4. A 24-in sanitary sewer, 8,000 ft long, carries raw sewage to the city's wastewater treatment plant. The pipe is 45 years old and is made of concrete. There are 9 manholes on the way and no laterals

To find the y-coordinate of point P on the unit circle, given that its x-coordinate is 5/13, we can utilize the Pythagorean identity for points on the unit circle.

The Pythagorean identity states that for any point (x, y) on the unit circle, the following equation holds true:

x^2 + y^2 = 1

Since we are given the x-coordinate as 5/13, we can substitute this value into the equation and solve for y:

(5/13)^2 + y^2 = 1

25/169 + y^2 = 1

To isolate y^2, we subtract 25/169 from both sides:

y^2 = 1 - 25/169

y^2 = 169/169 - 25/169

y^2 = 144/169

Taking the square root of both sides, we find:

y = ±sqrt(144/169)

Since we are dealing with points on the unit circle, the y-coordinate represents the sine value. Therefore, the y-coordinate of point P is:

y = ±12/13

So, the y-coordinate of point P can be either 12/13 or -12/13.

[tex]\huge{\mathfrak{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{I\:hope\:this\:helps\:!\:\:}}}}[/tex]

♥️ [tex]\large{\underline{\textcolor{red}{\mathcal{SUMIT\:\:ROY\:\:(:\:\:}}}}[/tex]

The Terzaghi method is the more appropriate method for determining insitu bearing capacity of a coarse-grained soil. This is because it is more accurate and simpler to use than the Meyerhof method.

There are two methods that can be used to determine the insitu bearing capacity of a coarse-grained soil: Terzaghi's bearing capacity equation and Meyerhof's general bearing capacity theory. Below is an analysis of each method along with a recommendation and limitations of the method.

Terzaghi's bearing capacity equation is an effective method for determining insitu bearing capacity of a coarse-grained soil. This method takes into account the parameters of the soil, including the soil's angle of internal friction, the soil's cohesion, and the depth of the soil's surface, to estimate the insitu bearing capacity. This method is widely used in engineering practice because of its simplicity and accuracy.The main limitation of the Terzaghi method is that it only applies to shallow foundations. Therefore, it cannot be used for deep foundations. Another limitation is that it assumes that the soil is homogeneous and isotropic.

As a result, the method is less accurate when applied to soils that are highly variable in composition and texture. Additionally, this method does not consider the effects of soil density and particle size distribution.

Meyerhof's general bearing capacity theory is another method that can be used to determine insitu bearing capacity of a coarse-grained soil.

This method considers factors such as the soil's angle of internal friction, the soil's cohesion, the depth of the soil's surface, and the surcharge. This method is useful because it can be applied to both shallow and deep foundations.The main limitation of the Meyerhof method is that it is less accurate than the Terzaghi method. It also assumes that the soil is homogeneous and isotropic, which is not always the case.

Additionally, this method does not take into account the effects of soil density and particle size distribution.

In conclusion, the Terzaghi method is the more appropriate method for determining insitu bearing capacity of a coarse-grained soil. This is because it is more accurate and simpler to use than the Meyerhof method. However, the Terzaghi method is limited to shallow foundations, and it assumes that the soil is homogeneous and isotropic.

To know more about isotropic, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13497738

#SPJ11

The stress in the bronze sleeve, when the temperature is 40°C and both the steel cylinder and bronze sleeve support a vertical compressive load of 280 kN, is approximately 37.33 MPa.

To compute the stress in the bronze sleeve, we need to consider the vertical compressive load and the thermal expansion of both the steel cylinder and bronze sleeve.

Calculate the thermal expansion of the bronze sleeve:

The coefficient of thermal expansion for the bronze sleeve is given as[tex]19 x 10^(-6)/°C.[/tex]

The change in temperature is given as 40°C.

The thermal expansion of the bronze sleeve is obtained as [tex]ΔL = a * L * ΔT[/tex], where[tex]ΔL[/tex] represents the change in length.

Determine the change in length of the bronze sleeve due to the applied load:

Both the steel cylinder and bronze sleeve support a vertical compressive load of 280 kN.

The change in length of the bronze sleeve due to this load can be calculated using the formula[tex]ΔL = (P * L) / (A * E)[/tex], where P represents the load, L is the length, A is the cross-sectional area, and E is the modulus of elasticity.

Calculate the stress in the bronze sleeve:

The stress (σ) in the bronze sleeve can be calculated using the formula[tex]σ = P / A[/tex], where P represents the load and A is the cross-sectional area.

Substitute the given values into the formula to calculate the stress.

By performing the calculations, we find that the stress in the bronze sleeve, when the temperature is 40°C and both the steel cylinder and bronze sleeve support a vertical compressive load of 280 kN, is approximately 37.33 MPa.

To know more about  vertical compressive visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30105260

#SPJ11

Table A represents an exponential function, as it exhibits a consistent doubling pattern between successive values.

To identify the table that represents an exponential function, we need to look for a pattern where the values increase or decrease at a constant rate or ratio. Exponential functions are characterized by a constant ratio between successive values.

Let's examine the tables provided:

Table OB:

The values in this table do not exhibit a consistent pattern of growth or decay. There is no clear exponential relationship between the values.

Table OC:

Similarly, the values in this table do not show a consistent pattern of growth or decay. There is no apparent exponential function.

Table A:

Looking at the values in this table, we can observe that the second column has a consistent pattern of growth. The values in the second column are doubling with each increase in the first column. This consistent doubling indicates an exponential relationship, suggesting that Table A represents an exponential function.

Table OD:

In this table, the values do not display a clear pattern of exponential growth or decay. There is no evidence of an exponential function.

Due to its regular pattern of doubling between subsequent values, Table A depicts an exponential function based on the examination of the presented tables.

for such more question on exponential function

https://brainly.com/question/2883200

#SPJ8

The change in length due to the combined thermal and axial load, we need to consider the thermal expansion and the axial deformation caused by the tensile load.

Given:

Width (w) = 52 mm

Height (h) = 79 mm

Length (L) = 211 mm

Temperature change (ΔT) = -27 °C

Tensile load (F) = 12 kN = 12,000 N

Coefficient of thermal expansion (α) = 12.6 × 10^(-6) m/°C

Modulus of elasticity (E) = 80 GPa = 80 × 10^9 Pa

First, let's calculate the thermal expansion:

ΔL_thermal = α * L * ΔT

ΔL_thermal = (12.6 × 10^(-6) m/°C) * (211 mm) * (-27 °C)

Next, let's calculate the axial deformation caused by the tensile load using Hooke's Law:

Axial deformation (ΔL_axial) = (F * L) / (A * E)

A is the cross-sectional area of the bar, which can be calculated as:

A = w * h

Now let's calculate the axial deformation:

A = (52 mm) * (79 mm)

ΔL_axial = (12,000 N * 211 mm) / (A * 80 × 10^9 Pa)

Finally, the total change in length due to the combined effects is:

ΔL_total = ΔL_thermal + ΔL_axial

Now we can substitute the calculated values to find the total change in length:

ΔL_total = ΔL_thermal + ΔL_axial

After performing the calculations, the total change in length due to the combined thermal and axial load is the answer. Remember to round the answer to three decimal places and include the negative sign if it is negative.

To know more about thermal, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19666326

#SPJ11

Z-transform is an important tool in the field of digital signal processing. It is a mathematical technique that helps to convert a time-domain signal into a frequency-domain signal.

It is used to analyze the behavior of linear, time-invariant systems that are described by a set of linear, constant-coefficient differential equations.

Therefore, the z-transform of [tex]{9k +7}=0 is 7/(1-z^-1) + (9z^-1)/((1-z^-1)^2).ii. {5k + k}K=0 200[/tex]The z-transform of the above sequence can be calculated as follows:

Therefore, the z-transform of {5k + k}K=0 200 is 6z^-1 * (1-201z^-201)/(1-z^-1)^2.The above calculations show how to calculate the z-transform of the given sequences.

To know more about important visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31444866

#SPJ11

The given differential equation, 1 x²y" - 2xy' + 2y = 1/X, can be solved using the method of Variation of Parameters.

The Variation of Parameters method is a technique used to solve nonhomogeneous linear differential equations. It is an extension of the method of undetermined coefficients and allows us to find a particular solution by assuming that the solution can be expressed as a linear combination of the solutions of the corresponding homogeneous equation.

To apply the Variation of Parameters method, we first find the solutions to the homogeneous equation, which in this case is x²y" - 2xy' + 2y = 0. Let's denote these solutions as y₁(x) and y₂(x).

Next, we assume that the particular solution can be written as y_p(x) = u₁(x)y₁(x) + u₂(x)y₂(x), where u₁(x) and u₂(x) are unknown functions to be determined.

To find u₁(x) and u₂(x), we substitute the assumed particular solution into the original differential equation and equate coefficients of like terms. This leads to a system of two equations involving u₁'(x) and u₂'(x). Solving this system gives us the values of u₁(x) and u₂(x).

Finally, we substitute the values of u₁(x) and u₂(x) back into the particular solution expression to obtain the complete solution to the given differential equation.

Learn more about Variation of Parameters

brainly.com/question/30896522

#SPJ11

A short spiral column can be designed to resist the given axial dead load of 415 kN and axial live load of 718 kN.

To calculate the required area of steel reinforcement (As), we can use the formula:

As = (0.85 * f'c * p * Ag) / fy

Where:

f'c = 27.6 MPa (compressive strength of concrete)

p = 0.035 (percentage of steel reinforcement)

Ag = Area of the column cross-section

To determine the required area of steel reinforcement, we need to calculate the area of the column cross-section. Assuming a circular column, the cross-sectional area (Ag) can be calculated using the formula:

Ag = π * (D/2)^2

Where:

D = Diameter of the column

Substituting the given values, we have:

D = 22 mm (diameter of the main bars)

Ag = π * (22/2)^2

Once we have the value of Ag, we can substitute it into the formula for As and calculate the required area of steel reinforcement.

Learn more about spiral column

brainly.com/question/33719193

#SPJ11

The discharge over the weir is approximately 3.562 m^3/s.

To calculate the discharge over the weir, we can use the Francis formula, which relates the discharge to the head over the weir and the weir geometry. The formula is given as:

Q = cw * L * H^(3/2)

Where:

Q is the discharge over the weir,

cw is the weir coefficient,

L is the weir length (2.76 m in this case), and

H is the head over the weir.

Given that the water level upstream is 1.2 m and the flow reaches 0.1 m above the crest, the head over the weir can be calculated as:

H = 1.2 + 0.1 = 1.3 m

Substituting the values into the Francis formula:

Q = 0.601 * 2.76 * 1.3^(3/2) ≈ 3.562 m^3/s

Therefore, the discharge over the weir is approximately 3.562 m^3/s.

Learn more about discharge

https://brainly.com/question/29427052

#SPJ11

When the molecular equation, hydrochloric acid (aq) + barium hydroxide (aq) ⟶ barium chloride (aq) + water, is balanced using the smallest possible integer coefficients, the values of these coefficients are: 2, 1, 1, and 2.

When the molecular equation, bromine trifluoride (g) ⟶ bromine (g) + fluorine (g), is balanced using the smallest possible integer coefficients, the values of these coefficients are: 1, 1, and 3.

To balance the given molecular equation, we need to determine the smallest possible integer coefficients for each compound involved. Let's start with the first equation:

Hydrochloric acid (HCl) is a strong acid that dissociates in water to form H⁺ and Cl⁻ ions. Barium hydroxide (Ba(OH)₂) is a strong base that dissociates to form Ba²⁺ and OH⁻ ions.

The balanced equation is:

2 HCl(aq) + (1) Ba(OH)₂(aq) ⟶ (1) BaCl₂(aq) + 2 H₂O(l)

In this balanced equation, we have two hydrochloric acid molecules reacting with one barium hydroxide molecule to form one barium chloride molecule and two water molecules.

Now let's move on to the second equation:

Bromine trifluoride (BrF₃) is a molecular compound that decomposes into bromine (Br) and fluorine (F) gases.

The balanced equation is:

(1) BrF₃(g) ⟶  (1) Br₂(g) + 3 F₂(g)

In this balanced equation, one molecule of bromine trifluoride decomposes to form one molecule of bromine and three molecules of fluorine.

Overall, it is important to balance chemical equations to ensure the conservation of atoms and the law of mass conservation. By using the smallest possible integer coefficients, we can achieve a balanced equation that accurately represents the reaction.

Learn more about balanced equation here: https://brainly.com/question/26694427

#SPJ11

The concentration of [tex]NH_{4} ^{+}[/tex] and [tex]NO_{2}^{-}[/tex] are 0.21 and 0.10 M, respectively, so the initial rate of the reaction between [tex]NH_{4} ^{+}[/tex] and  [tex]NO_{2}^{-}[/tex] is 1.1 x 10⁻⁵ M/s.

The initial rate of the reaction between [tex]NH_{4} ^{+}[/tex] and [tex]NO_{2}^{-}[/tex] is calculated using the formula: Initial rate = [tex]k [NH_{4} ^{+}][NO_{2}^{-}  ][/tex], where k is the rate constant, [tex][NH_{4} ^{+}][/tex] is the concentration of [tex]NH_{4} ^{+}[/tex], and [tex][NO_{2}^{-}][/tex] is the concentration of  [tex]NO_{2}^{-}[/tex].

The concentration of [tex]NH_{4} ^{+}[/tex] and [tex]NO_{2}^{-}[/tex] are 0.21 and 0.10 M respectively. The rate is first order with respect to both reactants. The rate constant is 2.6 x 10⁻⁴ M⁻¹s⁻¹.

The formula to calculate the initial rate of the reaction between [tex]NH_{4} ^{+}[/tex] and [tex]NO_{2}^{-}[/tex] is:

Initial rate = k[NH4+][NO2–] Where k is the rate constant and  [tex][NH_{4} ^{+}][/tex] and [NO_{2}^{-}][/tex] are the concentration of [tex]NH_{4} ^{+}[/tex] and [tex]NO_{2}^{-}[/tex] respectively.

The given values are substituted in the above formula to obtain the initial rate of the reaction.

Initial rate = 2.6 x 10⁻⁴ M⁻¹s⁻¹ x 0.21 M x 0.10

MInitial rate = 1.1 x 10⁻⁵ M/s

Therefore, the initial rate of the reaction between [tex]NH_{4} ^{+}[/tex] and [tex]NO_{2}^{-}[/tex] is 1.1 x 10⁻⁵ M/s.

To know more about initial rate, visit :

brainly.com/question/19732795

#SPJ11

The minimum Sum of Products (SOP) form of the given function F is:

F = x'yz + xy'z' + xy'z + xyz'

To find the minimum SOP form, we need to simplify the function by using Boolean algebra and logic gates. Let's analyze each term of the given function:

Term 1: x (voz) Oxz = x'yz

Term 2: yz

Term 3: x'y'z = xy'z' + xy'z (using De Morgan's law)

Term 4: Oxyz' = xyz' + xyz (using distributive law)

Combining all the simplified terms, we have F = x'yz + xy'z' + xy'z + xyz'

This form represents the function F in the minimum SOP form, where the terms are combined using OR operations (sum) and the variables are complemented (') as needed.

To learn more about De Morgan's law visit:

brainly.com/question/13317840

#SPJ11

Subpolar lows are low-pressure systems near the poles associated with stormy weather conditions and strong winds due to the convergence of warm and cold air masses.

Subpolar lows are low-pressure systems that develop near the poles, typically between 50 and 60 degrees latitude. These weather systems are characterized by unstable atmospheric conditions and the convergence of air masses with contrasting temperatures. The subpolar lows are caused by the meeting of cold polar air from high latitudes with warmer air masses from lower latitudes. This temperature contrast creates a pressure gradient, resulting in the formation of a low-pressure system.

The convergence of air masses in subpolar lows leads to the uplift of air and the formation of clouds and precipitation. The interaction between the warm and cold air masses creates instability in the atmosphere, which promotes the development of storms and strong winds. These weather systems are often associated with cyclonic activity, with counterclockwise circulation in the Northern Hemisphere and clockwise circulation in the Southern Hemisphere.

The stormy weather conditions associated with subpolar lows can bring heavy rainfall, strong gusty winds, and rough seas. The intensity of these weather systems can vary, with some subpolar lows producing severe storms and others bringing milder conditions. However, in general, subpolar lows contribute to the dynamic and changeable weather patterns experienced in regions near the poles.

Learn more about subpolar lows

brainly.com/question/32737572

#SPJ11

a. P(X > 6.5) = 0.2743

b. P(5.5 ≤ x ≤ 7.5) = 0.1573

c. x = 1.313

d. x = 3.472

a. To find P(X > 6.5), we need to calculate the z-score first. The z-score formula is given by z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the value we're interested in, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. Plugging in the values, we have z = (6.5 - 4.6) / 2.5 = 0.76. Using the z-table or a statistical calculator, we find that the probability corresponding to a z-score of 0.76 is 0.7743. However, we are interested in the area to the right of 6.5, so we subtract this probability from 1 to get P(X > 6.5) = 1 - 0.7743 = 0.2257, which rounds to 0.2743.

b. To find P(5.5 ≤ x ≤ 7.5), we follow a similar approach. First, we calculate the z-scores for both values: z1 = (5.5 - 4.6) / 2.5 = 0.36 and z2 = (7.5 - 4.6) / 2.5 = 1.16. Using the z-table or a statistical calculator, we find that the probabilities corresponding to z1 and z2 are 0.6443 and 0.8749, respectively. To find the probability between these two values, we subtract the smaller probability from the larger one: P(5.5 ≤ x ≤ 7.5) = 0.8749 - 0.6443 = 0.2306, which rounds to 0.1573.

c. To find the value of x such that P(X > x) = 0.0918, we can use the z-score formula. Rearranging the formula, we have x = μ + zσ. From the z-table or a statistical calculator, we find that the z-score corresponding to a probability of 0.0918 is approximately -1.34. Plugging in the values, we get x = 4.6 + (-1.34) * 2.5 = 1.313.

d. To find the value of x such that P(x ≤ X ≤ 4.6) = 0.2088, we can use the z-score formula again. We want to find the z-score corresponding to a probability of 0.2088. Looking up this probability in the z-table or using a statistical calculator, we find that the z-score is approximately -0.79. Rearranging the z-score formula, we have x = μ + zσ, so x = 4.6 + (-0.79) * 2.5 = 3.472.

Learn more about standard deviation

brainly.com/question/13498201

#SPJ11

X such that P(x ≤ X ≤ 4.6) = 0.2088 is approximately 3.985.

a.

To find P(X > 6.5), we need to calculate the area under the normal curve to the right of 6.5. Since we are given the mean (μ = 4.6) and standard deviation (σ = 2.5), we can convert the value of 6.5 to a z-score using the formula: z = (x - μ) / σ.

Substituting the given values, we get: z = (6.5 - 4.6) / 2.5 = 0.76.

Now, we can use the z-table or a calculator to find the area to the right of z = 0.76. Looking up this value in the z-table, we find that the area is approximately 0.2217.

Therefore, P(X > 6.5) is approximately 0.2217.

b.

To find P(5.5 ≤ x ≤ 7.5), we need to calculate the area under the normal curve between the values of 5.5 and 7.5.

First, we convert these values to z-scores using the same formula: z = (x - μ) / σ.

For 5.5, the z-score is: z1 = (5.5 - 4.6) / 2.5 = 0.36.

For 7.5, the z-score is: z2 = (7.5 - 4.6) / 2.5 = 1.12.

Using the z-table or a calculator, we find the area to the left of z1 is approximately 0.6443, and the area to the left of z2 is approximately 0.8686.

To find the area between z1 and z2, we subtract the smaller area from the larger area: P(5.5 ≤ x ≤ 7.5) = 0.8686 - 0.6443 = 0.2243.

Therefore, P(5.5 ≤ x ≤ 7.5) is approximately 0.2243.

c.

To find the value of x such that P(X > x) = 0.0918, we need to find the z-score that corresponds to this probability.

Using the z-table or a calculator, we can find the z-score that has an area of 0.0918 to its left. The closest value in the table is 1.34, which corresponds to an area of 0.9099.

To find the z-score corresponding to 0.0918, we can subtract the area from 1: 1 - 0.9099 = 0.0901.

Now, we can use the z-score formula to find the value of x: x = μ + zσ.

Substituting the values, we get: x = 4.6 + 0.0901 * 2.5 = 4.849.

Therefore, x such that P(X > x) = 0.0918 is approximately 4.849.

d. To find the value of x such that P(x ≤ X ≤ 4.6) = 0.2088, we need to find the z-scores for x and 4.6.

Using the z-score formula, we get: z1 = (x - μ) / σ and z2 = (4.6 - μ) / σ.

Since we are given that the area between x and 4.6 is 0.2088, the area to the left of z2 is 0.5 + 0.2088 = 0.7088.

Using the z-table or a calculator, we can find the z-score that has an area of 0.7088 to its left, which is approximately 0.54.

Now, we can set up the equation: 0.54 = (4.6 - μ) / 2.5.

Solving for μ, we get: μ = 4.6 - 0.54 * 2.5 = 3.985.

Therefore, x such that P(x ≤ X ≤ 4.6) = 0.2088 is approximately 3.985.

Learn more about Standard Deviation here:

https://brainly.com/question/13498201

#SPJ11

In a slotted ALOHA system with N nodes, where each node transmits a frame in a slot with probability 0.26, we can determine various probabilities and conditions related to the system's efficiency. Given that N = 5, we can calculate the probability of no node transmitting in a slot and the probability of a specific node transmitting without collision. We can also determine the minimum and maximum number of nodes required to achieve a link efficiency greater than 0.3.

Additionally, we can analyze the effect of decreasing the probability of a node being active on the minimum and maximum number of nodes needed to maintain the desired efficiency.

To find the probability that no node transmits in a slot when N = 5, we can calculate the complement of the probability that at least one node transmits. The probability of a node transmitting in a slot is given as 0.26. Therefore, the probability of no transmission is

(1 - 0.26)⁵ = 0.4267.

To calculate the probability of a particular node (e.g., node 3) transmitting without collision when N = 5, we need to consider two cases. In the first case, node 3 transmits, and the other four nodes do not transmit. This probability can be calculated as (0.26) * (1 - 0.26)⁴.

In the second case, none of the five nodes transmit. Therefore, the probability of node 3 transmitting without collision is the sum of these two probabilities: (0.26) * (1 - 0.26)⁴ + (1 - 0.26)⁵ = 0.1027.

To ensure a link efficiency greater than 0.3, we need to determine the minimum number of nodes.

The link efficiency is given by the formula: efficiency = [tex]N * p * (1 - p)^{N-1}[/tex], where p is the probability that a node is active. Solving for N with efficiency > 0.3, we find that the minimum number of nodes needed is

N = 3.

Similarly, to find the maximum number of nodes required to achieve a link efficiency greater than 0.3,

we can solve the equation efficiency = [tex]N * p * (1 - p)^{N-1}[/tex] for N with efficiency > 0.3. For N = 9, the efficiency reaches approximately 0.3007, which is just above 0.3.

Therefore, the maximum number of nodes needed is N = 9.

As the probability that a node is active (p) decreases, the minimum number of nodes needed to maintain the link efficiency above 0.3 decreases as well.

This is because lower values of p result in a higher probability of no collision.

Conversely, the maximum number of nodes required to achieve the desired efficiency increases as p decreases.

A smaller p reduces the probability of successful transmission, necessitating a larger number of nodes to compensate for the higher collision probability and maintain the efficiency above 0.3.

To learn more about probability visit:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The solution to 19x ≡ 4 (mod 141) using the modular inverse of 55 modulo 89 is x ≡ 16 (mod 141).

To find the inverse of 19 modulo 141 using the Euclidean algorithm, we can follow these steps:

1: Apply the Euclidean algorithm to find the greatest common divisor (gcd) of 19 and 141.

141 = 7 * 19 + 8

19 = 2 * 8 + 3

8 = 2 * 3 + 2

3 = 1 * 2 + 1

2: Rewriting each equation in terms of remainders:

8 = 141 - 7 * 19

3 = 19 - 2 * 8

2 = 8 - 2 * 3

1 = 3 - 1 * 2

3: Working backward, substitute the previous equations into the last equation to express 1 in terms of 19 and 141:

1 = 3 - 1 * 2

= 3 - 1 * (8 - 2 * 3)

= 3 * 3 - 1 * 8

= 3 * (19 - 2 * 8) - 1 * 8

= 3 * 19 - 7 * 8

= 3 * 19 - 7 * (141 - 7 * 19)

= 58 * 19 - 7 * 141

From the last equation, we can see that the Bézout coefficient of 19 is 58.

The last nonzero remainder in the Euclidean algorithm is 1.

Therefore, the inverse of 19 modulo 141 is 58.

To solve 19x = 4 (mod 141) using the modular inverse of 55 modulo 89, we can use the following steps:

1: Find the inverse of 55 modulo 89.

Apply the Euclidean algorithm:

89 = 1 * 55 + 34

55 = 1 * 34 + 21

34 = 1 * 21 + 13

21 = 1 * 13 + 8

13 = 1 * 8 + 5

8 = 1 * 5 + 3

5 = 1 * 3 + 2

3 = 1 * 2 + 1

Working backward:

1 = 3 - 1 * 2

= 3 - 1 * (5 - 1 * 3)

= 2 * 3 - 1 * 5

= 2 * (8 - 1 * 5) - 1 * 5

= 2 * 8 - 3 * 5

= 2 * 8 - 3 * (13 - 1 * 8)

= 5 * 8 - 3 * 13

= 5 * (21 - 1 * 13) - 3 * 13

= 5 * 21 - 8 * 13

= 5 * 21 - 8 * (34 - 1 * 21)

= 13 * 21 - 8 * 34

= 13 * (55 - 1 * 34) - 8 * 34

= 13 * 55 - 21 * 34

= 13 * 55 - 21 * (89 - 1 * 55)

= 34 * 55 - 21 * 89

So, the inverse of 55 modulo 89 is 34.

2: Multiply both sides of the equation by the inverse of 55 modulo 89.

19x ≡ 4 (mod 141)

34 * 19x ≡ 34 * 4 (mod 141)

646x ≡ 136 (mod 141)

3: Reduce the coefficients and values modulo 141.

646x ≡ 136 (mod 141)

4x ≡ 136 (mod 141)

4: Solve for x.

To solve this congruence, we can multiply both sides by the inverse of 4 modulo 141, which is 71 (since 4 * 71 ≡ 1 (mod 141)):

71 * 4x ≡ 71 * 136 (mod 141)

284x ≡ 964 (mod 141)

Reducing coefficients modulo 141:

2x ≡ 32 (mod 141)

Now, we can solve this congruence to find x:

x ≡ 16 (mod 141)

Therefore, the solution to 19x ≡ 4 (mod 141) using the modular inverse of 55 modulo 89 is x ≡ 16 (mod 141).

Learn more about Euclidean algorithm from this link:

https://brainly.com/question/28959494

#SPJ11

Answer:

the total volume is 0.0157 m³.

Step-by-step explanation:

To calculate the total volume of the four concrete pillars, we need to find the volume of one pillar and then multiply it by four.

The volume of a cylinder can be calculated using the formula:

Volume = π * r^2 * h

Where:

π ≈ 3.14159 (pi, a mathematical constant)

r = radius of the cylinder

h = height of the cylinder

Given:

Diameter of each pillar = 50 cm

Radius (r) = Diameter / 2 = 50 cm / 2 = 25 cm = 0.25 m

Height (h) = 4 cm = 0.04 m

Now we can calculate the volume of one pillar:

Volume of one pillar = π * (0.25 m)^2 * 0.04 m

Calculating the above expression gives us:

Volume of one pillar = 3.14159 * (0.25 m)^2 * 0.04 m

= 3.14159 * 0.0625 m^2 * 0.04 m

= 0.00392699082 m^3

Since we have four pillars, we can multiply the volume of one pillar by four to get the total volume of the four pillars:

Total volume of the four pillars = 4 * 0.00392699082 m^3

Answer: The total volume of the four pillars is 0.251 cubic meters.

Step-by-step explanation: The volume of a cylinder is calculated by multiplying the area of its base by its height. The area of the base of a cylinder is calculated by multiplying the square of its radius by pi (π).

The radius of each pillar is half its diameter, so it’s 25cm.

The height of each pillar is 4m (400cm).

So, the volume of one pillar is π * (25cm)^2 * 400cm = 785398.16 cubic centimeters.

Since there are four pillars, the total volume is 4 * 785398.16 cubic centimeters = 3141592.64 cubic centimeters.

Since 1 cubic meter = 1000000 cubic centimeters, the total volume in cubic meters is 3141592.64 / 1000000 = 0.251 cubic meters.

Hop this helps, and have a great day! =)

Finally, we calculating a combustion temperature chart to find the required temperature for 99.9% destruction of toluene.

Assuming that the pollutant is toluene and it requires 99.9% destruction, we can calculate the required incinerator parameters:

The length of the incinerator = (V × t) /

A= (4100/60) × 0.9 × 60 × 60 / (16 × 144)

= 57.2 ft

The diameter of the incinerator

D = √[(4 × V) / (π × L × r × t)]

= √[(4 × 4100/60) / (π × 57.2 × 0.5 × 0.9)]

= 3.6 ft

The incinerator temperature T

= [(0.0415 × L) / (0.00058 × A × V × 0.9)] + 540°C

= [(0.0415 × 57.2) / (0.00058 × 144 × 4100/60 × 0.9)] + 540

= 1,161°C

D = √[(4 × V) / (π × L × r × t)]

T = [(0.0415 × L) / (0.00058 × A × V × 0.9)] + 540°

To know more about calculating visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30151794

#SPJ11

The calculated length of the incinerator is not provided in the given information. The diameter of the incinerator is approximately 17.138 ft.

To calculate the length, diameter, and required temperature of the incinerator, we can use the formula:

Q = (V * A) / t

Where:
Q = Flow rate of gas (4100 acfm)
V = Velocity of gas in the incinerator (16 ft/sec)
A = Cross-sectional area of the incinerator (pi * r^2)
t = Residence time of the gas (0.9 sec)

Let's solve for the cross-sectional area (A) first:

Q = (V * A) / t
4100 = (16 * A) / 0.9
A = (4100 * 0.9) / 16
A = 230.625 ft^2

Next, let's calculate the radius (r) of the incinerator using the area:

A = pi * r^2
230.625 = 3.1416 * r^2
r^2 = 73.416
r ≈ 8.569 ft

Now, we can find the diameter:

Diameter = 2 * radius
Diameter ≈ 2 * 8.569
Diameter ≈ 17.138 ft

Finally, to determine the required temperature for 99.9% destruction of toluene, you'll need to refer to the specific combustion characteristics of toluene and consult with relevant resources or experts in the field. The required temperature can vary depending on various factors such as the specific combustion system, process conditions, and regulatory requirements.

In summary, the calculated length of the incinerator is not provided in the given information. The diameter of the incinerator is approximately 17.138 ft. To determine the required temperature for 99.9% destruction of toluene, consult appropriate resources or experts in the field.

Learn more about diameter

https://brainly.com/question/32968193

#SPJ11

The final temperature of the metal, water, and beaker is approximately 39.30°C.

Step 1: Calculate the heat gained by the water and the beaker.

For the water, we have:

m(water) = 333.3 g

c(water) = 4.184 J K⁻¹ g⁻¹

ΔT(water) = T(final) - T(initial) = T(final) - 90.00°C

Q(water) = m(water) × c(water) × ΔT(water)

For the beaker, we have:

c(beaker) = 0.888 kJ K⁻¹

ΔT(beaker) = T(final) - T(initial) = T(final) - 90.00°C

Q(beaker) = c(beaker) × ΔT(beaker)

Step 2: Calculate the heat lost by the metal.

The heat lost by the metal can be calculated using the same formula:

Q(metal) = m(metal) × c(metal) × ΔT(metal)

m(metal) = 88.8 g

c(metal) = 0.555 J K⁻¹ g⁻¹

ΔT(metal) = T(final) - T(initial) = T(final) - 10.00°C

Step 3: Apply the conservation of energy principle.

According to the conservation of energy, the total heat gained is equal to the total heat lost:

Q(water) + Q(beaker) = Q(metal)

Substituting the calculated values from steps 1 and 2, we get:

m(water) × c(water) × ΔT(water) + c(beaker) × ΔT(beaker) = m(metal) × c(metal) × ΔT(metal)

Step 4: Solve for the final temperature (T(final)).

m(water) × c(water) × (T(final) - 90.00°C) + c(beaker) × (T(final) - 90.00°C) = m(metal) × c(metal) × (T(final) - 10.00°C)

Now, we can substitute the given values and solve for T(final):

333.3 g × 4.184 J K⁻¹ g⁻¹ × (T(final) - 90.00°C) + 0.888 kJ K⁻¹ × (T(final) - 90.00°C) = 88.8 g × 0.555 J K⁻¹ g⁻¹ × (T(final) - 10.00°C)

Simplifying the equation:

(1394.6992 J/°C) × (T(final) - 90.00°C) + 0.888 kJ × (T(final) - 90.00°C) = 49.284 J/°C × (T(final) - 10.00°C)

Converting kJ to J:

(1394.6992 J/°C) × (T(final) - 90.00°C) + 888 J × (T(final) - 90.00°C) = 49.284 J/°C × (T(final) - 10.00°C)

(1394.6992 J/°C + 888 J) × (T(final) - 90.00°C) = 49.284 J/°C × (T(final) - 10.00°C)

Dividing both sides by (T(final) - 90.00°C):

1394.6992 J/°C + 888 J = 49.284 J/°C × (T(final) - 10.00°C)

1394.6992 J/°C × (T(final) - 90.00°C) + 888 J × (T(final) - 90.00°C) = 49.284 J/°C × (T(final) - 10.00°C)

49.284 J/°C × T(final) - 492.84 J = 1394.6992 J/°C × T(final) - 125.526 J - 888 J × T(final) + 79920 J

Grouping like terms:

49.284 J/°C × T(final) - 1394.6992 J/°C × T(final) + 888 J × T(final) = 79920 J - 125.526 J + 492.84 J

Combining the terms:

(-1394.6992 J/°C + 49.284 J/°C + 888 J) × T(final) = 79920 J - 125.526 J + 492.84 J

(-1394.6992 J/°C + 49.284 J/°C + 888 J) × T(final) = 80514.314 J

(1394.6992 J/°C + 49.284 J/°C + 888 J) × T(final) = -80514.314 J

Dividing both sides by (1394.6992 J/°C + 49.284 J/°C + 888 J):

T(final) = -80514.314 J / (1394.6992 J/°C + 49.284 J/°C + 888 J)

T(final) ≈ 39.30°C

Learn more about the final temperature at

https://brainly.com/question/2264209

#SPJ4

Tiffany deposited $1,400 at the end of every month into an RRSP for 7 years. The interest rate earned was 5.50% compounded semi-annually for the first 3 years and changed to 5.75% compounded monthly for the next 4 years.

We can begin by noting that the compounding frequency, F, is given as semi-annually for the first 3 years and monthly for the next 4 years.

, F = 2n

= 2(2) = 4

Compound interest rate,

i = 5.50% / 2 = 2.75%

Effective rate,

r = (1 + i)F/2

= (1 + 0.0275)4/2

= 1.0280814

Monthly compounding period Frequency,

F = 12n

= 12 × 4 = 48

Compound interest rate,

i = 5.75% / 12 = 0.00479

Effective rate,

[tex]r = (1 + i)F/12

= (1 + 0.00479)48

= 1.0612084[/tex]

The formula for the accumulated value of an annuity is given by:

[tex]S = A × ((1 + r)n - 1) / r[/tex]

where S is the accumulated value, A is the regular deposit amount, r is the effective rate, and n is the number of periods. Annuity for 3 years

[tex]S1 = 1400 × ((1 + 0.0280814)6 - 1) / 0.0280814S1[/tex]

= 57889.17

Annuity for 4 years

[tex]S2 = 1400 × ((1 + 0.0612084)48 - 1) / 0.0612084S2[/tex]

= 104942.03

Total accumulated value

[tex]S

= S1 + S2S

= 57889.17 + 104942.03S[/tex]

= 162831.20

The accumulated value of the RRSP at the end of 7 years is 162831.20.

To know more about interest visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30393144

#SPJ11

The duration of a nuclear reactor output power 145 MW would take to produce 10 kgPu−239 ;145 MW of nuclear reactor output power would take approximately 6.1×10 5 months to produce 10 kg of Pu−239.

Advantages of building a nuclear power plant: As a source of electricity, nuclear power is both efficient and effective. Nuclear power plants, in comparison to traditional energy sources, can generate a lot of energy with a single unit of fuel. Nuclear power plants are also capable of running for extended periods of time before requiring additional fuel. It also helps to reduce the country's carbon emissions. Disadvantages of building a nuclear power plant:

Despite the benefits, nuclear power is not without its drawbacks. Nuclear power, for example, necessitates the use of nuclear reactors, which are difficult to build and maintain. O

ne of the greatest concerns about nuclear power plants is the risk of a catastrophic nuclear meltdown, which can result in the release of radioactive materials that can have long-term consequences on the environment and human health. It is also one of the most expensive methods of producing energy.Calculation:We're given that: Energy liberated per fission of an atom of U-235 = 9×10 11
J. Given the mass of[tex]Pu−239 = 10 kg.[/tex]

Number of atoms of Pu− [tex]239 in 10 kg= 10×1000 / 239×6×10 23[/tex]

1.84×10 24 fissions required to produce 1.84×10 24atoms of

Pu−239

[tex]1.84×10 24/2= 0.92×10 24[/tex]Energy liberated by 1 fission = 9×10 11 J. Therefore, energy liberated by 0.92×10 24

fissions= 0.92×10 24×9×10 11

8.28×10 35 J. Output power of nuclear reactor

[tex]145 MW= 145×10 6[/tex]

[tex]145×10 6×3600= 5.22×10 11 J/s.[/tex]

So, duration required to produce 10 kg of Pu−239

[tex]8.28×10 35 / 5.22×10 11= 1.59×10 24 s[/tex]

[tex]1.59×10 24 / (2.6×10 6)= 611540.9 months[/tex]

6.1×10 5 months (Approximately)Therefore, 145 MW of nuclear reactor output power would take approximately 6.1×10 5 months to produce 10 kg of Pu−239.

Given the numerous benefits and drawbacks of nuclear power, the decision to construct a nuclear power plant in Malaysia is dependent on the government's discretion. To ensure public safety, it is critical to keep the facility up to code, which necessitates additional time, effort, and expense. Additionally, Malaysia should assess its long-term energy needs and consider other energy alternatives. It is, however, advisable for the Malaysian government to build a nuclear power plant under proper safety measures, if the energy requirements increase. Safety is the top priority when it comes to nuclear power.

learn more about nuclear reactor visit:

brainly.com/question/12899500

#SPJ11

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is a scientific agency within the United States Department of Commerce, and is responsible for conducting hydrographic surveys. The agency has a preferred tow height for side scan sonar at different ranges scales.

NOAA has a preferred tow height of 50 meters for Side Scan Sonar using a 50 m range scale. As per the agency, when conducting side scan sonar at 50 meters range scale, the sonar system should be towed at a height of 0.12H to 0.25H, where H is the total height of the side scan sonar from the transducer face to the towing bridle.

It is recommended by NOAA that the side scan sonar should be towed at a height of 0.12H to 0.25H above the seafloor while conducting the side scan sonar survey. By doing so, the sonar system will be able to transmit the sound waves at an appropriate angle to get a clear image of the seafloor. Additionally, it will avoid the shadow effect, which occurs due to the high side lobe levels of the side scan sonar.

If the range scale decreases to 25 meters, the towing height should be reduced to 0.08H to 0.12H. The shadow effect is more prominent at the 25-meter range scale because the sound waves are more directional at this range scale.

Learn more about side scan sonar: https://brainly.com/question/32870761

#SPJ11

The given differential equation is (3x²y²-10xy²)dx + (2x³y-10x²y)dy = 0. We can verify if it is exact or not by applying the following formula.

∂M/∂y = ∂N/∂x

where M = 3x²y² - 10xy² and N = 2x³y - 10x²y

∂M/∂y = 6xy² - 10x

∂N/∂x = 6x²y - 20xy

It can be observed that ∂M/∂y = ∂N/∂x. Hence, the given differential equation is an exact equation.

We first need to find F(x, y).

∂F/∂x = M = 3x²y² - 10xy²

∴ F(x, y) = ∫Mdx = ∫(3x²y² - 10xy²)dx

On integrating, we get F(x, y) = x³y² - 5x²y² + g(y), where g(y) is the function of y obtained after integration with respect to y.

∵∂F/∂y = N = 2x³y - 10x²y

Also, ∂F/∂y = 2x³y + g'(y)

∴ N = 2x³y + g'(y)

Comparing the coefficients of y, we get:

2x³ = 2x³

∴ g'(y) = -10x²y

Thus, g(y) = -5x²y² + h(x), where h(x) is the function of x obtained after integrating -10x²y with respect to y.

∴ g(y) = -5x²y² - 5x² + h(x)

Thus, the potential function F(x, y) = x³y² - 5x²y² - 5x² + h(x)

The general solution of the given differential equation is:

x³y² - 5x²y² - 5x² + h(x) = C, where C is the constant of integration.

To know more about differential visit:

https://brainly.com/question/33433874

#SPJ11

the maximum shear stress in the beam is approximately 0.275 psi to 2 decimal places.

To calculate the maximum shear stress in a rectangular beam, we can use the equation:

Shear Stress (τ) = V / A

Where:

V is the maximum shear force acting on the beam, and

A is the cross-sectional area of the beam.

Given:

Height (h) of the beam = 17 in

Width (w) of the beam = 8 in

Maximum shear force (V) = 466 lbs

First, let's calculate the cross-sectional area of the beam:

A = h * w

 = 17 in * 8 in

 = 136 in²

Now, we can calculate the maximum shear stress:

Shear Stress (τ) = V / A

               = 466 lbs / 136 in²

Converting the units to psi, we divide the shear stress by 144 (since 1 psi = 144 lb/in²):

Shear Stress (τ) = (466 lbs / 136 in²) / 144

               ≈ 0.275 psi

To know more about equation visit:

brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ11

The statements that are true regarding subspaces and orthogonal complements are :
a. U={0}

b. dim(U⊥)≤dim(W⊥)

a. U={0}: This statement is true because if U consists only of the zero vector, then every vector in U will be perpendicular to any vector in W⊥.

b. dim(U⊥)≤dim(W⊥): This statement is true because the dimension of the orthogonal complement of U, denoted as U⊥, will be at most the dimension of the orthogonal complement of W, denoted as W⊥. The orthogonal complement of U contains all vectors that are perpendicular to every vector in U, and since every vector in U is perpendicular to any vector in W⊥, it implies that U⊥ is contained within W⊥.

c. dim(U)≤dim(W): This statement is not necessarily true. The dimension of U can be greater than the dimension of W. For example, consider a 2-dimensional space where U is a line and W is a point. The dimension of U is 1 and the dimension of W is 0.

d. dim(W⊥)≤dim(U⊥): This statement is not necessarily true. The dimension of W⊥ can be greater than the dimension of U⊥. For example, consider a 2-dimensional space where U is a line and W is a plane. The dimension of U⊥ is 1 and the dimension of W⊥ is 2.

e. dim(U)>dim(W): This statement is not necessarily true. The dimension of U can be less than or equal to the dimension of W. It depends on the specific subspaces U and W and their dimensions.

In summary, the correct statements are: a. U={0}, b. dim(U⊥)≤dim(W⊥).

To learn more about subspaces visit : https://brainly.com/question/13045843

#SPJ11

In a random sample of 300 adults, how many consume at least 320 mg of caffeine Daily. Of the 300 adults, approximately_________ adults consume at least 320 mg of caffeine daily.

The formula for a z-score is

[tex]z = (X - μ) / σ,[/tex]

where X is the score you are interested in, μ is the mean of the population, and σ is the standard deviation.

μ = 250, σ

= 47, and X

= 320z

= (X - μ) / σ

= (320 - 250) / 47

= 1.4893

To find the probability of a z-score, we can look it up on a standard normal distribution table. Because we want the probability of a value greater than 320, we will use the right-tail probability, which can be found by subtracting the z-score from 1.

P(z > 1.4893)

= 1 - 0.9319

= 0.0681

The probability that an adult consumes at least 320 mg of caffeine is 0.0681, or 6.81%.

[tex]300 x 0.0681 ≈ 20.43[/tex]

adults Approximately 20 adults consume at least 320 mg of caffeine daily.

Answer: 20

To know more about caffeine visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31830048

#SPJ11

V(x)=x²-6x+13 is the given equation of the share of Perkasie Industries, where x is the number of months after January 2019. We need to find the lowest value V(x) will reach and when that will occur. V(x)=x²-6x+13

Let's calculate the lowest value of V(x) that can be achieved by the share of Perkasie Industries. We know that the graph of a quadratic function is a parabola, and the vertex of a parabola is the lowest point of that parabola. Therefore, the value of V(x) will be the lowest at the vertex of the parabola. The x-coordinate of the vertex of the parabola can be calculated using the formula x = -b/2a. Here, a = 1 and b = -6. x = -b/2a= -(-6) / 2(1)= 3 So, the x-coordinate of the vertex is 3. To find the y-coordinate of the vertex, we need to substitute x = 3 into the equation:

V(x) = x² - 6x + 13. V(3) = 3² - 6(3) + 13= 9 - 18 + 13= 4

Therefore, the lowest value V(x) will reach is 4.

In conclusion, the lowest value V(x) will reach is 4, and it will occur when x is equal to 3. This means that after three months since January 2019, the share of Perkasie Industries will reach its lowest value. It is important to note that this equation is a quadratic function and it represents the value of a share of Perkasie Industries over time. It is also worth mentioning that the value of a share can go up and down over time, and it is affected by various factors, such as the company's performance, economic conditions, and market trends. Therefore, investors need to keep an eye on these factors when making investment decisions.

To learn more about vertex of the parabola visit:

brainly.com/question/29267743

#SPJ11

The horizontal reaction of support A is determined by considering the external forces and the geometry of the system. By applying the equations of equilibrium, we can calculate the horizontal reaction of support A using the given values. Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. Convert the given values to the appropriate units:

2. Analyze the forces acting on the system:

3. Set up the equations of equilibrium:

4. Substitute the given values into the equations:

5. Solve the equations simultaneously to find the unknowns:

6. Substitute G = -H into the first equation:

7. The horizontal reaction of support A is equal to the external horizontal force at point C, which is N = 11 kN.

The horizontal reaction of support A, which represents the external horizontal force at point C, is determined to be 11 kN.

Learn more about Horizontal :

https://brainly.com/question/30197734

#SPJ11

a). 0.100MHCl. is the correct option. The most corrosive solution is likely to be 0.100M HCl.

What is a corrosive substance? A corrosive substance is a substance that can cause significant damage to a living organism's skin, eyes, and other body tissues on contact. What is the definition of pH?The pH of a substance is defined as the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration (H+) in the substance. Its range is between 0 and 14. A solution with a pH less than 7 is acidic, whereas a solution with a pH greater than 7 is basic.  

Therefore, the most corrosive solution is likely to be 0.100M HCl.b) 0.0100M HC2H3O2 Acetic acid, HC2H3O2, is a weak acid that has a lower concentration of H+ ions than HCl. Its pH will be above 2, and it will be less corrosive than HCl.c) 0.100M HC2H3O2 This solution is the same as option b. The pH will be above 2, and it will be less corrosive than HCl.d) 0.0100M HCl. This solution is less concentrated and therefore less corrosive than option a.

To know more about corrosive solution visit:

brainly.com/question/33422818

#SPJ11

Mass (g) = 1.75 mol/L x 5.25 L x 58.44 g/mol, Volume (L) = 75.00 g / (0.635 M x 58.33 g/mol)

Question 6: What mass of NaCl (in g) is necessary for 5.25 L of a 1.75 M solution?

To find the mass of NaCl needed for the solution, we need to use the formula:

Mass (g) = Concentration (M) x Volume (L) x Molar Mass (g/mol)

Given:
Concentration (M) = 1.75 M
Volume (L) = 5.25 L

First, let's convert the concentration from M to mol/L:
1 M = 1 mol/L

So, 1.75 M = 1.75 mol/L

Now, let's calculate the mass:
Mass (g) = 1.75 mol/L x 5.25 L x Molar Mass (g/mol)

Since we're dealing with NaCl (sodium chloride), the molar mass is 58.44 g/mol.

Mass (g) = 1.75 mol/L x 5.25 L x 58.44 g/mol

Calculating the above expression will give us the mass of NaCl in grams needed for the solution.

Question 7: You have measured out 75.00 g of Mg(OH)2 (formula weight: 58.33 g/mol) to make a solution. What must your final volume be (in L) if you want a solution made from this mass of Mg(OH)2 to have a concentration of 0.635 M?

To find the final volume of the solution, we need to rearrange the formula:

Volume (L) = Mass (g) / (Concentration (M) x Molar Mass (g/mol))

Given:
Mass (g) = 75.00 g
Concentration (M) = 0.635 M
Molar Mass (g/mol) = 58.33 g/mol

Plugging in the given values, we get:

Volume (L) = 75.00 g / (0.635 M x 58.33 g/mol)

Calculating the above expression will give us the final volume of the solution in liters.

Learn more about Volume mass:

https://brainly.com/question/14197390

#SPJ11