Answer:
D third-party
Explanation:
The two-party system is the political system in the economy under which two major parties of the same city or state rule over the political landscape consistently.
Because of the dominance of the two-party system, "third-party" candidates often struggle to raise both funds and the visibility of their campaigns.
When in a single landscape two stronger political parties rule dominantly over the candidates of other parties, known as third-party rulers, and candidates suffer problems in raising funds for their party and even face problems for the campaigns.
The other options are incorrect because the electoral, republican, and democratic do not get affected in their campaign during the two-party system.
To know more about the two-party system, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/2326034
what does federal law say about departmental accountable officials
Answer:
DoD may use them; if they are used, they only have limited pecuniary liability
Explanation:
who is the longest serving supreme court justice currently
Answer:
Among the current members of the Court, Clarence Thomas's tenure of 10,939 days (29 years, 346 days) is the longest, while Amy Coney Barrett's 342 days is the shortest.
Question 6 of 10
How do nominal and contemptuous damages differ from one another?
O A. With contemptuous damages, the judge or jury believes the
plaintiff
should pay for bringing the case to court.
O B. With nominal damages, the judge or jury believes the plaintiff
should pay for bringing the case to court.
C. With nominal damages, the judge or jury believes the plaintiff
should not have filed the suit.
O D. With contemptuous damages, the judge or jury believes the
plaintiff should have filed the suit.
The difference between nominal and contemptuous damages is that A. With contemptuous damages, the judge or jury believes the plaintiff should pay for bringing the case to court.
What is a contemptuous damage?These are damages that a Judge imposes on a plaintiff for bringing a matter to the court that the Judge believes has no merit and should never have made it to the courtroom.
This is opposed to a nominal damage that is imposed on the defendant for being found guilty of legally wronging the defendent.
Find out more on court damages at https://brainly.com/question/14001157.
A. With contemptuous damages, the judge or jury believes plaintiff SHOULD PAY for bringing the case to court
Explanation:
just got it right on the quiz boiis
Which of the following statements best explains the meaning of this quote from the Declaration of Independence?
“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government...”
If the government does not protect people’s natural rights, the people have the right to change the government
The government must be changed if people are unhappy
Whenever the government is not democratic, people can revolt.
If the government is destructive, the people can elect new officials.
Answer:
If the government does not protect people’s natural rights, the people have the right to change the government
and
If the government is destructive, the people can elect new officials.
Explanation:
c. The length, breadth and height of the box is 5m,6m and 7m respectively. Find its volume.
Answer:
VOLUME = LENGTH ×BREADTH × HEIGHT
= 5m × 6m × 7m
=210 m^3(metercube)
Based on the graph, which statements are correct? Check all that apply.
Voters age 55–64 were more likely to use nontraditional voting methods than people age 45–54.
Voters age 65 and older were more likely to use nontraditional voting methods than all other age groups.
Men were more likely to use nontraditional voting methods than women.
Voters with less than a high school education were less likely to use nontraditional voting methods than voters in all other educational groups.
Answer:
Based on the graph, which statements are correct? Check all that apply.
Voters age 55–64 were more likely to use nontraditional voting methods than people age 45–54. {{{{{CORRECT}}}}} Voters age 65 and older were more likely to use nontraditional voting methods than all other age groups.{{{{{CORRECT}}}}} Men were more likely to use nontraditional voting methods than women. Voters with less than a high school education were less likely to use nontraditional voting methods than voters in all other educational groups.
Explanation:
October 2021 CORRECT on EDGE
The correct statements from the graph are 1. Voters aged 55–64 were ... and 2. Voters aged 65 and older were ...
The graph suggests that the likelihood of the 55–64 aged group using non-traditional voting methods is 69.7 against 65.9 scored by the 45–54 age group. Based on the graph, the age group with the highest likelihood to use non-traditional voting methods is voters aged 65 and older with 77.7.Thus, the graph shows that age influences voters to choose non-traditional voting methods over traditional methods.
Related link: https://brainly.com/question/21817767
how might race, class, and gender differences in offending be explained by criminological theory?
Answer:
Simple!! Profiling!
Explanation:
Tons say that felons are discriminated and profiled negatively based on their race, class, gender, AND appearance. If law enforcement were to see someone with tattoos, that person has a chance of being criminally profiled in a negative way. It's the same for if you see a southern, black, hispanic, or Arabic felon. Yes, I have to say, they are interrogated fairly, but I would say law enforcement is stereotypical of the people in which they arrest. You're welcome!
Many people claim that convicts are discriminated against and profiled adversely because of their color, class, gender, and physical appearance. If a person with tattoos is seen by law enforcement, that person may be criminally profiled in a negative way.
What is criminological theory?Criminological ideas try to explain the incomprehensible and investigate what is frequently the brutality, oppression, or even evil that some perpetrate on others.
criminological theory are Rational Choice, Sociological Positivism, Biological Positivism and Psychological Positivism.
Thus, people claim that convicts are discriminated against and profiled adversely
For more details about criminological theory, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/5137629
#SPJ2
HELPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!
5. Conner walked past the candy section in the grocery store and quickly stuffed a handful of candy bars into her purse. A store security guard saw her do it, and she was arrested. Her parents came to the police station after her arrest to take her home. Did Conner’s shoplifting affect anyone? If so, who? Was Conner basing her conduct on emotion or reason? Was she treating herself and the other customers and stockholders of the store equally?
6. Sharon knows about tax laws and how the In-ternal Revenue Service (IRS) audits tax returns. She knows a way to cheat on her tax return that would save her almost $2,000. She thinks her chance of being caught is about one in 100. Can this cheating be justifi ed by reasoning based on ethical rules? Can it be justified by ethics based on consequences? Explain your answers.
7. An ordinance of Walker County provided that all automobiles must pass a smog emissions test once a year. Ross was ticketed because his car had not been inspected and approved at a testing center. Ross claimed to be a skilled mechanic who kept his car well tuned and cleaner than the law required. According to Ross, the law violated his natural rights. Explain why you agree or disagree with Ross.
8. If a legislature enacted a law that made it illegal to shout “fire” in a movie theater, would the ethical character of the law reflect consequences-based reasoning, rule-based reasoning, or both?
9. Assume a state legislature enacted legislation which budgeted more money to educating rich children than to educating poor children. Also assume that the majority of children are poor. Would complying with the law more reflect rule-based ethics or consequences-based ethics? (include evidence/reasonings)
Answer:
5) Conner's shoplifting affected the people around him. His mother, father, and the rest of his family had to deal with the whole ordeal of bailing him out. Connor was basing her conduct on emotion (impluse). She was not treating herself and the other customers and stock holders of the store equally since she didn't pay for the candybar.
6) No, this can not be justified by ethics based on consequences or ethical rules because while she may not face any immediate consequences, her dishonestly will affect other people in the end.
7) Ross has to follow the ordinance and have it tested at a testing center and have his vehicle tested no matter his expertise.
8) The ethical character of the law would reflect rule based reasoning because if there had been a fire then the potential "good" that could have come from this would have outweighed the bad.
9) Consequences-based ethics because it is created by a government for a specific group of people, being rich in this case
Which government department is in charge of combating computer crimes
worldwide?
Answer:
The Department of Justice
Explanation:
i am doing a favorite movie project any ideas?
Answer:
Love. Who doesn't enjoy a good love story? ...
Humanity vs. technology. ...
Sacrifice. The Lord of the Rings trilogy has several different themes throughout it, but the most unifying is that of sacrifice. ...
Good vs. evil. ...
Death. ...
Perseverance. ...
Coming of age. ...
Family drama.
Answer:
CARS 3
Explanation:
Who prosecuted Ernesto Miranda
Answer:
Twila Hoffman accused him and testified in court against him. Saying he told her about his crimes while he was behind bars.
Explanation:
violated when a person ""knowlingly"" makes or uses a false record or statement to get a false or fraudulent claim paid or approved by the federal government.
This is violated when a person ""knowingly"" makes or uses a false record or statement to get a false or fraudulent claim paid or approved by the federal government. This is called:
False claimThe False Claims Act is one that is backed up by federal law which is used to combat fraud among the people who make false claims knowingly in order to defraud the government.
As a result of this, this False Claims Act is indeed violated when there is a conspiracy by a company or individual to make false claims which would entitle the government to pay the person a certain sum.
This Act has been very helpful in prosecuting criminal cases in the United States, and it is sometimes called the Lincoln Law.
Therefore, the correct answer is false claim.
Read more here:
https://brainly.com/question/9569824
d. Write any 4 differences between simple and modern technology.
Answer:
- In simple technology, a plough was used to dig a field whilst in modern technology we use a tractor
- Paintings were used to capture people in simple technology whilst we use cameras to portray ourselves today
- To draft letters, it was traditional to use ink & paper or a typewriter whilst we now we use an app or our devices to send letters
- In simple technology, people used horses and carriages or simple boats to be taken from one point to another whilst we use transport such as cars, trains, bus, ships and aeroplanes today.
Nbayoungboy is the best at what
Answer: he is really good at making songs, and he’s good at everything
How does the goverment know almost everything?
will mark you brainliest has a reasonable answer and explanation
Answer:
Millions of Americans may soon become part of an expanded database that would give two federal regulatory agencies an up-close and personal (perhaps too up-close and personal) view of their private financial lives that, if breached, could make for a really bad day for a whole lot of people.
please help asap, 20 points !!!
Answer:
fourth one
Explanation:
Why does the way private military companies (PMC) work cause them to be considered controversial?
They come from the largest security firm, G4S, which focuses on prisoners and detention.
They are set up much like the Pinkerton agents during the Civil War where they use intelligence and secrecy to provide security.
They contract their services as security guards but they perform military duties.
They come from law enforcement and show that they can apply the same skills to military operations.
Answer:
most companies don't use their work in military operations or "like" them. nor do they keep there securities that much of a secret
Explanation:
The way private military companies (PMCs) work causes them to be considered controversial: They contract their services as security guards but they perform military duties. Thus, option C is the correct option.
PMCs are controversial because they are private entities that offer military-related services, such as combat and security operations, despite not being part of a formal military structure. This blurring of the line between military and private actors raises concerns about accountability, transparency, and adherence to international humanitarian law.
The fact that they contract their services as security guards but engage in military duties further intensifies the controversy, as it involves private individuals assuming roles traditionally held by trained military personnel.
Thus, option C is the correct option.
Learn more about military companies here:
https://brainly.com/question/30128645
#SPJ6
What is the definition of Bankruptcy?
Answer:
legal process through which people or other entities who cannot repay debts to creditors may seek relief from some or all of their debts.
Answer:
Bankruptcy is a legal process through which people or other entities who cannot repay debts to creditors may seek relief from some or all of their debts. In most jurisdictions, bankruptcy is imposed by a court order, often initiated by the debtor.
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP
3. Disqualification means that your driver's license privileges are:
O A. lost temporarily
B. lost permanently
O C. forfeited for five years
O D. forfeited for 10 years
if a supreme court justice believes that the constitution should be interpreted exactly as written, rather than examined in the context of the current social context, they would be advocating for ______.
If the supreme court believes that the constitution has to be interpreted directly as written, they would be advocating for what is called the strict interpretation.
The strict interpretation is also called the original intent. It means that the supreme court is to follow strictly the way the constitution was written and the intention of the framers of the constitution.
This kind of interpretation is related to the exact words with which the constitution was written and the language that was used.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/25160235?referrer=searchResults
the head of state in a parliamentary system
What is the most important condition for the probation system to function?
O a well-paid staff
O good judges and court supervisors
O well-trained dedicated probation officers
O the support of a community
Well-trained dedicated probation officers will most affect will be is the most important condition for the probation system to function
Option C
What is probation system to functionProbation is respponsibe for publishing appropriate pre-sentence reports for judges in the courts toto help them to choose the most accurate sentence.
Well-trained dedicated probation officers will most affect will be is the most important condition for the probation system to function
Option C
More on Law
https://brainly.com/question/17956416
After swerving in and out of traffic, a truck pulls over into a parking lot. Another truck that has been following closely pulls off as well. The first driver gets out, with a baseball bat in his hand, and approaches the other truck. When the driver of the other truck gets out to yell at the first driver, he is hit with the baseball bat. The injured driver sustains a broken arm. What charges would MOST likely be filed against the driver with the baseball bat
Answer:
aggravated assault
Explanation:
aggravated assault is when a person is injured because they are attacked by another person. To determine how serious a prosecutable aggravated assault charge is, it's necessary to assess whether a weapon was used, the level of injury a victim sustained and the intent behind it.
Also, I took the quiz :)
In the given case, If the injured motorist breaks his arm, charges of aggravated assault will certainly be brought against the driver.
What is the aggravated assault?Aggravated assault refers to the use of deadly force against a person, most frequently a deadly weapon. Simple objects like pipes, chisels, and rods have the potential to be deadly weapons. A chancy weapon, which can be any object that might seriously damage a person, is used in an aggravated assault.
A simple definition of an aggravated assault is an assault that results in substantial physical harm to the victim. Even if some municipal regulations may not define it in those terms, the more violent forms of assault are typically referred to as aggravated assaults.
Therefore, aggravated assault is the charges that would most probably be filled against the driver with the baseball bat.
Learn more about the aggravated assault, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/13993389
#SPJ5
a __________ is an essential element for a promise or agreement to binding. an agreement without this is unenforceable and contrary to public policy.
Molly purchases a blender from Bed Bath and Beyond and it flies off the base when she tries to make her first protein smoothie. As it flies across the kitchen, it hits Molly's 2 year old son on the head and knocks him to the floor. He suffers a concussion due to the fall. Depending on when she brings a lawsuit against Bed, Bath and Beyond, she might be prevented from winning a tort case because Bed Bath and Beyond might be able to use:
its a he say she say and she does not have the proof they could say she made him suffer from concussion Explanation:
help asap, 20 points
Answer:
fourth one again
Explanation:
What made the creation of the Constitution a radical document?
ment
o it heralded the sovereignty of King George
O it was written and adopted after America established independence from England
O it focused on the limits of power and not on crime and punishments
O it bore no resemblance to the Magna Carta
Answer:
O it was written and adopted after America established independence from England
and mabye
O it focused on the limits of power and not on crime and punishments
Explanation:
Answer:
it focused on the limits of power and not on crime and punishments
Explanation:
odyssey-ware
what is the term used in the fourteenth amendment to describe persons who are born or naturalized in the united states?
Answer:
Citizens
Explanation:
According to the 14th Amendment (XIV), you see that they describe them as citizens.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States..." -Amendment XIV
what ia the worst law (rule) in your school. answer fast get brainlist
Answer:
no hates in school but people can wear cat ears and cat tails.
no outside drinks
we can sit with friends at lunch we have 1 table for each grade in high school so you can sit with anyone elce besides your class mates
Explanation:
Examples of judicial activism and why that example would be considered judicial activism.
Answer:
Brown v. Board of Education (1954) is one of the most popular examples of judicial activism to come out of the Warren Court. ... For example, when a court strikes down a law, exercising the powers given to the court system through the separation of powers, the decision may be viewed as activist.
Explanation: