A screenplay is referred to as a teleplay or a script. It is written for television, but a play comprises a screenplay as well as others that are not produced in a theatre or on television.
What is a script, exactly?As a result, a play can be created as a text, as opposed to being produced for theatrical performance.
A play may be written just for the purpose of reading, whereas a screenplay is written for performance and is a condensed version of a play.
Check out the link below to learn about screenplay writers;
https://brainly.com/question/27793256
#SPJ1
Re-read the boxed feature
above the photograph of the
sculpture. What "stunned"
researchers in the 1950s?
Please help I need to graduate!!!
Answer:
the were stunned about the new surveying method
Explanation:
Answer:
The thing that stunned researchers in the 1950s was when new surveying methods revealed thousands of tombs hidden on a hillside they thought they knew well.
Hope this helped.
what are the signal words and phrases in left over and tracers
Answer:
The Text for this is
Explanation:
In 1910, just before Marie Curie collected her second Nobel Prize for radioactivity, young György Hevesy arrived in England to study radioactivity himself. His university’s lab director in Manchester, Ernest Rutherford, immediately assigned Hevesy the Herculean task of separating out radioactive atoms from nonradioactive atoms inside blocks of lead. Actually, it turned out to be not Herculean but impossible. Rutherford had assumed the radioactive atoms, known as radium-D, were a unique substance. In fact, radium-D was radioactive lead and therefore could not be separated chemically. Ignorant of this, Hevesy wasted two years tediously trying to tease lead and radium-D apart before giving up.
Hevesy—a bald, droopy-cheeked, mustached aristocrat from Hungary—also faced domestic frustrations. Hevesy was far from home and used to savory Hungarian food, not the English cooking at his boardinghouse. After noticing patterns in the meals served there, Hevesy grew suspicious that, like a high school cafeteria recycling Monday’s hamburgers into Thursday’s beef chili, his landlady’s “fresh” daily meat was anything but. When confronted, she denied this, so Hevesy decided to seek proof.
Miraculously, he’d achieved a breakthrough in the lab around that time. He still couldn’t separate radium-D, but he realized he could flip that to his advantage. He’d begun musing over the possibility of injecting minute quantities of dissolved lead into a living creature and then tracing the element’s path, since the creature would metabolize the radioactive and nonradioactive lead the same way, and the radium-D would emit beacons of radioactivity as it moved. If this worked, he could actually track molecules inside veins and organs, an unprecedented degree of resolution.
Before he tried this on a living being, Hevesy decided to test his idea on the tissue of a nonliving being, a test with an ulterior motive. He took too much meat at dinner one night and, when the landlady’s back was turned, sprinkled “hot” lead over it. She gathered his leftovers as normal, and the next day Hevesy brought home a newfangled radiation detector from his lab buddy, Hans Geiger. Sure enough, when he waved it over that night’s goulash, Geiger’s counter went furious: click-click-click-click. Hevesy confronted his landlady with the evidence. But, being a scientific romantic, Hevesy no doubt laid it on thick as he explained the mysteries of radioactivity. In fact, the landlady was so charmed to be caught so cleverly, with the latest tools of forensic science, she didn’t even get mad. There’s no historical record of whether she altered her menu, however.
how well do you fit the mythical norm of mainstream U.S. culture's?
Answer:
I believe that I fit very well, even in factors over which I have no control.
Explanation:
It is important to note that mythical norm is a term that refers to the stereotyped and idealized characteristics of society. Regarding the mythical norm present in the USA, I believe that I fit very well.
Firstly, because I am a white middle class person, I already consider myself very well established in the mythical norm of the country. Because these characteristics put me as a privileged individual who has certain facilities in society. The fact of having full access to technology, education, basic sanitation, freedom, right to vote, driver's license, among other things, also allow me to establish myself very well within this norm. Some people may fit better than me, but it is necessary to recognize, when their characteristics are not only within a stereotype, but within a system that oppresses those that do not fit.
Which is the answer ?
Answer:
title....
Explanation:
when we read the title of the passage...we will know what is it about
Will give Brainliest if correct! What is the best way to battle wordiness in your writing?A.Eliminate words that begin with t.B.Eliminate all proper nouns and pronouns from your writing.C.Eliminate useless words and phrases, negative statements, and unnecessary adverbs, and express one idea at a time.D.Eliminate all words with more than six letters from your writing
Answer:
i think C
Explanation:
Where is yacon from?
Answer:
south america
Be not dismayed that her unmoved mind
Doth still persist in her rebellious pride:
And love not like to lusts of baser kind,
The harder won, the firmer will abide.
what is the rhyme scheme
Answer:The rhyme scheme is a typical ABAB in each quartet, which means that the first line's end rhymes with the third and the second line with the fourth, in every quartet, and finally, the couplet rhymes the two lines' ends.
Explanation:
im not sure this is right but i think it is and im sorry if its not!
Use passive or active verbs where needed in the following passages.
Answer:
was tossed
was to be
was to climb
contollred
turned
was guided
was started
flew
reached
Read act 1 of Hamlet and answer the following question.
How do the scene with the gravediggers and Hamlet's scene with Yorick's skull illustrate the broader theme of Hamlet's preoccupation with
death?
Answer: because a skull is associated with death
Explanation:
Hamlet was using the skull as an obvious phenomenon to not mislead the reader because of the abstract scenes taking place
Answer:
PLATO ANSWER
Explanation:
The scene with the gravediggers illustrates the play’s broader theme of mortality. In the first part of the scene, two gravediggers discuss the burial of people who have taken their own lives and how the Christian system is flawed in disallowing su-icide. Hamlet and Horatio then look at the remains of the many dead bodies and reflect on the certainty of death for all people. In death, we are all the same. For example, a woman may go to great ends to beautify herself in life, but her remains after death may look like any ordinary person’s remains. Hamlet and Horatio also discuss how a person's greatness ceases to matter when he or she dies. Hamlet refers to Alexander the Great being buried and becoming one with the sand.
Yorick’s skull acts as a symbol of death. With the skull in his hand, Hamlet reminisces about the time he spent with Yorick. Now, in death, Yorick is nothing more than a pile of bones, with no wit, humor, or intelligence. Earlier in the play, Hamlet spent much time mulling over death and wondering what came after death. Yorick’s skull answers that question for Hamlet.
The skull and the graveyard directly contrast with the life Hamlet led in the castle. In Elsinore, Hamlet’s mother and Claudius tried to make him forget about his father's death. In the graveyard, he has the freedom to contemplate death.
PLEASE ANSWER QUICK!What is the significance of “The Black Ball”and literary works like it in the era after World War II?
"The Black Ball" is a collection of stories by Ralph Ellison. In this collection, Ellison describes the problems and tribulations that African American people experienced in the years after World War II. The collection discusses many important topics, including segregation, racism, the divisions that existed between Americans of different races, etc.
Literary works of this kind were extremely important in the period after World War II. After the war, African Americans began to fight for equality and representation in a more systematic way. Their contributions during the war years exemplified the importance of their role in society and the need for equality. These works became significant because they illustrated how unique African American experiences were. They became a catalyst for the Civil Rights Movement that would take place in the 1950s and 1960s.
2. PART B: Which of the following
quotes best supports the answer to
Part A?
A "Although she feeds me bread of
bitterness, / And sinks into my
throat her tiger's tooth, / Stealing
my breath of life, I will confess / 1
love this cultured hell that tests
my youth." (Lines 1-4)
B "Her vigor flows like tides into my
blood, / Giving me strength erect
against her hate" (Lines 5-6)
C Yet, as a rebel fronts a king in
state, / I stand within her walls
with not a shred--/ Of terror,
malice, not a word of ſeer." (
Lines 8-10)
D "Darkly I gaze into the days
ahead, / And see her might and
granite wonders there" (
Lines 11-12)
Answer:
It's B
Explanation:
It just makes sense
According to Philip Zimbardo, what
influences people to do bad things?
A
social situations
B
specific chemicals
people's imaginations
D
a desire to be famous and well-
known
Answer:
Explanation:
A social situation
According to Philip Zimbardo A. social situations influences people to do bad things.
Philip Zimbardo ran the Stanford prison experiment in 1971 that showed that:
prison guards would be abusive to prisoners because the situation demanded it. the social situation of being above the prisoners, caused the prison guards to abuse their power over the prisoners.It is worthy of note that his research has been criticized by many for not properly following scientific procedure.
Regardless, we can conclusively say that Philip Zimbardo believed that social situations influences people to do bad things.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/16988886.
Enzo formed a study group for an upcoming geography test. To start off each session, they go over past notes and look at maps. Then, they talk about the material and share information. Finally, they quiz one another on what they have learned.
How can they make their study session more effective?
by reviewing the subject and the previous session
by discussing the topic and asking questions
by drilling one another on the material covered
by brainstorming ideas on likely test questions
Answer:
May be fourth one.
hope it helps
Answer: last on, D.
Explanation: got it right on edge 2020
Question 3 (1 point
Belaya-Kaya and Djuguturlyuchat are
Answer:
Belaya-Kaya and Djuguturlyuchat are mountains in Russia.
Explanation:
Belaya-Kaya and Djuguturlyuchat are the gigantic peaks in Russia. These mountains are fictional used in the poem 'A Storm in the Mountains' by Alexander Solzhenitsyn. The poem is written in prose and ordinary paragraph form.
The poet is speaking about a storm that occured on the gigantic peaks of Belaya-Kaya and Djuguturlyuchat. The storm was dreary and fierce that can be described by the words used by the poet such as ''pitch-black night', 'darkness and chaos', etc.
Thus the correct answer is that Belaya-Kaya and Djuguturlyuchat are mountains in Russia.
Use passive or active verbs where needed in the following passages. It was a cold, windy morning, December 17, 1903, on a beach at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. There were no crowds, no newspaper reporters present for this historic moment. Only a few people (stand) ________________ on the beach and (watch) ____________________ as history (make) ____________________. Two men from Dayton, Ohio, named Wilbur and Orville Wright, (take) _______________ a strange-looking machine out of a building and (prepare) _________________ it for its first flight.
Nancy believes that her brother, Peter, is currently in Paris. It is true that Peter is in Paris. According to the traditional definition of knowledge, can we say that Nancy knows her brother is in Paris:__________.
Answer:
[tex]\boxed{\mathrm{No}}[/tex]
Explanation:
Nancy only believes that her brother is in Paris. Even if he is in Paris or he is not, Nancy cannot know for sure.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Nancy only doubts the presence of his brother in Paris. She only believes that he is in Paris. She is not sure about it.
Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
Match each excerpt to the correct text type.
narrative
informational
persuasive
Excerpt
Text Type
A lot of people do not like eating Brussels sprouts, but they are one of the healthiest sources of nutrition. Brussels sprouts are rich in vitamin C, which helps the absorption of iron in the blood. More people should try incorporating Brussels sprouts in their dishes.
A baseball game is played between two teams, and each team has nine players. The baseball field has three bases plus home base. The batters hit the ball and run through all bases to score runs. The fielders aim to stop the batters from scoring runs.
Arthur was making a jug of fresh lemonade when Chris entered the kitchen. Arthur did not know how to react when he saw him. Chris had been his oldest friend, but after their heated argument about a football game yesterday, everything had become extremely awkward.
Answer: The answer is:
~Narrative - Arthur was making a jug of fresh lemonade when Chris entered the kitchen. Arthur did not know how to react when he saw him. Chris had been his oldest friend, but after their heated argument about a football game yesterday, everything had become extremely awkward.
~Persuasive - A lot of people do not like eating Brussels sprouts, but they are one of the healthiest sources of nutrition. Brussels sprouts are rich in vitamin C, which helps the absorption of iron in the blood. More people should try incorporating Brussels sprouts in their dishes.
~ Informational - A baseball game is played between two teams, and each team has nine players. The baseball field has three bases plus home base. The batters hit the ball and run through all bases to score runs. The fielders aim to stop the batters from scoring runs.
Explanation: Hope this helps!
Read the passage from "Gid."
How would the passage most likely change if Girl's
mother were the narrator?
...is it true that you sing benna in Sunday School?
always eat your food in such a way that it doesn't turn
someone else's stomach; On Sundays, try to walk like
a lady ... don't sing benna in Sunday school, you
mustn't speak to warf-rat boys, not even to give
directions, don't eat fruits on the street-flies will follow
you but I don't sing benna on Sundays at all and never
in Sunday school.
O She would explain why she is so concerned about
Girl.
O She would tell readers why she respects Girl's
decisions
O She would ignore Girl's insistence that she doesn't
sing benna.
O She would share Girl's point of view on interacting
with boys
Answer:
She would explain why she is so concerned about Girl.
Explanation:
The passage would most likely change if Girl's mother was the narrator by explaining her concern for her daughter and why she would want her to be upright and be a good daughter.
From the passage given, it is narrated from the perspective of Girl where she talks about how her mother always tells her not to sing Benna in Sunday School, eat her food in such a way that it won't turn her stomach, walk like a lady and so on. We can infer that Girl is exasperated and tired of her mother's interference in her life and does not really understand her mother as she believes she is trying to control her life.
Narrating the story from her mother's point of view would enable her to explain why she is so concerned about her daughter, not as if she is controlling her.
Answer:
A- She would explain why she is so concerned about Girl.Explanation: Took the test hope I helped plz five stars. :)
Which of these questions best helps you develop a thesis statement early in the writing process?
A What am I trying to say about that topic?
B What is my indirect argument?
C What are my supporting ideas?
D What is my plan for organizing my writing?
The correct answer is A. What am I trying to say about that topic?
Explanation:
The purpose of a thesis statement is to express a position about a topic; moreover, this statement shows the main point of the author, and in the process of writing is an essential element as this defines the supporting ideas that will be included, the evidence, and event the structure of the text.
Besides this, the thesis is created after the topic was selected and one of the ways to do this is to think about the position or point of view you have about the topic. In this context, one helping question would be "What am I trying to say about that topic?" because as it was mentioned before the thesis statement is the position about the topic or what the author feels/thinks or says about the topic.
Juvante feels strongly that socialized health care is the most-effective, most-realistic option for modernized countries, but is required to read several articles about the negative financial and practical implications of socialized medicine for his assignment. Why does his instructor insist that he do that? a. so that he will have more exposure to different viewpoints b. so that he can learn how to form arguments c. so he can learn to identify reputable sources
Answer:
I think the answer is A.so that he will have more exposure to different view points
Juvante's instructor insists that he read texts with negative arguments about socialized health so that he has access to different points of view, as shown in option A.
We can arrive at this answer because:
Juvante has a very positive opinion of socialized health.This makes him tend to only read articles and texts that present positive opinions.However, this does not strengthen his knowledge of the subject and prevents him from having a wider range of information.Thus, his instructor influenced him to read articles and texts with negative opinions on the subject, as this would allow Juvante to have access to different opinions and how they are formed, which would enhance his knowledge.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/23534523?referrer=searchResults
What evidence from the passage supports the inference that sugar was expensive and not available to everyone?
Answer:
B. "cooks working for the wealthiest people"
Explanation:
Sugar was expensive because cooks used it and it was only for the wealthiest people.
Read the passage from "The Yellow Wallpaper.”
John laughs at me. . . .
John is practical in the extreme. He has no patience with faith, an intense horror of superstition, and he scoffs openly at any talk of things not to be felt and seen and put down in figures.
John is a physician, and . . . perhaps that is one reason I do not get well faster.
You see, he does not believe I am sick! . . . .
If a physician of high standing, and one’s own husband, assures friends and relatives that there is really nothing the matter with one but temporary nervous depression—a slight hysterical tendency—what is one to do?
How does the syntax of this passage help create the tone of the text?
Several short sentences in a row give the text a comical tone.
Fragmented sentences give the text a lighthearted tone.
Long, complex sentences give the text an authoritative tone.
Direct address and a question give the text a conversational tone.
.
Answer:
D. Direct address and a question give the text a conversational tone.
Explanation:
Correct Fiction Writing Edge 2021
The syntax of this passage help create the tone of the text by D. Direct address and a question give the text a conversational tone.
What is a syntax instance?
Syntax is the order or arrangement of phrases and phrases to shape proper sentences. The most fundamental syntax follows a topic + verb + direct item system. this is, "Jillian hit the ball." Syntax lets in us to remember the fact that we would not write, "Hit Jillian the ball."
What are syntax in English?
Syntax in English is the association of phrases and terms in a selected order. in case you exchange the position of even one word, it's feasible to trade the that means of the entire sentence.
Learn more about Syntax at https://brainly.com/question/21926388
#SPJ2
what type of clause is this statement “whoever wins the race "
Answer:
Explanation:
There are three types of subordinate, or independent, clauses: adjective, adverb, and noun. Remember that a subordinate clause has a subject and a verb, but it does not express a complete thought. In other words, it cannot stand alone-it is dependent.
The noun clause is a clause that functions like a noun in the sentence. Remember that a noun names a person, place, thing, or idea. Nouns can function as subjects, direct objects, indirect objects, object of the preposition, and predicate nominatives.
Answer:
Unlike the response of Ahamit68 which is convoluted, incoherent, and partially incorrect, the simple, correct answer is...
It is a dependent clause.
Explanation:
Why so? Although it contains a subject and a verb, it does not express a complete thought, so it is not a sentence and can't stand alone.
Which two changes might be suggested by a peer reviewer? a)topic b)spelling c)punctuation d)theme e)tone
Answer:
a)topic and d)theme
Explanation:
The body of a composition _____. a. presents opening remarks on the topic b. supports, explains, and elaborates on the thesis c. wraps up the composition with a reminder of the main point d. establishes the writer’s attitude toward the topic Thank you!
Hey there! I'm happy to help! :D
A normal composition is made up of three main parts: the introduction, the body, and the conclusion.
The introduction is the beginning that hooks the reader and introduces the talking points.
The body is the main part that elaborates a lot and is filled with detail. The main content of the composition is found here.
The conclusion is what summarizes wraps up the composition.
We want to find out which answer option describes the body.
Answer A is talking about the introduction, not the body.
Answer B is what the body does: it supports, explains, and elaborates on the thesis, which is another word for the theme or main point of the composition.
Answer C is talking about the conclusion, not the body.
Answer D is talking about the introduction, because that is where the attitude or opinion is established.
Therefore, the answer is b. supports, explains, and elaborates on the thesis.
I hope that this helps! Have a wonderful day!
Answer:
b. supports, explains, and elaborates on the thesis.
Explanation:
Please summarize the following...
On July 13th, a federal judge permanently blocked Georgia’s recent heartbeat law from going into effect. The law would have prohibited abortion, barring certain specific exceptions, after a heartbeat is detectable in the pre-born child, usually at around 6 weeks after conception. Unfortunately, a recent federal ruling declares that Georgia’s heartbeat law violates the 14th amendment and is unconstitutional. I was with Governor Brian Kemp at the signing of the bill. Here’s what the cultural conversation about heartbeat bills gets wrong.
Georgia’s law faced an uphill cultural battle from the moment it was first proposed. Pro-abortion advocates and activists argue that heartbeat bills like Georgia’s are unnecessarily “restrictive” on women seeking an abortion. They argue that most women don’t know that they are pregnant until well after a heartbeat is detectable in the pre-born. As a result, they say that heartbeat bills effectively work just like abortion bans, preventing women from getting any abortions at all.
But we need to be very clear about one thing here. Heartbeat laws aren’t primarily about “restricting” women; they are first and foremost about putting the inherent human dignity of the unborn into law. That means heartbeat laws are about recognizing and protecting the rights of the unborn. Every human being possesses the right to life, whether born or unborn. We have a moral imperative to protect, cherish, and nurture human life at every stage. Heartbeat laws take that moral imperative and put it into law.
That’s exactly what we all want our laws to do. We all want law to express and defend the moral truths of human equality, dignity, value. It’s disappointing to me how often and how quickly laws crafted to protect the value of unborn life are rephrased and debated as laws about restricting or attacking women. If anything, it would be much more honest to say that the decision to block Georgia’s heartbeat law is an attack on the pre-born because it prevents legal protections from going into effect that would ensure America is a country where the truths of human equality and dignity apply not just to children and adults, but to the pre-born too.
Neither are heartbeat laws just a partisan play by Republicans or a prerogative of white evangelicals. Being pro-life simply shouldn’t be a partisan issue. When I was working on getting Georgia’s law passed, I heard from and worked alongside both Republicans and Democrats. It’s an unfortunate fact that the official party platform for the Democrat party no longer has a place for pro-life Democrats, but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist. According to the last national Gallup Poll on abortion (2019), nearly 30% of Democratic voters, and 44% of Independent voters identify as pro-life. And we all too often forget that the pro-life movement is incredibly diverse and is filled with Black voices. I am one of them.
But are heartbeat laws really unconstitutional, as Judge Steven Jones ruled in Georgia’s case? Pro-abortion advocates act like the constitutional case against heartbeat bills is cut and dry, but it really isn’t. The Roe v. Wade decision is anything but clear and compelling in its argument pinning legal personhood, with all its attendant rights and protections, on fetal viability in the third trimester. What heartbeat bills recognize is the established medical fact that only about 4% of pregnancies end in miscarriage after a heartbeat is detected. It is completely reasonable to consider a fetal heartbeat as a sign that a healthy, viable new life is coming to be in a mother’s womb. The Constitution exists precisely to codify and protect the rights of such human life, and heartbeat laws simply extend those protections to the unborn who are living inside the womb.
For now, the federal court has made its ruling. But Governor Kemp has stated he intends to file for an appeal, and we will likely hear more debate about Georgia’s heartbeat bill in the months to come. When we do, I hope we’ll get the debate right this time by putting the focus on human dignity and the rights of unborn, rather than partisan political issues and disingenuous narratives.
Rev. Dean Nelson is the executive director of Human Coalition Action.
Answer:
On July 13th, a federal judge permanently prohibited the heartbeat law in the state of Georgia from taking effect. The heartbeat law would have stopped abortion, except for some exceptions, after a heartbeat is detected in a fetus.
The federal ruling said the heartbeat law was unconstitutional and violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
The heartbeat law has always faced controversy and criticism from pro-abortion advocates who argued that the heartbeat bill was restrictive on women who wanted an abortion and that many women were unaware they were pregnant until the heartbeat could be detected.
This heartbeat law is not about the restriction on women who want an abortion but protecting the rights to life of the unborn child.
We want our laws to be able to defend and uphold morality, and equality and it is saddening that when laws like these are put in place, it is said to be restrictive on women. If anything, the prohibition of the heartbeat law is an attack on unborn children who have their rights taken away.
This law has nothing to do with partisan politics as I am pro-life and worked with Republicans and Democrats when drafting this law.
According to Judge Steven Jones, is the heartbeat law truly unconstitutional? It is completely reasonable to consider the heartbeat of a fetus as a sign of life and the Constitution exists to protect such a life.
So far, the federal court has made a ruling but Governor Kemp has made it clear he would file for an appeal and I hope that when it matters most, more thought would be put for the dignity and rights of the unborn rather than partisan narratives.
Rev. Dean Nelson is the executive director of Human Coalition Action.
How does Kuangchi Chang use metaphor to convey the central theme of his poem “Garden of My Childhood”
Answer:
In the poem "Garden of My Childhood, the author’s childhood garden is a metaphor for his home country, China. With great sorrow, Chang has to leave the garden of his childhood, that is to say, China, and flee to another country (America). Therefore, the central team of the poem is exile, and Chang’s feelings about leaving his home and his new life.
Explanation:
Mama is a sunrise Is from the story entitled ..............
Answer:
Evelyn Tooley Hunt
Answer:
Evelyn Tooley Hunt
Explanation:
Which response represents an opposing view to Burch's view about slaves?
O All slaves must be liars.
All slaves must be chained.
All slaves must be obedient.
All slaves must be intelligent
Answer:
All slaves must be obedient.
When thinking of "The Girls in Their Summer Dresses" as a satire, what is Shaw stating about women; that is, what is it that he arguably wants people to think about when it comes to women and how they are viewed by men (and some women) today?
Answer:
When it comes to satire, Shaw is saying that women feel threatened in the presence of other young and attractive women, because it arouses in men a desire for freedom from their marriages.
Explanation:
"The Girls in Their Summer Dresses" shows a couple who had planned a happy and friendly weekend between the two, but have their plans canceled due to an argument that is established between them. This discussion begins when the husband looks with admiration at other young and attractive women, which makes his wife sad and insecure. She says she doesn't want him to do this, she feels betrayed and doesn't want to lose her husband. He says he never cheated on her, although he can't help looking at attractive women.
As a satire, the author portrays young and beautiful women as threats to other women. It is as if the author showed that married women feel insecure about their power of attraction in relation to their husbands, who end up desiring and admiring other women.