BRAIN-COMPATIBLE
Directions: Arrange the sentences in the box to form a problem. Then solve each problem.
Write your answer in your activity notebook.
1. If she leaves home at 6:00 in the morning
What time will she arrive?
Zaira goes to her grandmother's house
She cycles 30 km at a steady speed of 10 km
Problem
Solution
2. I had an average speed of 55 kph for 2 hours in the afternoon
What was the total distance covered by the bus
A bus had an average speed of 65 kph for 1. 5 hours in the morning.
Problem:
Solution:
3 What was the average speed of the train?
The distance between the two stations is 14 km
A train left Station X at 9:00 a. M. And arrived station Y ay 9:30 a. M. ​

Tim's truck has a volume of (6.5 feet) x (5 feet) x (7 feet) = 227.5 cubic feet. Each box of papers has a volume of (2 feet) x (2 feet) x (2 feet) = 8 cubic feet. To determine how many boxes of papers Tim can pack into the truck, we need to divide the total volume of the truck by the volume of each box:

227.5 cubic feet ÷ 8 cubic feet per box = 28.44 boxes

Since we can't pack a fraction of a box, Tim can pack a maximum of 28 boxes of papers into his truck. However, this assumes that there is no wasted space due to irregular shapes of the boxes or other items in the truck.

In reality, Tim may be able to pack slightly fewer boxes depending on how he arranges them in the truck.

Hence, Tim's truck has a volume of 227.5 cubic feet. Each box of papers has a volume of 8 cubic feet.

To know more about find volume, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/22907480#

#SPJ11

The possible maximum value of the expression is (d) None

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

a = bq + r

The above expression is an Euclid's Division statement

The Euclid's Division Algorithm states that "For any two positive integers a, b there exists unique integers q and r such that:"

a = bq + r

where 0 ≤ r < b.

From the question, we have

q = 4

Max r = 4

Using 0 ≤ r < b, we have

Minimum b = 5

So, we have

a = bq + r

This gives

Min a = 5 * 4 + 4

Min a = 24

The above represents the minimum value of a

The maximum value cannot be calculated because as b increases, the value of the expression also increases

Hence, the possible maximum value is (d) None

Read more about Euclid's Division at

https://brainly.com/question/26569165

#SPJ1

Thus, through the steps of horizontal translation, dilation and at last vertical translation, the new quadratic function , g(x)= -4(x+2)²-3 from the parent function f(x)=x².

The simplest function which nonetheless complies with a particular type of function's definition is a parent function. For instance, y = x would be the parent function when considering the linear functions that make a family of functions. The most basic linear function is this one.

Given parent function:  f(x)=x²

new quadratic function , g(x)= -4(x+2)²-3

Thus, through the steps of horizontal translation, dilation and at last vertical translation, the new quadratic function , g(x)= -4(x+2)²-3 from the parent function f(x)=x².

Know ore about the parent function

https://brainly.com/question/29233606

#SPJ1

Complete question:

from the following quadratic function , g(x)= -4(x+2)²-3 .identify the difference between its parent function f(x)=x² and  g(x).

20 pieces of 10 5/6 inch bar can be cut from a stock 29 foot bar.

To calculate the number of pieces of 10 5/6 inch bar that can be cut from a 29 foot bar, we need to first convert the measurements to a common unit. One foot is equal to 12 inches, so 29 feet equals 348 inches.

Next, we need to determine how many 10 5/6 inch bars can be cut from the 348-inch stock bar. To do this, we can use division. First, we need to convert the mixed number 10 5/6 to an improper fraction by multiplying the whole number by the denominator and adding the numerator. This gives us 125/6 inches.

Now, we can divide the length of the stock bar (348 inches) by the length of one 10 5/6 inch bar (125/6 inches). This gives us:

348 / (125/6) = 20.736

Since we cannot cut a partial bar, we need to round down to the nearest whole number. Therefore, we can cut 20 pieces of 10 5/6 inch bar from a 29 foot stock bar.

To know more about measurements, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/29373453#

#SPJ11

The probability of a defect in the manufacturing process, assuming that the weight of the products follows a normal distribution, is 0.1587 to four decimal places.

To calculate the probability of a defect, we first need to calculate the z-score of the weight that would classify the product as a defect. The z-score is a measure of how many standard deviations a value is from the mean. In this case, the z-score is -1 or 1, depending on whether the weight is less than one standard deviation below the mean or greater than one standard deviation above the mean.

Once we have calculated the z-score, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator to find the probability of a product being classified as a defect. If the z-score is -1, the probability of a product being classified as a defect is 0.1587. If the z-score is 1, the probability of a product being classified as a defect is also 0.1587.

To know more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

Answer:

Approx 67.24%

Step-by-step explanation: If the Atlanta Hawks' free-throw percentage is 82%, the probability that a player will make one free throw is 0.82.

To find the probability that a player will make two free throws in a row, we can use the multiplication rule of probability which states that the probability of two independent events occurring together is the product of their individual probabilities.

Therefore, the probability of a player making two free throws in a row can be calculated as follows:

P(making two free throws in a row) = P(making first free throw) x P(making second free throw)

P(making two free throws in a row) = 0.82 x 0.82

P(making two free throws in a row) = 0.6724 or 67.24%

Therefore, the probability that a player for the Atlanta Hawks will make two free shots in a row is approximately 67.24%

For the given function f(x, y), there is a saddle point at (-28, 4). There are no local maximum or local minimum points.

A saddle point or minimax point is a point on the surface of the graph of a function where the slopes in orthogonal directions are all zero, but which is not a local extremum of the function.

Local maximum and minimum are the points of the functions, which give the maximum and minimum range. The local maxima and local minima can be computed by finding the derivative of the function.

The first derivative test and the second derivative test are the two important methods of finding the local maximum and local minimum.

To find the local maximum, local minimum, or saddle points of the given function f(x, y) = y^2 + 373 + 2xy - 8x + 6y^2, we need to first find the critical points by setting the first-order partial derivatives equal to zero.

∂f/∂x = 2y - 8
∂f/∂y = 2y + 2x + 12y => 2x + 14y

Now set both partial derivatives equal to zero and solve for x and y:

2y - 8 = 0 => y = 4
2x + 14y = 0 => 2x + 56 = 0 => x = -28

The critical point is (-28, 4). Now, we need to classify this point using the second-order partial derivatives:

∂²f/∂x² = 0
∂²f/∂y² = 14
∂²f/∂x∂y = ∂²f/∂y∂x = 2

Now we can use the discriminant D = (∂²f/∂x²)(∂²f/∂y²) - (∂²f/∂x∂y)^2 = (0)(14) - (2)^2 = -4. Since D < 0, the critical point is a saddle point.

So, for the given function f(x, y), there is a saddle point at (-28, 4). There are no local maximum or local minimum points.

To learn more about saddle points visit:

brainly.com/question/29526436

#SPJ11

From the function f(x,y)=y⁵ ln(−2x⁴+3y⁵).  The value of  fx = -10x³y⁵ / (-2x⁴ + 3y⁵) and

fy = y⁴ * ln(-2x⁴ + 3y⁵) * d/dy [(-2x⁴ + 3y⁵)]

To find fx, we differentiate f(x,y) with respect to x, treating y as a constant:

fx = d/dx [y⁵ ln(-2x⁴ + 3y⁵)]

Using the chain rule and the derivative of ln u = 1/u, we have:

fx = y⁵ * 1/(-2x⁴ + 3y⁵) * d/dx [-2x⁴ + 3y⁵]

Simplifying and applying the power rule of differentiation, we get:

fx = -10x³y⁵ / (-2x⁴ + 3y⁵)

Similarly, to find fy, we differentiate f(x,y) with respect to y, treating x as a constant:

fy = d/dy [y⁵ ln(-2x⁴ + 3y⁵)]

Using the chain rule and the derivative of ln u = 1/u, we have:

fy = y⁴ * ln(-2x⁴ + 3y⁵) * d/dy [(-2x⁴ + 3y⁵)]

Applying the power rule of differentiation and simplifying, we get:

fy = 15y⁴ ln(-2x⁴ + 3y⁵)

To learn more about partial derivatives:

brainly.com/question/28751547

#SPJ11

For series Σ a(-1)^(k+1)k!, convergence depends on the limit of |a(k+1)/a(k)|. For series Σ ka sin(2), it diverges.

Consider the series Σ a(-1)^(k+1)k!, where a is a sequence of real numbers.

To determine the convergence of this series, we can use the ratio test

lim┬(k→∞)⁡〖|a(k+1)(-1)^(k+2)(k+1)!|/|ak(-1)^(k+1)k!| = lim┬(k→∞)⁡〖(k+1)|a(k+1)|/|a(k)||〗

If this limit is less than 1, then the series converges absolutely. If the limit is greater than 1, the series diverges. If the limit is equal to 1, then the test is inconclusive.

Let's evaluate the limit

lim┬(k→∞)⁡〖(k+1)|a(k+1)|/|a(k)||〗 = lim┬(k→∞)⁡〖(k+1)!/(k!k)|a(k+1)/a(k)||〗 = lim┬(k→∞)⁡〖(k+1)/(k)|a(k+1)/a(k)||〗

Since lim┬(k→∞)⁡〖|a(k+1)/a(k)||〗 exists, we can apply the ratio test again:

if the limit is less than 1, the series converges absolutely.

if the limit is greater than 1, the series diverges.

if the limit is equal to 1, the test is inconclusive.

Therefore, we can classify the series Σ a(-1)^(k+1)k! as either absolutely convergent, conditionally convergent, or divergent depending on the value of the limit.

Consider the series Σ ka sin(2), where a is a sequence of real numbers.

To determine the convergence of this series, we can use the alternating series test, which states that if a series Σ (-1)^(k+1)b(k) is alternating and |b(k+1)| <= |b(k)| for all k, and if lim┬(k→∞)⁡〖b(k) = 0〗, then the series converges.

In this case, we have b(k) = ka sin(2), which is alternating since (-1)^(k+1) changes sign for each term. We also have

|b(k+1)|/|b(k)| = (k+1)|a|/k < k|a|/k = |b(k)|/|b(k-1)|

Therefore, |b(k+1)| <= |b(k)| for all k. Finally, we have

lim┬(k→∞)⁡〖b(k) = lim┬(k→∞)⁡〖ka sin(2)〗 = ∞〗

Since the limit does not exist, the series diverges.

Therefore, we can classify the series Σ ka sin(2) as divergent.

To know more about convergent and divergent:

https://brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ4

When we multiply (2x - 1) and (x + 2) using FOIL method, we get:

(2x - 1)(x + 2) = 2x(x) + 2x(2) - 1(x) - 1(2)

= 2x² + 4x - x - 2

= 2x² + 3x - 2

Therefore, the product of (2x - 1) and (x + 2) is 2x² + 3x - 2.

the slope of   [tex]6.5[/tex] in this equation indicates that for each additional year of age, the median height of boys increases by approximately 6.5 cm. Thus, option D is correct.

The statement that best interprets the slope in the context of the problem is "The slope is 6.5, this means that each year boys grow approximately  [tex]6.5[/tex]  cm."

The slope of a linear equation represents the rate of change, or the amount by which the dependent variable (in this case, median height) changes for each unit increase in the independent variable (in this case, age).

Therefore, the slope of  [tex]6.5[/tex] in this equation indicates that for each additional year of age, the median height of boys increases by approximately [tex]6.5[/tex] cm.

Learn more about median here:

https://brainly.com/question/28060453

#SPJ1

The price of the stereo system after the discount and markup is $691.20.

The markup price represents the price after adding a percentage of the discounted price.

The markup can be determined using the markup factor, which increases 100% by the markup percentage.

The discount offered on the stereo system = 20%

Original sales price of the system = $720

Discount factor = 0.8 (1 - 0.2)

Discounted price = $576 ($720 x 0.8)

Markup percentage after the discount = 20%

Markup factor = 1.2 (1 + 0.2)

Marked up price = $691.20 ($576 x 1.2)

Learn more about the markup at https://brainly.com/question/1153322.

#SPJ1

The only even function among the given options is g(x) = 2x^2, so the answer is B) g(x) = 2x^2.

A function is even if it satisfies the property g(-x) = g(x) for all x.

Checking each of the given functions:

g(x) = (x - 1)^2 is not even, because g(-x) = (-x - 1)^2 = x^2 + 2x + 1, which is not equal to g(x) = (x - 1)^2.

g(x) = 2x^2 is even, because g(-x) = 2(-x)^2 = 2x^2 = g(x) for all x.

g(x) = 4x^2 is even, because g(-x) = 4(-x)^2 = 4x^2 = g(x) for all x.

g(x) = 2x is odd, because g(-x) = 2(-x) = -2x = -g(x) for all x.

Therefore, the only even function among the given options is g(x) = 2x^2, so the answer is B) g(x) = 2x^2.

To know more about even function refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/23446734

#SPJ11

The event that has a probability of 0 is selecting a yellow marble

Other probabilities are listed below

The items in the jar are given as

6 black, 4 brown, 8 white, and 2 blue.

These items are the sample space of this event

Hence, the sample space is 6 black, 4 brown, 8 white, and 2 blue.

For the probability Julie will draw a white marble, we have

P(White) = White/Total

So, we have

P(White) = 8/20

Simplify

P(White) = 2/5

For the event that is more likely to happen, we have

P(black marble) = 6/20

P(brown or blue marble) = (4 + 2)/20

P(brown or blue marble) = 6/20

The probabilities are equal

So, both events have equal likelihood

The event that has a probability of 0 could be the probability of selecting a yellow marble

This is because the jar has no yellow marble

Read more about probability a

https://brainly.com/question/251701

#SPJ1

The magnitude of the resultant force is approximately 60.28 newtons. The angle between the resultant force and the smaller force is approximately 50.5 degrees.

To find the magnitude of the resultant force, we can use the Pythagorean theorem, which states that in a right triangle, the square of the hypotenuse (the longest side) is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides.

In this case, the two forces are acting at right angles, so we can treat them as the sides of a right triangle:

resultant force^2 = (39n)^2 + (46n)^2

resultant force^2 = 1521n^2 + 2116n^2

resultant force^2 = 3637n^2

resultant force = sqrt(3637n^2) = 60.28n

So the magnitude of the resultant force is approximately 60.28 newtons.

To find the angle that the resultant force makes with the smaller force, we can use trigonometry.

We know that the two forces are at right angles, so the angle between the resultant force and the smaller force is the same as the angle between the resultant force and the larger force. Let's call this angle θ. Then we have:

tan θ = (larger force) / (smaller force)

tan θ = 46n / 39n

θ = tan^-1(46/39) = 50.5°

Therefore, the angle between the resultant force and the smaller force is approximately 50.5 degrees.

To learn more about magnitude, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14452091

#SPJ11

It will take Josh about 66.67 minutes to easy the cafeteria alone.

Let's anticipate that the amount of work required to easy the cafeteria is 1 unit.

In a single minute, Josh can easy 1/x of the cafeteria (in which x is the number of mins it takes Josh to do the task alone), and Draven can clean 1/40 of the cafeteria in one minute.

When they work together, they could easy the cafeteria in 25 minutes, so in one minute they are able to easy 1/25 of the cafeteria.

The use of the fact that their combined rate is the sum in their individual rates, we are able to installation an equation:

1/x + 1/40 = 1/25

Multiplying each facets through the least common more than one of the denominators (40 * 25 * x), we get:

25 * 40 + x * 40 = x * 25

1000 + 40x = 25x

15x = 1000

x = 66.67

Therefore, it'd take Josh about 66.67 minutes to easy the cafeteria alone.

Learn more about denominators :-

https://brainly.com/question/20712359

#SPJ4

Answer:

10/12

Step-by-step explanation:

(3/10)x=1/4

3x=10/4

x=10/12

E = 0.01(0.0005(30)^2 + 0.38(30) + 35)(2*0.0005(30) + 0.38) ≈ 0.63

Interpretation: The income elasticity of demand is 0.63, which means that for every 1% increase in household income, the fraction of children attending a live musical performance increases by 0.63%.
At a family income level of $30,000, the fraction of children attending a live musical performance is increasing by 0.63% per 1% increase in household income.
To compute the income elasticity of demand E at an income level of $30,000, we need to find the derivative of q with respect to x, and then evaluate it at x=30. The derivative of q with respect to x is:

dq/dx = 0.01(0.001x + 0.38)
Now, let's evaluate this derivative at x=30:
dq/dx = 0.01(0.001(30) + 0.38) = 0.004
To calculate the income elasticity of demand E, we use the formula:
E = (dq/dx)(x/q)
First, let's find q at x=30:
q = 0.01(0.0005(30)^2 + 0.38(30) + 35) = 0.178
Now, we can find E:
E = (0.004)(30/0.178) ≈ 0.67

Interpret the result:
At a family income level of $30,000, the fraction of children attending a live musical performance is increasing by approximately 67% per 1% increase in household income.

To know more about Elasticity click here .

brainly.com/question/28790459

#SPJ11

Using the  Pythagorean theorem we get , the  height of the TV screen is approximately 15.4 inches to the nearest tenth of an inch.

The screen of a 32-inch high definition television has a diagonal length of 31.5 inches. If the TV screen is 27.5 inches wide, you need to find the height of the screen to the nearest tenth of an inch. To do this, you can use the Pythagorean theorem, which states that the square of the length of the hypotenuse (diagonal) of a right triangle is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides (width and height).

1. Let the height of the TV screen be h inches.
2. According to the Pythagorean theorem, (width)^2 + (height)^2 = (diagonal)^2.
3. Substitute the given values: (27.5)^2 + (h)^2 = (31.5)^2.
4. Calculate the squares: 756.25 + h^2 = 992.25.
5. Subtract 756.25 from both sides: h^2 = 236.
6. Find the square root of 236: h ≈ 15.4 inches.

The height of the TV screen is approximately 15.4 inches to the nearest tenth of an inch.

Learn more about: Pythagorean theorem - https://brainly.com/question/31882171

#SPJ11

x = 0, π, 2π, 3π, 4π, 5π, 6π, π/3, 5π/3

These are the exact solutions of the given equation on the interval [0, 21). To find all exact solutions of the equation sec(x) sin(x) - 2 sin(x) = 0 on the interval [0, 21), we will use the factoring method:

First, we can factor out the sin(x) term:

sin(x) (sec(x) - 2) = 0

Now, we have two separate equations to solve:

1) sin(x) = 0
2) sec(x) - 2 = 0

For equation (1), sin(x) = 0 at x = nπ, where n is an integer. We need to find the values of n that give solutions in the range [0, 21):

0 ≤ nπ < 21
0 ≤ n < 21/π
n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

x = 0, π, 2π, 3π, 4π, 5π, 6π

For equation (2), sec(x) - 2 = 0, or sec(x) = 2. We know that sec(x) = 1/cos(x), so:

1/cos(x) = 2
cos(x) = 1/2

The values of x for which cos(x) = 1/2 in the range [0, 21) are x = π/3 and x = 5π/3.

Combining both sets of solutions, we have:

x = 0, π, 2π, 3π, 4π, 5π, 6π, π/3, 5π/3

These are the exact solutions of the given equation on the interval [0, 21).

Learn more about range  here:

https://brainly.com/question/29452843

#SPJ11

Answer:

There are three methods used to solve systems of equations: graphing, substitution, and elimination.

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio to make the portrait proportional is width/42 = 5/8

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Photograph that is 5 inches wide by 8 inches high.

This means that

Ratio = width/height

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Ratio = 5/8

Given that he wants the portrait to be proportional to the photograph and 42 inches high.

Then, we have

width/42 = 5/8

Hence, the ratio to make the portrait proportional is width/42 = 5/8

Read more about proportion at

https://brainly.com/question/1781657

#SPJ1

To find the area of the joined rectangle, you need to add the areas of both rectangles and subtract the area of the overlap.

The area of the first rectangle is:

6 cm x 4 cm = 24 cm²

The area of the second rectangle is:

7 cm x 3 cm = 21 cm²

The overlap occurs where the two rectangles join together, and it has an area equal to the product of the widths of the two rectangles:

4 cm x 3 cm = 12 cm²

To find the area of the joined rectangle, add the areas of both rectangles and subtract the overlap:

24 cm² + 21 cm² - 12 cm² = 33 cm²

Therefore, the area of the joined rectangle is 33 cm².

Without a diagram or additional information, it is impossible to determine the value of the x-coordinate of point A.

To know more about coordinates refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/16634867

#SPJ11

DF^2 = 170 * 169^2 / (135^2 + 200 - 26EX) = 106.7027

DY^2 = 170 * 169^2 / (135^2 + 50 -

In the given figure, we have a triangle DEF, where EF is a transversal intersecting DE and DF at points X and Y, respectively, such that XY || DE.

    D

   / \

  /   \

 /     \

E-------F

Given that XF = 10, YF = 5, and EF = 13, we need to find DY.

We can start by using the property of similar triangles. Since XY || DE, we have the following similarity ratios:

EF / ED = EY / EJ  (where J is the intersection of XY and DF)

EF / DF = EJ / EY

Substituting the given values, we get:

13 / ED = EY / EJ

13 / DF = EJ / (13 - EY)

Multiplying the above two equations, we get:

13 / ED * 13 / DF = EY / EJ * EJ / (13 - EY)

169 / (ED * DF) = EY / (13 - EY)

Substituting the values of XF = 10 and YF = 5, we get:

169 / (ED * DF) = 5 / 8

ED / DF = 135 / 169

Using the Pythagorean theorem on triangles DEX and DFY, we get:

ED^2 = EX^2 + DX^2

DF^2 = FY^2 + DY^2

Since EX + DX = EF = 13, we have DX = 13 - EX. Substituting this in the first equation and simplifying, we get:

ED^2 = EX^2 + (13 - EX)^2

ED^2 = 2EX^2 - 26EX + 170

Similarly, substituting FY = 13 - EY in the second equation and simplifying, we get:

DF^2 = FY^2 + DY^2

DF^2 = 170 - 26EY + EY^2 + DY^2

Now, using the fact that ED/DF = 135/169, we can substitute ED^2 = (135/169)^2 * DF^2 in the above equation for ED^2, and simplify to get:

(135/169)^2 * DF^2 = 2EX^2 - 26EX + 170

DF^2 = 170 * 169^2 / (135^2 + 2EX^2 - 26EX)

DF^2 = 170 * 169^2 / (135^2 + 2(10^2) - 26EX)   (Substituting XF = 10)

Similarly, we can substitute EY = 5 in the above equation for DF^2 and simplify to get:

FY^2 + DY^2 = 170 * 169^2 / (135^2 + 2(5^2) - 26EY)   (Substituting YF = 5)

DY^2 = 170 * 169^2 / (135^2 + 2(5^2) - 26EY) - FY^2

Substituting the given values, we get:

DF^2 = 170 * 169^2 / (135^2 + 200 - 26EX) = 106.7027

DY^2 = 170 * 169^2 / (135^2 + 50 -

To learn more about equations visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11950137

#SPJ11

The amount of water in the tank can be calculated by multiplying 3/4 to the volume of the tank: 3/4 x V = (3/4)L x W x H.

To calculate the amount of water in the aquarium's fish tank in the shape of a prism,

you would need to know the dimensions of the tank and then multiply the volume of the tank by 3/4.

Let's assume that the aquarium has a rectangular prism shape,

the amount of water in the tank would depend on the dimensions of the tank.

Let's assume the tank has a length of L, a width of W, and a height of H.

The volume of the tank can be calculated by multiplying the length, width, and height together: V = L x W x H.

If the tank is 3/4 full of water, the volume of water in the tank would be 3/4 of the total volume of the tank.

Learn more about  rectangular prism here:

https://brainly.com/question/21308574

#SPJ4

The Rohe Theorem can be applied to on the dood inter - 2x-) -1.31 WS. No, because it is not continuous on the closed intervals.

To determine whether Rolle's Theorem can be applied to the given function (ignoring typos and irrelevant parts), we need to consider the requirements for Rolle's Theorem: the function must be continuous on a closed interval and differentiable on an open interval within that closed interval.
Your answer: B. No, because the function is not continuous on the closed intervals. This is due to the presence of irrelevant parts in the given function, which makes it impossible to determine its continuity and differentiability. Therefore, Rolle's Theorem cannot be applied in this case.

Visit here to know about Rohr Theorem:

brainly.com/question/6563267

#SPJ11

The number of miles remaining in Mr. Ramos's monthly allowance is 191.1 miles.

To find out how many miles remain in Mr. Ramos's monthly allowance after the trip, let's first calculate the total miles he drove:

1. For the 10 days at 8 miles per day: 10 days * 8 miles/day = 80 miles
2. For the 3-day trip, sum up the miles driven each day: 156.1 + 240.8 + 82.0 = 478.9 miles

Now, add the miles from both parts: 80 miles + 478.9 miles = 558.9 miles

Finally, subtract this total from Mr. Ramos's monthly allowance of 750 miles:

750 miles - 558.9 miles = 191.1 miles

After the trip, 191.1 miles remain in Mr. Ramos's monthly allowance.

More on allowance: https://brainly.com/question/29496871

#SPJ11

The total interest on a 20-year, 5.26% loan with a principal of $50,000 is $52,600.

From the information,

Principal: $50,000

Interest rate: 5.26%

Loan duration: 20 years

Total Interest = (Principal x Interest Rate x Loan Duration) / 100

Plugging in the values we have, we get:

Total Interest = (50,000 x 5.26 x 20) / 100

Total Interest = $52,600

The interest is $52600.

Leans more about interest on

https://brainly.com/question/25793394

#SPJ1

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance between both those points are 6