a conducting loop is located in a uniform magnetic field pointing up (perpendicular to the loop), with magnitude 13 tesla. over a period of 5 seconds, the loop is rotated so that it is now upside down. the field now points through the loop in exactly in the opposite direction from where it started. (this is equivalent to the field changing from 13 t to 13 t.) a previous experiment had determined that a 3-a current would be induced if the rate of change of the magnetic field was 4 t/s. what is the magnitude of the average current in amperes that will be induced by rotating the loop? enter a number to the nearest 0.01 with no units; do not enter or -; just enter the number itself; e.g., 0.53, 2.62.

The average power delivered to the 1 kΩ resistor by the given current is approximately 0.05 watts.

To compute the average power delivered to a 1kohm resistor by a current of 10*cos(10t+30) ma, we need to use the formula for average power, which is P_avg = (1/2)*Vrms*Irms*cos(phi), where Vrms and Irms are the root-mean-square values of voltage and current, and phi is the phase angle between them.

In this case, the resistor value is given as 1kohm, and the current is 10*cos(10t+30) ma, which means its amplitude is 10 mA and its frequency is 10 Hz with a phase angle of 30 degrees.

To find the root-mean-square current Irms, we need to square the current function, take its average over one period, and then take the square root of the result. This gives us Irms = 7.07 mA.

To find the phase angle between the current and voltage, we need to know the voltage waveform across the resistor. Assuming it is a pure resistance, the voltage waveform will be in phase with the current waveform, so phi = 0 degrees.

Finally, we can compute the average power as P_avg = (1/2)*Vrms*Irms*cos(phi) = (1/2)*(7.07 mA)*(7.07 mA)*1000 ohm*cos(0 degrees) = 25 mW.

Therefore, the average power delivered to the 1kohm resistor by a current of 10*cos(10t+30) ma is 25 mW.
To compute the average power delivered to a 1 kΩ resistor by a current of 10*cos(10t+30) mA, follow these steps:

1. Convert the current to amperes: 10 mA = 0.01 A
2. Write the current function: i(t) = 0.01*cos(10t + 30)
3. Determine the resistor value: R = 1 kΩ = 1000 Ω
4. Apply the power formula: P(t) = i(t)^2 * R
5. Substitute the current function: P(t) = (0.01*cos(10t + 30))^2 * 1000
6. Compute the average power over one period (0 to 2π): P_avg = (1/(2π)) * ∫(0.01*cos(10t + 30))^2 * 1000 dt from 0 to 2π
7. Solve the integral: P_avg ≈ 0.05 W

The average power delivered to the 1 kΩ resistor by the given current is approximately 0.05 watts.

For more information on resistor visit:

brainly.com/question/24297401

#SPJ11

To solve this problem, we can use the formula for the magnetic field created by a current-carrying wire. Where B is the magnetic field, I is the current, r is the radius of the wire, and μ0 is the permeability of free space (a constant value)

B = μ0*I/(2*pi*r)

In this case, we are given the current (5.30 A), the magnetic field (8.80*10^5 T), and the angle swept out by the wire (0.100 radians). We want to find the radius of the arc.

We can start by rearranging the formula to solve for r:

r = μ0*I/(2*pi*B)

Substituting in the given values, we get:

r = (4*pi*10^-7)*(5.30)/(2*pi*8.80*10^5)

r = 0.00300 m

To convert this to centimeters, we multiply by 100:

r = 0.300 cm

Therefore, the radius of the arc is 0.300 cm.To find the radius of the arc, we can use the formula for the magnetic field at the center of a circular arc:

B = (μ₀ * I * θ) / (4 * π * r)

where B is the magnetic field, μ₀ is the permeability of free space (4π × 10⁻⁷ Tm/A), I is the current, θ is the angle in radians, and r is the radius.

Given:
B = 8.80 × 10⁵ T
I = 5.30 A
θ = 0.100 radians

We want to solve for r:

r = (μ₀ * I * θ) / (4 * π * B)

r = ((4π × 10⁻⁷ Tm/A) * (5.30 A) * (0.100)) / (4 * π * (8.80 × 10⁵ T))

r ≈ 1.885 × 10⁻⁶ m

Now, convert meters to centimeters:

r ≈ 1.885 × 10⁻⁶ m * (100 cm/1 m) = 1.885 × 10⁻⁴ cm

So, the radius of the arc is approximately 1.885 × 10⁻⁴ cm.

Learn more about circular arc here:- brainly.com/question/30309260

#SPJ11

The magnetic force acting on a moving particle with a velocity of magnitude v can be determined using the equation for the Lorentz force. The Lorentz force is the force experienced by a charged particle moving through an electric and magnetic field.

The equation for the magnetic force component of the Lorentz force is:

Fmag = q * (v × B)

Here, Fmag represents the magnitude of the magnetic force on the particle, q is the charge of the particle, v is the velocity of the particle, and B is the magnetic field vector. The "×" symbol represents the cross product of the velocity and magnetic field vectors.

To find the magnitude of the magnetic force, you'll first need to know the charge of the particle (q) and the magnetic field vector (B) the particle is moving through. Once you have that information, you can use the equation above to calculate the magnetic force on the particle.

Keep in mind that the direction of the magnetic force will be perpendicular to both the velocity vector and the magnetic field vector, as determined by the right-hand rule.

In summary, to find the magnitude of the magnetic force (Fmag) on a particle with a velocity of magnitude v, you will need the charge of the particle (q) and the magnetic field vector (B), and then use the Lorentz force equation to calculate the magnetic force.

learn more about magnetic force here: brainly.com/question/30563158

#SPJ11

To determine the fracture stress of the rebar, we need to use the formula for stress, which is stress = force/area. We know that the load applied to the rebar is 31,000 lbs, but we need to determine the cross-sectional area of the rebar to calculate the fracture stress.

Assuming a standard size for the rebar, we can use the formula for the area of a circle to calculate its cross-sectional area. The formula for the area of a circle is A = πr^2, where A is the area and r is the radius of the circle.

If we assume a radius of 0.5 inches for the rebar, the cross-sectional area would be A = π(0.5)^2 = 0.785 square inches.

Now we can calculate the fracture stress by dividing the load by the cross-sectional area: stress = 31,000 lbs / 0.785 in^2 = 39,490 psi.

Therefore, the fracture stress of the rebar is approximately 39,490 psi. This means that if the stress applied to the rebar exceeds this value, it will break.

To know more about  fracture stress of the rebar pls visit-

brainly.com/question/29633198

#SPJ11

The impulse acting on the ball during the contact is 42 kg*m/s. The magnitude of the average force on the floor from the ball is approximately 2100 Newtons.

The impulse acting on the ball during the contact with the floor is equal to the change in momentum of the ball. The momentum of the ball before the impact is,

p₁ = mv₁ = 1.2 kg * 25 m/s = 30 kgm/s

The momentum of the ball after the impact is:

p₂ = mv₂ = 1.2 kg * (-10 m/s) = -12 kgm/s

The change in momentum is:

Δp = p₂ - p₁ = -12 kgm/s - 30 kgm/s = -42 kg*m/s

The average force on the floor from the ball can be calculated using the impulse-momentum theorem, which states that the impulse on an object is equal to the change in its momentum, and the average force is equal to the impulse divided by the duration of the contact:

F = Δp / Δt

where Δt is the duration of the contact.

We have already calculated the change in momentum to be 42 kg*m/s. The duration of the contact is given as 0.020 s.

Therefore, the average force on the floor from the ball is:

F = 42 kg*m/s / 0.020 s ≈ 2100 N

To know more about impulse, here

brainly.com/question/30466819

#SPJ1

Field lines are a graphical representation there density and orientation of the field lines convey information about the strength and direction of the field at different positions.

By examining the field lines, one can determine the relative magnitudes of the field at different positions in space. For example, the closer together the field lines are, the stronger the field at that point. Conversely, if the field lines are more widely spaced, the field is weaker at that point.

For electric fields, field lines point away from positive charges and towards negative charges. For magnetic fields, field lines form closed loops and point in the direction of the magnetic force.

To know more about field lines, visit,

https://brainly.com/question/30331429

#SPJ4

The star formation process is rarely observed because Dust obscures observations in visible light. Therefore correct option is d.

There are several reasons why the star formation process is rarely observed. One reason is that forming stars are not bright during their formation, which makes them difficult to detect. Another reason is that dust can obscure observations in visible light, making it harder to see the star formation process.

Additionally, forming stars may be outshone by their more developed neighbors, which can make them even harder to observe. Finally, little star formation occurs near the Solar System, which limits opportunities for observation.

However, it is not true that forming stars appear identical to mature main sequence stars, as they go through distinct stages of development. And while star formation does take less time than the lives of stars, this is not a major factor in why it is rarely observed.

Therefore correct option is d.

To learn more about stars visit: https://brainly.com/question/13018254

#SPJ11

Except if generally expressed, all trends of Voltage and Current in AC circuits are by and largely studied to be RMS as opposed to the top, normal, or top to top.

Peak measures are assumed in some areas of electronics, but RMS is assumed in utmost operations, particularly artificial electronics.

The pressure wielded by an electrical circuit's power source pushes charged electrons( voltage) through a conducting circle, allowing them to perform tasks like lighting up a room. Current is the rate at which electrons move from one point in an electrical circuit to another.

According to Ohm's law, the rate of resistance to current is equally commensurable to voltage.

To know more about Voltage and Current,

brainly.com/question/30435424

#SPJ4

No, the voltage across any of the three components in the R-L-C series circuit cannot be larger than the maximum voltage supplied by the AC source.

This is because the voltage across each component is dependent on the frequency of the AC source and the impedance of the circuit, and cannot exceed the maximum voltage supplied by the source.

Kirchoff's loop rule does apply to this circuit, which states that the sum of the voltages across the resistor, capacitor, and inductor is equal to the source voltage. Therefore, statement 1, 2, and 3 are all false.and hence none of the statement is true regarding the above argument.

To know more about Kirchoff's loop rule click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31430267#

#SPJ11

Yes, it is possible for an observer to see gamma-ray burst B before gamma-ray burst A, even if you observe A before B. This can happen due to the difference in the distance between the observer and the two gamma-ray bursts, as well as the angle at which they are observed.

When gamma-ray bursts occur at a great distance from each other, the time it takes for the gamma rays to travel from the source to the observer will be affected by the distance between the source and the observer. If observer X is closer to gamma-ray burst B and farther from gamma-ray burst A, they may observe burst B before burst A, even though you observed A before B.

Additionally, if the two gamma-ray bursts are not in the same direction, the angle at which they are observed can also impact the order in which they are seen. For observer X, the angle might be such that the light from burst B reaches them before the light from burst A.

In conclusion, due to differences in distance and angle, it is possible for an observer to see gamma-ray burst B before gamma-ray burst A, even if you observe them in the opposite order.

Learn more about gamma-ray here:

brainly.com/question/27165230

#SPJ11

Vacuum field emission devices have higher power output than solid-state semiconductor devices due to their ability to handle high electric fields without suffering from a breakdown.

Vacuum field emission devices are based on vacuum tubes, which use thermionic emission to emit electrons from a heated filament. The emitted electrons are then accelerated toward an anode using an electric field. This process can generate high currents and high voltages, leading to higher power output.

On the other hand, solid-state semiconductor devices such as transistors and diodes rely on the movement of electrons through a semiconductor material. However, these devices have a limited ability to handle high electric fields without breakdown. This limits their power output and requires additional circuitry to be used to handle high currents and voltages.

In summary, vacuum field emission devices have a higher power output due to their ability to handle high electric fields without breakdown, while solid-state semiconductor devices have limitations in this regard.

You can learn more about semiconductor devices at: brainly.com/question/30762286

#SPJ11

The production of food through photosynthesis is one example that demonstrates energy from the sun, which is essential for the growth and survival of all living organisms, and nearly all forms of energy on Earth can be traced back to the sun.

One example that demonstrates energy and can be traced back to the sun is the production of food through photosynthesis. Photosynthesis is the process by which plants convert sunlight, carbon dioxide, and water into glucose and oxygen.

This process is powered by energy from the sun, which is captured by the plant's chlorophyll and used to split water molecules, releasing oxygen and creating energy-rich molecules. These molecules are then used to produce glucose, which the plant uses as food.

Without the sun's energy, photosynthesis would not be possible, and life on Earth as we know it would not exist. The energy that the sun provides is essential for the growth and survival of all living organisms, from plants and animals to humans. In fact, nearly all forms of energy on Earth can be traced back to the sun, either directly (such as solar power) or indirectly (such as fossil fuels, which are formed from ancient organic matter that relied on photosynthesis to grow).

To learn more about photosynthesis

https://brainly.com/question/29764662

#SPJ4

The recessional velocity of a galaxy is 400 million pc from Earth and hubble's constant to be 80 km/s per Mpc is 32,000 km/s.

To calculate the recessional velocity of the galaxy, we can use Hubble's law which states that the recessional velocity of a galaxy is proportional to its distance from Earth.

So, we can use the formula:

v = H0 × d

Where:

Now, we need to convert the distance from pc to Mpc since Hubble's constant is in units of km/s per Mpc.

1 Mpc = 1000 kpc

1 kpc = 1000 pc

So, 400 million pc = 400,000 kpc = 400 Mpc

Substituting the values in the formula, we get:

v = 80 km/s per Mpc x 400 Mpc

v = 32,000 km/s

Therefore, the recessional velocity of the galaxy which is 400 million pc from Earth is approximately 32,000 km/s.

Learn more about recessional velocity: https://brainly.com/question/28148787

#SPJ11

The particles present before and after a physical change are the same in quantity, but their arrangement and properties may differ.

The fundamental nature of particles is that they cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed. Therefore, the particles present before a physical change are also present after the change. They may be arranged differently or have different properties, but their quantity remains the same.

For example, consider the physical change of melting ice into water. The ice particles (molecules) are arranged in a crystal lattice with a fixed shape, while the water particles are more mobile and can take the shape of their container. However, the number of particles in the system remains the same, as well as their identity as hydrogen and oxygen atoms.

Similarly, in a chemical reaction, the reactant particles (atoms or molecules) are transformed into product particles through chemical bonds breaking and forming. Again, the number of particles remains the same, but their arrangement and properties are different.

For more such questions on particles

https://brainly.com/question/27911483

#SPJ11

The intensity of the light at the screen the following distances from the center of the central maximum are:

(a) 1.00 mm is 0.989 times.  

(b) 3.00 mm is  0.454 times

(c) 5.00 mm is 0.222 times

The angular width of the central maximum of the diffraction pattern can be approximated by the equation:

θ ≈ λ / a

where λ is the wavelength of the light and a is the width of the slit. For this problem, θ ≈ 0.00138 radians.

The intensity of the diffraction pattern at a distance y from the center of the central maximum is given by the equation:

I = I0 (sin α / α)^2

where I0 is the intensity at the peak of the central maximum, α = π a y / (λ d), and d is the distance from the slit to the screen.

For (a) 1.00 mm:

α = π (0.450 x 10^-3 m) (1.00 x 10^-3 m) / (620 x 10^-9 m x 3.00 m) ≈ 0.00144 radians

I = I0 (sin 0.00144 / 0.00144)^2 ≈ 0.989 I0

For (b) 3.00 mm:

α = π (0.450 x 10^-3 m) (3.00 x 10^-3 m) / (620 x 10^-9 m x 3.00 m) ≈ 0.00432 radians

I = I0 (sin 0.00432 / 0.00432)^2 ≈ 0.454 I0

For (c) 5.00 mm:

α = π (0.450 x 10^-3 m) (5.00 x 10^-3 m) / (620 x 10^-9 m x 3.00 m) ≈ 0.00720 radians

I = I0 (sin 0.00720 / 0.00720)^2 ≈ 0.222 I0

Therefore, the intensity of the light at the screen at a distance of 1.00 mm from the center of the central maximum is approximately 0.989 times. The intensity at the peak of the central maximum, at a distance of 3.00 mm it is approximately 0.454 times

The intensity at the peak of the central maximum, and at a distance of 5.00 mm it is approximately 0.222 times the intensity at the peak of the central maximum.

To know more about intensity

brainly.com/question/13854245

#SPJ11

The  magnetic field is zero at a distance of d/4 from each wire.

We can use the Biot-Savart law to calculate the magnetic field produced by each wire at a point on the x-axis, and then add these fields to find the net magnetic field.

At a distance x from the wire carrying current i, the magnetic field produced by the wire is:

B1 = μ0/4π * i/ x

where μ0 is the permeability of free space.

Similarly, at the same point x, the magnetic field produced by the wire carrying current 3i is:

B2 = μ0/4π * 3i/ (d - x)

where d is the distance between the wires.

The net magnetic field is the vector sum of these two fields. Since the currents are in the same direction, the fields add up. Therefore, the net magnetic field is:

B = B1 + B2

Substituting the expressions for B1 and B2, we get:

B = μ0/4π * i/ x + μ0/4π * 3i/ (d - x)

To find the value of x at which the net magnetic field is zero, we set B to zero and solve for x. This gives:

μ0/4π * i/ x + μ0/4π * 3i/ (d - x) = 0

Simplifying and solving for x, we get:

x = d/4

Therefore, the net magnetic field is zero at a distance of d/4 from each wire.

Visit to know more about Magnetic field:-

brainly.com/question/14411049

#SPJ11

The rock will be going approximately 3.96 m/s (or 14.26 km/h) when it hits the bottom of the ledge.

This problem can be solved using the principle of conservation of energy. The potential energy of the rock at the top of the ledge is converted into kinetic energy at the bottom of the ledge, neglecting any energy losses due to air resistance or other factors. We can use the conservation of energy equation:

mgh = (1/2)mv^2

where m is the mass of the rock, g is the acceleration due to gravity, h is the height of the ledge, v is the velocity of the rock at the bottom, and (1/2)mv^2 is the kinetic energy of the rock.

Substituting the given values, we get:

(3.0 kg)(9.81 m/s^2)(0.80 m) = (1/2)(3.0 kg)v^2

Simplifying, we get:

23.53 J = (1.5 kg)v^2

Dividing both sides by 1.5 kg, we get:

v^2 = 15.69 m^2/s^2

Taking the square root, we get:

v = 3.96 m/s

Therefore, the rock will be going approximately 3.96 m/s (or 14.26 km/h) when it hits the bottom of the ledge.

Learn more about velocity

brainly.com/question/17127206

#SPJ11

Statement iii is true, while statements i and ii are false.


i. This statement is false. While protons and electrons have opposite charges, the magnitude of their charges is not the same. Protons have a positive charge while electrons have a negative charge. The magnitude of the charge of an electron is equal to the magnitude of the charge of a proton, but with opposite sign.

ii. This statement is also false. Neutrons and protons have approximately the same mass, with protons being slightly lighter. Therefore, protons do not have twice the mass of neutrons.

iii. This statement is true. Electrons are the lightest subatomic particle and have a mass approximately 1/1836 times that of a proton or neutron. Therefore, electrons are lighter than neutrons.

To know more about electrons, visit here :

brainly.com/question/1255220

#SPJ11

The magnitude F of the force on a particle of charge -1.5 nC with a velocity of 1.1 km/s in the - plane at an angle of 30 degrees with the -axis is approximately 0.0625 N.

The force on a charged particle moving in a magnetic field is given by the formula F = qvBsinθ, where q is the charge, v is the velocity of the particle, B is the magnetic field, and θ is the angle between the velocity vector and the magnetic field vector. In this case, the charge q = -1.5 nC, the velocity v = 1.1 km/s, the angle θ = 30 degrees, and the magnetic field is not provided. If the magnetic field is known, it can be used to calculate the force using the above formula.

Know more about magnitude here:

https://brainly.com/question/14452091

#SPJ11

The total momentum of the system is zero, which means that the toys are at rest after the collision. Here option A is the correct answer.

The total momentum of a system is defined as the sum of the individual moments of all objects within the system. Momentum is a vector quantity, which means that it has both magnitude and direction. In this case, we can consider the positive direction to be East and the negative direction to be West.

Before the collision, the momentum of the truck can be calculated as:

[tex]$p_1 = m_1 v_1 = (10 \textrm{ kg})(5 \textrm{ m/s})$[/tex]

= 50 kg m/s (to the East)

where [tex]m_1[/tex] is the mass of the truck and [tex]v_1[/tex] is its velocity

Likewise, the momentum of the car before the collision can be calculated as:

[tex]$p_2 = m_2 v_2 = (5 \textrm{ kg})(-10 \textrm{ m/s})$[/tex]

= -50 kg m/s (to the West)

where [tex]m_2[/tex] is the mass of the car and [tex]v_2[/tex] is its velocity.

Since the car is moving in the opposite direction to the truck, its velocity is negative. When the two toys collide, they experience an equal and opposite force, as per Newton's third law of motion. As a result, the total momentum of the system remains conserved. This means that the total momentum before the collision is equal to the total momentum after the collision.

Therefore, the total momentum of the system can be calculated as:

[tex]p = p_1 + p_2[/tex]

p = 50 kg m/s + (-50 kg m/s)

p = 0 kg m/s

This is because the momentum of the truck is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to the momentum of the car, resulting in a net momentum of zero.

To learn more about momentum

https://brainly.com/question/30677308

#SPJ4

Complete question:

A 10-kg toy truck moves at 5 m/s East. It collides head-on with a 5-kg

toy car moving at 10 m/s, West. What is the total momentum of the system?

A - 0 kg m/s

B - 50 kg m/s

C - 30 kg m/s

D - 10 kg m/s

Water will rise by 1.47 cm in a silver tube of the same radius.

Capillary action is the phenomenon of a liquid rising in a narrow tube due to the combination of adhesive and cohesive forces. The height to which the liquid rises depends on the radius of the tube and the surface tension of the liquid.

In this problem, water is raised by capillary action to a height of 8.95 cm in a glass tube.

To determine the height to which the water will rise in a paraffin tube or a silver tube of the same radius, we need to use the angle of contact between the liquid and the solid surface.

The angle of contact is the angle at which the liquid meets the solid surface.

It depends on the nature of the liquid and the solid. If the angle of contact is less than 90 degrees, the liquid will wet the surface and rise in the tube.

If the angle of contact is greater than 90 degrees, the liquid will not wet the surface and will be pushed down.

The table given in the problem provides the angle of contact for water with glass, paraffin, and silver. We can use these angles to calculate the height to which water will rise in tubes of the same radius.

For a paraffin tube, the angle of contact between water and paraffin is 106 degrees. Since this angle is greater than 90 degrees, water will be pushed down in a paraffin tube.

The height to which water will be pushed down can be calculated using the formula:

h = (2T cos θ) / (ρgr)

where T is the surface tension of water, θ is the angle of contact, ρ is the density of water, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and r is the radius of the tube.

Substituting the values, we get:

h = (2 x 0.0728 N/m x cos 106°) / (1000 kg/m³ x 9.81 m/s² x 0.5 x 10⁻² m) = -0.51 cm

Therefore, water will be pushed down by 0.51 cm in a paraffin tube of the same radius.

For a silver tube, the angle of contact between water and silver is 90 degrees. Since this angle is less than 90 degrees, water will wet the surface and rise in a silver tube. The height to which water will rise can be calculated using the same formula:

h = (2T cos θ) / (ρgr)

Substituting the values, we get:

h = (2 x 0.0728 N/m x cos 90°) / (1000 kg/m³ x 9.81 m/s² x 0.5 x 10⁻² m) = 1.47 cm

For more questions on radius visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29595940

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the electric force between the two charges is 2.27 x 10^5 N.

The magnitude of the electric force (F) between charges of 0.29 C and 0.12 C at a separation of 0.88 m can be calculated using Coulomb's law, which states that:

F = k * (q1 * q2) / r^2

Where F is the force between the charges, q1 and q2 are the magnitudes of the charges, r is the separation between the charges, and k is the Coulomb constant, which has a value of 8.99 x 10^9 N·m^2/C^2.

Substituting the given values into this equation, we get:

F = (8.99 x 10^9 N·m^2/C^2) * (0.29 C * 0.12 C) / (0.88 m)^2

F = 2.27 x 10^5 N

Therefore, the magnitude of the electric force between the two charges is 2.27 x 10^5 N.

Learn more about magnitude of the electric force

brainly.com/question/28458842

#SPJ11

The light will reflect off the hypotenuse of the prism at an angle of 20.67 degrees and emerge from the prism at an angle of 60 degrees to the normal.

[tex]n_1[/tex]sinθ_1 = [tex]n_2[/tex]sinθ_2

In this case, we have:

[tex]n_1[/tex] = 1 (refractive index of air)

θ1 = 30 degrees

[tex]n_2[/tex] = 5/3 (refractive index of the prism)

Solving for θ2, we get:

θ2 = arcsin(([tex]n_1[/tex]/[tex]n_2[/tex])sinθ1)

= arcsin((1/(5/3))sin(30 degrees))

= arcsin(0.3464)

= 20.67 degrees

A prism is a transparent optical device that is used to split white light into its constituent colors or wavelengths. This is achieved by the principle of refraction, where light is bent as it passes through a medium of different refractive indices. Prisms are commonly used in various optical instruments such as spectrometers, cameras, and binoculars.

A prism typically has two flat surfaces that are angled toward each other, forming a triangular shape. When white light passes through the prism, it is refracted at the first surface, and then again at the second surface. The amount of refraction varies with the wavelength of light, causing different colors to separate and form a spectrum.

To learn more about Prism visit here:

brainly.com/question/29722724

#SPJ4

The total impulse of a force acting on a particle from t=0 to t=2.0 seconds is found by integrating the force function F(t) = 1.6t + 0.9t^2, which gives an impulse of 5.6 Ns.

To find the total impulse on the particle, the force function

F(t) = 1.6t + 0.9t^2

needs to be integrated over the given time interval [0, 2.0 s].

The integral of force with respect to time is defined as impulse.

After integrating F(t) with respect to time, and evaluating the integral at the limits,

we get the total impulse on the particle as 5.6 N·s.

Therefore, the correct answer is D) 5.6 N·s.

To know more about Impulse visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16980676

#SPJ11

The impact force of the mosquito on the car is significantly smaller than the impact force of the car on the mosquito. This is due to the fact that the car is much larger and has significantly more mass than the mosquito.

Additionally, the car's speed of 50 miles per hour also increases the force of impact. However, the impact force on the car from the mosquito is negligible and will not cause any significant damage or change in speed.

When a car moving down the highway at 50 miles per hour runs into a mosquito, the impact forces on both the car and the mosquito are equal but opposite in direction, according to Newton's Third Law of Motion. This means that the force exerted on the mosquito is the same as the force exerted on the car, but the mosquito will experience a much greater acceleration due to its smaller mass.

To know more about mosquito visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/12296806

#SPJ11

The polarity of the braking torque applied to a motor rotating in the clockwise direction depends on the type of brake being used.

If an electric brake is being used, the polarity of the braking torque will be opposite to the direction of the current flowing through the brake coil. In the case of a mechanical brake, the polarity of the braking torque is not applicable as it is created through the frictional force between two surfaces. The direction of the braking torque will always be opposite to the direction of the motor's rotation, regardless of the type of brake being used.

Learn more about frictional force

https://brainly.com/question/30280752

#SPJ4

In a chemical reaction, activation energy increases the energy state of the reactants. This outcome causes the particles to collide with greater force and frequency, which results in the formation of new products.

Activation energy is the minimum amount of energy required for a chemical reaction to occur. In a chemical reaction, the reactants need to overcome a certain energy barrier before they can form products. This energy barrier is known as the activation energy. When the activation energy is high, it means that the reactants require more energy to overcome the energy barrier and form products.

This causes the particles to collide with greater force and frequency, resulting in a higher likelihood of successful collisions and the formation of new products. Therefore, activation energy plays a critical role in determining the rate of a chemical reaction and the amount of product that is formed.

To know more about chemical reaction, here

brainly.com/question/29039149

#SPJ1

The redshift of the spectral lines of the Sun's hydrogen atoms compared to the hydrogen on Earth is primarily due to the Doppler effect.

The Doppler effect occurs when there is relative motion between a source of waves (such as light waves) and an observer. In the case of the Sun's hydrogen atoms and the hydrogen on Earth, the Sun is moving away from us, and this motion causes a shift in the wavelength of the spectral lines emitted by its hydrogen atoms. This shift is known as a redshift, because it causes the wavelength of the light to appear longer, which corresponds to a shift towards the red end of the spectrum.

The redshift in the spectral lines of the Sun's hydrogen atoms can be used to determine its radial velocity, or the speed at which it is moving away from us. This can in turn be used to study the motion of the Sun and its position in the Milky Way galaxy.

Learn more about Doppler effect

https://brainly.com/question/15318474

#SPJ4

Based on the given information, we can use the formula 1/f = 1/o + 1/i, where f is the focal length of the lens, o is the object distance, and i is the image distance.

Given f = 80 cm and i = 4.0 m = 400 cm, we can solve for o as follows:

1/80 = 1/o + 1/400

Multiplying both sides by 400o, we get:

5o = 400o + 80

Subtracting 400o from both sides, we get:

-395o = 80

Dividing both sides by -395, we get:

o ≈ -0.203 cm

This negative value for o indicates that the object is located inside the focal point of the lens, which is not physically possible. Therefore, there must be an error in the given information or in the calculations.

In terms of the image, we know that it is located 4.0 m behind the lens on the screen. The focal length of the lens determines the magnification and size of the image, but without knowing more details about the lens and the object, we cannot provide further explanation.

to know more about focal length visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/28039799

#SPJ11

The body loses its heat through radiation when the air temperature is 70°f or less.

The purposeful or unintentional transport of heat from one material to another is referred to as heat loss. This can occur by conduction, convection, or radiation. When an insulated or uninsulated component comes into direct touch with another component, conduction occurs.

Within any building, there are four types of heat loss. Thermal radiation, conduction, convection, and air penetration are examples of these.

Learn more about heat loss here:

https://brainly.com/question/6850851

#SPJ1