / (4 - (-6)) = -10/10 = -1.
The point-slope form of a line is y - y1 = m(x - x1), where (x1, y1) is one of the points on the line and m is the slope. Substituting in the values for m, x1, and y1, we get y - 15 = -1(x + 6). Simplifying this equation gives us y = -x + 9.
So, the equation of the line passing through the points (-6, 15) and (4, 5) is y = -x + 9.
Find the square root of each of the following numbers by division method. Iii)3481
v)3249
vi)1369
viii)7921
Please hurry up I need the answers :))
The square roots of 3481, 3249, 1369, and 7921 are 59, 57, 37, and 89, respectively, using the division method.
To find the square root of a number the usage of the division method, we first pair the digits of the number, starting from the proper and proceeding left. If the number of digits is odd, the leftmost digit will form a pair with a placeholder 0.
Then, we take the biggest best square that is less than or identical to the leftmost pair and write it down because the first digit of the answer. We subtract this ideal square from the leftmost pair and bring down the subsequent pair of digits.
We double the primary digit of the solution and try to find a digit that, when appended to the doubled digit, gives a product this is much less than or identical to the range acquired by means of bringing down the subsequent pair of digits. This digit is written as the following digit of the solution. The method maintains until all of the digits had been used.
Using this method, we get:
square root of 3481 = 59square root of 3249 = 57square root of 1369 = 37square root of 7921 = 89Consequently, the square roots of 3481, 3249, 1369, and 7921 are 59, 57, 37, and 89, respectively, using the division method.
Learn more about square roots:-
https://brainly.com/question/3617398
#SPJ4
suppose r balls are put into n boxes one by on at random if n denotes the number of empty boxes show that
The expected number of empty boxes: [tex]E(n) = Σk=0^n-1 P[/tex](n-k empty boxes) [tex]= n[1 - (1-1/n)^r][/tex]
We can use the principle of inclusion-exclusion to solve this problem. Let Bi be the event that the ith box is empty, for i = 1, 2, ..., n. Then, the probability that n boxes have at least one ball is given by:
P(at least one ball in each box) = 1 - P(at least one empty box)
= 1 - P(B1 or B2 or ... or Bn)
=[tex]1 - [P(B1) + P(B2) + ... + P(Bn) - P(B1 and B2) - ... - P(Bn-1 and Bn) + ... + (-1)^n-1 P(B1 and B2 and ... and Bn)][/tex]
We can find P(Bi) by using the multiplication rule: for the first ball, it can go into any of the n boxes, so [tex]P(Bi) = (1/n)^r[/tex]. For the second ball, it cannot go into the ith box, so P(Bi and [tex]Bj) = [(n-1)/n]^r[/tex], for i ≠ j. Continuing in this way, we can find P(B1 and B2 and ... and [tex]Bn) = [(n-1)/n]^r.[/tex]
Substituting these values into the above expression and simplifying, we get:
P(at least one ball in each box) = [tex]1 - Σ(-1)^k C(n,k) [(n-k)/n]^r[/tex]
where C(n,k) is the binomial coefficient "n choose k".
Therefore, the probability that there are exactly k empty boxes is:
P(n-k empty boxes) = [tex]C(n,k) [(n-k)/n]^r - C(n,k+1) [(n-k-1)/n]^r[/tex]
Finally, we can use this to find the expected number of empty boxes:
[tex]E(n) = Σk=0^n-1 P[/tex](n-k empty boxes) [tex]= n[1 - (1-1/n)^r][/tex]
To know more about inclusion-exclusion refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/10927267
#SPJ11
I NEED HELP ON THIS ASAP!!!!
In the two functions as the value of V(x) increases, the value of W(x) also increases.
What is the value of the functions?
The value of functions, V(x) and W(x) is determined as follows;
for h(-2, 1/4); the value of the functions is calculated as follows;
v(x) = 2ˣ ⁺ ³ = 2⁻²⁺³ = 2¹ = 2
w(x) = 2ˣ ⁻ ³ = 2⁻²⁻³ = 2⁻⁵ = 1/32
for h (-1, 1/2); the value of the functions is calculated as follows;
v(x) = 2ˣ ⁺ ³ = 2² = 4
w(x) = 2ˣ ⁻ ³ = 2⁻⁴ = 1/16
for h(0, 1); the value of the functions is calculated as follows;
v(x) = 2ˣ ⁺ ³ = 2³ = 8
w(x) = 2ˣ ⁻ ³ = 2⁻³ = 1/8
for h(1, 2); the value of the functions is calculated as follows;
v(x) = 2ˣ ⁺ ³ = 2⁴ = 16
w(x) = 2ˣ ⁻ ³ = 2⁻² = 1/4
for h(2, 4); the value of the functions is calculated as follows;
v(x) = 2ˣ ⁺ ³ = 2⁵ = 32
w(x) = 2ˣ ⁻ ³ = 2⁻¹ = 1/2
Learn more about functions here: https://brainly.com/question/10439235
#SPJ1
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!! the jason problem please
a cylinder has a radius of 5mm and a height of 8mm. what is the volume in terms of pi.
The volume of the given cylinder is 400π cubic millimeter.
Given that, a cylinder has a radius of 5 mm and a height of 8 mm.
We know that, the volume of a cylinder is πr²h.
Here, volume = π×5²×8
= π×25×8
= 400π
Therefore, the volume of the given cylinder is 400π cubic millimeter.
To learn more about the volume visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13338592.
#SPJ1
find all roots of the polynomial equation 2x^3 -5x^2-3x+9=0
why must this polynomial have at least one real root. explain
why
To find the roots of the polynomial equation 2x^3 - 5x^2 - 3x + 9 = 0, we can use different methods like factoring, using the Rational Root Theorem, or numerical methods such as Newton's method or the bisection method.
One possible method is using the Rational Root Theorem, which states that any rational root of a polynomial equation with integer coefficients must be of the form p/q, where p is a factor of the constant term and q is a factor of the leading coefficient.
In this case, the constant term is 9 and the leading coefficient is 2. Therefore, the possible rational roots are ±1, ±3, ±9, ±1/2, ±3/2, and ±9/2.
We can then test each of these possible roots by substituting them into the equation and checking if the result is zero. Doing this, we find that x = 3/2 is a root of the equation. To find the other roots, we can use polynomial division to factor out (2x - 3) from the polynomial. We obtain:
(2x - 3)(x^2 - x - 3) = 0
The quadratic factor x^2 - x - 3 can be factored using the quadratic formula or by completing the square, which gives us:
x^2 - x - 3 = (x - (1/2 + √(13)/2))(x - (1/2 - √(13)/2))
Therefore, the roots of the equation 2x^3 - 5x^2 - 3x + 9 = 0 are:
x = 3/2, x = 1/2 + √(13)/2, and x = 1/2 - √(13)/2.
Visit here to learn more about rational root theorem brainly.com/question/29551180
#SPJ11
A toy manufacturer's cost for producing a units of a game is given by m) - 1450+ 3.69 + 0.00069?. If the demand for the game is given by p8.6 440 how many games should be produced to maximize profit?
The cost of producing a game for a toy manufacturer is given by a formula. If the demand for the game is known, the manufacturer should produce around 1779 units to maximize profit.
The profit function P is given by [tex]P(a) = a \times p(a) - c(a)[/tex]v, where a is the number of units produced, p(a) is the price function, and c(a) is the cost function. To maximize profit, we need to find the value of a that maximizes P(a).
The demand function p(a) is given as p(a) = 8.6 - 0.00069a, where a is the number of units produced. We can substitute this into the profit function to get:
[tex]P(a) = a \times (8.6 - 0.00069a) - (1450 + 3.69a + 0.00069a^2)[/tex]
Expanding and simplifying, we get:
[tex]P(a) = 8.6a - 0.00069a^2 - 1450 - 3.69a - 0.00069a^2[/tex]
[tex]P(a) = -0.00138a^2 + 4.91a - 1450[/tex]
To find the value of a that maximizes P(a), we can take the derivative of P(a) with respect to a and set it equal to zero:
P'(a) = -0.00276a + 4.91 = 0
a = 1778.99
Therefore, to maximize profit, the manufacturer should produce approximately 1779 units of the game.
In summary, we used the cost and demand functions to derive the profit function and then found the value of a that maximizes the profit by taking the derivative of the profit function and setting it equal to zero.
The result is that the manufacturer should produce approximately 1779 units of the game to maximize profit.
To know more about demand refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29703449#
#SPJ11