Fill in the blanks to explain what
some Native people have done at Mount Rushmore since 1970.

1939 to December 1941:

In the European Theatre, WWII began in September 1939 when Germany invaded Poland, quickly followed by Britain and France declaring war on Germany. Germany had already annexed Austria and the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia, but the invasion of Poland marked the beginning of a major war. In the following years, Germany invaded and conquered Denmark, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, and France. Britain was the only remaining major power in Europe that opposed Germany, and the two countries engaged in a protracted and bloody air campaign known as the Battle of Britain. The Soviet Union, led by Joseph Stalin, had initially signed a non-aggression pact with Germany, but this agreement ended in June 1941 when Germany invaded the Soviet Union, launching the largest military operation in history. The Soviet Union eventually became one of the major Allied powers in the war.

In the Pacific Theatre, the situation was less volatile in this time period. Japan was engaged in a war with China, which had been ongoing since the early 1930s, and had already occupied much of China. Japan also had territorial ambitions in Southeast Asia, but for the most part, it had not engaged in large-scale military operations in the region. The United States had imposed economic sanctions on Japan in response to its invasion of China, and tensions between the two countries were rising. However, the US was still officially neutral in the war in Europe and had not yet entered the conflict.

December 7, 1941 to June 1944:

In the European Theatre, the war was in full swing. Germany had occupied most of Europe and was now focusing on the Soviet Union. The tide began to turn against Germany in late 1942 when the Soviets began to push back, winning key victories at Stalingrad and Kursk. The Allies also launched a campaign in North Africa, where British and American forces defeated German and Italian forces in a series of battles. In 1943, the Allies invaded Italy and overthrew the fascist government of Benito Mussolini. Germany responded by occupying Italy and setting up a puppet government. Meanwhile, the Allies were planning a major invasion of France, which would take place in June 1944.

In the Pacific Theatre, the situation changed dramatically on December 7, 1941, when Japan launched a surprise attack on the US naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. The attack resulted in the US declaring war on Japan and entering WWII. Japan also began a campaign of territorial expansion, occupying much of Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands. The US and its allies fought back, engaging in a series of naval and land battles, including the Battle of Midway and the Guadalcanal Campaign. The Allies gradually began to push back against Japan, but the war in the Pacific was far from over.

women's equality is peace, dignity, and equality on a healthy planet in Cambodia, hundreds of people joined the Siem Reap running race in 2015, saying no to violence against women.

gender equality is essential in our time, women and girls' representation is also very important gender equality besides being a fundamental human right. unfortunately, there is still a long way to go to achieve full equality of rights and opportunity between men and women.

women's reservation is the most important in society and also in a political system such as a parliament of government to get proper rules and regulations also the proper laws for women's reservation and also equality for women's empowerment. in the government sector, there should be equal pay for equal opportunity for men and women in the workplace.

UN support for the rights of women began with the organization's founding charter. among the purpose of the UN declared in ARTICLE 1 OF ITS CHARTER is to achieve international cooperation in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights within the UN's first year, the Economic and social council established its commission on the status of women.

women's rights as human rights and gender equality were made part of international human rights law by the universal declaration of human rights. which was adopted by the UN general assembly on 10th December 1948 that milestone document in the history of human rights recognized that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.

women should be treated equally in society because they have all rights as men. so do not make them keep in a marginalized manner women and men's equality is mandatory.

As per international laws, there should be coordination between men and women and also men try to understand the situation of women in the world's progress. equal treatment should be applied we should explore women in a proper way.

To know about more detils about women equality;

https://brainly.in/question/44323170

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is someone who I think has made America a better place, like Martin Luther King, Jr. In the 1970s, Ginsburg oversaw the influential American Civil Liberties Union Women's Rights Project.

Throughout her career as a Supreme Court justice, Ginsburg worked to advance women's rights and gender equality. She was also renowned for her vociferous dissents, which influenced both legal and public discourse. Continue promoting gender equality and giving aid to groups that enhance women's rights as a way to honor her legacy. Ginsburg headed the significant American Civil Liberties Union Women's Rights Project in the 1970s.

Learn more about Ruth Bader Ginsburg here:

https://brainly.com/question/29774518

#SPJ1

Answer:

A is the answer

Explanation:

because in economy the supply of goods and what the consumer need in the market is the increase in economy scarcity

Answer: The abolitionist movement began as a more organized, radical, and immediate effort to end slavery than earlier campaigns. It officially emerged around 1830. Historians believe ideas set forth during the religious movement known as the Second Great Awakening inspired abolitionists to rise up against slavery

Explanation:

Abolitionist newspapers played a vital role in the crusade to end slavery in the United States. The articles carried in these newspapers educated readers about the evils of the institution of slavery and helped to turn public opinion in northern states against it.

Answer: Choice B

Explanation: During the Chinese civil war, the communists and nationalist parties in China temporarily stopped fighting to work together in the fight against invading Japanese forces. This temporary truce was known as the Second United Front, and it lasted from 1937 to 1945. The Chinese saw the Japanese invasion as a greater threat to their country than the internal conflict between the two parties, so they put aside their differences to fight against the common enemy. After the defeat of Japan in 1945, the civil war resumed, and the communists eventually emerged as the victors in 1949.

The true statement about general elections is that they have a higher turnout than primary elections do. The Option C.

Yes, the general elections have a higher turnout because they are the final stage in the electoral process where voters choose their representatives for public office but primary elections are preliminary contests within political party to select a candidate for the general election.

Therefore, its tend to attract a wider range of voters such as those who may not be registered with a political party or who may not have participated in the primary election. In addition, its also receive more media coverage from political campaigns which can also help to drive up voter turnout.

Read more about general elections

brainly.com/question/25815264

#SPJ1

Answer:

Here are five New Deal programs and their objectives:

Program Name Objective Benefits

Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) Provide jobs to young, unemployed men to work on conservation projects Reduced unemployment; improved infrastructure; increased environmental awareness

Works Progress Administration (WPA) Create jobs for unemployed Americans in various public works projects Provided jobs; improved infrastructure; created public art; supported cultural programs

Social Security Act (SSA) Provide retirement and disability benefits to American workers Established a social safety net; helped protect seniors from poverty

National Recovery Administration (NRA) Regulate industry and establish fair business practices Improved working conditions; established minimum wage and maximum hours

Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) Help farmers by reducing crop production and stabilizing crop prices Increased agricultural stability; supported farmers and rural communities

Explanation:

Explanation:

Many historians question the claim that Betsy Ross made the first flag for the country during the American Revolution for two main reasons:

Lack of evidence: There is no historical evidence or documentation to support the claim that Betsy Ross made the first American flag. The story of Betsy Ross making the first flag was first told by her grandson, William Canby, nearly a century after the supposed event. Canby’s account was based on family oral tradition and was not supported by any contemporary records or eyewitness accounts.

Inconsistencies with historical facts: The story of Betsy Ross making the first flag contains several inconsistencies with known historical facts. For example, the design of the flag was not fixed until later than 1776 or 1777, and there are several paintings from that time period that depict flags with six-pointed stars rather than five-pointed stars. Additionally, there are records of other seamstresses in Philadelphia who were making flags during the Revolutionary War.

Due to these reasons, many historians consider the story of Betsy Ross making the first American flag to be a legend rather than a historical fact.

{ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - }

The overthrow of the Aztec Empire by Cortez and his expedition rests on three factors: The fragility of that empire, the tactical advantages of Spanish technology, and smallpox.

===============================================

The riots that occurred after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. in April 1968 were the most extensive wave of civil unrest in the United States since the Civil War. Many people, especially in African American communities, saw the assassination of King as a devastating blow and a symbolic representation of the injustices and inequalities they faced daily. The riots that followed were an expression of anger, frustration, and desperation that had built up over years of racial discrimination, poverty, and police brutality.

However, whether the riots were justified or not is a matter of debate, and opinions on this issue vary widely. Some argue that the riots were a legitimate form of protest against a system that had long denied African Americans their basic rights and freedoms. They believe that the violence was a necessary response to the violence and oppression that African Americans had experienced for centuries.

Others argue that the riots were counterproductive and harmful to the cause of civil rights. They believe that the violence and destruction that occurred only served to reinforce negative stereotypes about African Americans and alienate potential allies. They also argue that the riots diverted attention away from the peaceful and nonviolent tactics that had been successful in the civil rights movement up to that point.

Ultimately, the question of whether the riots that occurred after Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination were justified is a complex and contentious issue. While some argue that the violence was a legitimate response to systemic injustice and oppression, others believe that it only served to perpetuate a cycle of violence and harm the cause of civil rights.

Answer:

Here are six reasons how the Berlin Conference reached its conclusions:

Division of Africa: The primary objective of the Berlin Conference was to divide Africa into territories that would be controlled by European powers. This was achieved through negotiations between the attending countries, where they agreed on the boundaries of the territories they would claim.

Recognition of territorial claims: The Conference recognized the territorial claims of European powers in Africa, as long as they had effective occupation and administration of the territory. This led to the formalization of colonial rule in Africa.

Free trade: The Conference agreed on the principles of free trade in the Congo Basin and the Niger and Congo rivers. This was intended to promote commerce and economic development in these regions.

Humanitarian concerns: The Conference recognized the need to address the humanitarian concerns of the African population, including the suppression of the slave trade and the promotion of human rights. However, these concerns were largely overshadowed by the interests of the European powers.

Colonial administration: The Conference established rules for the administration of colonial territories, including the provision of infrastructure, education, and healthcare. However, these rules were often not enforced and colonial administration was frequently exploitative.

International recognition: The conclusions reached at the Berlin Conference were recognized internationally, and other countries who wished to establish colonies in Africa were expected to abide by them. This led to the formalization of European colonial rule in Africa and the exploitation of its resources for the benefit of European powers.

Explanation:

Answer:

the Allies implemented a multi-pronged strategy to defeat the Axis powers

Explanation: After the United States joined World War II, the Allies implemented a multi-pronged strategy to defeat the Axis powers. This strategy involved a combination of military, economic, and political tactics.

Militarily, the Allies used a combination of ground, naval, and air forces to launch attacks on Axis territories from multiple directions. This involved coordinated offensives in different theaters of the war, including Europe, Africa, and Asia. The Allies used their superior resources and firepower to gradually push back Axis forces, liberating occupied territories and advancing towards the heartlands of Germany, Italy, and Japan.

Economically, the Allies implemented a range of measures to weaken the Axis powers. The United States, as the leading economic power, provided significant economic aid to the Allies, including supplies, weapons, and money. This helped sustain the war effort and allowed the Allies to out-produce the Axis in terms of arms and resources. The Allies also implemented economic blockades and trade restrictions to disrupt Axis supply lines and limit their access to critical resources.

Politically, the Allies worked to build and maintain a coalition of nations united against the Axis powers. This involved diplomacy, propaganda, and intelligence efforts to gain the support of neutral nations and undermine Axis influence. The Allies also worked to coordinate their military efforts and minimize conflicts between their own forces, which was not always easy given their different strategic priorities and national interests.

Overall, the Allies' strategy after the US joined WWII was to use their combined military, economic, and political resources to wear down the Axis powers and ultimately defeat them. While this strategy took time and required significant sacrifices, it ultimately succeeded in achieving the Allies' objectives and bringing an end to the war.

Answer & Explanation:

Various tactics were employed by the United States to undermine Mexican rights and social structures in California and Texas during the 19th century. These tactics included a combination of attitudes, economic strategies, and brute force. Some examples of these tactics are:

   Manifest Destiny: The belief in Manifest Destiny, which held that the United States was destined to expand across the North American continent, played a significant role in justifying the erosion of Mexican rights and social structures. This attitude led to widespread support for American expansion into Mexican territories, often at the expense of the Mexican people.

   Economic pressure: American settlers and entrepreneurs moved into Mexican territories, such as California and Texas, and established businesses and farms. This influx of American economic activity undermined the local Mexican economy and displaced Mexican landowners. Additionally, the increasing economic dependence on the United States made it more difficult for Mexico to maintain control over these regions.

   Land policies and dispossession: American land policies in newly acquired territories, like the implementation of the Homestead Act, often favored American settlers over Mexican landholders. These policies led to the dispossession of Mexican landowners and further eroded their rights and social structures.

   Brute force and military action: The United States engaged in military actions, such as the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), to forcefully annex Mexican territories, including California and Texas. The war and subsequent Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo resulted in the loss of a substantial portion of Mexico's territory and further weakened its influence in the region.

   Racism and discrimination: American settlers often held racist attitudes towards Mexicans and other non-white groups. This led to discrimination and violence against Mexican communities, further eroding their rights and social structures. For example, the lynching of Mexicans in Texas by Anglo-American vigilantes was not uncommon during this period.

   Assimilation and Americanization: American authorities and settlers promoted the assimilation of Mexican populations into American society, often at the expense of their cultural identity and social structures. This process, sometimes referred to as "Americanization," involved the imposition of American customs, language, and values on Mexican communities.

These tactics, which combined attitudes, economic strategies, and brute force, significantly impacted Mexican rights and social structures in California and Texas, leading to the long-lasting marginalization of Mexican-American communities in these regions.

Answer:

The codependency of the feudal system during the Middle Ages had a significant impact on society. The system was based on the exchange of land for military protection, which led to a hierarchical social structure that was highly stratified. The lord, who owned the land, provided protection and resources to the vassal, who pledged loyalty and service to the lord. This codependency led to a sense of obligation and duty among the people, and it created a rigid social structure that limited social mobility.

At the same time, the feudal system provided some stability and security in an era marked by warfare and uncertainty. It allowed for the creation of small, self-sufficient communities that were largely independent of outside influence. However, it also led to the fragmentation of political power, making it difficult for centralized government to emerge.

Overall, the codependency of the feudal system had both positive and negative impacts on society during the Middle Ages. It provided stability and security but also created a rigid social structure that limited social mobility and fragmented political power.

Explanation:

Answer:

United Nations

Explanation:

Brainliest please!

Throughout the interwar period and the outbreak of World War II, American Nazi parties engaged in activities such as sporting Nazi propaganda, storming newspapers, spreading Nazi-sympathetic materials and infiltrating other non-political organizations.

Consideration of American responses to Nazism during the 1930s and 1940s raises questions about the responsibility to intervene in response to persecution or genocide in another country. As soon as Hitler assumed power in 1933, Americans had access to information about Nazi Germany’s persecution of Jews and other groups.

Although some Americans protested Nazism, there was no sustained, nationwide effort in the United States to oppose the Nazi treatment of Jews. Even after the US entered World War II, the government did not make the rescue of Jews a major war aim.

Learn more about war, here:

https://brainly.com/question/12233146

#SPJ1

In his argument about the "impending decline of the West," Barton may have been referring to the rise of economic and cultural globalization in the late twentieth century. Globalization, which refers to the increasing interconnectedness of economies, cultures, and societies around the world, has been a major trend in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. As countries and regions become more integrated, the balance of economic and political power has shifted away from the West and towards other regions, such as Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America. This shift in power has led some to argue that the West is losing its dominance and that its economic and cultural influence is declining.

Barton's argument may also have been influenced by the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, which marked a significant geopolitical shift in the world order. The West, led by the United States and its allies, had long been engaged in a struggle against the Soviet Union and its communist ideology. With the end of the Cold War, the West was no longer united by a common enemy, and its position in the world became less clear.

In addition, the rise of new technologies and new economic models in the late twentieth century may have contributed to Barton's argument about the decline of the West. For example, the rise of the internet and digital technology has made it easier for businesses and individuals to connect across borders, while new economic models such as outsourcing and offshoring have led to the transfer of jobs and wealth from the West to other regions.

Overall, the rise of economic and cultural globalization, the end of the Cold War, and the rise of new technologies and economic models may have contributed to Barton's argument about the decline of the West in the late twentieth century.

Answer:

Okinawa Island

Explanation:

If you examine a map you can tell that the largest islands in order are:

1. Honshu

2. Kyushu

3. Shikoku

4. Okinawa Island.

Hope it helps!

The terms that do not belong in the Gilded Age and the correct eras are :

The Gilded Age spanned the 1870s to the 1890s in American history, characterized by swift industrialization and urban expansion coupled with a notable surge in the economy.

Amidst this economic prosperity were corrupt practices promoted at large alongside social inequality. The era witnessed affluent industrialists including Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller amassing growing fortunes while the labor class experienced destitution with scant access to better occupational prospects, meagre income and poor working conditions.

Find out more on the Gilded Age at https://brainly.com/question/28145617

#SPJ1

Answer:

C. The state was NOT able to gather together a militia due to lack of funds.

Explanation:

Hope this helps:)

The Cold War was a period of intense diplomatic, political, and military rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union that lasted from 1945 to 1991.

It was characterized by an ideological divide between capitalist and communist states, and the two superpowers were unable to find common ground on a wide range of issues. Key events that contributed to the Cold War include the end of World War II, the formation of NATO and the Soviet-dominated Warsaw Pact, the Korean War, the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Vietnam War, and the Space Race.

Each event helped to further cement the divide between the two superpowers and contributed to the deepening of the Cold War. The Cold War was ultimately marked by a nuclear arms race, superpower interventions in proxy wars, and economic competition.

To know more about Cold War , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/26831734

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Greensboro Sit-Ins were a series of nonviolent protests that took place in 1960 in Greensboro, North Carolina, where a group of African American college students sat at a segregated lunch counter at a local Woolworth's store and refused to leave until they were served. The sit-ins were successful for several reasons:

Nonviolent protest: The students were committed to nonviolent protest, and their peaceful actions made it difficult for the authorities to use force against them without risking public condemnation.

Persistence: The students continued their sit-ins day after day, despite facing harassment, threats, and physical violence. This persistence kept the issue of segregation in the forefront of public attention and created pressure for change.

Media coverage: The sit-ins attracted significant media attention, both locally and nationally, which helped to raise awareness of the issue of segregation and put pressure on local businesses and authorities to take action.

Community support: The sit-ins were widely supported by the African American community in Greensboro, as well as by sympathetic white allies. This support helped to sustain the protests and put pressure on local authorities and businesses to change their policies.

Economic impact: The sit-ins had a significant economic impact on the targeted businesses, as the protesters encouraged a boycott of the stores. This economic pressure helped to convince the stores to change their policies and desegregate their lunch counters.

Overall, the Greensboro Sit-Ins were successful because of the students' commitment to nonviolence, their persistence in the face of opposition, the media coverage they received, the support of the community, and the economic pressure they exerted.

Explanation:

They appealed to the business owners' morality were the reason why Greensboro Sit-Ins so successful. Correct option is 2.

The Greensboro Sit-Ins were a series of nonviolent protests that began on February 1, 1960, when four African American college students sat at a segregated Woolworth's lunch counter in Greensboro, North Carolina. They refused to leave until they were served, sparking a larger movement of sit-ins across the country.

The success of the Greensboro Sit-Ins can be attributed to several factors:

Nonviolent and Peaceful Approach: The protesters adhered to nonviolent tactics, inspired by the principles of civil disobedience advocated by leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. Their peaceful and disciplined behavior garnered sympathy and support from many Americans who were disturbed by the blatant injustice of racial segregation.

Moral Appeal: The sit-in participants demonstrated tremendous courage and dignity, sitting quietly at the lunch counter despite facing hostility and threats. Their actions highlighted the moral injustice of segregation and appealed to the conscience of business owners and the public.

Media Attention: The sit-ins attracted significant media coverage, both local and national. Television and newspapers showcased images and stories of peaceful demonstrators being denied service simply because of their race. This media exposure brought the issue of racial segregation to the forefront of public consciousness and put pressure on businesses and local authorities to address the situation.

Solidarity and Widespread Participation: The Greensboro Sit-Ins inspired similar protests in other cities and towns across the United States. The movement gained momentum as more people joined in, creating a sense of solidarity and a powerful collective voice demanding change.

Support from the Black Community: The sit-ins received strong support from the local African American community, civil rights organizations, and religious leaders. Their unity and determination added strength to the movement.

In conclusion, the Greensboro Sit-Ins were successful because they appealed to the morality of business owners and the public at large. By peacefully confronting the injustice of segregation and showcasing the courage and determination of the protesters, the sit-ins brought attention to the issue and played a significant role in the broader civil rights movement, leading to the eventual desegregation of public facilities in the United States.

To know more about Greensboro Sit-Ins :

https://brainly.com/question/363060

#SPJ2

Answer & Explanation:

Because the negotiations that brought the Cuban crisis to a conclusion were part of a series of covert conversations between Bobby Kennedy and Soviet Ambassador Dobrynin that included a verbal agreement not just to remove the Jupiter missiles from Turkey, but also not to invade Cuba.

Answer: The answer should probably be answer A:  Explain why the negotiations that ended the Cuban Missile Crisis were successful

Hope this helps! :)