Answer:
The correct answer is information.
the – members of the texas legislature meet in regular session for – each odd-numbered year. in the 2019 legislative session, they successfully passed – of all proposed legislation.
Answer: 181 , 140 calendar days , less than 20 percent
Explanation:
how does the requirement for probable cause to detain compare to the requirement for probable cause to go to trial
Answer:
Probable cause to detain requires fewer facts than does the decision to go to trial. The former refers to offenses where imprisonment is authorized but not required, while the latter refers to offenses that don't actually result in imprisonment.
Explanation:
3 new laws to help the country
Answer:
1. You good sir/ma'am are president forever
2. Human experiments are illegal
(Not sure if they are already but oh well)
3. Netflix is either $10 or free
Explanation:
will give brainliest
thank you so much.......
A(n) _____ is a court order forcing a person to do or not to do an act, such as violating a private restriction.
Answer:
Injunction.
A(n) injunction is a court order forcing a person to do or not to do an act, such as violating a private restriction.
I hope this helped at all.
The answer is injunction. An injunction is an authoritative warning or order. For example an injunction can force a company to stop dumping sewage into the waters system. This is forcing the company to not do the act, as it violates the private restriction.
I hope this helps! :)
Compare what you know about paralegals with paralegals who are part of law shows on television. Make one statement about reading and gaining knowledge of paralegals and make one statement about paralegals portrayed in the media.
Paralegals, as I know them in person (and this may be in first person, or as experienced by a close acquaitance), do not command the kind of representation they are given in television shows.
Simply put, their job is to help lawyers do their job. The following include but are not a comprehensive list of what lawyers do:
Go for trials to defend their clients;Attend court hearings;initiate and or attend corporate and personal meetings; and sometimesget involved in police investigations etc.In the shows I have seen, they always seem smart, passionate about the cases they are working on, very ambitious, and always dressed in well-tailored corporate attire.
The reality that I have to accept is that:
Paralegals are not super-legal corporate figures. They are human too.Sometimes, they don't even love the job. For some, it's just another job to save up for their primary goalSome paralegals make very terrible mistakes. Not all of them are as smart as the job requires;They do not all dress for the part.People who are passionate about practicing law, perhaps, should read up about paralegals, and aim to practice as a paralegal before taking steps to become a lawyer.
I definitely would want the paralegals that I know to look and sound very smart like the ones often portrayed in the media.
Please read up more about paralegals here:
brainly.com/question/2763321
The Department of Labor (DOL) works to protect public health and safety.
bus
Decide if each item on the list is a DOL regulation (R) or enforcement activity (E).
Enforcement Regulation
1. Monitor workplaces to see if they are following safety and health standards.
2 Employers must use a certain method for calculating overtime pay.
3. Employers must record and report work-related fatalities, injuries, and illnesses.
4. Evaluate possible cancer-causing substances found in the workplace
5. Employees can file a charge if they feel they've been discriminated against
6. Educate employers about how to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act.
7. Make sure agricultural workers are receiving fair treatment required by law.
8. Employers must post a notice explaining laws about the minimum wage
Activity - Side
IVICS © 2019 iCivics, In
Answer:
1) no
2) yes
3) yes
4) no
5) no
6) yes
7) yes
8) yes
legal decisions made by judges in court cases are called
Answer:
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to such past decisions.#StudyHars
#BrainlyEveryday
Brainliest! Please help
Answer:
D) perpetrator
Explanation:
someone who carries out the act.
C IS THE ANSWER.
I HOPE IT IS HELPFUL
can you claim self defense if you are committing a crime
Answer:
Depends
Explanation:
Sometimes you can because it really depends, if you commited the crime and then claimed self defense just to reduce the time of your sentence people might belive you, but the moral of the story is , yes you can
(depending on your state)
Answer:
As the other person said, it depends.
Explanation:
If someone was aiming guns at your face or someone was trying to kill you, or maybe someone was harassing you. And you hit them back to the point they couldn't breathe, yeah you can, it should give you some wiggle space in court if you say that.
which amendment prevents cruel and unusual punishment
Answer:
The eighth amendment
Explanation:
Features of the us constitution
Please help me!!!!!
J. W. Gamble filed suit against W.J. Estelle because _____. he was also a medical doctor and should have known that Gamble was really sick he had the most money and therefore, if Gamble won his lawsuit, would have to pay more than the other people named in the suit he was cruel he was the Director of the Texas Department of Corrections and most responsible for the level of medical care afforded prisoners
Answer:
J. W. Gamble filed suit against W.J. Estelle because he was the Director of the Texas Department of Corrections and most responsible for the level of medical care afforded prisoners
Explanation:
legal decisions made by judges in court cases are called
Answer:
A precedent.
Legal decisions made by judges in court cases are called precedents.
I hope this helped at all.
Law books and articles that summarize, systematize, compile, explain, and interpret the law are called
Answer:
Are called secondary sources.
Law books and articles that summarize, systematize, compile, explain, and interpret the law are called secondary sources.
Other secondary sources are...
Biographies.Textbooks.Journal articles.A secondary source is a source that analyzes a specific event, but most of time, it is a historical event.
I hope this helped at all.
The ________________ is a law limiting the amount of time prosecutors have to bring criminal charges against a suspect after the crime has occurred.
Answer:
statute of limitations
Explanation:
our license will be suspended for failing, refusing, or neglecting to report an accident in which there is more than ________ worth of property damage, an injury, or a death. $300 $400 $550 $750
Answer:
Technichally all of them because, most license suspentions are due to failure to report an accident. Within 72 hours, every driver involved in a motor vehicle accident that causes death or injury, property damage of more than $1,500, or enough damage that any vehicle must be towed must file a written accident report with the DMV.
at what point can the defense move to end the case to end the case and for what cause?
Answer:
The majority of criminal cases terminate when a criminal defendant accepts a plea bargain offered by the prosecution. In a plea bargain, the defendant chooses to plead guilty before trial to the charged offenses, or to lesser charges in exchange for a more lenient sentence or the dismissal of related charges.
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP
Prisha has lived her whole life with a violent parent. She learned to hide when her father gets home because his temper is unpredictable. One afternoon, her father comes in very angry. Prisha is trying to make dinner but her father begins to push her toward the stove and around the kitchen. Prisha is so scared because he seems to be out of his mind. As he lifts his fist toward her, Prisha grabs the knife she has been using to cut vegetables and thrusts it blindly toward him so that he will not hit her. The knife hits her father in the neck, causing his death. When arrested, what crime will Prisha MOST likely be charged with? A. first-degree murder B. second-degree murder C. voluntary manslaughter D. involuntary manslaughter
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
involuntary manslaughter
The crime Prisha will most likely be charged with is involuntary manslaughter, as she didn't has the intention to kill her father and she was self-defending her. Therefore, option 'D' is the correct option.
What is involuntary manslaughter?An unintended killing caused by criminal carelessness, recklessness, or the committing of a low-level crime like a misdemeanour is referred to as involuntary manslaughter.
Involuntary manslaughter differs from other types of homicide in that it does not need thought, planning, or even intent. Involuntary manslaughter is the least serious type of homicide since these mental characteristics are not necessary.
Involuntary manslaughter demands a greater standard of carelessness than ordinary civil negligence, as well as extremely illogical behavior on the part of the defendant. The precise terminology for this threshold of carelessness differs from state to state, although it is sometimes referred to as "criminal negligence" or "gross negligence."
Therefore, option 'D' (involuntary manslaughter) is the correct option.
Learn more about involuntary manslaughter, here:
https://brainly.com/question/24622663
#SPJ5
Holding people in jail without bond to ensure both their appearance at trial and the safety of the community is known as:
Answer:
The answer is Preventative Detention
Answer:
Holding people in jail without bond to ensure both their appearance at trial and the safety of the community is known as preventive detention.
I hope this helped at all.
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP
To be found guilty of breaking the law, a prosecutor must prove that the person committed the crime. Once this is proven, the guilty verdict is rendered by the court. OA. True СВ. False
This is true because the prosecutor must have evidence to show to the court that this person, or suspect, was someone who broke this law. Without proof, the court cannot accuse the suspect of a wrong doing. Hope this helped, but who knows, im just a 7th grader, lol
Please answer these questions
PLEASE HELP ME ASAPP
Carson is called to the scene of a murder. He brings his kit with him and begins to dust the area for fingerprints. Then he carefully puts a clear, special tape over possible prints to lift them off the surface. Carson puts the prints in his evidence bag to scan into the computer at the lab. What title would MOST likely describe Carson's profession? OA. criminologist B. criminalist C. criminal justice professional CD. jurist
Answer:
criminalist
Explanation:
Forensic science, also known as criminalistics, is the application of science to criminal and civil laws, mainly—on the criminal side—during criminal investigation, as governed by the legal standards of admissible evidence and criminal procedure.
The title that would doubtlessly depict Carson's profession is criminalist.Therefore, choice (B) is exact response.
A criminalist is a legal researcher who spends significant time in gathering, examining, and deciphering actual proof connected with criminal examinations. For this situation, Carson's activities of tidying for fingerprints, utilizing exceptional tape to lift the prints, and safeguarding the proof in a proof sack for additional examination demonstrate that he is associated with criminological examinations.
Criminalists assume a significant part in crime location examination, looking at proof to assist with recognizing suspects and add to settling criminal cases. They frequently work in legal research centers and team up with policing to offer logical help in criminal examinations.
Accordingly, choice (B) is exact response.
Learn more about criminalist, from:
brainly.com/question/31030668
#SPJ3
Under California law, any person seeking relief for a breach of contract must do so within the time limits of the:
Answer:
action for cause occurring, which is limited to four years.
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP
Cheng's father has constantly told him to put his bike in the garage when he is not using it. After a long day of soccer practice, Cheng is tired and ready for dinner. He puts his bike next to the garage door but does not put it inside. The next morning, Cheng cannot find his bike anywhere. His father thinks that someone saw it outside and took it. Of what kind of crime is Cheng MOST likely a victim? O A. robbery B. larceny C. shoplifting OD. burglary
Answer:
(B) Robbery
Explanation:
cause he saw it and took it and that's stealing so robbery
As Cheng is a victim of larceny. Thus, the correct answer is option B.
What is a larceny?Larceny is a crime that involves the illegal taking or theft of another person's or business's personal property. It was an offence under English common law, and it became an offence in jurisdictions that incorporated English common law into their own law (also statutory law), where it is still in effect in many cases.
In England, Wales, Ireland, and Northern Ireland, the crime of larceny has been divided into the specific crimes of burglary, robbery, fraud, theft, and related crimes. Larceny, on the other hand, is still a crime in parts of the United States, Jersey, and New South Wales, Australia, involving the taking (caption) and carrying away (asportation) of personal property without the owner's consent.
As Cheng was warned by his father to put his bike in the garage when he is not using it. Still he does not put it inside, and the next morning, Cheng cannot find his bike anywhere.
Therefore, Cheng is most likely the victim of larceny, as it is a theft of personal property without the owner's consent.
To learn more about larceny, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17612570
#SPJ2
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP
Andre is found murdered in the office of his construction company. His father began the company when Andre was a boy and several of Andre's brothers and cousins work for the company. After a lengthy investigation, detectives uncover evidence that Andre's brother James shot Andre in order to take his place as the manager of the company. Since the perpetrator was a member of Andre's family, what type of homicide would this be classified as? A. friendly homicide B. primary homicide OC. close homicide OD. secondary homicide
Answer:
primary homicide
Explanation:
instrumental crimes that involve premeditation and are less likely to be victim precipitated. False, primary homicides are expressive crimes that result from acts of interpersonal hostility. Who is involved in non primary homicides? Strangers, no prior relationship between victims and offenders
Since the perpetrator was a member of Andre's family, it is a type of primary homicide. The appropriate response is option B.
What is homicide?Homicide, or the killing of one person by another, The term "homicide" refers to both criminal and noncriminal killings, including murder, manslaughter, and various forms of homicide.
First-degree murder in the United States is defined as a homicide committed with intent or as part of a major offense (e.g., kidnapping). Less severe degrees of intent are required for second- and third-degree murder.
Noncriminal homicides include murders carried out in self- or other-defense as well as fatalities brought on by accidents caused by people acting lawfully.
Primary homicides are expressive crimes that are the outcome of hostile activities committed against other people. Who is responsible for secondary homicides? There is no history of acquaintance between the victims and the culprits.
Hence, the appropriate response is option B.
To learn more about homicide
https://brainly.com/question/28177539
#SPJ5
When does the law give a blind pedestrian special consideration at intersections where there are no traffic lights
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP
Ever since he was young, Kai was fascinated with fires. He loved to play with matches, eventually using kerosene or gasoline to create bigger fires. When Kai visits the library, all he can think about is how quickly the paper would go up in flames. He waits until it is after hours and throws a wadded-up cloth soaked with kerosene through one of the windows. Kai watches from the shadows as the building quickly goes up in flames. Firefighters arrive on the scene to put out the fire. Kai continues to watch as an ambulance pulls up and wonders if one of the firefighters has gotten a little to close to his flames. As Kai watches, firefighters bring out a body on a stretcher. Evidently someone was inside the library when the fire erupted and did not survive. When investigators track down Kai for starting the fire, what charge besides arson will he MOST likely face? OA. aggravated assault OB. first-degree murder C. second-degree murder OD. manslaughter
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
Manslaughter
Manslaughter is the charge besides arson will he most likely face. Hence, option D is correct.
What is meant by Manslaughter?Homicide is a broad category of crimes that includes manslaughter and murder. Manslaughter can be committed in three different ways: by killing with the intent to kill but where there is a partial defence, like loss of control; by assuming less responsibility; or by killing in accordance with a pact.
Those found guilty of murder must receive a life sentence from the court. Manslaughter carries no mandatory sentence, and the following are examples of possible punishments under UK law: a jail term of between two and ten years.
If parole is granted, a person serving a life sentence will spend the rest of their time under the PBC's supervision.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more information about Manslaughter, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6228473
#SPJ2
Assume a restaurant is forced to pay damages to a person who suffered food poisoning after eating at the restaurant. What type of law is involved
The type of law involved would be Private & Civil Law. Due to the fact that costumer did not die, there is no ability to charge for criminal law under manslaughter. The only paths available is to sue under Private and Civil Law. Remember, a private law is one that mainly involves lawsuits between private individuals or groups. In this case the restaurant and victim. Civil law is very similar, as it deals with members of the community and not criminals or governments.
I hope this helps! :)
mendel’s laws of segregation and independent assortment are based on the movement of chromosomes during meiosis, even though mendel did not know about chromosomes during his lifetime. can you match each of the following events with the law it illustrates?
According to Mendel, the law of segregation posits that an individual has two alleles and a parent typically passes only one allele to the offspring.
Your information is incomplete. Therefore, an overview of the law of segregation and independent assortment will be given. Mendel's Law of Independent Assortment implies that the inheritance of one gene is independent of the inheritance of the other pair.
It should be noted that the law of segregation and independent assortment are vital during meiotic division. Mendel's law of segregation simply entails how homologous chromosomes are separated in meiosis.
Learn more about laws of segregation on:
https://brainly.com/question/25783034