Answer:
Assault and battery exists in both the tort law context and the criminal law context. ... In an act of physical violence, assault refers to the act which causes the victim to apprehend imminent physical harm, while battery refers to the actual act causing the physical harm.
Does this help?
What is the main reason the Supreme Court has nine justices?
Concerning the incorporation of the Fifth Amendment protection against double jeopardy. Frank Palko had been charged with first-degree murder. He was convicted instead of second-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The state of Connecticut appealed and won a new trial; this time the court found Palko guilty of first-degree murder and sentenced him to death. Protection against double jeopardy is not a fundamental right and thus falls outside constitutional protection- Palko was convicted and put to death in 19378.
The second conviction of Palko was affirmed by the Supreme Court. Cardozo laid out the guiding principles for the Court's activities throughout the following three decades in his majority judgment.
He pointed out that some provisions in the Bill of Rights, such freedom of speech and opinion, are basic, and that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment included these rights and applied them to the states. Double jeopardy protection was not a basic right. On April 12, 1938, Palko passed away in the electric chair in Connecticut. Only those rights that are "in the very core of a scheme of organized liberty" are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The phrase "so established in the traditions and sensibilities of our people as to be classed as basic" refers to the type of rights that fall under this category. According to Cardozo, the First Amendment's protections for "freedom of thought, and expression" provide "the matrix, the essential prerequisite, of practically every other type of freedom."
To know more about Bill of Rights click on the below link:
https://brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ4
An attempt to define and explain factors that predict behavior under certain conditions is termed
a. theories.
b. case studies.
c. data collection.
d. causation determination.
Theories are attempts to define and explain factors that predict behavior under certain conditions.
While there are numerous sociological theories about crime, four major perspectives on deviance exist: structural functionalism, social strain typology, conflict theory, and labeling theorCesare Lombroso founded the Italian positivist school of criminology, which argued that a criminal mind was inherited and could be identified by physical characteristics and defects.Behavioral intention - This refers to the motivational factors that influence a given behavior, with the stronger the intention to perform the behavior, the more likely it will be performed. Subjective norms - This is the belief that the majority of people approve or disapprove of the behavior.
Learn mpore about behavior here:
https://brainly.com/question/28362085
#SPJ4
What is Mendel's 1st and 2nd law?
Mendel's first law explains that two copies of alleles of a particular gene segregate into gametes while second law states during gamete formation, the alleles of each gene segregate from each other.
Law of dominance
According to the law of dominance, hybrid offspring inherit only phenotypic dominant traits. Suppressed alleles are called recessive traits, and alleles that determine traits are called dominant traits.
Law of segregation
The law of segregation states that during the production of gametes, her two copies of each genetic element are separated, so that offspring receive one her factor from each parent.
In other words, pairs of alleles (alternate forms of genes) segregate during gametogenesis and combine randomly during fertilization.
To learn more about 'Mendel's law', here:
https://brainly.com/question/23067535
#SPJ4
Can the U.S. citizenship be taken away?
Denaturalization is only possible in cases when a person obtained citizenship fraudulently or incorrectly when they were not qualified. To denaturalize a citizen, the federal government may file a civil or criminal case in federal court.
A citizen who loses their citizenship is not always forced to leave the United States. Instead, unless there are grounds for removal, they will return to their prior legal status in the United States. However, if they applied for family members to immigrate to the U.S. based on their citizenship, such family members may be deported unless they had a different reason for being in the country legally. This is due to the fact that denaturalization implies that the person never really possessed citizenship.
To know more about Denaturalization click on the below link:
https://brainly.com/question/1578776
#SPJ4
A law enforcement officer is pulling over vehicles at a checkpoint to make sure everyone has valid driver's licenses. One car that pulls
over has several visible bottles of alcohol on the passenger seat. The driver is clearly intoxicated. The officer has the driver pull to the sid
and eventually makes an arrest. This is an example of
•cultural bias
•criminal profiling
•police interrogation
•probable cause
What is the philosophy of judicial activism?
Judicial activism maintains that the courts can and should consider wider societal effects of their judgements in addition to the relevant law while exercising their judicial power.
American historian, Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., in a 1947 article in Fortune coined the term Judicial activism.
Judicial activism is discusses in two contexts- political and academic. In academic usage, activism refers to only the willingness of a judge to strike down or overturn a judicial precedent or to strike down any of another branch of government/.
Instead of deferring to the views of other government officials or earlier courts, an activist judge tires to enforce their own views based on constitutional requirements.
In political fabric, activism is used as a pejorative.
By claiming that judges make decisions based on their personal policy preferences rather than an accurate reading of the law, one can claim that they have abandoned their impartial position as judges and are instead "legislating from the bench."
To know more about Judicial Activism, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30035277
#SPJ4
What were the results of Mendel's experiment ?
He proved that qualities are reliably passed on from parents to children in dominant and recessive patterns, regardless of other traits.
Although Gregor Mendel's rules serve as the theoretical foundation for our knowledge of the genetics of heredity, genetic analysis precedes Mendel.
Mendel contributed two new ideas to the field of genetics:
created clean lines
kept statistics notes and counted his findings
The gene for tall plants was dominant in Mendel's trials, whereas the allele for short plants was recessive. Similar to this, the dominant gene for yellow seeds outweighed the recessive allele for green seeds.
Mendel's second law was developed as a consequence of his second series of experiments. The law of independent assortment is this. It claims that the determinants of certain attributes are inherited separately from one another.
The law of segregation states that each gamete (egg or sperm cell) that an organism produces receives only one of the two gene copies that are present in the organism, and that the distribution of the gene copies is random.
For more questions on Mendel's conclusion
https://brainly.com/question/30097040
#SPJ4
The first requirement for an effective offer is serious, objective intent on the part of the offeror. Intent is not determined by the subjective intentions, beliefs, or assumptions of the offeror. Rather, it is determined by what a reasonable person in the offeree's position would conclude that the offeror's words and actions meant. Offers made in obvious anger, jest, or undue excitement do not meet the requirement of serious, objective intent. Because these offers are not effective, an offeree's acceptance does not create an agreement.
Answer:
Yes, that is correct. In order for an offer to be considered valid, it must be made with serious and objective intent. This means that the offeror must have a genuine intention to enter into a legally binding agreement with the offeree. The intent is determined by the words and actions of the offeror and how a reasonable person in the offeree's position would interpret them. If an offer is made in jest, anger or undue excitement, it will not be considered a valid offer as there is no serious intent behind it. Therefore, acceptance of such an offer would not create a legally binding agreement.
2. Describe a situation in which a government has a great deal of power but does
not have political agthority. Then explain whether you think the rule of law would
likely be respected under such a government.
A situation in which a government has a great deal of power but does not have political authority might be a military dictatorship. In a military dictatorship, the military is in charge of the state and controls the majority of its resources. The military leadership makes all the decisions without input from the citizenry.
Whether or not the rule of law would be respected in such a government is highly dependent on the values of the leadership of the military. If they value the rule of law, they may respect it even though they have a great deal of power. On the other hand, if they value their own power and authority, they may be more likely to sidestep legal protections in favor of their own interests.
Why did the Supreme Court hear Furman v. Georgia?
It accepts appeals against decisions made by the High Courts and other tribunals, courts, and courts.
The death sentence is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment when it is applied arbitrarily and capriciously and results in discriminatory outcomes, according to the Supreme Court's ruling in Furman v. Georgia. It accepts appeals against decisions made by the High Courts and other tribunals, courts, and courts. It resolves conflicts between various authorities, between national governments, and between the center and any national authority. In its consultative capacity, it also hears topics that the President refers to it. The SC may also pursue lawsuits against motorcycles (on its own). In addition to the national governments, the SC's ruling is binding on all Indian courts as well as those at the Union.
Learn more about Eighth Amendment's here:
https://brainly.com/question/29548737
#SPJ4
How did William Blackstone influence the Constitution?
William Blackstone advised the Founding Fathers of the USA to understand the value of common law.
Blackstone's work had a profound impact on the ideology that led to the American Revolution and the subsequent drafting of the United States Constitution.
Commentary has been frequently cited by US courts as a source for Common His Law.
The purpose of Blackstone's commentary on English law was to provide a readable source of common law for most people.
Government policies and practices should therefore also be implemented in harmony with this power. In other words, governments should not be allowed to restrict individuals' freedom of choice and action.
To learn more about 'William Blackstone', here:
https://brainly.com/question/30133256
#SPJ4
How did city infrastructure in the early 20th century affect the modernization of firefighters? (Check all that
apply.)
AThe training for firefighting opened more job opportunities.
B The city became the main overseer of all firefighting duties and jurisdictions.
CTechnology changes brought improvements to fire engines.
DWater hydrants and reservoirs were planned with the city's development.
Answer: all of them apply
Explanation:
Before the 1970s, what EMS service was provided to the nation?
O one medical person to ride along in an ambulance
an ambulance driver who knew first aid
O only ambulance service with a stretcher
O a team of at least two EMTS-most of who have the training 2-weeks requirement
Prior to the 1970s, EMS were the main providers of ambulance services, and the quality of their training and the services they offered varied greatly across the country.
What were the ambulance services provided by EMS?The ambulance service typically consisted of a driver who was familiar with basic first aid, however occasionally a single medical professional would accompany the ambulance. The majority of ambulances simply had a stretcher on board, and the service was often centered on taking patients from the scene of an accident or illness to a hospital.Although not perfect, this method frequently resulted in patients receiving subpar or even detrimental care while being transported, and frequently the patient's health would worsen before arriving at the hospital.To know more about ambulance services, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/20660966
#SPJ1
Which of the following will cause demand for EMTS and paramedics to keep increasing?
Aplans for vast expansion of hospital triage centers all over the nation
Bdecline in doctors, nurses, psychiatrists
C increased EMT and paramedic academic programs
Dnatural disasters, car accidents, violence, and natural physical events
Answer:
natural disasters, car accidents, violence, and natural physical events
Explanation:
ion got no explanation, quizlet helped me
The United States taxes each barrel of imported oil at a flat rate. This is
a. an antidumping duty.
b. a dumping duty.
c. a quota.
d. a tariff.
More than half of women who are murdered are killed by a partner or family member. True or False?
True, More than half of women who are murdered are killed by a partner or family member, as per a study from United Nations.
Research shows that female victims tend to be younger than perpetrators in the United States, and domestic violence is more common in couples where the male partner is at least 15 years older than the female partner.
The United Nations also said sex workers were the group most likely to be killed, with rates in the United States about 18 times higher than non-sex workers.
The Drug and Crime Control Service stresses that legislative change and early intervention can help victims of domestic violence before it's too late, and can also train criminal justice system staff.
To learn more about ‘United Nations’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15152811
#SPJ4
One of the duties of a 9-1-1 dispatcher is to pass information to first responders and dispatch them to the scene of the emergency. Is the previous statement true or false
True, One of the duties of a 9-1-1 dispatcher is to pass information to first responders and dispatch them to the scene of the emergency.
911 dispatchers are often the unsung heroes of emergency response teams.
Collecting critical information from callers and dispatching appropriate first responders to the scene, these professionals must be able to manage chaotic, heartbreaking, stressful, disorganized and hectic situations.
A 911 dispatcher's job description may vary slightly depending on the position. Affects the duties associated with the position, such as Dispatcher I, Dispatcher II, and Dispatcher III (Supervisor).
911 dispatchers are required to answer emergency and non-emergency calls for assistance and information. Must provide police, fire, emergency and related services dispatch and communications support services.
To learn more about dispatcher, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11626662
#SPJ4
Assault and Battery is a tort not a crime when the action involves people who know each other.
True or False
Answer: True
Explanation:
Generally speaking, assault and battery are torts not crimes. A tort is an action of wrongdoing against an individual or their personal property while a crime is an action against society as it involves an intentional breaking of the laws that society goes by.
For this reason, assault and battery are not treated as crimes but as torts because they involved action against a single person.
If a party against whom enforcement of an oral contract is sought admits under oath that a contract for sale was made, the contract will be enforceable
True
False
If a party seeking to enforce an oral contract admits under oath that a contract for sale was made, the contract is enforceable. True
If a party seeking to enforce an oral contract "admits" in court that a contract was made, the contract, however admitted, will be enforceable.Contrary to popular belief, oral contracts are legally binding. They are usually not in your best interests and result in a "he said, she said" argument. However, as long as there is sufficient evidence, a court will enforce an oral agreement. However, there is one exception to this rule, and it is known as the Statute of Frauds. An oral agreement can be legally enforceable if it complies with a law known as the statute of frauds.
Lerarn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/28567848
#SPJ4
if a prepaid smart card or gift card is lost, then the money that was on that card is
Answer:
The money in the gift card will be lost aswell if you loose it
Why did it take so long for all of the states to approve the Articles of Confederation?
The majority of people readily agreed that the constitution needed to be changed for the sake of the country.
People feared that the power expended would quickly go to waste if they submitted to a large and powerful government.
The government created the Bill of Rights because people wanted their rights protected and felt the federalists threatened it.
Anti-Federalists mainly occupied rural areas like the West (then) and South. Anti-Fed becomes Democratic-Republican.
The Articles of Confederation and the Eternal Alliance were agreements between the 13 states of the United States and served as the first framework of government.
To learn more about the confederation, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11649223
#SPJ4
is south African law codified???
Answer:
no
Explanation:
It is not recorded into one comprehensive piece of legislation.
g One party wants to file a suit against another. For a court to hear the case, Group of answer choices both parties must consent. the court must have jurisdiction. both parties must own property. the parties must have no minimum contacts with each other.
Option b: One party wants to file a suit against another and for a court to hear the case the court must have jurisdiction.
Jurisdiction is a legal term for the legal powers granted to a legal entity to administer the judiciary. In federal states such as the United States, jurisdictions are local, state, and federal.
The judiciary draws its substance from international law, conflicts of law, constitutional law, and the powers of the executive and legislative branches to direct resources to best serve the needs of society.
A lawsuit is an action brought in court by one party against another party(s). These are usually civil cases, meaning there are no allegations of criminal conduct.
To learn more about 'Jurisdiction', here:
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ4
What is law of segregation also called?
The Law of Segregation is also called as the law of purity of the gametes. Law of segregation is considered to be the second law of inheritance.
The Law of Segregation tends to explain that the pair of the alleles tend to segregate from each other which is during the meiosis cell division which is the gamete formation, so that the only one allele will be then present in each gamete.
However, according to the Law of Segregation, the two alleles of a gene tend to separate during formation of the gametes. Thus, they do not tend to blend but segregate or separate into different gametes.
Hence, here each gamete is pure and tend to possess only one allele of a gene.
To learn more about the Law of Segregation here:
https://brainly.com/question/1594166
#SPJ4
Question 8 (1 point)
Which of these is not something that people demanded of their governments during
the Enlightenment?
Freedom
Equality
Equal pay for women
Order
What are some of the basic responsibilities of law enforcement supervisors?
Some basic responsibilities of law enforcement supervisors include:
Managing and supervising subordinate officersDeveloping and implementing department policies and proceduresEnsuring that officers under their command are properly trained and equippedWhat are the basic responsibilities of law enforcement supervisors?Generally, The supervisors make sure that the officers and detectives have access to all of the necessary information and equipment so that they can accomplish their jobs effectively.
They instruct employees in the appropriate processes and techniques. They keep them up to date on any modifications that have been made to the legislation. The operations of the division that they administer are planned and coordinated by the supervisors.
Investigating complaints and misconduct allegations against officersMaintaining discipline and enforcing department rules and regulationsCoordinating with other agencies and community organizationsManaging the department's budget and resourcesRepresenting the department in meetings and court proceedingsPlanning and directing department operations and activities.Read more about law enforcement supervisors
https://brainly.com/question/10222622
#SPJ1
Some of the basic responsibilities of law enforcement supervisors include:
Supervising the activities of police officers Ensuring the proper training of police officers Keeping updated with new laws so they are better enforced. What are the responsibilities of supervisors in law enforcement ?There are several responsibilities that a supervisor in the field of law enforcement would have and some of them include:
Supervising and directing the activities of police officers and other personnel under their command.Ensuring that officers are properly trained and equipped to carry out their duties.Managing department resources, including budget, equipment, and personnel.Developing and implementing department policies and procedures.Investigating complaints and allegations of misconduct by officers under their command.Coordinating with other law enforcement agencies and community groups to build positive relationships and promote public safety.Representing the department in court and other legal proceedings.Responding to and managing critical incidents, such as emergencies, natural disasters, and large-scale events.These roles and responsibilities would however be based on the jurisdiction.
Find out more on law enforcement at https://brainly.com/question/21082629
#SPJ1
Moira has delivered a counter-offer to some potential buyers for her property. Which of these best states the time frame for the buyers' acceptance
Option-b: The buyers must respond by the time and date specified in the counter offer best states the time frame for the buyers' acceptance.
A counteroffer is a response to an offer. The authentic offer became rejected and changed with some other.
A counter-offer gives the caller three options for-
Accept, decline, or make another offer and continue the negotiation.
Counteroffers are widely used in many types of business negotiations, deals, contracts, and private and public transactions between two individuals or two companies.
You can find them in real estate deals, job negotiations, car sales, private placements, mergers, acquisitions, takeovers, and more.
Moira has delivered a counteroffer to some potential buyers for her property to which they must respond by the time and date specified in the counteroffer.
To know more about 'counteroffer', here:
https://brainly.com/question/12573084
#SPJ4
Complete question:
Moira has delivered a counter-offer to some potential buyers for her property. Which of these best states the time frame for the buyers' acceptance?
a. The buyers have five days to respond.
b. The buyers must respond by the time and date specified in the counter-offer.
c. The buyers must respond within the time frame originally noted as their offer acceptance date.
d. The counter-offer is active until the seller accepts or rejects it.
Identify the strengths and weaknesses of the American jury system
The American jury system has several strengths. It allows ordinary citizens to participate in the administration of justice, which can increase public trust in the legal system. Juries also provide a check on the power of the government and the courts, as they are able to acquit defendants who are not guilty, even if the prosecution has presented a strong case.
WEAKNESSES:However, the American jury system also has some weaknesses. One concern is that jurors may not always be fully informed or capable of understanding the complex legal issues that are presented in court. In addition, the process of selecting jurors can be biased, as it is often based on factors such as race, gender, and socio-economic status. Finally, the jury system can be slow and expensive, as it requires the selection and convening of a group of jurors for each trial.
HOPE IT HELPS!Douglas Massey and Nancy Denton documented which of the following patterns in U.S. inner cities?
a. hypersegregation
b. the absence of racial segregation
c. de jure segregation
d. declining segregation
Douglas Massey and Nancy Denton documented the hypersegregation which is patterns in U.S. inner cities. The Option A.
What pattern did they document in U.S. inner cities?In work called "American Apartheid," both of them documented the pattern of hypersegregation in U.S. inner cities in which they defined hypersegregation as level of segregation that goes beyond what can be explained by demographic factors such as income, education, and preferences.
It is characterized by high levels of racial and ethnic segregation ad social and economic isolation which can lead to a range of negative outcomes for marginalized communities which includes limited access to jobs, education, healthcare and political representation.
Read more about hypersegregation
brainly.com/question/30461271
#SPJ1