a rectangle that is not a square is rotated counterclockwise about its center. what is the minimum positive number of degrees it must be rotated until it coincides with its original figure?

Answer:

neither.

Step-by-step explanation:

perpendicular would have to be -1/2x instead of 1/2x and parallel would have to be 2x.

The measure of the angle for the given parallel lines cut by transversal is given by a = 126°, b =54°, c = 126°, d = 54°, e = 126°,  f = 54° and g = 126°.

From the attached figure,

Two parallel lines and a transversal cut both the parallel lines.

Measure of one of the angle = 54°

Measure of angle b degrees is vertically opposite angle .

This implies,

Measure of angle b = 54°

Measure of angle a is linear pair to 54°

⇒ Measure of angle a = 180° - 54°

⇒Measure of angle a =  126°

Measure of angle c is vertically opposite to ∠a

⇒Measure of angle c = 126°

using corresponding angle theorem,

Measure of angle c = measure of angle g

⇒measure of angle g = 126°

Measure of ∠a = Measure of ∠e

⇒Measure of ∠e = 126°

Measure of angle b = Measure of angle f

⇒Measure of angle f = 54°

Measure of d is vertically opposite to ∠f

⇒Measure of angle d = 54°

Therefore, the values of the measure of angle is equal to a = 126°, b =54°,

c = 126°, d = 54°, e = 126°,  f = 54° and g = 126°.

Learn more about angle here

brainly.com/question/30324573

#SPJ1

Answer:

need this

Step-by-step explanation:

he

volume

of the parallelepiped is 235 cubic units.

V = |u · (v × w)|

where · represents the dot product and × represents the

cross product

.

First, we need to find the cross product of v and w:

v × w = (i+j+9k) × (i+4j+9k)
     = (36i - 7j - 3k)

Next, we take the dot product of u with the cross product of v and w:

u · (v × w) = (7i+2j+k) · (36i - 7j - 3k)
           = 252 - 14 - 3
           = 235

Finally, we take the absolute value of this result to get the volume:

V = |u · (v × w)| = |235| = 235 cubic units.

Therefore, the volume of the parallelepiped is 235 cubic units.

To find the volume of the

parallelepiped

with adjacent edges u, v, and w, you need to calculate the scalar triple product of these vectors. The scalar triple product is the absolute value of the

determinant

of the matrix formed by the components of the three vectors.

Given vectors:
u = 7i + 2j + k
v = i + j + 9k
w = i + 4j + 9k

Step 1: Write the matrix using the components of u, v, and w:
| 7  2  1 |
| 1  1  9 |
| 1  4  9 |

Step 2: Calculate the determinant of the matrix:
7 * (1 * 9 - 4 * 9) - 2 * (1 * 9 - 1 * 9) + 1 * (1 * 4 - 1 * 1)

Step 3: Simplify the expression:
7 * (9 - 36) - 2 * (9 - 9) + (4 - 1)

Step 4: Calculate the result:
7 * (-27) - 0 + 3

Step 5: Find the absolute value of the result:
|-189 + 3| = |-186| = 186

The volume of the parallelepiped is 186 cubic units.

Learn more about

volume

at: brainly.com/question/1578538

#SPJ11

A graph of the triangle after a dilation by scale factor 3 using the blue dot as the centre of enlargement is shown below.​

In Mathematics and Geometry, a dilation is a type of transformation which typically changes the size of a geometric object, but not its shape.

In order to dilate the coordinates of the preimage (right-angled triangle) by using a scale factor of 3 centered at the blue dot, the transformation rule would be represented this mathematical expression:

(x, y)  →  (k(x - a) + a, k(y - b) + b)

(x, y)  →  (3(x - a) + a, 3(y - b) + b)

In this scenario, the intersection of the three (3) medians would represent the centre of the given traingle;

AO ≅ 20D

BO ≅ 20E

Read more on dilation and scale factor here: brainly.com/question/4421026

#SPJ1

Answer: 130 miles every week

Step-by-step explanation:

26*5=130

Round trip means from home to work and back home

Based on the past data indicating that 30% of the general population holds the belief that life exists elsewhere within 4% of the real answer, we can use statistical analysis to determine the level of confidence we can have in this statement.

With a 95% confidence level, we can say that there is a high likelihood that this belief is true within a margin of error of 4%. In other words, we can be 95% confident that the true percentage of people who believe that life exists elsewhere within 4% of the real answer falls somewhere between 26% and 34%.

Based on the information provided, it seems that 30% of the general population believes that life exists elsewhere in the universe. There is a 95% confidence level that the true percentage of people holding this belief is within 4% of the given 30% estimate. This means that the actual percentage of people with this belief likely falls between 26% and 34%.

To know more about Population click here.

brainly.com/question/27991860

#SPJ11

Sally's sweet shoppe has cylindrical cups that have a diameter of 8 centimeters and a height of 5 centimeters the cylinder has a larger volume than the cone, by 64π cubic centimeters.

The sweet shoppe sells cylindrical cups with a diameter of 8 centimeters and a height of 5 centimeters.

The volume of the cylinder can be calculated using the formula V = [tex]\pi r^2h[/tex], where r is the radius (half the diameter) and h is the height. So, for this cylinder:

r = 4 cm

h = 5 cm

[tex]V_{cylinder} = \pi (4cm)^2(5cm) = 80\pi[/tex] cubic cm

The volume of a cone can be calculated using the formula V = (1/3)πr^2h, where r is the radius and h is the height.

The radius of the cone is half the diameter, or 4 centimeters, and we need to find the height of the cone.

The height of the cone can be found using the Pythagorean theorem, since the radius and height of the cone form a right triangle. The height is the square root of the difference between the hypotenuse (the slant height of the cone) and the radius, squared:

h = sqrt[tex]((5cm)^2 - (4cm)^2)[/tex] = 3cm

Now we can calculate the volume of the cone:

r = 4 cm

h = 3 cm

V_cone = (1/3)π[tex](4cm)^2[/tex](3cm) = 16π cubic cm

Comparing the volumes of the cylinder and cone, we find:

V_cylinder - V_cone = 80π - 16π = 64π cubic cm

Thus, the cylinder has a larger volume than the cone, by 64π cubic centimeters.

For more details regarding volume, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1578538

#SPJ1

a) Method of moments can be used to estimate α by equating the first two moments (sample mean and variance) with their theoretical counterparts and solving for α.

b) The MLE of α satisfies the equation: Ψ(3α) − Ψ(α) + 2nΣ[ln(Xi) − ln(1 − Xi)] = 0, where Ψ is the digamma function.

c) The asymptotic variance of the MLE is (9n[Ψ'(3α) − Ψ'(α)])^(-1), where Ψ' is the trigamma function.

a) The method of moments involves equating the first two moments of the distribution with their sample counterparts and solving for the parameter α. Setting the theoretical mean and variance of the given distribution equal to their sample counterparts and solving for α, we get α = (4n − 1)/(9n − 2).

b) The log-likelihood function for the given distribution is l(α) = n[ln(Γ(3α)) − ln(Γ(α)) − ln(Γ(2α))] + (α − 1)Σ[ln(Xi) + 2ln(1 − Xi)]. Taking the derivative of l(α) with respect to α and equating it to zero, we get the MLE of α as the solution to the equation: Ψ(3α) − Ψ(α) + 2nΣ[ln(Xi) − ln(1 − Xi)] = 0, where Ψ is the digamma function.

c) The asymptotic variance of the MLE can be found using the Fisher information. The Fisher information is given by I(α) = −n[Ψ''(α) + 2Ψ''(2α)], where Ψ'' is the polygamma function. The asymptotic variance of the MLE is then (I(α)^(-1)), which simplifies to (9n[Ψ'(3α) − Ψ'(α)])^(-1), where Ψ' is the trigamma function.

For more questions like Function click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/16008229

#SPJ11

The estimated instantaneous velocity at t = 1 is -1 ft/s.

a. To find the average velocity for a time period, we need to find the change in distance over the change in time.

For the time period starting when t = 1 second and lasting 0.5 seconds:

- Distance at t = 1.5 seconds: y = 49(1.5) - 25(1.5)^2 = 33.75 feet
- Distance at t = 1 second: y = 49(1) - 25(1)^2 = 24 feet

Change in distance = 33.75 - 24 = 9.75 feet
Change in time = 0.5 seconds

Average velocity = change in distance / change in time = 9.75 / 0.5 = 19.5 ft/s

For the time period starting when t = 1 second and lasting 0.01 seconds:

- Distance at t = 1.01 seconds: y = 49(1.01) - 25(1.01)^2 = 24.96 feet
- Distance at t = 1 second: y = 49(1) - 25(1)^2 = 24 feet

Change in distance = 24.96 - 24 = 0.96 feet
Change in time = 0.01 seconds

Average velocity = change in distance / change in time = 0.96 / 0.01 = 96 ft/s

For the time period starting when t = 1 second and lasting 0.001 seconds:

- Distance at t = 1.001 seconds: y = 49(1.001) - 25(1.001)^2 = 24.9996 feet
- Distance at t = 1 second: y = 49(1) - 25(1)^2 = 24 feet

Change in distance = 24.9996 - 24 = 0.9996 feet
Change in time = 0.001 seconds

Average velocity = change in distance / change in time = 0.9996 / 0.001 = 999.6 ft/s

b. To estimate the instantaneous velocity at t = 1, we can take the derivative of the height equation with respect to time:

y = 49t - 25t^2

y' = 49 - 50t

At t = 1, y' = -1

So the estimated instantaneous velocity at t = 1 is -1 ft/s.

Learn more about :

estimated instantaneous velocity : brainly.com/question/28837697

#SPJ11

Answer: 1750

Step-by-step explanation:

100+500+1000+5000+6000= 12600x10= 126000

126000 divided 74 = 1750

The scenario describes insufficient data in terms of geographical coverage. The data analyst only had relevant data from half of the country, so they needed to generate new data to represent the entire nation.

This means that the dataset was incomplete and lacked the necessary information to analyze the national supply chain as a whole, The scenario you described represents a type of insufficient data known as "incomplete data" or "missing data.

In this case, the data analyst is working on a project around a national supply chain, but they only have data from about half of the country. To address this issue, they decide to generate new data that represents the entire nation. This process is often done using data imputation techniques or by obtaining additional data sources to fill the gaps in the existing dataset.

To know more about "incomplete data"

The integral converges, the series also converges by the integral test. Therefore, ∑ infinity _n=4 (14ne^(-n^2)) converges.

For the first series, we can use the integral test. We need to find a function f(x) that is continuous, positive, and decreasing such that f(n) = ((n^2)/((n^3 +6)^9/2)) for all positive integers n. Then, we can use the integral test to determine whether the series converges or diverges by evaluating the integral of f(x) from 20 to infinity.

Let f(x) = (x^2)/((x^3 + 6)^9/2). Then, we can take the derivative of f(x) and find that f'(x) = ((x^3 - 18)/(x^3 + 6)^(11/2)) which is negative for all x > 0. This means that f(x) is decreasing for all x > 0. Additionally, f(x) is positive for all x > 0 since the numerator and denominator are both positive. Therefore, we can use the integral test.

We evaluate the integral of f(x) from 20 to infinity by using a substitution. Let u = x^3 + 6. Then, du/dx = 3x^2 and dx = du/(3x^2). Substituting, we get:

∫((x^2)/((x^3 + 6)^9/2))dx = (1/3)∫u^(-9/2)du
= (-2/15)u^(-7/2) from 20^3 + 6 to infinity
= (2/15)(20^3 + 6)^(-7/2)

Since the integral converges, the series also converges by the integral test. Therefore, ∑ infinity _n=20 ((n^2)/((n^3 +6)^9/2))) converges.

For the second series, we can also use the integral test. We need to find a function f(x) that is continuous, positive, and decreasing such that f(n) = 14ne^(-n^2) for all positive integers n. Then, we can use the integral test to determine whether the series converges or diverges by evaluating the integral of f(x) from 4 to infinity.

Let f(x) = 14xe^(-x^2). Then, we can take the derivative of f(x) and find that f'(x) = (14 - 28x^2)e^(-x^2) which is negative for x > 1/sqrt(2) and positive for 0 < x < 1/sqrt(2). This means that f(x) is decreasing for x > 1/sqrt(2) and increasing for 0 < x < 1/sqrt(2). Additionally, f(x) is positive for all x > 0 since e^(-x^2) is always positive. Therefore, we can use the integral test.

We evaluate the integral of f(x) from 4 to infinity by using a substitution. Let u = x^2. Then, du/dx = 2x and dx = du/(2x). Substituting, we get:

∫(14xe^(-x^2))dx = 7∫e^(-u)du
= -7e^(-u) from 4^2 to infinity
= 7e^(-16)

Since the integral converges, the series also converges by the integral test. Therefore, ∑ infinity _n=4 (14ne^(-n^2)) converges.

Visit here to learn more about integers  : https://brainly.com/question/15276410
#SPJ11

The curve is given by: y(t) = -4t + 4[tex]t^2[/tex] And the derivative is: y'(t) = -4 + 8t

(a) Given that (3, 12) is a local minimum, we know that the derivative of y(t) at t = 3 is zero. So, y'(3) = 0. This eliminates options (i) and (iv) for the first question.

Since y(3) = 12, the correct answer to the first question is (iii) y(3) = 12.

(b) To find y'(t), we take the derivative of y(t) with respect to t:

y'(t) = a + b

(c) We know that y(3) = 12, so we can substitute t = 3 and get:

y(3) = a(3) + b(3) = 12

We also know that y'(3) = 0, so we can substitute t = 3 into y'(t) and get:

y'(3) = a + b = 0

We now have two equations with two unknowns:

a(3) + b(3) = 12

a + b = 0

Solving for a and b, we get:

a = -4

b = 4

Therefore, the curve is given by:

y(t) = -4t + 4[tex]t^2[/tex]

And the derivative is:

y'(t) = -4 + 8t

Learn more about curve

https://brainly.com/question/28793630

#SPJ4

The results indicate a statistically significant positive linear relationship between lean body mass and maximal oxygen uptake in college athletes.

The researchers hypothesized that there is a positive relationship between lean body mass and maximal oxygen uptake in college athletes.

To test this hypothesis, they collected data from 18 randomly selected college athletes and created a scatterplot of the measurements.

The scatterplot displayed a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables, indicating that their hypothesis may be correct.

To further investigate the relationship between the variables, the researchers performed a significance test.

Specifically, they tested the null hypothesis that the slope of the regression line is 0, meaning there is no relationship between the variables, versus the alternative hypothesis that the slope is greater than 0, indicating a positive relationship.

The test yielded a p-value of 0.04, which is below the commonly used significance level of 0.05.

This means that there is strong evidence against the null hypothesis and we can reject it.

Therefore, we can conclude that there is a statistically significant positive linear relationship between lean body mass and maximal oxygen uptake in college athletes.

In practical terms, this suggests that increasing lean body mass through exercise or other means may lead to an improvement in maximal oxygen uptake, which is an important measure of physical fitness and endurance.

Further research can explore the specific mechanisms that underlie this relationship and the potential benefits of interventions aimed at increasing lean body mass for athletic performance and overall health.

For similar question on hypothesized.

https://brainly.com/question/29350481

#SPJ11

In this case, as the number of hours spent on television increases, the GPA decreases. This relationship is called a negative correlation.

The plot of data that demonstrates the relationship between the number of hours a person watches television and their GPA is an essential tool to understand the correlation between these two factors.

From the plot, we can see that as the number of hours of television increases, the GPA goes down. This relationship suggests that the more time a person spends watching television, the lower their academic performance tends to be.

It is crucial to note that this relationship is not a direct causation. The plot of data does not prove that watching television causes a decrease in GPA.

It merely shows that there is a correlation between these two factors. There may be other underlying factors that contribute to the lower GPA of people who watch more television, such as lack of study time or poor time management skills.

Therefore, it is essential to use caution when interpreting the plot of data and not make any hasty conclusions about the relationship between the number of hours a person watches television and their academic performance.

Still, the data provides valuable insights that can help individuals make informed decisions about how they manage their time and prioritize their activities .A plot of data illustrates the relationship between the number of hours a person watches television and their GPA.

In this case, as the number of hours spent on television increases, the GPA decreases. This relationship is called a negative correlation.

To know more factors click here

brainly.com/question/29128446

#SPJ11

The number of blocks that Tommy travels is given as follows:

26 blocks.

Suppose that we have two points of the coordinate plane, and the ordered pairs have coordinates [tex](x_1,y_1)[/tex] and [tex](x_2,y_2)[/tex].

The shortest distance between them is given by the equation presented as follows, derived from the Pythagorean Theorem:

[tex]D = \sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}[/tex]

Then the distances are given as follows:

Then the total number of blocks is given as follows:

2 x (8 + 5) = 26 blocks.

More can be learned about the distance between two points at https://brainly.com/question/7243416

#SPJ1

a. The conditional distribution of U is 1 / (u - a), a < u ≤ 1.

b.  The conditional distribution of U is  1 / (au), 0 < u < a.

We will use Bayes' theorem to compute the conditional distributions.

a. U > a:

The probability that U > a is given by P(U > a) = 1 - P(U ≤ a) = 1 - a. To compute the conditional distribution of U given that U > a, we need to compute P(U ≤ u | U > a) for u ∈ (a,1). By Bayes' theorem,

P(U ≤ u | U > a) = P(U > a | U ≤ u) P(U ≤ u) / P(U > a)

= [P(U > a ∩ U ≤ u) / P(U ≤ u)] [P(U ≤ u) / (1 - a)]

= [P(a < U ≤ u) / (u - a)] [1 / (1 - a)]

= 1 / (u - a), a < u ≤ 1.

Therefore, the conditional distribution of U given that U > a is a uniform distribution on (a,1), i.e., U | (U > a) ∼ U(a,1).

b. U < a:

The probability that U < a is given by P(U < a) = a. To compute the conditional distribution of U given that U < a, we need to compute P(U ≤ u | U < a) for u ∈ (0,a). By Bayes' theorem,

P(U ≤ u | U < a) = P(U < a | U ≤ u) P(U ≤ u) / P(U < a)

= [P(U < a ∩ U ≤ u) / P(U ≤ u)] [P(U ≤ u) / a]

= [P(U ≤ u) / u] [1 / a]

= 1 / (au), 0 < u < a.

Therefore, the conditional distribution of U given that U < a is a Pareto distribution with parameters α = 1 and xm = a, i.e., U | (U < a) ∼ Pa(1,a).

Learn more about uniformly distrributed at https://brainly.com/question/31384725

#SPJ11

(a) The probability that the sample proportion will be within +0.03 of the population proportion is 0.7242.

(b) The probability that the sample proportion will be within +0.05 of the population proportion is 0.9312.

(a) The standard error of the sample proportion is given by:

SE = √[p(1-p)/n]

where p = population proportion, n = sample size

SE = √[0.7(1-0.7)/300] = 0.0274

To find the probability that the sample proportion will be within +0.03 of the population proportion, we need to find the z-scores for the upper and lower limits of the interval and then find the probability between those z-scores using a standard normal distribution table. The z-score for +0.03 is:

z = (0.03)/0.0274 = 1.09

The z-score for -0.03 is -1.09 (since it is the same distance from the mean but in the opposite direction). Thus, we need to find the probability between -1.09 and 1.09:

P(-1.09 < z < 1.09) = P(z < 1.09) - P(z < -1.09)

Using a standard normal distribution table, we find:

P(z < 1.09) = 0.8621

P(z < -1.09) = 0.1379

Therefore, the probability that the sample proportion will be within +0.03 of the population proportion is:

0.8621 - 0.1379 = 0.7242 (rounded to four decimal places)

(b) Using the same formula for standard error, we get:

SE = √[0.7(1-0.7)/300] = 0.0274

To find the probability that the sample proportion will be within +0.05 of the population proportion, we need to find the z-scores for the upper and lower limits of the interval and then find the probability between those z-scores using a standard normal distribution table. The z-score for +0.05 is:

z = (0.05)/0.0274 = 1.82

The z-score for -0.05 is -1.82 (since it is the same distance from the mean but in the opposite direction). Thus, we need to find the probability between -1.82 and 1.82:

P(-1.82 < z < 1.82) = P(z < 1.82) - P(z < -1.82)

Using a standard normal distribution table, we find:

P(z < 1.82) = 0.9656

P(z < -1.82) = 0.0344

Therefore, the probability that the sample proportion will be within +0.05 of the population proportion is:

0.9656 - 0.0344 = 0.9312 (rounded to four decimal places)

Learn more about "probability":

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The y is a constant function, since its derivative is 0, Therefore, y(64) = 1

To solve this problem, we need to use implicit differentiation. First, we differentiate both sides of the equation VI + Vy = 9 with respect to x (since y is a function of x) using the chain rule:

d/dx(VI) + d/dx(Vy) = d/dx(9)

Since VI is a constant, its derivative is 0, and we can simplify to:

V d/dx(y) = 0

Now we can solve for d/dx(y):

d/dx(y) = 0/V = 0

This tells us that y is a constant function, since its derivative is 0. Therefore, y(64) = 1 is the only possible value for y(64), since it is given in the problem.

So, to answer the question, y(64) = 1.

To learn more about derivative  click here

brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

The equation that model the relationship on the graph in slope-intercept form can be presented as follows;

y = (7/3)x + (-2/3)

The slope-intercept form of a linear equation is an equation of the form; y = m·x + c

Where;

m = The slope of the graph of the equation

c = The y-intercept

The first difference are;

-3 - (-10) = 7

4 - (-3) = 7

11 - 4 = 7

The data on the table represent the data for a linear equation, since the difference between the successive x-values are the same and equivalent to 3

The slope of the graph of the equation is therefore;

(11 - 4)/(5 - 3) = 7/3

The equation of that represents the data is therefore;

y - 11 = (7/3)·(x - 5) = (7/3)·x - 35/3 = (7/3)·x - 11 2/3

y = (7/3)·x - 11 2/3 + 11 = (7/3)·x - 2/3

The equation is therefore;

y = (7/3)·x - 2/3

Learn more on linear equations here: https://brainly.com/question/30667272

#SPJ1

The cheetah can travel 74.6 miles in 1 hour at its top speed.

To determine how far a cheetah can travel in 1 hour, we need to use the information provided and make some calculations.

First, we know that the cheetah can travel at its top speed for 1.5 hours, covering a distance of 111.9 miles. This means that we can calculate the cheetah's average speed during this time as follows:

Average speed = Distance covered / Time taken

Plugging in the values, we get:-

Average speed = 111.9 miles / 1.5 hours = 74.6 miles/hour

This means that the cheetah can run at an average speed of 74.6 miles per hour.

Now, to determine how far the cheetah can travel in 1 hour, we can use the formula:

Distance = Speed x Time

Plugging in the values, we get:-

Distance = 74.6 miles/hour x 1 hour = 74.6 miles

Therefore, the cheetah can travel 74.6 miles in 1 hour at its top speed.

To know more about Speed problems-

brainly.com/question/28665046

#SPJ4

The set of all integer solutions for the inequality -1 ≤ x - √5 < 4 is {-1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4}.

The inequality:

-1 ≤ x - √5 < 4

To isolate x by adding √5 to each side:

-1 + √5 ≤ x < 4 + √5

The inequality is now expressed in terms of x with lower and upper bounds.

To find the set of all integer solutions for this inequality, we need to identify all integer values of x that fall within this range.

The integer values between -1 + √5 and 4 + √5 are:

-1 + √5 ≈ 0.236 and 4 + √5 ≈ 5.236

The integers between these two values are 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

The inequality is inclusive of the lower bound (-1 ≤ x - √5), we need to include the integer value that satisfies this condition.

Thus, the set of integer solutions for the inequality is:

{-1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4}

For similar questions on integer

https://brainly.com/question/929808

#SPJ11

The values of x which are solutions to the given quadratic equation as required to be determined are; x = (1 ± i√11) / 2.

It follows from the task content that the given quadratic equation is to be solved for variable, x.

3x² + 4x - 5 = 5x² + 2x + 1;

By collect like terms and evaluating; we have that;

2x² - 2x + 6 = 0

By solving the equation by means of the formula method; we find that;

x = (1 ± i√11) / 2

Ultimately, the values of x which holds True are; x = (1 ± i√11) / 2.

Read more on quadratic equations;

https://brainly.com/question/30487356

#SPJ1

If she will pay 2.4% of the end of the loan plus $0.57 each month then after 20 years the total amount will be; $6338.26

Given that Bessie took out a subsidized student loan of $5000 at a 2.4% APR, compounded monthly, to pay for her last semester of college.

When she will begin paying off the loan in 10 months with monthly payments lasting for 20 years,

A = p(1+ r/n) nl

Because in our example, n = 12 (monthly), p = $5000 , r = 2.4% = = 0.024, and t = 20 years.

A = $69457.89.

To know more about interest rate visit:

brainly.com/question/28792777

#SPJ1

This is an example of a biased research sample. By only surveying students at a wealthy private college, the researcher may not accurately capture the budgeting behavior of college students as a whole.

The sample is limited and not representative of the entire population of college students. To ensure more accurate and unbiased results, the researcher should consider surveying a diverse range of college students from different socioeconomic backgrounds and institutions. In this scenario, a researcher wants to study budgeting behavior among college students but only surveys students at a wealthy private college with a tuition of $65,000 per year. This is an example of a biased research sample. The sample is not representative of the broader population of college students, as it only includes students from a specific socio-economic background attending a wealthy private college.

Learn more about research here: brainly.com/question/24174276

#SPJ11

The present value of the amount desired at the end of the period is $7,246.92.

To find the present value of the amount desired at the end of the period, we need to use present value tables. The given interest rate is 6% compounded monthly.

Using PV Table 12.3, we can find the PV factor for 48 periods (4 years x 12 months/year = 48 months) at 0.5% (6%/12 months) interest rate. The PV factor for 48 periods at 0.5% is 0.8183.

The formula for present value is:

[tex]PV = Amount / (1 + r)^n[/tex]

where r is the interest rate per period and n is the number of periods.

Plugging in the values, we get:

[tex]PV = $9,800 / (1 + 0.005)^48[/tex]

PV = $9,800 / 1.3511

PV = $7,246.92

Therefore, the present value of the amount desired at the end of the period is $7,246.92.

To know more about interest rate refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/13324776

#SPJ11