The author of Vernon's "What is Love?" contends that real love entails accepting a person as they are rather than attempting to change them. Vernon thinks that rather than trying to change someone into an idealized version of themselves, love is about accepting both the good and the bad in a person and seeing them as a whole. Therefore, it can be concluded that Vernon does not think that changing one another is necessary for a healthy relationship.
On the other hand, Ben-Zeev contends in "Endless Love" that change is a necessary component of every relationship. As long as they are changing for themselves rather than just to please their partner, he thinks that partners should be willing to change each other for the better. According to Ben-Zeev, it is normal and essential for partners in a relationship to change for one another.
It appears that there is some ambivalence regarding the question of whether partners should alter each other in a relationship based on these two readings. Vernon argues against switching partners, but Ben-Zeev contends that change is a normal and essential component of any happy relationship. The choice of whether partners should alter one another ultimately rests with the parties involved in the relationship and their own individual morals and values.
Fill in the blanks using the Present Perfect Tense or the Present Perfect Continuous Tense
He ___________________ (save) for the trip to New Zealand for years.
Answer:
He has been saving for the trip to New Zealand for years.How does Shakespeare develop the theme the following ways? Main character foil characters intertaction
Answer:
Shakespeare develops themes through the main character, foil characters, and their interactions, including the character's struggles, contrasting traits, and dialogue.
Explanation:
Shakespeare develops themes in several ways, including through the main character, foil characters, and their interactions.
The main character is often a vehicle for exploring the central theme of the play. For example, in Hamlet, Shakespeare uses the character of Hamlet to explore the theme of revenge and its consequences. Hamlet's struggles with revenge and his eventual decision not to kill his uncle, even after having the opportunity to do so, demonstrate the complexity of this theme.
Foil characters are also used to develop themes. Foils are characters who are similar to the main character in some ways but differ in other important ways. By contrasting the main character with a foil, Shakespeare can highlight different aspects of the central theme. For example, in Romeo and Juliet, Romeo's impulsiveness is contrasted with Benvolio's level-headedness, emphasizing the dangers of rash decisions and the importance of careful consideration.
Interactions between characters are another way that Shakespeare develops themes. Dialogue, conflict, and resolution between characters can reveal different perspectives on the theme and deepen our understanding of it. For example, in Othello, the interactions between the jealous Iago and the trusting Cassio and Othello highlight the destructive nature of jealousy and the importance of trust in relationships.
Overall, Shakespeare uses a variety of techniques to develop themes in his plays, including through the main character, foil characters, and their interactions.
Got you bro
Fill in the blanks to retell the details of the beginning of the story.
Four cousins are hanging out together when Devin suddenly ______ a video game. His sister reminds him that everyone is ___________ to beat the game. Dahlia also tells Devin that his _________ is strategy.
Answer: Lost failing and strength
Explanation:
.
How many months make a year
Answer:
There are 12 months in a year.
Explanation:
The months are January, February, march, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December.
O
9.
What are conjunctions?
Where two sentences meet or are joined by a
period or semicolon.
An abrupt end to a sentence.
Is a word that joins words or groups of words
and create smoother writing.
When paragraphs can be combined.
PLEASE HELP ASAP
Which of the following sentences correctly uses a colon to join two clauses into one sentence?
A banana: is a berry because it has three layers, like a watermelon and a kiwi.
The voting results were unanimous: the winning school mascot was the honey badger.
Toilet paper was not commercially available in the United States until the 1850s: awkward!
Trevor had the biggest mountain biking race of his life tomorrow he was: nervous and excited about the competition.
The sentence that correctly uses a colon to join two clauses into one sentence is: "The voting results were unanimous: the winning school mascot was the honey badger." Therefore, option B is correct.
Unanimous refers to a situation where everyone involved or participating in a decision or vote is in complete agreement or consensus. In the given sentence, "The voting results were unanimous: the winning school mascot was the honey badger," it indicates that there was a unanimous agreement among the voters regarding the selection of the school mascot.
This implies that every person involved in the voting process supported and chose the honey badger as the mascot. The term "unanimous" highlights the absence of any dissenting or opposing opinions, indicating a high level of agreement and unity among the voters.
Learn more about Unanimous here:
https://brainly.com/question/29785690
#SPJ2
Explain the impact of the persuasive message created in Upton Sinclair's novel, The Jungle.
[Try to keep the answer 2-5 sentences please.]
Upton Sinclair's novel, The Jungle, had a significant impact on American society and politics.
The book exposed the horrendous working conditions and unsanitary practices in the meatpacking industry in Chicago during the early 20th century. Sinclair's graphic descriptions of the filthy slaughterhouses and the exploitation of the immigrant workers shocked the American public and spurred outrage. The book created a powerful persuasive message that led to the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act and the Meat Inspection Act of 1906. These laws established federal regulation of the food and drug industry, improving public health and safety. The Jungle was a prime example of how literature can serve as a catalyst for social change.
FOR MORE INFORMATION ON The Jungle SEE:
https://brainly.com/question/30314351
#SPJ1
the warriors and villagers change their opinions of Nou from the beginning of the story to the end of the story. How do their opinions change throughout the story? What causes their opinions to change? Use details from the story to support your responce.
Because of Nou's acts and combat skills, the warriors and villagers' opinions of him changed. They could see for themselves that he was a courageous and skillful warrior, ready to lay down his life to defend them.
Development of the story to its conclusion. How do their viewpoints evolve during the narrative?The warriors and peasants first thought poorly of Nou at the beginning of the tale. As Nou was not a great fighter, they didn't think he could defend them from the opposition. The people were also enraged with Nou for endangering their settlement by informing the adversary of their whereabouts.
Nevertheless, as the narrative progressed, their perspectives about Nou started to shift. The warriors and villagers started to view Nou differently after he routed the first batch of adversaries. They understood Nou was an accomplished fighter who could defend them. Even the warriors started to respect him and take his direction.
To know more about Nou visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30444887
#SPJ1
Which of these statements is a fact from the reading assignment ?
A statement of fact from the reading assignment is: A. Mr. Darcy found Lydia Bennet and George Wickham in London.
What is a statement of fact?A statement of fact expresses truth in a passage. A statement of fact from the reading Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen is that Mr. Darcy met the couple Lydia and George in London to have in-depth interactions with them about their discovery of each other.
A statement of fact is not subjective but objective because it has no personal opinions included. It goes straight to the point while revealing the truth in the text.
Learn more about statements of fact here:
https://brainly.com/question/27140846
#SPJ1
1. I don't understand what's happening in this film. It's very ...
confused
confusing
Clear selection
2. The film wasn't good. I was ... from the beginning to the end. I nearly fell asleep.
bored
boring
Clear selection
3. My trip to London wasn't as good as I expected. It was rather ... . I didn't like the place. People had told me London was beautiful, but I thought it was dirty and ugly.
disappointed
disappointing
Clear selection
4. I didn't enjoy my course. I was ... because I though I would learn more.
disappointed
disappointing
Answer:
1 confusing
2 bored
3 disappointing
4 disappointed
Explanation:
1A: Which sentence accurately states the author's purpose in using the photograph of
Henrietta Lacks to introduce the interview?
* 1 point
Silver begins his interview with the photograph of Henrietta Lacks in order to
O emphasize the human elementof the story as well as introduce Skloot's book, The
Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks.
Silver introduces his interview with the photograph of Henrietta Lacks in order to
Ohighlight the seriousness of the disease that took her life as well as affirm the impact
of her donation on medical research.
Silver begins his interview with the photograph of Henrietta Lacks in order to inform
Ohis audience that shewas an African-American woman as well as suggest that this
was the reason her cells were taken withoutpermission.
Silver introduces his interview with the photograph of Henrietta Lacks in order to
focus his conversation withSkloot as well as highlight the author's intentions in
writing her book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks.
Skloot uses in-depth narrative narratives of Henrietta's youth to narrate her story, drawing on primary sources and in-depth interviews.
What motivated the author to pen The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks?
The paucity of knowledge about Henrietta perplexed and intrigued Skloot when she saw HeLa cells throughout her formal biology schooling. She later dreamed of writing a book that covered both Henrietta's life and the scientific impact of her cells while pursuing her MFA.
What happens at the beginning of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks?
It relates the tale of an African-American woman who succumbed to malignant cervical cancer at the young age of 31 in 1951. The HeLa cell line, derived from her, is another legacy that is described.
To know more about Henrietta Lacks visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29341302
#SPJ9
How did Sojourner Truth used Direct statement, Ethical appeal, and Ethos during her speech to the American Equal Rights Association? Please help
Answer:
Explanation:
Sojourner Truth's speech to the American Equal Rights Association in 1867 is a powerful example of the use of rhetorical strategies, including direct statement, ethical appeal, and ethos.
Direct Statement:
Throughout her speech, Sojourner Truth makes use of direct statements that challenge the assumptions and beliefs of her audience. For example, she asks the question "Ain't I a woman?" to challenge the notion that women are inherently weaker and less capable than men. This direct statement highlights the hypocrisy of those who claim to support equal rights while simultaneously denying them to women.
Ethical Appeal:
Sojourner Truth's speech also makes use of ethical appeal, or the appeal to the audience's sense of morality and values. She draws on her own experiences as a former slave and as a woman to make a moral argument for equal rights. For example, she states that "I have as much muscle as any man, and can do as much work as any man" to appeal to the audience's sense of fairness and justice.
Ethos:
Finally, Sojourner Truth's speech is a powerful example of ethos, or the use of credibility and authority to persuade an audience. As a former slave and a powerful public speaker, she is able to use her personal experiences and her powerful voice to establish herself as a credible and authoritative speaker on the topic of equal rights.
Overall, Sojourner Truth's speech to the American Equal Rights Association is a masterful example of the use of rhetorical strategies to persuade an audience and make a powerful argument for equal rights.
you will need to make your own disposal jar to disinfect lab tools. to do this, you will do the following (sort of options into the correct order): question 4 options: -pour alcohol down the drain and follow with plenty of cool water. -let the took soak for at least 1/2 hour. when finished with inoculating tool, put in disposal jar. -dispose of tool and (empty) disposal jar in the trash. -obtain disposable plastic container (like a disposable cup or empty water bottle). -fill disposable plastic container half-way with isopropyl alcohol or common rubbing alcohol.
Answer:
Here are the correct order of steps to make your own disposal jar to disinfect lab tools:
Obtain a disposable plastic container (like a disposable cup or empty water bottle).
Fill the disposable plastic container halfway with isopropyl alcohol or common rubbing alcohol.
When finished with an inoculating tool, put it in the disposal jar and let it soak for at least half an hour.
Dispose of the tool and empty disposal jar in the trash.
Do not pour alcohol down the drain. Instead, follow proper disposal procedures and guidelines for hazardous waste in your area.
(Please could you kindly mark my answer as brainliest you could also follow me so that you could easily reach out to me for any other questions)
The lessons we take from obstacles we encounter can be fundamental to later success. Recount a time when you faced a challenge, setback, or failure. How did it affect you and what did you learn from the experience?
Something that obstructs or delays activity or progress is referred to as an obstacle, obstruction, hindrance, or barrier.
How do you write about failure in a college essay?Describe the difficulties you faced and the emotions that arose in response to those difficulties. The most crucial thing to remember is to accept responsibility for your mistakes rather than blaming a buddy, coach, parent, or teacher.
Do you foresee any challenges to reaching your objectives?Being insecure can prevent you from achieving your goals. Failure in the past can demoralize and demotivate us. This is a result of the idea that failing is a waste of time and an entirely terrible experience. We can learn the most from failure.
To know more about Success visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/13909620
#SPJ1
As Winston waits in the jail cell in the Ministry of Love, he meets the poet Ampleforth
and his neighbor Parsons. What are they in for?
Answer:
In George Orwell's novel 1984, Winston meets Ampleforth and Parsons while he is waiting in the jail cell in the Ministry of Love. Ampleforth is a poet who works in the Ministry of Truth, where he rewrites old poetry to conform to the Party's ideology. He has been arrested for committing a thoughtcrime by leaving the word "God" in a poem he was rewriting, instead of replacing it with "the deity." Parsons, on the other hand, is a coworker of Winston at the Ministry of Truth and has been arrested for thoughtcrime as well. He was heard by his daughter speaking critically of the Party in his sleep and was reported to the Thought Police by her. Parsons is later portrayed as a model Party member who fully embraces the Party's ideology and even informs on his own children for thoughtcrime.
Trapped what a joke Ulrich con Gradwitz trapped in his stolen forest that Justice for you
How the dialogue is ironic
Answer:
The dialogue is ironic because it presents a situation where the character Ulrich von Gradwitz is trapped in his stolen forest, and the speaker finds this to be a just punishment. However, the irony lies in the fact that the forest was originally owned by Ulrich's family, but it was taken away from them by the speaker's family. So, in reality, Ulrich is not the one who stole the forest, but his ancestors were the ones who lost it.
Furthermore, the fact that the speaker finds justice in Ulrich's predicament is also ironic because it is a reflection of the ongoing feud between the two families, where both sides believe that they are in the right and the other side is in the wrong. This demonstrates the absurdity of the situation and highlights the futility of holding onto grudges and seeking revenge, which ultimately lead to tragic consequences for both parties.
Underline The verb and state which is transitive or intransitive verb in this sentence. Suddenly the child woke up
The verb in the sentence is "woke up," and it is an intransitive verb since it does not have an object to complete its meaning, as seen below.
Suddenly the child woke up.
What are intransitive verbs?An intransitive verb is a verb that does not take an object in a sentence. It is a verb that expresses a complete thought without requiring any further information to complete its meaning.
In the sentence, "Suddenly the child woke up," the verb "woke up" is intransitive because it does not have a direct object. The sentence expresses a complete thought with just the subject "the child" and the intransitive verb "woke up." There is no object to receive the action of the verb, as waking up is something that the child does on their own without affecting anyone or anything else. Therefore, "woke up" is an example of an intransitive verb.
Learn more about intransitive verbs here:
https://brainly.com/question/24606230
#SPJ1
The author reports that rising sea levels and melting ice caps were originally predicted to occur at the end of this century, but they are occurring now.
given the conditions in fields, why didn't more slaves rise and protest
Note two pieces of evidence that convey Maria Teresa's youth
Maria Teresa (born María Teresa Mestre y Batista; 22 March 1956) is the Grand Duchess of Luxembourg as the wife of Grand Duke Henri.
How would you describe Maria Teresa's character?
Maria Theresa was courageous, generous and kind. She respected the rights of others and expected others to respect her rights. In the later part of her rule, the empress focused more on human concerns, and less on financial and administrative improvements.
What are the characteristics of Maria Teresa In the Time of the Butterflies?
Maria Teresa is the youngest of the four Mirabal sisters. She is very superficial and materialistic in the beginning of the story, but she becomes a resilient, strong-willed revolutionary hero.
To know more about Maria Teresa visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30739491
#SPJ1
The film wasn't good. I was ... from the beginning to the end. I nearly fell asleep.
bored
boring
The correct word to fill in the blank is "bored."
"I was bored from the beginning to the end" means that the person did not find the film interesting or engaging and felt uninterested or disengaged while watching it.
Using "boring" in this context would mean that the film itself was causing the feeling of boredom, which would not make sense since the speaker is the one experiencing the feeling.
Michelle Obama makes decency great again in her memoir Becoming: EW review David Canfield Becoming is a straightforward, at times rather dry autobiography from a major public figure that stands in remarkably sharp contrast to the state of our discourse starting with the man in the White House. Yet that contrast isn't derived from Obama's scathing commentary on Donald Trump but rather, from the rest of Becoming, which describes one woman's growth from the South Side of Chicago to First Lady of the United States, through tales of empowerment and overcoming adversity. What sets Becoming apart is context: Michelle Obama is a black woman, unlike her predecessors, and her book is publishing at a time of unprecedented social division. Every sentence Obama writes makes a statement. This turns out to be especially true because of how little the author deviates from the formula. The book's first third, "Becoming Me," is dedicated to Obama's upbringing in '60s Chicago and her educational development. It can drag, progressing like so many memoirs of its type. But Obama also constructs episodes from her childhood which vividly, subtly capture the experience of growing up black in America: learning of racism's legacy as she hears her grandfather's stories, being challenged by a peer for "talking like a white girl," occupying spaces like piano recitals and, later, Princeton University, where her blackness - "that everyday drain of being in a deep minority" clarifies itself. Obama's strength in Becoming lies in hindsight, her ability to take a step back from a specific anecdote, and not only contextualize but ruminate on it, really consider its power. In these asides, that introspection Obama claims to have had as a kid comes into thrilling evidence- as prose. On one difficult teen experience, she writes, "I look back on the discomfort of that moment and recognize the more universal challenge of squaring who you are with where you come from and where you want to go." I focus particularly on the book's opening section because it's most reflective of how Obama frames Becoming: as a story of where she came from, where she went, and how she carried herself along the way. "Becoming Us" the book's second and best section, is devoted to her romance with Barack Obama. Again, from a distance, it looks roughly like what we've seen from many a First Lady's public account: the bumps in the road, the difficulty of the spotlight, the durability of their love. But Obama seems determined in Becoming to fully live in the pain, the disappointment, the regret, and the loss she's felt at various times during their relationship. She interrogates it, picks at it, and reveals to readers what's underneath. Just listen to the words she uses. Obama felt "resentment" toward her husband and his commitment to politics after she suffered a miscarriage and, on a doctor's recommendation, proceeded with IVF treatments to start a family. Obama embraces passionate language periodically, lending Becoming bursts of authenticity. Becoming takes a peculiar turn in its final act, as Obama discusses her time in the White House. She ably conveys the confinement she felt and the toll it took on her family. But this extends to her writing. It's choppy and guarded and, strangely, a bit defensive as she espouses the value of the causes she took up as First Lady. One senses there are layers yet to be peeled here that the presidency remains relatively raw for Becoming's author. She is direct, forceful, and condemnatory when speaking about Trump, but in a fashion that doesn't sour or alter her own life story. Her honesty translates. More importantly, her intention translates. Page 4 of 4 a) Briefly discuss what information you expect to obtain when reading a book review. (3) b) In a paragraph of 250 words critically analyse the content of Text B and discuss if the text is an example of a good book review or not. Cite specific examples from the text to justify your answer. (14)
"Becoming, for me, is not about getting somewhere or reaching a goal. Instead, I see it as a means of moving forward, an evolution, and a constant striving to become a better version of oneself.
What is a succinct synopsis of Michelle Obama's book Becoming?In her book "Becoming," Michelle Obama describes the life of a young Chicago-born girl as she develops and goes through her formative years. It describes a lady finding her voice in a patriarchal environment.
Has Obama published a memoir?When Obama first started his political campaign for the Illinois Senate in 1995, he published his memoir. The book was republished in 2004 after Obama won the Democratic primary election for the U.S. Senate in Illinois.
To know more about Michelle Obama visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/29776038
#SPJ1
Based on what you know about roots and affixes, select the word that means not able to do something.
Choose the word that signifies unable to perform something based on your knowledge of roots and affixes. English questions that are new.
What are the origins and affixes of the word?The components are roots and affixes. Affixes, which are so named because they "affix" or link one word segment to another, are created when prefixes and suffixes are combined. A word's root, to which one or both kinds of affixes may be affixed, is its fundamental building block.
What does a root word's affixes __ mean?Hence, a root word—a word that may stand alone without an affix—describes most letters added to its beginning or end to alter its meaning. When used in that definition earlier When the prefix im- is added to the word possible, the meaning of the term is altered.
To know more about Roots and affixes visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/16998969
#SPJ1
Which of the following quotes from the novel supports the idea that the Civil Affairs soldiers are trying to develop a more simple purpose for their presence in the war?
"There wasn't one war going on in Iraq, there were a dozen."
"It means we're taking care of business."
"I'd like to get an idea of how bad it is away from the Green Zone."
"But my gut feeling is that you don't let people die if you can help it."
Answer:
The quote "It means we're taking care of business" suggests that the Civil Affairs soldiers are trying to simplify their purpose in the war and focus on accomplishing their mission. This implies that they are trying to develop a more straightforward and clear purpose for their presence in the war. The other quotes do not necessarily support this idea as directly as this quote does.
Why did Rashad draw a face on his drawing? Use evidence from the text to support your answer.
Answer: as a sign of maturity.
Explanation:
What does Jim Trainum, the "real detective", think about how the case was handled? (11:00-
12:52)
James Trainum, the "genuine detective," considered how they handled the case as a murder case on a silver platter.
What does Trainum think about Adnan and Jay?James Trainum believes that they were both lying and hiding evidence. What information regarding Adnan did Patrick and Chris provide? Adnan claims that if Jay did not control his tongue, he was going to kill Stephanie.
Why did Jay alter his story?Why would he alter this portion of his narrative? probably to keep himself safe. He doesn't want to confess to felonies in front of two investigators, but he wants to demonstrate how he might have been blackmailed by a killer .
To know moire about Jim Trainum, the "real detective", visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31169460
#SPJ1
what literary element is: Matt was swept by both fear and joy
The literary element present in the sentence "Matt was swept by both fear and joy" is contradiction.
This literary technique creates a paradoxical situation in which two opposite emotions are juxtaposed to show the complexity of human emotions. The use of contradiction is a powerful tool for writers to convey deeper meanings, adding depth to their characters and their experiences. By using contradictory emotions, writers can create a sense of tension and uncertainty, highlighting the struggle within a character's psyche. This technique is particularly effective in portraying conflicting emotions, where characters might feel both happy and sad, or afraid and excited, at the same time. Overall, contradiction is an essential literary element that helps writers to create engaging, multifaceted characters and stories.
for more information on literary see:
https://brainly.com/question/6199325
#SPJ1
Even a mouse may help a lion. ( Into passive )
Answer:
“A lion may be helped by even a mouse.”
Explanation:
The sentence “Even a mouse may help a lion” can be changed to the passive voice by making the object of the sentence the subject of the sentence.
The object of the sentence is “a lion,” so we can make it the subject of the sentence. We also need to change the verb to its past participle form, which is “helped.”
The passive voice sentence is: “A lion may be helped by even a mouse.”
USING THE LIST BELOW DECIDE WHICH PURPOSE OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING THE TEXTS
ARE?
>
To inform
created by ALICIA SMITH 07/07/16
B. To instruct
?
To persuade
To describe
Portmeirion was created by the architect Clough Williams-Ellis from 1925 to 1976. The name
Portmeirion comes from 'Port' to put it on the coast and 'Meirion', the correct spelling of
Merioneth, the county in which it was located.
The given text is an example of "To describe" type of writing. It provides information about the creation of Portmeirion and its name, without any intention to persuade, instruct or influence the reader's opinion. The purpose of the text is to describe the history and background of Portmeirion in a factual and informative manner.
How to explain the writingTo describe" type of writing, which presents factual information about Portmeirion's creation and name without any explicit intention to persuade, instruct, or influence the reader's opinion.
The purpose of the text is to provide a clear and objective description of Portmeirion's history and background.
Learn more about writing on
https://brainly.com/question/1643608
#SPJ1
Now that you have read act 3, scene 2, it is important to compare the central ideas that Brutus and Antony convey to the audience at Caesar’s funeral.
-In a well-structured paragraph, state the topic of the funeral orations of Brutus and Antony. Then state how the speeches are similar, and end your paragraph outlining the differences between the speeches. Use transition words to connect supporting details.
The topic of the funeral orations of Brutus and Antony is the assassination of Julius Caesar. Both speakers address the crowd gathered at Caesar's funeral and attempt to justify their actions.
Brutus argues that Caesar's ambition threatened the Roman Republic, and that his death was necessary to preserve the freedom of the Roman people. Antony, on the other hand, argues that Caesar was a great leader who was unjustly killed by traitors.
Despite their different viewpoints, the speeches of Brutus and Antony share some similarities. Both speakers begin by acknowledging their love for Caesar and their desire to honor his memory. Additionally, both use rhetorical devices such as repetition and appeals to emotion to sway the crowd. However, the speeches differ in significant ways.
Brutus speaks in a more formal and academic style, using logic and reason to make his case. Antony, on the other hand, uses more colloquial language and employs irony and sarcasm to criticize the conspirators. While Brutus seeks to convince the audience of the nobility of their cause, Antony seeks to incite anger and vengeance against the conspirators.
In conclusion, while both speeches aim to address the assassination of Caesar, Brutus focuses on the rational justifications for the act, while Antony focuses on the emotional response of the people. The differences between their approaches highlight the complex motivations and conflicting ideas at the heart of this pivotal moment in Roman history.
Learn more about funeral orations
https://brainly.com/question/30243323
#SPJ1
Answer:
SAMPLE RESPONSE AND MINE (choose wisely)
Explanation:
sample response :In act 3, scene 2, Brutus and Antony speak to the crowd about Caesar’s assassination. Both senators convey a love for Caesar and his accomplishments for the people of Rome. However, Brutus claims that Caesar was ambitious and a danger to the Roman republic. In contrast, Antony states that Caesar only benefited Rome, and that the conspirators were not honorable men.
MY REPSONSE
The assassination of Julius Caesar is the subject of Brutus and Antony's funeral orations. Speaking to the assembled mourners during Caesar's burial, both speakers make an effort to defend their respective deeds. Caesar, according to Brutus, was a menace to the Roman Republic and needed to be killed in order to protect the liberty of the Roman populace. On the other hand, Antony contends that Caesar was a fantastic leader who was wrongfully murdered by treachery. Despite having opposite points of view, Brutus and Antony's speeches had several things in common. They both begin by expressing how much they adore Caesar and want to preserve his memory. Both both employ rhetorical strategies to influence the audience, including repetition and emotional appeals. But there are some notable differences in the speeches.Brutus uses reason and logic to support his claims while speaking in a more formal, academic manner. Antony, on the other hand, speaks more casually and criticizes the conspirators with irony and sarcasm. While Antony aims to provoke rage and retaliation against the conspirators, Brutus tries to persuade the audience of the virtue of their cause. In sum, both speeches address the assassination of Caesar, but Brutus concentrates on the logical justifications while Antony concentrates on the emotional reaction of the populace. The variations in their strategies reflect the complicated motivations and opposing viewpoints at the core of this crucial period in Roman history.