Answer:
It led to their participation in helping the American colonists.
Explanation:
In June 1779 Spain joined the American War for Independence on the side of the American rebels who they recognised as legitimate. This led to Spain and its Empire, including the Viceroyalty of New Spain which Texas was a part of, being dragged into the conflict aswell.
which is a characteristic of the paleolithic period? a. stone tools b. cities c. writing d. domesticated plants
Answer:
I was just wondering maybe the answer could be stone tools
Which of these ideas was not associated with the Second Great Awakening?
- People have a duty to do what is right.
- All people should be treated equally.
- Excitement is necessary to promote faith.
Answer:
B - All people should be treated equally.
Answer:
B) All people should be treated equally.
Second answer is also B) They were often not invited to participate in white churches.
☆
EDGE2022; Good Luck :D!!!
Which of the following were executed
for being communist
Answer:
the rosenbergs?
Explanation:
En que parte habitan los olmecas
Answer:
Habitaron en el sur del estado de Veracruz y noroeste de Tabasco
Explanation:
:)
Narrative about a character who goes exploring and discovers a new land
Answer:
Robinson Crusoe
Explanation:
Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe is a narrative where the main character, Robinson Crusoe goes onto a ship, goes exploring, and ends up on an island because of his ship getting destroyed.
What invention cause nomadic people to build permanent settlements?
Please I need help right away
Answer:
Hey mate.....
Explanation:
This is ur answer....
AgricultureThe development of agriculture resulted in people creating permanent settlements. Ancient people started to domesticate animals (the cow and pig for example) and invent new tools, like the plow, which made farming easier. Since there was a surplus of food in the villages, many people could pursue other jobs.
Hope it helps!
Brainliest pls!
Follow me! ◇
How did the war of 1812 impact the United States ?
A. It resulted in a surge of national pride.
B. It led to the belief that United States should stay out of other countries' conflicts.
C. It spurred on the removal of Indians.
D. It caused increased division between political parties.
Plz answer this ASAP and if u know ur answer is wrong please don't put it
The war of 1812 impacted the United States by resulting in a surge of national pride.
This is because the war of 1812 was fought between the United States and Great Britain.
At the time, Great Britain was considered the best military in naval war, and the United States, which was then a new nation, was able to fight them to draw.
This created a sense of pride among the Americans and increased the spirit of nationalism among the citizens.
Also, the United States gained a lot of international respect.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A. "It resulted in a surge of national pride."
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/20902667
Governments with laws limiting the exercise of official power and protecting
individual liberties are known as:
A. oligarchic.
B. authoritarian.
C. constitutional.
D. totalitarian.
E. autocratic
Answer:
C. constitutional is the answer
Which of the following is most useful in identifying sites left by the Clovis?
Answer:
you need to list the following
Explanation:
Which of the following is terminating decimal.
1/6
1/3
1/5
1/7
Answer:
1/5
Explanation:
a terminating decimal is one that ends. since 1/5 is 0.2, while the other numbers keep on going, 1/5 is the terminating decimal.
ethnicity is __.
a) a biological category
b) a scientific theory of race
c) shared cultural heritage
d) unchangeable
please help
Answer:
shared cultural heritage
Why can't you count on people voting?
Pls answer asap
It’s Election Day in the United States, and as the day unfolds, all eyes will be on the men and women streaming into the polls to cast their ballots. News broadcasts will be devoted to counting up all the votes cast, and trying to divine who came out to vote and why.But American elections aren’t actually about the people who vote. They’re about the people who don’t. Politicians are almost always chosen by less than a majority of the population. Laws and practices that exclude large numbers of potential voters determine who wins and who loses.That’s by design. Voter exclusion is hard-wired into what is, on close inspection, a very undemocratic system of governance. The U.S. Constitution placed the selection of presidents in the hands of “electors,” not the people, and it offered no clear protections for a citizen’s right to vote. In the original Constitution, states retained enormous latitude to determine who went to the polls and who did not.And although amendments eventually extended voter protection to black Americans, women and people 18 and over, even these guarantees were only partially enforced. Communities nationwide used poll taxes, literacy tests, inconvenient voting locations and onerous registration requirements to discourage voting by particular groups, especially African Americans and other minorities.The real fraud in American voting is not illegally cast votes but legally blocked ones. Our history has taught us all too well how to keep people away from the polls, despite their constitutional rights. Even a half-century after the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965, tens of thousands of citizens are denied the franchise because of insufficient proof of identity, felony convictions or other state stipulations — all of which are designed today, as they were in the past, to keep certain people from casting their ballots.“Certain people” means, most obviously, people of color, who are told they are not welcome as voters at every stage in the process, from demeaning rhetoric about their “fake” votes to convoluted registration processes to intimidation at the polls. For many Mexican Americans, it feels safer just to stay home. That’s why states such as Texas have electorates that remain dominated by white votes even as their populations become rapidly more diverse.But “certain people” also means those without access to wealth. The mobilization of money for elected office makes dominant groups even more powerful. The sheer scale of wealth in the hands of several billionaires has allowed them, and their political action committees (PACs), to smother competitors. As the rich have become so much richer, they have made their votes count more, and the votes of others count less. Donald Trump began his presidential campaign as a critic of big political donors, but he and his supporters in the Republican Party benefited from their money in the election.By the time poor citizens vote, the candidates have already been vetted by the wealthy donors who are necessary for any person running to have a chance. That means Election Day is really about choosing among candidates handpicked by the super wealthy (say, Trump or Hillary Clinton), rather than candidates who reflect the needs and experiences of citizens.And this dominance by wealth becomes more true with each successive electoral cycle. As candidates require more and more money for advertising and social media, the influence of money grows. Parties have always chosen elites, but now fundraising crowds out other qualities of leadership. You cannot run if you cannot bring in big bucks, immediately.Gerrymandering likewise nullifies votes, erecting exclusionary boundaries between voters and their representatives. During the decennial district-drawing process for national, state and local representatives, the politicians in power choose their voters, rather than the other way around. Incumbent legislators make certain that their districts are dominated by like-minded citizens, and they limit the power of opposition groups by splitting their presence among as many districts as possible.Although gerrymandering goes back to the earliest days of the republic, it has never distorted electoral outcomes as much as it does today. Wisconsin and Texas are two of many states where elected representatives are far more Republican than the voters. That is because Republican majorities in both legislatures set it up that way, exaggerating and entrenching their power with the lines they drew across the landscape. New computer technologies have turned this process into a precise science, limiting voter choice wherever possible.These structural roadblocks make clear how little say citizens have in who represents them. The system is indeed “rigged,” but the rigging benefits the powerful, the wealthy and the extremes — not the vast majority of Americans.Trump’s presidency is a result of this system.
Controversial issue about the territorial disputes between the people's republic of china and republic of philippines
The controversial issue about the territorial disputes between the people's republic of china and the republic of the Philippines was caused by the " illegal occupation of some of China's islands and reefs in the South China Sea."
The Republic of China claimed that some coastal islands like the Philippines are illegally occupying their territories.
To solve these territorial disputes, the Philippines seek arbitration while China seeks bilateral negotiation.
With none of the countries yielding a method to solve the issue, territorial disputes continue to exist.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the cause of the controversial issues on the territorial disputes between China and the Philippines can be resolved if both are willing to come to terms.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/20263720
what role
do you think immigration will play in the desire for the US to remain neutral in World War 1?
Answer:
no it will not
Explanation:
Why is the power in the United States divided between several branches?
(History and geography)
Answer:
It is like this to help ensure that no one branch is more powerful than another. Therefore making them all equal and not one is more powerful. I hope this helps you.
Please help I don’t understand this!! Will give brainliest who helps me! :)
What happens to a bill passed by the legislature if the governor does not veto it, but does not sign it?
A. The bill goes back to the House of Representatives.
B. The bill goes back to the Senate.
C. The bill becomes law.
D. The bill is killed.
Answer: C
Explanation: Once the governor receives a bill, he can sign it, veto it, or do nothing. If he signs it, the bill becomes law. *If he does nothing, the bill becomes law without his signature.* If he vetoes the bill, and the Senate and House of Representatives do nothing, the bill “dies.
How are the poems "Old Ironsides" and "Village Blacksmith" similar? Include at least 2 similarities and respond with 4-6 sentences.
The poems "Old Ironsides" and "Village Blacksmith" were similar as they were both in three stanzas. Also, the emotions of the authors were conveyed in the poems.
The Village Blacksmith described a local blacksmith and his daily life. In the poem, the blacksmith was a role model so balanced both his job with the role that he played in his family and community.
The purpose of the author in Old Ironsides was to protest the destruction of a ship that fought in World War. The poem centered on the ship that served in many battles. It should be noted that the poems had three stanzas and the emotions of the authors were conveyed in the poems.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/25305843
When the great powers of Europe met at the congress of Vienna for peace talks after napoleons defeat, their goal was to?
Answer: After Napoleon's defeat, the Congress of Vienna was convened in 1814–15 to set new boundaries, re-create the balance of power, and guard against future French hegemony. It also dealt with international problems internationally, taking up issues such as rivers, the slave trade, and the rules of diplomacy.
What was the goal of the Sugar Act of 1764 and the Stamp Act of 1765?
Answer:
The Sugar and Stamp Acts. The Sugar and Stamp Acts of 1764 and 1765, intended to raise revenue in Great Britain, led to increased resistance from the colonies.
Explanation:
CAN YOU GIVE ME BRAINLIEST
100 points answer ASAP please, question below
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Most Logical Answer
During the Whiskey Rebellion, why did people protest? whiskey insurrection A. The amount of whiskey was rationed. B. The price of whiskey was rising. C. Whiskey was prohibited. D. Whiskey was being taxed.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
In 1794, farmers from Western Pennsylvania rose up in protest of what they saw as unfair taxation and provided the new nation, and George Washington, with a looming crisis.
please mark as brainliest it helps
Whiskey was being taxed is the people protest is the Whiskey Rebellion. Hence, option D is correct.
What is Whiskey Rebellion?The Whiskey Rebellion served as the federal government of the United States' first significant test. This rebellion enforced the notion that the new government had the authority to impose a certain tax that would apply to citizens of all states.
The Whiskey Rebellion provided the fledgling American government with its first opportunity to exercise federal power militarily within state boundaries as authorities moved into western Pennsylvania to put down a rebellion of settlers opposing the whiskey tax.
Farmers in Western Pennsylvania revolted in 1794 over what they perceived as excessive taxes, creating a crisis that threatened the fledgling country and George Washington.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about Whiskey Rebellion, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/478473
#SPJ2
Which of the following is the best definition of "Industrial Revolution"? A) An increase in factory-based manufacturing that capitalized on new forms of energy
(like coal)
B) The creation of new inventions like gunpowder and the printing press.
C) A revolution in creating new products fueled by internet sales.
D) The revival of "industrial" style religious beliefs, like Agnosticism
Answer:
A.)
Explanation:
Why did Europeans look to africa for a source of lador to use in the americas?
A. Indigenous people's resistance made it impossible for Europeans to work with them
B. Africans were willing to work for lower wages than indigenous peoples were
C. Europeans already had the respect and trust of African laborers
D. European diseases wiped out much of the indigenous labor force
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Explain what scientific management is and how it change the way people worked?
Your answer - Management theory that examines work flows in order to increase economic efficiency, particularly labor productivity. This management philosophy, created by Frederick Winslow Taylor, was prominent in the United States' industrial industries in the 1880s and 1890s.
Hope that helps
The Sumerians mainly used cuneiform to
А
write decrees and challenges to other kingdoms.
B
keep track of taxes and government issues.
с
write the world's first dramas and comedies.
D
create complex drawings and love poems.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's B
Explanation:
it was used to record a variety of information such as temple activities, business and trade. *Sorry if it's incorrect.*
WHO IS GOOD A HISTORY AND CAN DO THIS NO PLAGIARIZING IF YOU DO NOT PLAGIARIZE AND MAKE A GOOD ANSWER I WILL GIVE YOU THE BRAINLIEST
There were many empires that rose and fell between 2300 B.C. and 334 B.C. Write a brief essay that compares and contrasts the Babylonian and Hittite empires. In what ways were they alike, and how were they different?
Answer:
Many empires rose and fell between 2300 B.C. & 334 B.C. This includes the Babylonian and Hittite Empires which were located near the Middle East. The Babylonian Empire was found particularly in between two rivers, the Euphrates and Tigris, but also stretched to include Present-day Palestine, Present-day & Ancient Israel, North-east of Egypt, and terminating at the ancient city of Ur. The Hittite Empire, on the other hand, included most of present-day Turkey down to present-day northern border of Israel. In comparing both of the empires, we can see that they were able to conquer areas of their surrounding.
However, there are extreme differences between the two empires. One can be savage, in that they continued to war and pillage other civilizations. The Hittite empire fell apart during the rise of the Assryian Kingdom, which effectively removed the "staff of power" from the Hittite's, as well as suppress Babylon.
The Babylonian Empire, on the other hand, rose after the fall of the Assryian Empire, and was able to conquer most of what the Hittite's had. They ruled Northern Egypt, present-day Israel and Palestine, up to what would later be known as Constantinople, and going down to the Persian Gulf. The Babylonians were conquerors, who defeated and assimilated the people groups into the empire, though displacing them to discourage rebellion. They were overthrown later on by the Persians at the end of their empire.
Babylon and the Hittite were similar only in that they became empires, but the differences are great. They both took different approaches in trying to conquer the lands. One tried suppression, while the other did assimilation (though they did have to suppress in numerous occasions). In the end, they both were empires, and they both fell.
Explanation:
Man I hope you mark it as brainliest
aaah im failing religion and i really dont wanna redo it
What is meant by the term ‘healthy sense of self’?
Answer:
Your sense of self refers to your perception of the collection of characteristics that define you.
Explanation:
Sense of self depends on not only recognizing your strengths but also believing in your capabilities to use them to achieve your goals. Having a good handle on your talents and maximizing them in your day-to-day life often means you have a healthy sense of self.
I hope this helps you in any shape or form.
Why were the Quincy Yates report?
Answer:
The 1820 Quincy Report exposed how paupers were treated within the state of Massachusetts. Written by Senator Josiah Quincy III (as seen in the painting on the left), the report was an attempt to improve the methods used to treat the impoverished.
How did the Spanish transform
the mit’a system to their
benefit?
Answer:
The Spanish used the system to get free labor from the indigenous people as a form of tribute. The indigenous people would provide agricultural labor or work in textile mills, but the most common form of labor was working the mines. This also contributed to the declining population of indigenous people.