Describe how to simplify the expression
3^-6
3^-4

Answer:

5 ≥ c

Step-by-step explanation:

-15≤-3c

Divide each side by -3, remembering to flip the inequality

-15/-3 ≤ -3c/-3

5 ≥ c

Answer:

c ≤ 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Since you have to divide both sides of the equation by a negative number, you have to flip the equality sign.

-15 ≤ -3c

(-15)/(-3) ≤ (-3c)/-3

5 ≥ c

c ≤ 5

====================================================

Explanation:

Here's our sample space

{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}

This is the set of all possible outcomes.

We see that {1,3,5,7,9} are odd. We have 5 odd numbers out of 10 total. The probability of getting an odd number is therefore 5/10 = 1/2. Let A = 1/2 as we'll use it later.

After we select the first card and put it back (or replace it with a copy), the stack of cards is the same as before we made that first selection. So the sample space hasn't changed. The set of values greater than 7 is {8,9,10}. We have 3 items in here out of 10 total. The probability of getting a value larger than 7 is 3/10. Let B = 3/10.

Multiply the values of A and B to get the answer

A*B = (1/2)*(3/10) = 3/20

This represents the probability of getting an odd number on the first selection, and a second card that is larger than 7. This only applies if a replacement is made on the first card. Otherwise, 3/10 would be different.

Answer:

We conclude that the mean slab thickness in the Vail region is the same as that in the region of Canada.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that slab avalanches studied in a region of Canada had an average thickness of μ = 66 cm.

A random sample of avalanches in spring gave the following thicknesses (in cm);

X: 59, 51, 76, 38, 65, 54, 49, 62, 68, 55, 64, 67, 63, 74, 65, 79.

Let [tex]\mu[/tex] = true mean slab thickness in the Vail region

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] = 66 cm      {means that the mean slab thickness in the Vail region is the same as that in the region of Canada}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] [tex]\neq[/tex] 66 cm      {means that the mean slab thickness in the Vail region is different from that in the region of Canada}

The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample t-test statistics because we don't know about population standard deviation;

                             T.S.  =  [tex]\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_n_-_1[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X[/tex] = sample mean thickness = [tex]\frac{\sum X}{n}[/tex] = 61.81 cm

             s = sample standard deviation = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{\sum (X-\bar X)^{2} }{n-1} }[/tex] = 10.64

             n = sample of avalanches = 16

So, the test statistics =  [tex]\frac{61.81-66}{\frac{10.64}{\sqrt{16} } }[/tex]  ~  [tex]t_1_5[/tex]

                                    =  -1.575

The value of t-test statistics is -1.575.

Now, at a 1% level of significance, the t table gives a critical value of -2.947 and 2.947 at 15 degrees of freedom for the two-tailed test.

Since the value of our test statistics lies within the range of critical values of t, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region.

Therefore, we conclude that the mean slab thickness in the Vail region is the same as that in the region of Canada.

Answer:

-2.95

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the functions w=y^3-4x^2y where x=e^s and y=e^t, to get dw/ds, we will use the chain rule for composite functions as shown;

dw/ds = dw/dx*dx/ds + dw/dy*dy/ds

dw/dx = -8xy

dx/ds = e^s

dw/dy = 3y²-4x²

dy/ds = 0 (since there are no s variable in the function)

Substituting the differentials into the formula above;

dw/ds = -8xy(e^s) + 3y²-4x²(0)

dw/ds = -8xy(e^s)

Substituting s = -3 and t = 5 into the resulting function;

dw/ds = -8(e^s)(e^t)(e^s)

dw/ds = -8(e^2s)(e^t)

dw/ds =  -8(e^-6)(e^5)

dw/ds = -8*0.00248*148.413

dw/ds = -2.945 ≈ --2.95 (to 2 dp)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement

3x less than two times the sum of 2X and one is written as

2( 2x + 1) - 3x

the sum of 2 and 5 is written as

2 + 5

Equate the two statements

We have

2( 2x + 1) - 3x = 2+5

Expand

4x + 2 - 3x = 7

Simplify

4x - 3x = 7 - 2

We have the final answer as

Hope this helps you

Answer:

$0.558

Step-by-step explanation:

The expected value is the sum of the value of each outcome times the chance that it happens. In this case, there are two outcomes:

Then our expected value can be calculated as:

[tex]EV=(31,000,000)(0.000000018)+(0)(1-0.000000018)=0.558[/tex]

Answer:

They are based in the investor’s country of residence

They are always traded in local currency.

Step-by-step explanation:

Stocks, in general, indicate ownership shares of a company and domestic stocks as the name suggests are stocks that are based in the investor's home country.

These domestic stocks are almost always traded in local currency and they are a great help to local investors because it eliminates the currency risk because of exchange rates which can change at any time.

Answer

They are based in the investor’s country of residence

They are always traded in local currency.

Step-by-step explanation:

Stocks, in general, indicate ownership shares of a company and domestic stocks as the name suggests are stocks that are based in the investor's home country.

These domestic stocks are almost always traded in local currency and they are a great help to local investors because it eliminates the currency risk because of exchange rates which can change at any time.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Together, they have 4 times what Linda has, plus $10. So, Linda has 1/4 of $60 = $15.

  Linda has $15

  Reuben has $25 . . . . . . $10 more than Linda

  Manuel has $30 . . . . . . twice what Linda has

Answer:

500

Step-by-step explanation:

350/70%=500

Sam's weight to the nearest stone is equal to 8.0 stone.

Given the following data:

To determine Sam's weight to the nearest stone:

In this exercise, you're required to determine Sam's weight to the nearest stone. Thus, we would convert his weight in kilograms to pounds and lastly to stone as follows:

Conversion:

1 kg = 2.2 pounds.

51 kg = [tex]51 \times 2.2[/tex] = 112.2 pounds.

Next, we would convert the value in pounds to stone:

14 pounds = 1 stone.

112.2 pounds = X stone.

Cross-multiplying, we have:

[tex]14X = 112.2\\\\X=\frac{112.2}{14}[/tex]

X = 8.01 ≈ 8.0 stone.

Read more on weight here: brainly.com/question/13833323

Answer:

Y = 6*y

Step-by-step explanation:

We have Y = b * y by a factor of 6.

That is, b = 6.

now, to find what results only in a horizontal compression of y = b * y by a factor of 6.

By transformation rule, the function would be a horizontal compression f (a * x) if a> 1.

Therefore, knowing the above, the answer would be:

Y = 6 * y

Answer:

Hello! The answer will be below!

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is 60, steps will be below....

Steps:

6 divided by 10

=0.6

And than we do (0.6 x 100)%

Which will give us 60%

Hope this helps! :)

⭐️Have a wonderful day!⭐️

Answer:

CIM

Step-by-step explanation:

C is the 3rd letter of the alphabet, A is the 1st, and B is the 2nd.

CAB = 3,1,2

Repeating for DEK:

DEK = 4,5,11

Comparing:

4−3 = 1

5−1 = 4

11−2 = 9

BED = 2,5,4, so adding the corresponding numbers:

2+1 = 3

5+4 = 9

4+9 = 13

So the code is CIM.

The code for BED is CIM. A further explanation is below.

As we know that,

then,

→ CIB = 3, 1, 2

Same as above,

→ DEK = 4, 5, 11

By comparing the values, we get

Same as above,

→ BED = 2, 5, 4

then,

Thus the above approach is appropriate.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/18804431

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The null hypothesis is usually the default statement. The alternative is the opposite of the null and usually tested against the null hypothesis

In this case study,

The null hypothesis in would be that the mean time between clicks of the second hand on a particular clock is 1 second. In symbolic form it would be u = 1

The alternative hypothesis would be that the mean time between clicks of the second hand on a particular clock is 1 not second. In symbolic form, it would be: u =/ 1

Answer:

Option A

Step-by-step explanation:

With the following data, H0:p=0.35 ; Ha:p>0.35 The p-value for this hypothesis test is 0.03. The level of significance is α=0.05.

Since the p value (0.03) is less than alpha (0.05), we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of snoring events compared to other events during a sleep study is more than 35%.

Answer:

9 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

54 divided by 18

=

3.

3 x 3 (miles per 18 min)

=

9 miles

Answer:

9 miles in 54 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Create proportions

Do it miles:minutes

In this case it would be

3:18

Then divide both sides of the proportion by three to get

1 : 6

or the statement "It takes the runner 6 minutes to run a mile."

Now create another proportion

x: 54

If he can run a mile in 6 minutes,

he can run x miles in 54 minutes.

In this case divide 54 and 6 to get 9 miles in 54 minutes.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

The correct answer is:

$12.00 and up to $15.00 (D)

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us arrange the data properly in a tabular format.

Hourly Earnings($)         6 - 9          9 - 12     12 - 15

Frequency                          16              42          10

The frequency of a distribution is the number of times that distribution occurs in a particular group of data or intervals.

From the frequency table above the following observations can be made:

Highest frequency = 42 (hourly earnings of $9 - $12)

smallest frequency = 10 ( hourly earnings of $12 - $15)

This means that among a total of 68 workers (16 + 42 + 10), the people earning $12 - $15 form the smallest group (only 10 people), while 42 workers earn $9 - $12, forming the largest majority

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We can solve each inequality apart and then see the possible solution sets.

Consider the inequality 4x+8 < -16. If we divide by 4 on both sides, we get

x+2 < -4. If we substract 2 on both sides we get x<-6. So the solution set for this inequality is the set of real numbers that are less than -6 (lie to the left of the point -6).

Consider 4x+8>4. If we divide by 4 on both sides we get x+2>1. If we substract 2 on both sides we get x>-1. So the solution set for this inequality is the set of real numbers that are bigger than -1 (lie to the right of the point -1).

So, for us to have 4x+8<-16 or 4x+8>4 we must have that either x <-6 or x>-1. So the solution set for the set of inequalities is the union of both sets, that is

[tex](\-infty, -6) \cup (-1,\infty)[/tex]

Answer:

  52/3.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are (54·53)/2 = 1431 ways the 2 jokers can be placed in the 54-card deck. We can consider those to see how the number of cards between them might work out.

Suppose we let J represent a joker, and - represent any other card. The numbers of interest can be found as follows:

For jokers: JJ---... there are 0 cards between. This will be the case also for ...

  -JJ---...

  --JJ---...

and so on, down to ...

 ...---JJ

The first of these adjacent jokers can be in any of 53 positions. So, the probability of 0 cards between is 53/1431.

__

For jokers: J-J---..., there is 1 card between. The first of these jokers can be in any of 52 positions, so the probability of 1 card between is 52/1431.

__

Continuing in like fashion, we find the probability of n cards between is (53-n)/1431. So, the expected number of cards between is ...

  [tex]E(n)=\sum\limits_{n=0}^{53}{\dfrac{n(53-n)}{1431}}=\dfrac{53}{1431}\sum\limits_{n=0}^{53}{n}-\dfrac{1}{1431}\sum\limits_{n=0}^{53}{n^2}\\\\=\dfrac{53(53\cdot 54)}{1431(2)}-\dfrac{1(53)(54)(107)}{1431(6)}=53-\dfrac{107}{3}\\\\\boxed{E(n)=\dfrac{52}{3}}[/tex]

Answer:

23/90

Step-by-step explanation:

23/90 balls are green or white

i hope this helps!

Answer:

Let the number be x

The statement

A number is increased by five is written as

x + 5

Then it's squared

So we the final answer as

Hope this helps

Using concepts of percentage,

3 is 16.63% of 22.

22 is 13.41% of 164.

0.88 is 4% of 22.

8 is 22% of 36.36.

1.1 is 5% of 22.

A percentage is a number or ratio expressed as a fraction of 100.

Let 3 be x% of 22.

[tex]=\frac{x}{100} *22 = 3\\\\=x = \frac{3*100}{22} = 13.63%[/tex]

3 is 13.63% of 22.

Let 22 be y % of 164.

[tex]=\frac{y}{100} *164 = 22\\\\=y = \frac{22*100}{164} = 13.41%[/tex]

13.41% of 164 is 22.

4% of 22 = 0.88

[tex]\frac{4}{100}*22 = 0.88[/tex]

Let 8 is 22% of z.

[tex]\frac{22}{100}*z = 8\\ \\z = \frac{8*100}{22} = 36.36[/tex]

5% of 22 = 1.1

[tex]\frac{5}{100}*22 = 1.1[/tex]

Learn more about percentage here

https://brainly.com/question/24159063

#SPJ2

Answer:

A) it is not an experiment it is an observational study/analysis

B) i)Foods high in fats and sugar affects IQ  (ii)Foods that contain the required classes of food affects IQ positively

Step-by-step explanation:

A) An analysis carried out on 400 children using the data derived from the long term investigation can not be said to be an experiment but an observational analysis this is because the complete data has been provided already from the long term investigation already. hence it can only be observed

B ) i) foods high in fats and sugar affects The IQ of children later in life as seen from the results of the observational study that children whom had processed foods had a significant negative difference in IQ when compared with children who had health-conscious diets

ii) following health conscious diets early in childhood will have a positive effect on one's IQ later in life .

Answer:

a) P(B'|A) = 0.042

b) P(B|A') = 0.625

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

80% of the light aircraft that disappear while in flight in a certain country are subsequently discovered

Of the aircraft that are discovered, 63% have an emergency locator,

whereas 89% of the aircraft not discovered do not have such a locator.

From the given information; it is suitable we define the events in order to calculate the probabilities.

So, Let :

A = Locator

B = Discovered

A' = No Locator

B' = No Discovered

So; P(B) = 0.8

P(B') = 1 - P(B)

P(B') = 1- 0.8

P(B') = 0.2

P(A|B) = 0.63

P(A'|B) = 1 - P(A|B)

P(A'|B) = 1- 0.63

P(A'|B) = 0.37

P(A'|B') = 0.89

P(A|B') = 1 - P(A'|B')

P(A|B') = 1 - 0.89

P(A|B') = 0.11

Also;

P(B ∩ A) = P(A|B) P(B)

P(B ∩ A) = 0.63 × 0.8

P(B ∩ A) = 0.504

P(B ∩ A') =  P(A'|B) P(B)

P(B ∩ A') = 0.37 × 0.8

P(B ∩ A') = 0.296

P(B' ∩ A) = P(A|B') P(B')

P(B' ∩ A) = 0.11 × 0.2

P(B' ∩ A) = 0.022

P(B' ∩ A') =  P(A'|B') P(B')

P(B' ∩ A') = 0.89 × 0.2

P(B' ∩ A') = 0.178

Similarly:

P(A) = P(B  ∩  A ) + P(B'  ∩  A)

P(A) = 0.504 + 0.022

P(A) = 0.526

P(A') = 1 - P(A)

P(A') = 1 - 0.526

P(A') =  0.474

The probability that it will not be discovered given that it has an emergency locator is,

P(B'|A) =  P(B' ∩ A)/P(A)

P(B'|A) = 0.022/0.526

P(B'|A) = 0.042

(b) If it does not have an emergency locator, what is the probability that it will be discovered?

The probability that it will be discovered given that it does not have an emergency locator is:

P(B|A') = P(B ∩ A')/P(A')

P(B|A') = 0.296/0.474

P(B|A') = 0.625

Answer:

6 first box. 12 second box. 21 third box. 10 fourth box. 4 fifth box.

Step-by-step explanation:

Look for common denominaters, that will show you what to multiply the equation by to get rid of fractions.

Answer:

-3x-12

Step-by-step explanation:

-10x-4-8+7x

-3x-4-8

-3x-12

Answer:

-3x-12

Step-by-step explanation:

– 10x + – 4 – 8 + 7x

Combine like terms

-10x +7x   -4-8

-3x              -12

Answer:

If I set my alarm to read 8:10 when it is really 8:00 (i.e., it is 10 minutes fast) and the alarm goes off each day when it reads 8:10, it will be reliable but not valid.

Step-by-step explanation:

If I set my alarm to wake me earlier than I need to be woken, it might be in order to give me enough time to adjust to the alarm, and be awake enough to get out of bed before the normal time I need to be out of bed. This method is very reliable, as there is a very little probability of me waking up late, since I have a 10 minutes head start everyday to get out of bed. The problem is that this method is not valid, since I now actually wake earlier than I am supposed to. The extra 10 minutes can actually lead to a disorientation with time.

Answer:

4! * 2!  = 48

Step-by-step explanation:

In general you have 6 elements so there are 6! = 6*5*4*3*2*1  lists in total, now, you have to think about the second condition, an odd integer has to appear before any even integer. Therefore odd integers go first, and since there are 4 odd integers, there are 4! possible lists, and  since there are two even integers there are 2! lists, so in total you have 4! * 2! lists

Answer:

The probability that the cycle time exceeds 65 minutes if it is known that the cycle time exceeds 55 minutes, should be 1 / 3.

Step-by-step explanation:

It is known that the cycle times for a truck hauling concrete is uniformly distributed over a time interval of ( 50, 70 ). If c = cycle time, according to the question the probability that the cycle exceeds 65 minutes, respectively exceed 55 minutes should be the following - ' [tex]Probability( c > 65 | c > 55 )[/tex]. '

_____

[tex]f( c ) = \left \{ {{1 / 20,} \atop {0}} \right. \\50< c<70 - ( elsewhere )[/tex]

We know that the formula for Probability( A | B ) is P( A ∩ B ) / P( B ),

[tex]P( c > 65 | c > 55 ) =[/tex] [tex]P( c > 55[/tex]  ∩ [tex]c > 65 )[/tex] /  [tex]P( c > 55 )[/tex],

And now we come to the formula [tex]P( a < c < b )[/tex] = [tex]\int\limits^{70}_{65} {f(x)} \, dc[/tex]. Substitute known values to derive two solutions, forming a fraction that represents the probability we desire.

[tex]P( 65<c<70) = \int\limits^{70}_{65} {f(y)} \, dy\\ = \int\limits^{70}_{65} {(1/20)} \, dy\\ \\= 0.25[/tex]

-------------------------------------

[tex]P( 55<c<70) = \int\limits^{70}_{55} {f(y)} \, dy\\ = \int\limits^{70}_{65} {(1/20)} \, dy\\ \\= 0.75[/tex]

Take 0.25 over 0.75, 0.25 / 0.75, simplified to the fraction 1 / 3, which is our solution.

_____

Probability: 1 / 3