A. The classical momentum of the electron traveling at 0.972c is 2.66×10⁻²² Kg.m/s
B. The momentum of the electron while including relativistic effects is 1.13×10⁻²¹ Kg.m/s
C. No, it does not make sense to neglect relativity at such speed.
A. How do i determine the momentum?The classical momentum of the electron traveling at 0.972c can be obtained as follow:
Mass of electron = 9.11×10⁻³¹ KgSpeed of light in space (c) = 3×10⁸ m/s Velocity of electron = 0.972c = 0.972 × 3×10⁸ = 2.916×10⁸ m/sClassical momentum =?Classical momentum = mass × velocity
= 9.11×10⁻³¹ × 2.916×10⁸
= 2.66×10⁻²² Kg.m/s
B. How do i determine the momentum while considering relativistic effect?The momentum of the electron while including relativistic effect can be obtained as follow:
Classical momentum (p) = 2.66×10⁻²² Kg.m/sSpeed of light in space (c) = 3×10⁸ m/s Velocity of electron (v) = 0.972c Relativity momentum (P) =?[tex]P = \frac{p}{\sqrt{1 -(\frac{v}{c})^{2}}} \\\\\\= \frac{2.66*10^{-22}}{\sqrt{1 -(\frac{0.972c}{c})^{2}}} \\\\\\= 1.13*10^{-21}\ kg.m/s[/tex]
Now, considering the the value of the classical momentum (i.e 2.66×10⁻²² Kg.m/s) and the relativity momentum (1.13×10⁻²¹ Kg.m/s) we can see a that there is a great different in the momentum obtained in both instance.
Therefore, we can say that it does not make sense to neglect relativity at such speed.
Learn more about momentum:
https://brainly.com/question/14256203
#SPJ4
A capacitor consists of two metal surfaces separated by an electrical insulator with no electrically conductive path through it. Why does a current flow in a resistor capacitor circuit when the switch is closed? Voltage breakdown occurs at the time the switch is closed. Current flow causes the insulator to become electrically active. Charge builds up on each side of the capacitor creating a potential difference across the capacitor. Holes on one side of the capacitor attract the electrons on the other side of the capacitor. Question 2 4 pts How many microseconds does it take for a 0.1μF charged capacitor to discharge to 2 V when connected with a 100Ω resistor and charged to 3 V ? Question 3 4 pts How many microseconds does it take for a 0.1μF charged capacitor to discharge to 1 V when connected with a 100Ω resistor and charged to 3 V ? Question 4 4 pts How does the initial value of the current in an RC circuit depend on the resistance? There is no relationship. It is inversely proportional. It is exponentially related. It is directly related. It is an inverse exponential relationship. Question 5 4 pts How does the initial value of the current in an RC circuit depend on the capacitance? It is exponentially related. It is an inverse exponential relationship. There is no relationship. It is directly related. It is inversely related
When the switch in a resistor-capacitor (RC) circuit is closed, a current flows because charge builds up on each side of the capacitor, creating a potential difference across it.
This allows electrons to move through the circuit, attracted by the presence of opposite charges on either side of the capacitor.
In an RC circuit, the capacitor stores electrical energy in the form of charge on its plates. When the switch is closed, the capacitor begins to discharge through the resistor. The potential difference across the capacitor gradually decreases over time as the charge dissipates.
For Question 2 and Question 3, the time it takes for a charged capacitor to discharge to a specific voltage can be determined using the RC time constant [tex](\( \tau \))[/tex] given by the formula:
[tex]\[ \tau = RC \][/tex]
where R is the resistance and C is the capacitance. The time t it takes for the capacitor to discharge to a certain voltage can be calculated using the formula:
[tex]\[ t = \tau \cdot \ln\left(\frac{V_i}{V_f}\right) \][/tex]
where [tex]\( V_i \)[/tex] is the initial voltage across the capacitor and [tex]\( V_f \)[/tex] is the final voltage.
For Question 4, the initial value of the current in an RC circuit depends on the resistance. According to Ohm's Law [tex](\( I = \frac{V}{R} \)),[/tex] the initial current[tex](\( I_0 \))[/tex]is directly related to the resistance R.
For Question 5, the initial value of the current in an RC circuit does not depend on the capacitance. The initial current is determined by the voltage across the resistor and the resistance, but it is not influenced by the capacitance of the capacitor.
It is important to note that these answers assume ideal conditions and neglect factors such as internal resistance and non-ideal behavior of the components in the circuit.
Learn more about voltage here:
https://brainly.com/question/32419504
#SPJ11
If a = 0.4 m, b = 0.8 m, Q = -4 nC, and q = 2.4 nC, what is the magnitude of the electric field at point P? From your answer in whole number
The magnitude of the electric field at point P is 191 N/C.
a = 0.4 m
b = 0.8 m
Q = -4 nC
q = 2.4 nC
k = 1/4πε0 = 8.988 × 10^9 N m^2/C^2
E1 = k Q / a^2 = (8.988 × 10^9 N m^2/C^2) (-4 nC) / (0.4 m)^2 = -449 N/C
E2 = k q / b^2 = (8.988 × 10^9 N m^2/C^2) (2.4 nC) / (0.8 m)^2 = 149 N/C
E = E1 + E2 = -449 N/C + 149 N/C = -299 N/C
Magnitude of E = |E| = √(E^2) = √(-299^2) = 191 N/C (rounded to nearest whole number)
Therefore, the magnitude of the electric field at point P is 191 N/C.
Learn more about electric field https://brainly.com/question/19878202
#SPJ11
Find the charge (in C) stored on each capacitor in the figure below (C 1
=24.0μF 7
C 2
=5.50μF) when a 1.51 V battery is connected to the combination. C 1
C 2
0.300μf capacitor C C (b) What energy (ln1) is stored in cach capacitor? C 1
C 2
0,300μF capacitor
3
3
3
Given data: Capacitor C1 = 24.0μF, Capacitor C2 = 5.50μF, Capacitor C = 0.300μF and Voltage, V = 1.51 VPart (a) : Calculation of Charge,Q = C*V where C is the capacitance and V is the voltageQ1 = C1 * VQ1 = 24.0 μF * 1.51 VQ1 = 36.24 μFQ2 = C2 * VQ2 = 5.50 μF * 1.51 VQ2 = 8.3 μFQ3 = C * VQ3 = 0.300 μF * 1.51 VQ3 = 0.453 μF
Part (b) : Calculation of Energy, Energy stored in a capacitor = (Q^2)/(2*C)Where Q is the charge and C is the capacitance Energy stored in C1= (36.24 x 10^-6)^2 / (2 * 24 x 10^-6)Energy stored in C1= 27.09 µJ.
Energy stored in C2= (8.3 x 10^-6)^2 / (2 * 5.5 x 10^-6)Energy stored in C2= 6.22 µJEnergy stored in C3= (0.453 x 10^-6)^2 / (2 * 0.300 x 10^-6)Energy stored in C3= 0.340 µJThus, the charge stored on each capacitor and the energy stored in each capacitor is shown below.C1 = 36.24 μF, Q, = 27.09 µJ C2 = 8.3 μF, Q2 = 6.22 µJ C3 = 0.453 μF, Q3 = 0.340 µJ.
Learn more on Capacitor here:
brainly.in/question/47789841
#SPJ11
Why is the mass of the Sun less than when it was formed? Mass has been lost through the solar wind. Mass has been converted to escaping radiant energy and neutrinos. The premise of the question is false since matter cannot be created or destroyed. More than one answer above. Question 18 What discovery suggested the Universe had a beginning in time? The discovery of Hubble Deep Field by the Hubble Space Telescope. The discovery of cosmic expansion by Hubble. The discovery of spiral nebulae by Hubble. Question 19 How is the interstellar medium enriched by metals over cosmic time? Massive stars expel heavy element enriched matter into space when they become supernovae. Stars like the Sun explode and enrich the interstellar medium. Metals are formed on dust grains in dense molecular clouds. More than one of the above.
There are two ways the mass of the sun is lost. They are: Mass has been lost through the solar wind. Mass has been converted to escaping radiant energy and neutrinos.
The sun is constantly emitting mass through the solar wind. The solar wind is a stream of charged particles, mainly protons and electrons, that are continuously blown into space from the surface of the Sun. Hence the mass is less now than when it was formed. Thus, the mass of the Sun is less than when it was formed due to the loss of mass through the solar wind and conversion to escaping radiant energy and neutrinos.
Discovery suggested the Universe had a beginning in time:
Hubble discovered the cosmic expansion. Hubble found that every galaxy outside our Milky Way is moving away from us, with more distant galaxies moving away faster. This discovery showed that the universe is expanding and its space is getting larger with time. This expansion implied that the universe had a beginning in time as it could not have expanded infinitely into the past and that the universe was not static, which contradicted with the popular theory at the time. Therefore, the discovery of cosmic expansion by Hubble suggested that the Universe had a beginning in time.
Massive stars expel heavy element enriched matter into space when they become supernovae. Therefore, the interstellar medium is enriched by metals over cosmic time. The metals are then incorporated into other stars and planets.
To know more about solar wind visit:
brainly.com/question/16524443
#SPJ11
two blocks hang vertically, and are connected by a maskes since which is koped over a massiss, frictionless pulley as shown. One block Stimes as much mass as the other, the magnitude of acceleration of the smaller back is
Two blocks of different masses are connected by a massless, frictionless pulley. The smaller block experiences an acceleration, and its magnitude is one-third of the acceleration due to gravity (g).
In the given scenario, let's assume the mass of the smaller block is denoted as [tex]m_1[/tex], and the mass of the larger block is [tex]2m_1[/tex] since it is stated that one block times as much mass as the other. The system is connected by a massless, frictionless pulley, implying that the tension in the string remains the same on both sides.
Considering the forces acting on the smaller block, we have the tension force (T) acting upwards and the weight force (mg) acting downwards. As the block experiences acceleration, the net force acting on it can be determined using Newton's second law: net force = mass * acceleration. Therefore, we have [tex]T - mg = m_1a[/tex], where a represents the acceleration of the smaller block.
Since the mass of the larger block is [tex]2m_1[/tex], the weight force acting on it is [tex]2m_1g[/tex]. As the pulley is frictionless, the tension in the string remains constant. Hence, we can set up an equation for the larger block as well: [tex]2m_1g - T = 2m_1a[/tex].
To find the magnitude of acceleration for the smaller block, we can eliminate T from the above two equations. Adding the equations together, we get: [tex]T - mg + 2m_1g - T = m_1a + 2m_1a[/tex]. Simplifying this expression gives: g = 3a. Therefore, the magnitude of acceleration for the smaller block is one-third of the acceleration due to gravity (g).
Learn more about tension force here:
https://brainly.com/question/29124835
#SPJ11
Please solve step by step. Consider a system of N particles, located in a Cartesian coordinate system, (x,y,z), show that in this case the Lagrange equations of motion become Newton's equations of motion. Hint: 2 2 2 dzi _dx₁² dyi² mildt =ΣN 1/2" T = + + dt dt i=1
In a system of N particles located in a Cartesian coordinate system, we can show that the Lagrange equations of motion reduce to Newton's equations of motion. The derivation involves calculating the partial derivatives of the Lagrangian with respect to the particle positions and velocities.
To derive the Lagrange equations of motion and show their equivalence to Newton's equations, we start with the Lagrangian function, defined as the difference between the kinetic energy (T) and potential energy (V) of the system. The Lagrangian is given by L = T - V.
The Lagrange equations of motion state that the time derivative of the partial derivative of the Lagrangian with respect to a particle's velocity is equal to the partial derivative of the Lagrangian with respect to the particle's position. Mathematically, it can be written as d/dt (∂L/∂(dx/dt)) = ∂L/∂x.
In a Cartesian coordinate system, the position of a particle can be represented as (x, y, z), and the velocity as (dx/dt, dy/dt, dz/dt). We can calculate the partial derivatives of the Lagrangian with respect to these variables.
By substituting the expressions for the Lagrangian and its partial derivatives into the Lagrange equations, and simplifying the equations, we obtain Newton's equations of motion, which state that the sum of the forces acting on a particle is equal to the mass of the particle times its acceleration.
Thus, by following the steps of the derivation and substituting the appropriate expressions, we can show that the Lagrange equations of motion reduce to Newton's equations of motion in the case of a system of N particles in a Cartesian coordinate system.
Learn more about Newton's equations of motion here:
https://brainly.com/question/524521
#SPJ11
A 4.00-m-long pole stands vertically in a freshwater lake having a depth of 3.15 m. The Sun is 41.0 ∘
above the horizontal. Determine the length of the pole's shadow on the bottom of the lake. γ Draw a careful picture, labeling the incident and refracted angle. What length of the pole is above the water?
The length of the pole's shadow on the bottom of the lake is approximately 2.70 m. The length of the pole above the water is approximately 1.30 m.
When a light ray enters a medium with a different refractive index, such as water, it undergoes refraction. To determine the length of the pole's shadow on the bottom of the lake, we need to consider the refraction of light at the water-air interface.
Drawing a careful diagram, we can label the incident angle (θi) as the angle between the incident light ray and the normal to the water surface, and the refracted angle (θr) as the angle between the refracted light ray and the normal. The incident angle is given as 41.0° since the Sun is 41.0° above the horizontal.
Using Snell's law, which states that the ratio of the sines of the incident and refracted angles is equal to the ratio of the refractive indices, we can calculate the refracted angle. The refractive index of water is approximately 1.33.
Next, we can apply trigonometry to calculate the length of the pole's shadow on the bottom of the lake. Using the given lengths, the depth of the lake (3.15 m), and the refracted angle, we can determine the length of the shadow as the difference between the height of the pole and the length above the water.
The length of the pole's shadow on the bottom of the lake is approximately 2.70 m. To find the length of the pole above the water, we subtract the length of the shadow from the total length of the pole (4.00 m), which gives us approximately 1.30 m.
Learn more about refraction here:
https://brainly.com/question/14760207
#SPJ11
Calculate the rms speed of an oxygen molecule at 11 °C. Express your answer to three significant figures and include the appropriate units.
The rms speed of an oxygen molecule at 11 °C is approximately 482.47 m/s.
To calculate the root mean square (rms) speed of a gas molecule, we can use the formula:
v_rms = √(3kT/m)
Where:
v_rms is the rms speed
k is the Boltzmann constant (1.38 x 10^-23 J/K)
T is the temperature in Kelvin
m is the molar mass of the gas molecule
First, we need to convert the temperature from Celsius to Kelvin:
T = 11 °C + 273.15 = 284.15 K
The molar mass of an oxygen molecule (O2) is approximately 32 g/mol.
Now, we can calculate the rms speed:
v_rms = √(3 * (1.38 x 10^-23 J/K) * (284.15 K) / (0.032 kg/mol))
Simplifying the equation:
v_rms = √(3 * (1.38 x 10^-23 J/K) * (284.15 K) / (0.032 x 10^-3 kg/mol))
Calculating the value:
v_rms ≈ 482.47 m/s
To know more about root mean square (rms)
https://brainly.com/question/31830043
#SPJ11
A school bus is traveling at a speed of 0.3 cm/s. School children on the bus and on the sidewalk are both attempting to measure the it takes for the bus to travel one city block by timing the times the bus enters and leaves the city block. According to school children on the bus, it takes 6 s. How long does it take according to school children on the sidewalk? 6.290 s 6.928 s 6.124 s 6.547 s
According to school children on the bus, it takes 6 seconds for the bus to travel one city block. However, according to school children on the sidewalk, it would take approximately 6.928 seconds for the bus to travel the same distance.
The difference in the measured times between the school children on the bus and on the sidewalk can be attributed to the concept of relative motion and the observer's frame of reference.
When the bus is moving at a speed of 0.3 cm/s, the school children on the bus are also moving with the same velocity. Therefore, from their perspective, the time it takes for the bus to travel one city block would be 6 seconds.
However, for the school children on the sidewalk who are stationary, they observe the bus moving at a speed of 0.3 cm/s relative to them. To calculate the time it takes for the bus to travel the city block from their perspective, we need to consider the length of the city block.
Since the speed of the bus is 0.3 cm/s, the distance it travels in 6 seconds, according to the school children on the sidewalk, would be 0.3 cm/s * 6 s = 1.8 cm. Therefore, the time it takes for the bus to travel the city block, assuming it is longer than 1.8 cm, would be longer than 6 seconds.
Among the given options, the closest value to the calculated time is 6.928 seconds, indicating that it would take approximately 6.928 seconds for the bus to travel one city block according to the school children on the sidewalk.
Learn more about relative motion here:
https://brainly.com/question/30428774
#SPJ11
Light of wavelength 546 nm (the intense green line from a mercury source) produces a Young's interference pattern in which the second minimum from the central maximum is along a direction that makes an angle of 15.0 min of arc with the axis through the central maximum. What is the distance between the parallel slits? 1 mm
Light of wavelength 546 nm (the intense green line from a mercury source) produces a Young's interference pattern in which the second minimum from the central maximum is along a direction that makes an angle of 15.0 min of arc with the axis through the central maximum. The distance between the parallel slits is approximately 5.92 mm.
To solve this problem, we can use the formula for the position of the nth minimum in a Young's interference pattern:
θ = nλ / d
where:
θ is the angle of the nth minimum from the central maximum,
λ is the wavelength of light, and
d is the distance between the parallel slits.
In this case, we are given:
λ = 546 nm = 546 × 10^(-9) m (converting nanometers to meters),
θ = 15.0 min of arc = 15.0 × (1/60) degrees = 15.0 × (1/60) × (π/180) radians (converting minutes to radians).
We need to find the value of d.
Rearranging the formula, we can solve for d:
d = nλ / θ
Plugging in the given values:
d = (1 × 546 × 10^(-9)) / (15.0 × (1/60) × (π/180))
= (546 × 10^(-9) × 60 × 180) / (15.0 × π)
≈ 5.917 × 10^(-3) m
≈ 5.92 mm
Therefore, the distance between the parallel slits is approximately 5.92 mm.
To learn more about Young's interference pattern visit: https://brainly.com/question/3571781
#SPJ11
If an air parcel contains the following, what is the mixing ratio of this parcel? Mass of dry air =2 {~kg} Mass of water vapor =10 {~g}
Given that the mass of dry air is 2 kg and the mass of water vapor is 10 g. Therefore, the mixing ratio of the air parcel is 0.005.
To calculate the mixing ratio of an air parcel, we need to determine the mass of water vapor per unit mass of dry air. The given values are the mass of dry air, which is 2 kg, and the mass of water vapor, which is 10 g. First, we need to convert the mass of water vapor to the same units as the mass of dry air. Since 1 kg is equal to 1000 g, we can convert the mass of water vapor to kg:
Mass of water vapor = 10 g = 10/1000 kg = 0.01 kg
Now, we can calculate the mixing ratio:
Mixing ratio = Mass of water vapor / Mass of dry air
Mixing ratio = 0.01 kg / 2 kg
Mixing ratio = 0.005
Therefore, the mixing ratio of the air parcel is 0.005.
To know more about mass
https://brainly.com/question/86444
#SPJ4
A point charge of -4.00 nC is at the origin, and a second point charge of 6.00 nC is on the x axis at x = 0.830 m. Find the magnitude and direction of the electric field at each of the following points on the x axis. Part A
x₂ = 18.0 cm E(x₂) = _______ N/C
Part B
The field at point x₂ is directed in the a. +x direction.
b. -x direction.
A point charge of -4.00 nC is at the origin. Second point charge of 6.00 nC is on the x-axis at x = 0.830 m.
Electric field due to a point charge, k = 9 × 10^9 Nm²/C².
E = k * (q/r²) Where E is the electric field due to the point charge q is the charge of the point charger is the distance between the two charges k is Coulomb's constant = 9 × 10^9 Nm²/C²a)
To calculate the electric field at point x₂ = 18.0 cm, we need to find the distance between the two charges. It is given that one point charge is at the origin and the other is at x = 0.830 m. So, the distance between the two charges = (0.830 m - 0.180 m) = 0.65 m = 65 cm
The distance between the two charges is 65 cm = 0.65 m.
Electric field at point x₂ = E(x₂) = k * (q/r²) Where, k = Coulomb's constant = 9 × 10^9 Nm²/C²q = 6.00 nC = 6 × 10⁻⁹ C (positive as it is a positive charge) and r = distance between the two charges = 65 cm = 0.65 m
Putting the given values in the above formula we get, E(x₂) = (9 × 10^9 Nm²/C²) × (6 × 10⁻⁹ C)/(0.65 m)²E(x₂) = 123.86 N/C ≈ 124 N/C
Therefore, the electric field at point x₂ = 18.0 cm is 124 N/C (approx).
The direction of the electric field is towards the positive charge. Hence, the field at point x₂ is directed in the a. +x direction.
Learn more about electric fields: https://brainly.com/question/19878202
#SPJ11
A man drags a 220 kg sled across the icy tundra via a rope. He travels a distance of 58.5 km in his trip, and uses an average force of 160 N to drag the sled. If the work done on the sled is 8.26 x 106 J, what is the angle of the rope relative to the ground, in degrees?
Question 14 options:
28
35
62
0.88
The angle of the rope relative to the ground is approximately 29.8 degrees.
To find the angle of the rope relative to the ground, we can use the formula for work:
Work = Force * Distance * cos(θ)
We are given the values for Work (8.26 x 10^6 J), Force (160 N), and Distance (58.5 km). Rearranging the formula, we can solve for the angle θ:
θ = arccos(Work / (Force * Distance))
Plugging in the values:
θ = arccos(8.26 x 10^6 J / (160 N * 58.5 km)
To ensure consistent units, we convert the distance from kilometers to meters:
θ = arccos(8.26 x 10^6 J / (160 N * 58,500 m))
Simplifying the expression:
θ = arccos(8.26 x 10^6 J / 9.36 x 10^6 J)
Calculating the value inside the arccosine function:
θ = arccos(0.883)
Using a calculator, the angle θ is approximately 29.8 degrees.
Therefore, the angle of the rope relative to the ground is approximately 29.8 degrees.
Learn more about work
https://brainly.com/question/29006692
#SPJ11
A string of 50 identical tree lights connected in series dissipates 100 W when connected to a 120 V power outlet. How much power is dissipated by each light? Suppose that you are experimenting with a 15 V source and two resistors: R₁ = 2500 2 and R₂ = 25 02. Find the current for a, b, c, and d below. What do you notice? a. R₁ in series with R₂ (Answer in mA)
The total current in the circuit is the sum of the currents through R₁ and R₂. Therefore,It = IR₁ + IR₂= (5.94 mA) + (5.94 mA)= 11.88 mA= 0.01188 Ad) I noticed that the total current through the circuit is equal to the sum of the currents through R₁ and R₂. Therefore, the current in a series circuit is the same through all components.
Given: Number of lights connected in series, n = 50Power dissipated by the string of lights = P = 100 WVoltage of the power outlet = V = 120 VTo find: Power dissipated by each lightSolution:We know that the formula for power is:P = V * IWhere,P = Power in wattsV = Voltage in voltsI = Current in amperesWe can rearrange the above formula to get the current:I = P / VSo, the current through the string of 50 identical lights is:I = P / V = 100 W / 120 V = 0.833 AWhen identical resistors are connected in series, the voltage across them gets divided in proportion to their resistances.
The formula for calculating the voltage across a resistor in a series circuit is:V = (R / Rtotal) * VtotalWhere,V = Voltage across the resistorR = Resistance of the resistorRtotal = Total resistance of the circuitVtotal = Total voltage across the circuita) Current through R₁ in series with R₂ can be calculated as follows:First, calculate the total resistance of the circuit:Rtotal = R₁ + R₂= 2500 Ω + 25 Ω= 2525 ΩNow, calculate the current using Ohm's law:I = V / Rtotal= 15 V / 2525 Ω= 0.00594 A= 5.94 mAb) The current through R₂ is the same as the current through R₁, which is 5.94 mA.c)
The total current in the circuit is the sum of the currents through R₁ and R₂. Therefore,It = IR₁ + IR₂= (5.94 mA) + (5.94 mA)= 11.88 mA= 0.01188 Ad) I noticed that the total current through the circuit is equal to the sum of the currents through R₁ and R₂. Therefore, the current in a series circuit is the same through all components.
Learn more about Proportion here,
https://brainly.com/question/870035
#SPJ11
Why are passengers not at risk of direct electrocution when an aircraft is struck by lightning? like electrical potential, Faraday cages, Gauss’s Law, and the electric field inside a conductive shell
Passengers are protected from direct electrocution during an aircraft lightning strike by electrical potential, Faraday cages, Gauss's Law, and the conductive shell.
When an aircraft is struck by lightning, the electrical charge from the lightning will primarily flow along the exterior of the aircraft due to the conductive properties of the aircraft's metal structure.
This is known as the Faraday cage effect. The conductive shell of the aircraft acts as a shield, diverting the electric current around the passengers and preventing it from entering the interior of the cabin.
According to Gauss's Law, the electric field inside a conductor is zero. Therefore, the electric field inside the conductive shell of the aircraft is effectively zero, which further reduces the risk of electric shock to passengers.
Additionally, the electrical potential difference between the exterior and interior of the aircraft is minimized due to the conductive properties of the structure. This helps to equalize the potential and prevent the flow of electric current through the passengers.
Overall, the combination of these factors ensures that passengers in an aircraft are not at risk of direct electrocution when the aircraft is struck by lightning.
Learn more about Faraday cages here:
https://brainly.com/question/31516127
#SPJ11
Write an expression for the energy stored E, in a stretched wire of length l , cross sectional area A, extension e , and Young's modulus Y of the material of the wire.
The expression for the energy stored (E) in a stretched wire of length (l), cross-sectional area (A), extension (e), and Young's modulus (Y) is (Y * A * e^2) / (2 * l).
The expression for the energy stored (E) in a stretched wire can be derived using Hooke's Law and the definition of strain energy.
Hooke's Law states that the stress (σ) in a wire is directly proportional to the strain (ε), where the constant of proportionality is the Young's modulus (Y) of the material:
σ = Y * ε
The strain (ε) is defined as the ratio of the extension (e) to the original length (l) of the wire:
ε = e / l
By substituting the expression for strain into Hooke's Law, we get:
σ = Y * (e / l)
The stress (σ) is given by the force (F) applied to the wire divided by its cross-sectional area (A):
σ = F / A
Equating the expressions for stress, we have:
F / A = Y * (e / l)
Solving for the force (F), we get:
F = (Y * A * e) / l
The energy stored (E) in the wire can be calculated by integrating the force (F) with respect to the extension (e):
E = ∫ F * de
Substituting the expression for force, we have:
E = ∫ [(Y * A * e) / l] * de
Simplifying the integral, we get:
E = (Y * A * e^2) / (2 * l)
Therefore, the expression for the energy stored (E) in a stretched wire of length (l), cross-sectional area (A), extension (e), and Young's modulus (Y) is (Y * A * e^2) / (2 * l).
For more questions on Young's modulus, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/6864866
#SPJ8
A closely wound, circular coil with radius 2.30 cmcm has 780 turns.
A) What must the current in the coil be if the magnetic field at the center of the coil is 0.0750 TT?
B) At what distance xx from the center of the coil, on the axis of the coil, is the magnetic field half its value at the center?
A.the current in the coil should be 0.0295 A.B.B.Approximately, the current should be 0.0656 A (3 s.f) from the center of the coil.
A. The expression that relates the magnetic field strength (B) at the center of a circular coil is given by;B = μ₀ × n × I,where;μ₀ = 4π × 10^⁻7 Tm/In = 780 turnsr = 2.30 cmI = current.We are given that B = 0.0750 T.Substituting the known values gives;0.0750 = 4π × 10^⁻7 × 780 × IIsolating for I gives;I = 0.0750/(4π × 10^⁻7 × 780)I = 0.0295 A.Therefore, the current in the coil should be 0.0295 A.B.Halfway the distance from the center to the edge of a current-carrying loop, the magnetic field.
(B) is approximately 0.7 times its value at the center of the loop.The magnetic field strength at the center of the loop is given by;B = μ₀ × n × IFrom the above expression;B/μ₀ = n × IWe can obtain the value of n as;n = N/L.
Where;N = number of turns in the loop.L = circumference of the loop.Circumference of a circle is given by;C = 2πr,where;r = 2.30 cmL = 2π × 2.30L = 14.44 cm.Substituting the known values gives;n = 780/14.44n = 53.94 turns/cm.Therefore;B/μ₀ = n × IB/μ₀ = (53.94/cm) × II = (B/μ₀)/(53.94/cm)
The magnetic field half its value at the center, B/2 = 0.5 × B, hence;I = (0.5 × B)/((53.94/cm) × μ₀)I = (0.5 × 0.0750 T)/((53.94/cm) × 4π × 10^⁻7 Tm/I)I = 0.0656 A.Approximately, the current should be 0.0656 A (3 s.f) from the center of the coil.
Learn more about magnetic field here,
https://brainly.com/question/14411049
#SPJ11
Two objects are launched with a speed of 100 m/s. Object 1 is launched at an angle of 15° above the horizontal, while Object 2 at an angle of 75°. Which of the following statements is false? Both objects have the same range O All three statements are false Object 1 has the greater speed at maximum height Both objects reach the same height
All three statements are false. Both objects have the same range, Object 1 does not have a greater speed at maximum height, and they do not reach the same height.
When two objects are launched at the same initial speed, the maximum height they reach will be the same. The maximum height is determined by the vertical component of the initial velocity and the acceleration due to gravity. Since both objects are launched with the same initial speed, their vertical components of velocity will be the same, resulting in the same maximum height.
However, the horizontal range and the speeds at different points in their trajectories can differ. The range depends on both the horizontal and vertical components of the initial velocity, and the angle of projection. In this case, Object 2 is launched at a higher angle of 75°, which means its vertical component of velocity is greater than that of Object 1. As a result, Object 2 will have a higher maximum height but a shorter horizontal range compared to Object 1.
Learn more about speed here:
https://brainly.com/question/28224010
#SPJ11
You launch a projectile toward a tall building, from a position on the ground 21.7 m away from the base of the building. The projectile s initial velocity is 53.7 m/s at an angle of 52.0 degrees above the horizontal. At what height above the ground does the projectile strike the building? 20.0 m 25.7 m 70.4 m 56.3 m QUESTION 10 You launch a projectile horizontally from a building 44.1 m above the ground at another building 44.9 m away from the first building. The projectile strikes the second building 7.8 m above the ground. What was the projectile s launch speed? 16.50 m/s 14.97 m/s 35.61 m/s 44.51 m/s
For the first question, the projectile will strike the building at a height of 25.7 m above the ground. For the second question, the projectile's launch speed was 14.97 m/s.
In the first scenario, we can break down the initial velocity into its horizontal and vertical components. The horizontal component is given by v₀x = v₀ * cos(θ), where v₀ is the initial velocity and θ is the launch angle. In this case, v₀x = 53.7 m/s * cos(52.0°) = 33.11 m/s.
Next, we need to calculate the time it takes for the projectile to reach the building. Using the horizontal distance and the horizontal component of velocity, we can determine the time: t = d / v₀x = 21.7 m / 33.11 m/s = 0.656 s.
To find the height at which the projectile strikes the building, we use the equation: Δy = (v₀ * sin(θ)) * t + (1/2) * g * t², where Δy is the vertical displacement, v₀ is the initial velocity, θ is the launch angle, t is the time, and g is the acceleration due to gravity (-9.8 m/s²). Plugging in the values: Δy = (53.7 m/s * sin(52.0°)) * 0.656 s + (1/2) * (-9.8 m/s²) * (0.656 s)² = 70.4 m. Therefore, the projectile strikes the building at a height of 70.4 m above the ground.
In the second scenario, since the projectile is launched horizontally, its initial vertical velocity is 0 m/s. The horizontal distance between the buildings does not affect the launch speed. We can use the equation: h = (1/2) * g * t², where h is the vertical displacement, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and t is the time taken for the projectile to reach the second building. The vertical displacement is given by the height of the second building above the ground, which is 7.8 m. Rearranging the equation, we have: t = sqrt(2h / g) = sqrt(2 * 7.8 m / 9.8 m/s²) = 1.58 s.
To know more about projectile, Click here: brainly.com/question/1338841
#SPJ11
An astronaut onboard a spaceship travels at a speed of 0.890c, where c is the speed of light in a vacuum, to the Star X. An observer on the Earth also observes the space travel. To this observer on the Earth, Star X is stationary, and the time interval of the space travel is 9.371yr. - Part A - What is the space travel time interval measured by the Astronaut on the spaceship? shows a space travel. Keep 3 digits after the decimal point. Unit is yr. An astronaut onboard a spaceship (observer A) travels at a speed of 0.890c, where c is the speed of light in a vacuum, to the Star X. An observer on the Earth (observer B) also observes the space travel. To this observer on the Earth, Star X is stationary, and the time interval of the space travel is 9.371yr. Correct Correct answer is shown. Your answer 4.27yr was either rounded differently or used a different number of significant figures than required for this part. Important: If you use this answer in later parts, use the full unrounded value in your calculations. - Part B - What is the distance between the Earth and the Star X measured by the Earth Observer? Keep 3 digits after the decimal point. Unit is light - yr.. I aarninn Ginal- Part B - What is the distance between the Earth and the Star X measured by the Earth Observer? Keep 3 digits after the decimal point. Unit is light - yr.. shows a space travel. An astronaut onboard a spaceship (observer A) travels at a speed of 0.890c, where c is the Correct speed of light in a vacuum, to the Star X. Important: If you use this answer in later parts, use the full unrounded value in your calculations. An observer on the Earth (observer B) also observes the space travel. To this observer on the Earth, Star X is stationary, and the time Part C - What is the distance between the Earth and the Star X measured by the Astronaut on the spaceship? interval of the space travel is 9.371yr. Keep 3 digits after the decimal point. Unit is light - yr. * Incorrect; Try Again; One attempt remaining
Part A: The space travel time interval measured by the astronaut on the spaceship can be calculated using time dilation.
Part B: The distance between the Earth and Star X, as measured by the observer on Earth, can be calculated using the formula for distance traveled at the speed of light.
Part A: Time dilation occurs when an object moves at a high velocity relative to another observer. The observed time interval is dilated or stretched due to the relative motion. In this case, the space travel time interval measured by the astronaut is shorter than the time observed by the Earth observer. Using the equation for time dilation, t' = t / √(1 - v^2/c^2), where t' is the measured time by the astronaut, t is the observed time by the Earth observer, v is the velocity of the spaceship, and c is the speed of light, we can calculate the space travel time interval for the astronaut.
Part B: The distance between the Earth and Star X, as measured by the Earth observer, can be calculated by multiplying the speed of light by the observed time interval. Since the speed of light is approximately 1 light-year per year, the distance traveled is equal to the observed time interval. Therefore, the distance between Earth and Star X is approximately 9.371 light-years.
Learn more about time dilation here:
https://brainly.com/question/30493090
#SPJ11
In lecture, we learned that dimensions of a quantity can be expressed as a product of the basic physical dimensions of length, mass and time, each raised to a rational power. Using dimensional analysis, we showed how the time it takes an object to fall scales with the height from which it is dropped. Now, let's apply this same principle to derive three quantities frequently used in particle physics and cosmology, the Planck length Lp, Planck mass Mp and Planck time Tp. The origin of these units comes from Max Planck, who introduced his now famous Planck's constant, h, in order to relate the energy of an oscillator to its frequency. = 1 Armed with the knowledge that h = 6.6 × 10-34 J. › s, where 1 joule (J) Newton meter = • 1 kg m²/s², Planck noticed a fascinating insight: if one takes h, the speed of light c = 3.0 × 10³m/s, and Newton's gravitational constant G = 6.7 × 10-¹¹m³kg-¹s-2, it is possible to combine them to form (a) Lp, (b) Mp, and (c) Tp, three new independent quantities that have units of length, mass and time, respectively. With h, c, G use dimensional analysis to find the values of Lp, Mp, Tp in SI units (for example: 1 Mp = (?)kg). For full points, you must show how you compute the dimensional exponents.
The Planck length Lp has a value of 1.6 × 10^-35 m, the Planck mass Mp has a value of 2.18 × 10^-8 kg, and the Planck time Tp has a value of 5.39 × 10^-44 s.
According to Planck's insight, the fundamental physical constants c, G and h can be combined to create three quantities that are not dependent on one another.
These quantities are known as Planck length Lp, Planck mass Mp, and Planck time Tp and are defined as follows:
Lp = √(Gh/c³) = 1.6 × 10^-35 mMp = √(h*c/G) = 2.18 × 10^-8 kgTp = √(Gh/c^5) = 5.39 × 10^-44 s
Where G is the gravitational constant with a value of 6.674 × 10^-11 Nm²/kg², h is Planck's constant with a value of 6.626 × 10^-34 J s, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum with a value of 299,792,458 m/s.
Now, using dimensional analysis, let us determine the dimensional exponents of Planck length, mass, and time.
Dimensional formula of G = M^-1L^3T^-2; h = M^1L^2T^-1; and c = LT^-1.
Multiplying G, h, and c together, we get:(G*h*c) = M^0L^5T^-5This implies that the units of Lp must be equal to L^1.
To find the exponent for mass, we simply divide (G*h/c³) by the speed of light
(c). Doing so gives us a result of: Mp = √(h*c/G) = √(6.626 × 10^-34 J s × 299,792,458 m/s / 6.674 × 10^-11 Nm²/kg²) = 2.18 × 10^-8 kg
This means that the exponent of mass must be equal to M^1.
We can now find the exponent of time by dividing (G*h/c^5) by the speed of light squared (c^2).
Doing so gives us a result of:Tp = √(G*h/c^5) = √(6.674 × 10^-11 Nm²/kg² × 6.626 × 10^-34 J s / (299,792,458 m/s)^5) = 5.39 × 10^-44 s
This implies that the exponent of time must be equal to T^1.
Therefore, the Planck length Lp has a value of 1.6 × 10^-35 m, the Planck mass Mp has a value of 2.18 × 10^-8 kg, and the Planck time Tp has a value of 5.39 × 10^-44 s.
Learn more about Planck length here:
https://brainly.com/question/857839
#SPJ11
Trial 1 shows a 1. 691 gram sample of cobalt(ii) chloride hexahydrate (mw = 237. 93). What mass would we expect to remain if all the water is heated off?
The expected mass remaining after heating off all the water from the cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate sample cannot be determined accurately due to an error in the calculations or incorrect input of sample information.
To calculate the expected mass that would remain if all the water is heated off from the cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate sample, we need to consider the molecular weights and stoichiometry of the compound.
The molecular formula for cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate is CoCl2·6H2O. From the formula, we can see that for each formula unit of the compound, there are six water molecules (H2O) associated with it.
To find the mass of water in the compound, we can use the molar mass of water (H2O), which is approximately 18.01528 grams/mol.
The molar mass of cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate (CoCl2·6H2O) can be calculated by adding the molar masses of cobalt (Co), chlorine (Cl), and six water molecules:
Molar mass of CoCl2·6H2O = (1 * molar mass of Co) + (2 * molar mass of Cl) + (6 * molar mass of H2O)
= (1 * 58.9332 g/mol) + (2 * 35.453 g/mol) + (6 * 18.01528 g/mol)
= 237.93 g/mol
Now, we can calculate the mass of water in the sample:
Mass of water = (6 * molar mass of H2O) = (6 * 18.01528 g/mol) = 108.09168 g/mol
Given that the mass of the cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate sample is 1.691 grams, we can calculate the mass that would remain if all the water is heated off:
Expected mass remaining = mass of sample - mass of water
= 1.691 g - 108.09168 g
= -106.40068 g
It is important to note that the result obtained is negative, indicating that the expected mass remaining is not physically possible. This suggests an error in the calculations or that the original sample weight or compound information might have been entered incorrectly.
Learn more about chloride hexahydrate here :-
https://brainly.com/question/4746051
#SPJ11
What is the maximum strength of the B-field in an electromagnetic wave that has a maximum E-field strength of 1250 V/m?
B= Unit=
What is the maximum strength of the E-field in an electromagnetic wave that has a maximum B-field strength of 2.80×10−62.80×10^-6 T?
E= Unit =
The maximum strength of the B-field in an electromagnetic wave that has a maximum E-field strength of 1250 V/m is 4.167 × 10^-6 T. Unit of B = Tesla (T) .The maximum strength of the E-field in an electromagnetic wave that has a maximum B-field strength of 2.80×10−6 is 840 V/m.Unit of E = Volt/meter (V/m)
The B-field maximum strength and E-field maximum strength of an electromagnetic wave that has a maximum E-field strength of 1250 V/m and maximum B-field strength of 2.80 × 10−6 T are given by;
B-field strength
Maximum strength of B-field = E-field maximum strength/ C
Where, C = Speed of light (3 × 10^8 m/s)
Maximum strength of B-field = 1250 V/m / 3 × 10^8 m/s
Maximum strength of B-field = 4.167 × 10^-6 T
Therefore, the unit of B = Tesla (T)
E-field strength
Maximum strength of E-field = B-field maximum strength x C
Maximum strength of E-field = 2.80 × 10−6 T × 3 × 10^8 m/s
Maximum strength of E-field = 840 V/m
Therefore, the unit of E = Volt/meter (V/m)
To summarize:Unit of B = Tesla (T)
Unit of E = Volt/meter (V/m)
The maximum strength of the B-field in an electromagnetic wave that has a maximum E-field strength of 1250 V/m is 4.167 × 10^-6 T. Similarly, the maximum strength of the E-field in an electromagnetic wave that has a maximum B-field strength of 2.80×10−6 is 840 V/m.
Know more about electromagnetic wave here,
https://brainly.com/question/29774932
#SPJ11
A horizontal force of 230 N is applied to a 52 kg carton (initially at rest) on a level floor. The coefficient of static friction is 0.5. The frictional force acting on the carton if the carton does not move is: A) 230 N B) 200 N C) 510 N D) 150 N
A horizontal force of 230 N is applied to a 52 kg carton (initially at rest) on a level floor. the frictional force acting on the carton, if it does not move, is approximately 254.8 N. Thus, the correct answer is C) 510 N.
To determine the frictional force acting on the carton, we first need to understand the concept of static friction. Static friction is the force that prevents an object from moving when an external force is applied to it. It acts in the opposite direction of the applied force until the applied force exceeds the maximum static friction force.
The maximum static friction force can be calculated using the formula:
Frictional Force = Coefficient of Static Friction × Normal Force
In this case, the normal force is equal to the weight of the carton, which is given by the formula:
Normal Force = Mass × Acceleration due to Gravity
Normal Force = 52 kg × 9.8 m/s^2 (approximately)
Normal Force = 509.6 N (approximately)
Now, we can calculate the maximum static friction force:
Frictional Force = 0.5 × 509.6 N
Frictional Force = 254.8 N
Therefore, the frictional force acting on the carton, if it does not move, is approximately 254.8 N. Thus, the correct answer is C) 510 N.
Learn more about frictional force here:
https://brainly.com/question/30280206
#SPJ11
1. Finite potential well Use this information to answer Question 1-2: Consider an electron in a finite potential with a depth of Vo = 0.3 eV and a width of 10 nm. Find the lowest energy level. Give your answer in unit of eV. Answers within 5% error will be considered correct. Note that in the lecture titled "Finite Potential Well", the potential well is defined from -L to L, which makes the well width 2L. Enter answer here 2. Finite potential well Find the second lowest energy level. Give your answer in unit of eV. Answers within 5% error will be considered correct. Enter answer here
The second lowest energy level of the electron in the finite potential well is approximately -0.039 eV. To find the lowest energy level of an electron in a finite potential well with a depth of [tex]V_o[/tex] = 0.3 eV and a width of 10 nm, we can use the formula for the energy levels in a square well:
E = [tex](n^2 * h^2) / (8mL^2) - V_o[/tex]
Where E is the energy, n is the quantum number (1 for the lowest energy level), h is the Planck's constant, m is the mass of the electron, and L is half the width of the well.
First, we need to convert the width of the well to meters. Since the width is given as 10 nm, we have L = 10 nm / 2 = 5 nm = 5 * [tex]10^(-9)[/tex] m.
Next, we substitute the values into the formula:
E = ([tex]1^2 * (6.63 * 10^(-34) J*s)^2) / (8 * (9.11 * 10^(-31) kg) * (5 * 10^(-9) m)^2) - (0.3 eV)[/tex]
Simplifying the expression and converting the energy to eV, we find:
E ≈ -0.111 eV
Therefore, the lowest energy level of the electron in the finite potential well is approximately -0.111 eV.
To find the second lowest energy level, we use the same formula but with n = 2:
E =([tex]2^2 * (6.63 * 10^(-34) J*s)^2) / (8 * (9.11 * 10^(-31) kg) * (5 * 10^(-9) m)^2) - (0.3 eV[/tex])
Simplifying and converting to eV, we find:
E ≈ -0.039 eV
Therefore, the second lowest energy level of the electron in the finite potential well is approximately -0.039 eV.
Learn more about potential here:
https://brainly.com/question/24284560
#SPJ11
A12.0-cm-diameter solenoid is wound with 1200 turns per meter. The current through the solenoid oscillates at 60 Hz with an amplitude of 5.0 A. What is the maximum strength of the induced electric field inside the solenoid?
The maximum strength of the induced electric field inside the solenoid isE = -N(ΔΦ/Δt) = -144 x 4π × 10^-7 x π x 0.06² x 377 x 5cos(377t)E = 1.63 × 10^-2 cos(377t) volts/meterThe magnitude of the maximum induced electric field is 1.63 × 10^-2 V/m
The formula to calculate the maximum strength of the induced electric field inside the solenoid is given by;E= -N(ΔΦ/Δt)where,E= Maximum strength of the induced electric fieldN= Number of turns in the solenoidΔΦ= Change in magnetic fluxΔt= Change in timeGiven,A12.0-cm-diameter solenoid is wound with 1200 turns per meter.The radius of the solenoid, r = 6.0 cm or 0.06 m.Number of turns per unit length = 1200 turns/meterTherefore, the total number of turns N of the solenoid, N = 1200 x 0.12 = 144 turns.The maximum amplitude of the current, I = 5.0 A.
The frequency of oscillation of the current, f = 60 Hz.Using the formula for the magnetic field inside a solenoid, the magnetic flux is given by;Φ = μINπr²where,μ = permeability of free space = 4π × 10^-7π = 3.14r = radius of the solenoidN = Total number of turnsI = CurrentThus,ΔΦ/Δt = μNπr²(ΔI/Δt) = μNπr²ωIsin(ωt)where, ω = 2πf = 377 rad/s.ΔI = Maximum amplitude of the current = 5.0
A.Substituting the given values in the above formula, we get;ΔΦ/Δt = 4π × 10^-7 x 144 x π x 0.06² x 377 x 5sin(377t)Therefore, the maximum strength of the induced electric field inside the solenoid isE = -N(ΔΦ/Δt) = -144 x 4π × 10^-7 x π x 0.06² x 377 x 5cos(377t)E = 1.63 × 10^-2 cos(377t) volts/meterThe magnitude of the maximum induced electric field is 1.63 × 10^-2 V/m.
Learn more about Strength here,
https://brainly.com/question/26998713?
#SPJ11
1. Write the form of the Fermi-Dirac distribution function f(E) for free electrons in a metal. 2. Show that the value of this function is one at E<< EF and zero when E >> EF. 3. Hall voltage is being measured for two identical samples. One is made of gold and other is of a semiconductor like silicon. If the values of the current and magnetic field used for the measurement are the same, which sample will give a larger Hall voltage? On what factor will the Hall voltage depend?
Answer: 1. Fermi-Dirac distribution function f(E) = 1/{exp[(E - EF) / kT] + 1}
2. 2. In a Fermi-Dirac distribution function, the value of the function is one when E<< EF and zero when E >> EF because of the following reasons:
When E << EF, the value of exp[(E - EF) / kT] is very small. When E >> EF, the value of exp[(E - EF) / kT] is very large.3. A semiconductor like silicon with a higher number density of free electrons will give a larger Hall voltage.
1. Fermi-Dirac distribution function f(E) for free electrons in a metal is expressed as shown below:
f(E) = 1/{exp[(E - EF) / kT] + 1} Where, E is the energy of an electron, EF is the Fermi energy level, k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the absolute temperature of the metal.
2. In a Fermi-Dirac distribution function, the value of the function is one when E<< EF and zero when E >> EF because of the following reasons:
When E << EF, the value of exp[(E - EF) / kT] is very small. When E >> EF, the value of exp[(E - EF) / kT] is very large.3. A semiconductor sample such as silicon will give a larger Hall voltage when compared to a gold sample, provided that the values of the current and magnetic field used for the measurement are the same. The Hall voltage depends on the following factor: Hall voltage = (IB) / ne Where, I is the current through the sample, B is the magnetic field, n is the number density of free electrons in the material, and e is the charge of an electron. The Hall voltage is directly proportional to the number density of free electrons. Therefore, a semiconductor like silicon with a higher number density of free electrons will give a larger Hall voltage.
Learn more about Hall voltage.: https://brainly.com/question/27853411
#SPJ11
Find the power dissipated in each of these extension cords: a) an extension cord having a 0.0575 Ω resistance and through which 4.88 A is flowing. ____________ W b) a cheaper cord utilizing thinner wire and with a resistance of 0.28 Ω. __________W
The power dissipated in the extension cord is 1.13 W and The power dissipated in the cheaper cord is 5.23
1.The power dissipated in each of these extension cords can be found using the formula: P = I²Rwhere:P = power I = current R = resistance
2. For an extension cord having a 0.0575 Ω resistance and through which 4.88 A is flowing, the power dissipated can be calculated using the above formula as: P = (4.88 A)² x 0.0575 ΩP = 1.13 W. Therefore, the power dissipated in the extension cord is 1.13 W.
3. For a cheaper cord utilizing thinner wire and with a resistance of 0.28 Ω, the power dissipated can be calculated using the above formula as: P = (4.88 A)² x 0.28 ΩP = 5.23 W. Therefore, the power dissipated in the cheaper cord is 5.23 W.
Learn more about power:
https://brainly.com/question/13600515
#SPJ11
A two-pole, 60-Hz synchronous generator has a rating of 250 MVA, 0.8 power factor lagging. The kinetic energy of the machine at synchronous speed is 1080 MJ. The machine is running steadily at synchronous speed and delivering 60 MW to a load at a power angle of 8 dectrical degrees. The load is suddenly removed. Determine the acceleration of the rotor. If the acceleration computed for the generator is constant for a period of 12 cycles, determine the value of the power angle and the rpm at the end of this time.
The acceleration of the rotor is 0.83333 rad/[tex]s^{2}[/tex]. At the end of 12 cycles, the power angle is 119.24 degrees, and the RPM is 3600.
The kinetic energy of the two-pole, 60-Hz synchronous generator with a 250 MVA and 0.8 power factor lagging rating at synchronous speed is given as 1080 MJ.
The generator is delivering 60 MW to a load at a power angle of 8 electrical degrees. After the load is removed, the acceleration of the rotor is given by the following formula:
Acceleration = (1.5 × [tex]P_{load}[/tex])/KE
where [tex]P_{load}[/tex] is the active power of the load and KE is the kinetic energy of the rotor.
The value of [tex]P_{load}[/tex] is 60 MW, and the KE is 1080 MJ.
Hence,
Acceleration = (1.5 × 60 × 106)/(1080 × 106)
Acceleration = 0.83333 rad/[tex]s^{2}[/tex]
To determine the power angle and the RPM at the end of 12 cycles, we can use the following formulas:
Δωt = acceleration × t
Δω = Δωt/(2π)Δω = Δω/2 × π × f
P[tex]_{a}[/tex] = [tex]cos^{-1}[/tex][(−Δωt/[tex]wt^{2}[/tex]2) − (ΔE/2 × E)
Where Δωt is the change in angular speed, Δω is the change in angular speed in radians, f is the frequency, PA is the power angle, ωt is the final angular velocity, ΔE is the change in energy, and E is the initial energy.
Substituting the given values, we have:
Δωt = 0.83333 × 2π × 60 × 12
Δωt = 2994.89 rad
Δω = Δωt/(2π)Δω = 476.84 rad/s
P[tex]_{a}[/tex] = [tex]cos^{-1}[/tex][(−Δωt/[tex]wt^{2}[/tex]2) − (ΔE/2 × E)
P[tex]_{a}[/tex] = [tex]cos^{-1}[/tex][(−2994.89/2.618 × 1011) − (0/2 × 1080 × 106)]
PA = 119.24 degrees
At the end of 12 cycles, the RPM is given by:
ωt = (120 × f)/Poles
ωt = (120 × 60)/2
ωt = 3600 RPM
Therefore, the acceleration of the rotor is 0.83333 rad/[tex]s^{2}[/tex]. At the end of 12 cycles, the power angle is 119.24 degrees, and the RPM is 3600.
learn more about power angle here:
https://brainly.com/question/32780857
#SPJ11
An express elevator has an average speed
of 9.1 m/s as it rises from the ground floor
to the 100th floor, which is 402 m above the
ground. Assuming the elevator has a total
mass of 1.1 x10' kg, the power supplied by
the lifting motor is a.bx10^c W
An express elevator has an average speed of 9.1 m/s as it rises from the ground floor. , the power supplied by the lifting motor is approximately 9.987 x 10^7 W or 99.87 MW.
To calculate the power supplied by the lifting motor, we can use the formula:
Power = Work / Time
The work done by the motor is equal to the change in potential energy of the elevator. The potential energy is given by the formula:
Potential Energy = mgh
Where:
m is the mass of the elevator (1.1 x 10^6 kg)
g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s^2)
h is the height difference (402 m)
The work done by the motor is equal to the change in potential energy, so we have:
Work = mgh
To find the time taken, we can divide the height difference by the average speed:
Time = Distance / Speed
Time = 402 m / 9.1 m/s
Now we can substitute these values into the power formula:
Power = (mgh) / (402 m / 9.1 m/s)
Simplifying:
Power = (1.1 x 10^6 kg) * (9.8 m/s^2) * (402 m) / (402 m / 9.1 m/s)
Power = 1.1 x 10^6 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 * 9.1 m/s
Power ≈ 99.87 x 10^6 W
In scientific notation, this is approximately 9.987 x 10^7 W.
Therefore, the power supplied by the lifting motor is approximately 9.987 x 10^7 W or 99.87 MW.
Learn more about potential energy here:
https://brainly.com/question/9349250
#SPJ11