Aura builds model airplanes. Her first model airplane is 4


feet long


She wants her next model airplane to be


4


as long as the first


How long will her next modhi airplane be?


1


ft


12


B


1


4


12


ft


7


4


12


ft


D


17


ft

The area of the sprinkled lawn is approximately 19.625 square meters.

The formula for the area of a circle is:

A = πr²

Where A is the area and r is the radius and π is constant pi ( 3.14 ).

If the sprinkler as a circle with a radius of 2.5 meters. The area that the sprinkler can cover is the area of this circle.

Here, the radius is 2.5 meters, so we can substitute that into the formula:

A = πr²

A = 3.14 × 2.5²

Area = 3.14 × 6.25

Area = 19.625 m²

Therefore, the area is 19.625 m²

Learn more about circles here:https://brainly.com/question/20693416

#SPJ1

The total cost of the trip in U.S. dollars as per given rates and conversion is equal to approximately USD 3,232.58.

Total cost of the trip in U.S. dollars,

Convert the Australian dollars to U.S. dollars.

Using the exchange rate of 0.7752 USD per 1 AUD.

The cost of the hotel is,

7 nights × A$110/night = A$770

To convert this to U.S. dollars, multiply by the exchange rate,

A$770 × 0.7752 USD/AUD

= USD 596.904

Expected cost of meals, tours, souvenirs, etc. is,

A$3,400

Convert this to U.S. dollars, we again multiply by the exchange rate,

A$3,400 × 0.7752 USD/AUD

= USD 2,635.68

Total cost of the trip in U.S. dollars is the sum of these two amounts is,

USD 596.904 + USD 2,635.68 = USD 3,232.584

Rounding to two decimal places = approximately USD 3,232.58.

Therefore, the cost of the trip in the U.S. dollars is equal to approximately USD 3,232.58.

Learn more about trip here

brainly.com/question/15698942

#SPJ4

The above question is incomplete, the complete question is:

You are planning a trip to Australia. your hotel will cost you a$110 per night for seven nights. you expect to spend another a$3,400 for meals, tours, souvenirs, and so forth. How much will this trip cost her in U.S. dollars if the USD equivalent is .7752?

The given question is related to a regression line, where the equation is given as y = 1425 + 19.87x.

Slope of the equation is 19.87 and the intercept of the equation is 1425.

In part (a), step 2, we can explain that the slope in the least square regression equation is the coefficient of x and represents the average increase or decrease in y per unit of x.

Therefore, the slope value here is b = 19.87, which means that the average consumption of natural gas per day by Joan will decrease by 19.87 cubic feet per degree Fahrenheit over a month.

In part (b), step 1, we can explain that the y-intercept is a constant value in the least square regression equation that represents the average value of y when x is 0. Here, the intercept value is m = 1425, which means that when the temperature is 0 degrees Fahrenheit, the average consumption of natural gas per day is 1425 cubic feet.

This value has significance in this scenario because it indicates that a temperature of 0 degrees Fahrenheit is a possible temperature for which the natural gas consumption has been calculated.

To know more about regression here

https://brainly.com/question/14184702

#SPJ4

the actual perimeter of the living room  in the scale drawing  is 216 inches.

We can precisely portray locations, areas, structures, and details in scale drawings at a scale that is either smaller or more feasible than the original.

When a drawing is said to be "to scale," it signifies that each piece is proportionate to the real or hypothetical entity; it may be smaller or larger by a specific amount.

When something is described as being "drawn to scale," we assume that it has been printed or drawn to a conventional scale that is accepted as the norm in the construction sector.

When our awareness of scale improves, we are better able to quickly recognize the spaces, zones, and proposed or existent spatial relationships when looking at a drawing at a given scale.

One metre is equivalent to one metre in the actual world. When an object is depicted at a 1:10 scale, it is 10 times smaller than it would be in real life.

You might also remark that 10 units in real life are equivalent to 1 unit in the illustration.

If the length and breadth of the living room in real life are 9/4 inches each, we can use the given scale of the drawing to find the corresponding dimensions of the living room in the drawing:

1/4 inch = 2 feet

So, 9/4 inches in real life is equal to:

(9/4) inches / (1/4 inch per 2 feet) = 18 feet

This means that each side of the living room in the drawing would be 18/2 = 9 inches long.

To find the actual perimeter of the living room, we need to convert the dimensions back to real-life measurements and add up the lengths of all four sides:

Length in real life = 9/4 inches x 2 x 12 inches/foot = 54 inches

Breadth in real life = 9/4 inches x 2 x 12 inches/foot = 54 inches

Perimeter in real life = 2 x (Length + Breadth)

Perimeter in real life = 2 x (54 inches + 54 inches)

Perimeter in real life = 2 x 108 inches

Perimeter in real life = 216 inches

Therefore, the actual perimeter of the living room is 216 inches.

To know more about scale drawing visit :-

brainly.com/question/17388747

#SPJ1

Answer:

13, 2x^2 - 98 = 0 ........ given

2x^2= 98 ........ take to tge left side no.98

x^2 = 98/2 = 49 ..... multiple both side by radical

x = √49 = 7 ........ simplify

17, 4x^2 + 10 = 11

4x^2 + 10 = 11 4x^2 = 11- 10 = 1

4x^2 + 10 = 11 4x^2 = 11- 10 = 1 x^2 = 1/4

4x^2 + 10 = 11 4x^2 = 11- 10 = 1 x^2 = 1/4 x = √1/4 = 1/2

A markup refers to the amount that is added on top of the cost price of a product to arrive at the selling price. In this case, the cost price of the roses was $4.50 per dozen. Therefore, a 90% markup would mean that the selling price is 90% more than the cost price.

To calculate the markup, we can use the following formula:
Markup = Cost Price x Markup Percentage

Markup Percentage = 90% = 0.9 (in decimal form)

Markup = $4.50 x 0.9 = $4.05

This means that the markup on the roses is $4.05 per dozen.

To calculate the final retail price, we simply need to add the markup to the cost price:
Retail Price = Cost Price + Markup

Retail Price = $4.50 + $4.05 = $8.55

Therefore, the final retail price for the roses that Larray bought at the flower shop is $8.55 per dozen.

In conclusion, Larray bought roses at the flower shop for $4.50 per dozen with a 90% markup, which resulted in a final retail price of $8.55 per dozen. The markup was calculated by multiplying the cost price by the markup percentage of 90%, and then adding it to the cost price to arrive at the selling price.

This is a common practice in the flower industry, where flower shops add a markup to the cost of their products to make a profit.

To know more about selling price refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28017453#
#SPJ11

To calculate the percent error, we need to use the following formula:

percent error = (|measured value - actual value| / actual value) x 100%

1. Determine the difference between the actual value (8 laps) and the estimated value (5 laps).
Actual value = 8 laps
Estimated value = 5 laps
Difference = Actual value - Estimated value = 8 - 5 = 3 laps

2. Divide the difference by the actual value:
Percent error (decimal) = Difference / Actual value = 3 laps / 8 laps = 0.375

3. Convert the decimal to a percentage by multiplying by 100:
Percent error = 0.375 * 100 = 37.5%

4. Round to the nearest percent:
Percent error ≈ 38%

So, Michael's percent error in estimating his laps around the track was approximately 38%.

Learn more about percent error at https://brainly.in/question/2230099

#SPJ11

Answer:

52.5

Step-by-step explanation:

First, we can see that the base is 14m. The top is 7m, and the height is 5m. Since the formula for a trapezoid is

top + base / 2 ∙ h,

we plug in our numbers to get

7 + 14 / 2 ∙ 5.

We can solve to get

21 / 2 ∙ 5

10.5 ∙ 5

52.5

Answer: The correlation coefficient (r) and determination coefficient (r²) are both measures of the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables in a dataset.

The correlation coefficient (r) is a measure of the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1, with -1 indicating a perfect negative correlation, 0 indicating no correlation, and 1 indicating a perfect positive correlation. The correlation coefficient only tells us the strength and direction of the relationship; it does not tell us anything about the proportion of variation in one variable that is explained by the variation in the other variable.

The determination coefficient (r²), also known as the coefficient of determination, is a measure of the proportion of variation in one variable that is explained by the variation in the other variable. It ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 indicating that none of the variation in one variable is explained by the variation in the other variable, and 1 indicating that all of the variation in one variable is explained by the variation in the other variable. The determination coefficient is calculated as the square of the correlation coefficient, so r² always has the same sign as r. A value of r² close to 1 indicates that the relationship between the variables is strong and that a large proportion of the variation in one variable can be explained by the variation in the other variable.

In summary, the correlation coefficient tells us about the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables, while the determination coefficient tells us about the proportion of variation in one variable that is explained by the variation in the other variable.

While correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables, determination coefficient measures how much of the variability in one variable can be explained by the other variable.

The correlation coefficient and determination coefficient are two related statistical measures that help us understand the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables. The correlation coefficient (denoted as r) measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1, with -1 indicating a strong negative relationship, 1 indicating a strong positive relationship, and 0 suggesting no relationship.

On the other hand, the determination coefficient (represented as R²) quantifies the proportion of variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable. It ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 indicating no explanatory power and 1 indicating perfect prediction. R² is simply the square of the correlation coefficient (r²).

In summary, while the correlation coefficient shows the strength and direction of a linear relationship, the determination coefficient indicates the extent to which one variable can predict the other. Both are important in determining the nature of relationships between variables in a data set.

Learn more about determination coefficient here: https://brainly.com/question/17237825

#SPJ11

The first fraction is closer to 1, while the second fraction is closer to 17.

Let's first determine the value of the first fraction with a denominator of 4, which rounds to 1.

Since the fraction is less than 1 and rounds to 1, its numerator must be 3. Therefore, the first fraction is:

3/4 = 0.75

Now let's consider the second fraction, which has a denominator of 6 and the same numerator as the first fraction. So its value is:

3/6 = 1/2 = 0.5

To determine which fraction is closer to 1 or 17, we need to calculate the absolute difference between the value of each fraction and 1 or 17, and then compare those differences.

For the first fraction, the absolute difference between 0.75 and 1 is:

|1 - 0.75| = 0.25

The absolute difference between 0.75 and 17 is:

|17 - 0.75| = 16.25

For the second fraction, the absolute difference between 0.5 and 1 is:

|1 - 0.5| = 0.5

The absolute difference between 0.5 and 17 is:

|17 - 0.5| = 16.5

Therefore, the first fraction is closer to 1, while the second fraction is closer to 17.

Learn more about fraction;

brainly.com/question/729654

#SPJ4

Answer:

 = 9

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope  = (y1-y2)/(x1-x2)

           = -12-6/4-6

           =  -18/-2

           = 9

Points of inflection: (11/6, -10.37).

To determine the intervals of concavity and find the points of inflection, we first need to find the second derivative of the function f(x) = 2x^3 - 11x^2 + 7.

1. First derivative:
f'(x) = 6x^2 - 22x

2. Second derivative:
f''(x) = 12x - 22

Now, we need to find the critical points by setting the second derivative equal to zero:

12x - 22 = 0
x = 11/6

The point of inflection occurs at x = 11/6. Now, let's find the intervals of concavity:

1. f''(x) > 0 (concave up):
12x - 22 > 0
x > 11/6

2. f''(x) < 0 (concave down):
12x - 22 < 0
x < 11/6

Finally, we need to find the y-coordinate for the point of inflection:

f(11/6) = 2(11/6)^3 - 11(11/6)^2 + 7 ≈ -10.37

So, the point of inflection is (11/6, -10.37).

Points of inflection: (11/6, -10.37).
Your answer: The function is concave up on the interval (11/6, ∞) and concave down on the interval (-∞, 11/6). The point of inflection is (11/6, -10.37).

To learn more about inflection, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/11986000

#SPJ11

Therefore, the simplified expression is 24.

To simplify the expression (-8)(10+(-5)+(-8)), you first need to solve the parentheses, following the order of operations, which requires solving the addition and subtraction within the parentheses before multiplying.

So, you have (-8)(10-5-8), which becomes (-8)(-3) after solving the parentheses. Finally, you can solve the multiplication by multiplying -8 by -3, resulting in 24.

It's important to remember the order of operations when simplifying expressions, which is Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division (from left to right), and Addition and Subtraction (from left to right).

You can read more about simplifying expressions at https://brainly.com/question/723406

#SPJ11

Answer: [tex](w^{\frac{1}{5} } )^{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The root of a number, say [tex]\sqrt[n]{x}[/tex] is equal to [tex]x^{\frac{1}{n} }[/tex]. So, [tex]\sqrt[5]{w^{3} } = (w^{3} )^{\frac{1}{5} }[/tex]. Since when dealing with an exponent of a number raised to an exponent you multiply the exponents, due to the associative property it does not matter which order you do the exponents in. So, [tex](w^{3} )^{\frac{1}{5} }= (w^{\frac{1}{5} } )^{3}[/tex], which is answer D.

One would least expect to find fossils in the surface bedrock in the Adirondack Mountains region of New York State.

This region is known for having some of the oldest rocks in North America, dating back over a billion years. These rocks were formed through volcanic activity and mountain-building processes that occurred long before the evolution of complex life forms.

As a result, the rocks in the Adirondack Mountains are generally not rich in fossils, especially those of plants and animals that evolved much later in Earth's history.

In contrast, other regions of New York State, such as the Hudson Valley and the Finger Lakes region, have rocks that are more conducive to fossil preservation. These regions were covered by shallow seas at various times in the past, allowing for the accumulation of sediment and the preservation of fossils of marine organisms.

To learn more about fossil, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31419516

#SPJ11

The equation of the line passing through the given points is y = -2x+2.

Given that are the values of x and y coordinates we need to find the equation of the line using them,

So, considering the points (1, 0) and (3, -4),

We know that the equation of a line passing through points (x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂) is =

y-y₁ = y₂-y₁ / x₂-x₁ (x-x₁)

Here (x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂) are (1, 0) and (3, -4),

Therefore, the required equation is =

y-0 = -4-0/3-1 (x-1)

y = -2x + 2

Hence, the equation of the line passing through the given points is y = -2x+2.

Learn more about equation of the line click

https://brainly.com/question/21511618

#SPJ1

The rate of interest that Neil gets, r%, comes out to be 3.18%

Compound interest is calculated as follows:

A = P[tex](1+r)^t[/tex]

where A is the amount

P is the principal

r is the rate of interest

t is the time

Simple interest can be calculated as:

A = P (1 + r * t)

where A is the amount

P is the principal

r is the rate of interest

t is the time

For Kay,

P = £1500

t = 5 years

r = 3% compound annually

A = 1500 [tex](1+0.03)^5[/tex]

= 1500 * [tex]1.03^5[/tex]

= £ 1,738.91

For Neil,

P = £1500

t = 5 years

r = r% simple interest

According to the question,

A = 1738.91

1500 ( 1 + r * 5) = 1738.91

1 + 5r = 1.159

5r = 0.159

r = 0.0318

r% = 3.18%

Learn more about Compound Interest:

https://brainly.com/question/30364118

#SPJ4

The 95% CI for the genuine proportion of this bank's checking account customers who also have savings accounts is (0.3666, 0.4976).

To construct a 95% confidence interval for the true proportion of checking account customers who also have savings accounts, we can use the following formula:

CI = p ± z*√(p*(1-p)/n)

where:

We are given that the sample size is n = 243 and that 105 of the customers had both checking and savings accounts. Therefore, the sample proportion is:

p = 105/243 = 0.4321

The critical value z for a 95% confidence interval is approximately 1.96 (obtained from a standard normal distribution table or calculator).

We get the following results when we plug these values into the formula:

CI = 0.4321 ± 1.96*√(0.4321*(1-0.4321)/243)

CI = 0.4321 ± 0.0655

CI = (0.3666, 0.4976)

Therefore, we can say with 95% confidence that the true proportion of checking account customers who also have savings accounts at this bank is between 0.3666 and 0.4976.

To learn more about confidence interval, visit:

brainly.com/question/13481020?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

The distance Gary traveled to visit his brother is 2.1 x 10^2 times as much as the distance he traveled to visit his sister.

To determine how many times the distance to visit Gary's brother is compared to the distance to visit his sister, we'll follow these steps:

1. Identify the distances traveled:
  - Sister: 2 x 10^3 miles
  - Brother: 4.2 x 10^5 miles

2. Divide the distance to the brother by the distance to the sister:
  (4.2 x 10^5 miles) / (2 x 10^3 miles)

3. Simplify the expression:
  - First, let's divide the coefficients: 4.2 ÷ 2 = 2.1
  - Next, divide the exponents: 10^5 ÷ 10^3 = 10^(5-3) = 10^2

4. Combine the results:
  2.1 x 10^2

So, the distance Gary traveled to visit his brother is 2.1 x 10^2 times as much as the distance he traveled to visit his sister.

Learn more about distance,

https://brainly.com/question/26046491

#SPJ11

The linear equation in slope intercept form is:

y = -0.1x + 9

The formula for finding the Linear Equation in slope intercept form is expressed in the form:

y = mx + c

where:

m refers to the slope

c refers to the y-intercept

Looking at the given graph, we can see that:

The y-intercept = 9

The y-intercept is the point where the line crosses the y-axis while x-intercept is the point where the line crosses the x-axis.

Taking the two coordinates:

(1970, 7) and (1990, 5)

Slope:

m = (5 - 7)/(1990 - 1970)

m = -2/20

m = -0.1

Thus, the Equation in slope intercept form is expressed in the form of:

y = -0.1x + 9

Read more about Linear Equation at: https://brainly.com/question/28732353

#SPJ1

We can conclude that Jack's claim is correct. QRST is indeed a parallelogram, since opposite angles in QRST are congruent, and opposite sides in a parallelogram are also congruent

To determine whether Jack's claim that QRST is a parallelogram is correct, we need to use the properties of parallelograms. One of the properties of a parallelogram is that opposite angles are congruent. Therefore, we need to check if the opposite angles in QRST are congruent.

If m∠R = 72 and m∠T = 108, then the sum of these angles is 180 degrees (72 + 108 = 180). This indicates that angles R and T are supplementary.

If m∠S = 72, then we need to find the measure of angle Q. Since QRST is a quadrilateral, the sum of its interior angles is 360 degrees.

m∠Q + m∠R + m∠S + m∠T = 360

Substituting the given values, we get:

m∠Q + 72 + 72 + 108 = 360

Simplifying the equation, we get:

m∠Q = 108

Therefore, angles Q and S are congruent (both measuring 72 degrees) and angles R and T are supplementary (measuring 72 and 108 degrees, respectively). Since opposite angles in QRST are congruent, and opposite sides in a parallelogram are also congruent, we can conclude that Jack's claim is correct. QRST is indeed a parallelogram.

More on parallelogram: https://brainly.com/question/11803780

#SPJ11

There are 42 yellow skittles in the box.

Based on the given information, we know that the ratio of green skittles to yellow skittles is 5:7. This means that for every 5 green skittles, there are 7 yellow skittles.

To find out how many yellow skittles are in the box, we need to know how many sets of 5 green skittles there are. We can do this by dividing the total number of skittles in the box (30) by 5 (since there are 5 green skittles for every set).
30 ÷ 5 = 6

This means there are 6 sets of 5 green skittles in the box.

Now we can use the ratio of 5:7 to find out how many yellow skittles there are in each set:
5 green skittles : 7 yellow skittles

Since there are 7 yellow skittles in each set, we can find the total number of yellow skittles by multiplying 7 by the number of sets (6):
7 x 6 = 42

There are 42 yellow skittles in the box.

To know more about "Ratio" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/17223098#

#SPJ11

Answer:

x=81

Step-by-step explanation:

Rewrite log_3 (x)=4 in exponential form using the definition of a logarithm. If x and b are positive real numbers and b≠1, then log_b(x)=y is equivalent to b^y=x.

Rewrite the equation as x=3^4

Raise 3 to the power of 4 

x=81

"The computer refused to obtain the estimates because of perfect multicollinearity caused by including all possible fourth-order terms in the regression model."

Perfect multicollinearity occurs when there is an exact linear relationship between predictor variables in a regression model. In this case, including all possible fourth-order terms in X1 and X2 resulted in perfect multicollinearity.

When there is perfect multicollinearity, it becomes impossible to calculate the regression estimates using the standard formula, as the matrix (X'X)^-1 does not exist. The presence of perfect multicollinearity creates redundancy and ambiguity in the model, making it impossible for the computer routine to obtain valid estimates.

To address this issue, the experimenter decided to ignore the levels of variable X2 and fit a fourth-order model solely in X1. By focusing on one variable and excluding the other, the problem of perfect multicollinearity was resolved, and the regression model could be estimated successfully.

In conclusion, the computer refused to obtain the estimates due to perfect multicollinearity caused by including all possible fourth-order terms in the regression model. Ignoring one variable helped overcome the issue and allowed the experimenter to fit the desired fourth-order model.

To know more about multicollinearity refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30691253

#SPJ11

According to recent studies, there is a notable difference in credit scores between those over the age of 55 and those between the ages of 18-24.

On average, individuals over the age of 55 tend to have higher credit scores than those in the 18-24 age range. This is primarily due to the fact that older individuals have had more time to establish and build their credit history, whereas younger individuals are just starting out and may not have had the opportunity to establish credit yet.

Additionally, older individuals tend to have more stable financial situations and may have less debt compared to younger individuals who may be dealing with student loans or other types of debt.

However, it's important to note that credit scores can vary greatly between individuals, regardless of age, and there are many factors that contribute to credit score, such as payment history, credit utilization, and length of credit history.

To know more about credit score:

https://brainly.com/question/29548283

#SPJ11

Weak correlation observed in scatter plot, inaccurate r=0.01 value; possible causal relationship - new fertilizer's effect on strawberry yields.

Based on the scatter plot, a correlation coefficient of r=0.01 is not an accurate value for this data. This is because the scatter plot shows an upward trend with moderately spread out points from the line of best fit, indicating a weak positive correlation. A correlation coefficient of 0.01 suggests a near-zero correlation, which is inconsistent with the observed pattern in the scatter plot.

A possible scenario for a causal relationship for strawberries picked on the farm could be the application of a new fertilizer that is known to increase strawberry yields. The farmer could divide the field in half, applying the new fertilizer to one half and the traditional fertilizer to the other half, and then compare the yields of each half. This would allow for a comparison of the effect of the two different fertilizers on strawberry yields and establish a causal relationship between the fertilizer and the yield of strawberries.

Learn more about scatter plot

brainly.com/question/29231735

#SPJ11

The absolute maximum is f(-2) = 10/3, and absolute minimum is f(0) = 8.

First, let's find the derivative of the function:

f(x) = 8+x/2-x

f'(x) = (1/2) - 1 = -1/2

Next, we need to find the critical points of the function on the given domain.

In this case, the derivative is always defined and is never zero. Therefore, there are no critical points on the given domain.

Next, we check the endpoints of the domain, x = -2 and x = 0:

f(-2) = 8 + (-2)/(2-(-2)) = 10/3

f(0) = 8 + 0/(2-0) = 8

Since the function is continuous on the closed interval [-2, 0],

The extreme value theorem tells us that the function must have both an absolute maximum and an absolute minimum on the interval.

Therefore, the absolute maximum occurs at x = -2 and is f(-2) = 10/3, and the absolute minimum occurs at x = 0 and is f(0) = 8.

Learn more about absolute extrema

brainly.com/question/2272467

#SPJ11

The equation is 86.25 + 3x = 99.

Let's assume the cost for each hour Troy's car was parked in the garage is x dollars.

Since Troy spent a total of $99, we can set up an equation based on the given information.

The cost of the ticket to the basketball game is $86.25, and Troy also had to pay for 3 hours of parking. Therefore, the equation can be written as:

86.25 + 3x = 99

In this equation, 86.25 represents the cost of the ticket, 3x represents the cost of parking for 3 hours at a rate of x dollars per hour, and 99 represents the total amount Troy spent.

Therefore, the equation is 86.25 + 3x = 99.

Learn more about the cost for each hour at Troy's.

brainly.com/question/30076036

#SPJ11

The average monthly exchange rate between the us dollar and the Australian dollar for 2018

A. The components of a time series of average monthly exchange rates include trend, seasonality, cyclical fluctuations, and random noise. The trend represents the long-term movement of the exchange rate, seasonality represents repeating patterns within a fixed period, cyclical fluctuations are changes due to economic cycles, and random noise consists of unpredictable fluctuations.

B. To smooth out the patterns that include everything the model learned, you can apply an exponential smoothing method with a chosen smoothing coefficient (alpha). A suitable coefficient could be 0.2, representing a balance between giving weight to recent data and considering the historical pattern. The decision on the coefficient depends on the specific characteristics of the data and the desired degree of smoothing.

C. To forecast the monthly exchange rate for 2020, you can apply various techniques, such as moving average, exponential smoothing, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), and machine learning-based methods. Each method has its advantages and limitations, and it's important to analyze the performance of each technique on historical data to choose the most appropriate method for forecasting.

D. Comparing the forecasting results of different techniques applied in part (C) requires measuring their accuracy using metrics like mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The technique with the lowest error values would be considered more accurate in predicting the monthly exchange rates. It is crucial to consider the data characteristics and the goals of the forecast when deciding on the most suitable technique.

To know more about monthly exchange refer here

https://brainly.com/question/14288610#

#SPJ11

As per the given values, the height of the vase is approximately 7.3 cm.

The radius of the vase = 4.3cm

The volume of vase = 1330. 2 cm³

Two parallel circular bases are connected by a curving surface to form the three-dimensional object known as a cylinder. There are two round flat sides, two curved edges, and one curved surface.

Using the formula for the volume of a cylinder -

V = πr²h,

where r is the radius and h is the height.

Substituting the values -

1330.2 = π(4.3)²h

1330.2 = 58.09πh

Dividing both sides by 58.09π

1330.2/58.09π = 58.09πh/58.09π

h = 7.27

= 7.3 ( After rounding)

Read more about height on:

https://brainly.com/question/28122539

#SPJ4